GuidesComparisonsCore i9-14900K Vs i7-13700K: We Tested 13 Games

Core i9-14900K Vs i7-13700K: We Tested 13 Games

To get better results for the Core i9-14900K vs Core i7-13700K, we'll examine the specifications, architectural variations, and gaming skills and capbilities of these two processors.

Expert Verified By

Intel’s cutting-edge 14th-generation desktop processors have just hit the market. Today, we’ll analyze the real-world performance and efficiency gap between the 14th generation’s top CPU and the 13th generation’s mid-tier option. So, let’s start the Core i9-14900K vs i7-13700K comparison.

Key Takeaways

  • Testing the Core i7-13700K, our editor Nauman has given it a solid rating of 9/10 due to  its utilization of hybrid Raptor Lake architecture. However, the i9-14900K generation has slightly updated the architecture and named it Raptor Lake S Refresh.
  • According to my benchmarks, the Core i9-14900K renders 5.33% better performance than the i7-13700K at 1080p resolution.
  • During my tests, the Core i7-13700K had 4.5% better power efficiency and 3.3% more enhanced thermal efficiency than the i9-14900K.
Why Trust Tech4Gamers
  • Abde Manaf is our comparison expert who has been benchmarking graphics cards, and processors.
  • 100+ components tested and reviewed by our team of hardware experts (Tech4Gamers Team).
  • 100+ hours spent testing different components for our comparisons.
  • Objective testing criteria (See how we compare PC hardware).

At Tech4Gamers, ensuring you get reliable information is our priority. That’s why every hardware round-up undergoes a meticulous review process by our team of experts and editors. Each review is carefully examined against our strict editorial guidelines, guaranteeing you trustworthy insights you can depend on.

Comparison Table

FeatureIntel Core i9-14900KIntel Core i7-13700K
ArchitectureHybrid Raptor Lake S RefreshHybrid Raptor Lake S
No. of CoresP-Cores: 8
E-Cores: 16
Total Cores: 24
P-Cores: 8
E-Cores: 8
Total Cores: 16
No. of Threads3224
P-Core Base Frequency3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
E-Core Base Frequency2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Max Turbo FrequencyUp to 6.0 GHzUp to 5.4 GHz
Integrated GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 770Intel UHD Graphics 770
Graphics FrequencyUp to 1.65 GHzUp to 1.60 GHz
Memory Type & SpeedDDR5: Up to 5600 MT/s
DDR4: Up to 3200 MT/s
DDR5: Up to 5200 MT/s
DDR4: Up to 3200 MT/s
Intel Smart Cache36MB30MB
Max. Operating Temperature100°C100°C
TDP125W - 253W125W - 253W
Launch MSRP$589-$599$409-$419
Best MotherboardsBest Motherboards For i9-14900KBest Motherboards For i7-13700K
Best CPU CoolersBest CPU Coolers For i9-14900KBest CPU Coolers For i7-13700k
Best RAMBest RAM For Core i9-14900KBEST RAM For Core i7-13700K
Best GPUBEST GPU For Core i9-14900KBest GPU For Core i7-13700K

Architectural Differences

  • Process Node: The i9-14900K and i7-13700K share a common manufacturing process, both crafted at an advanced 10nm Intel node, showing their analogous fabrication technology.
  • CPU Socket: Coming to the CPU socket, both the processors utilize the identical FCLGA1700 socket, comprising 1700 pins, to interface with the motherboard’s CPU socket.
  • CPU Memory: The i9-14900K and i7-13700K have a max memory size of 128GB and support both DDR4 and DDR5. They have two memory channels and a max memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.
  • Clock Speed: The i7-13700K boasts a 6.25% higher base clock of performance cores, while the i9-14900K has an 11.1% greater maximum turbo clock. Additionally, both the CPUs feature Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 Frequency.
  • Integrated Graphics: Both processors feature dual-core Intel UHD Graphics 770 as their iGPU solution, thus ensuring concurrent graphics prowess. Nevertheless, the iGPU of the i9-14900K has a 3.12% higher graphics frequency.

Gaming Benchmarks

Let’s put both processors through rigorous gaming benchmark tests to understand their performance better. I inspected the gaming performance of the Core i9-14900K vs i7-13700K for 12 challenging games at 1080p. The gaming setup I employed had the following specifications.

Test Bench

A Plague Tale: Requiem

A Plague Tale: Requiem
A Plague Tale: Requiem Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Let’s begin with analyzing the gameplay of A Plague Tale: Requiem. The i9-14900K demonstrated an average frame rate of 150 FPS, 2.0% higher than the i7-13700K’s average of 147 FPS.
  • Examining the worst 1% performance, I observed that the i7-13700K achieved 134 FPS, marginally lagging behind the i9-14900K’s 136 FPS.

Assassin’s Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage
Assassin’s Creed Mirage Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In my next gameplay, Assassin’s Creed Mirage, the i9-14900K scored a respectable average of 197 FPS, surpassing the i7-13700K’s 189 FPS by 4.2%.
  • Considering the low 1% frame rates, I noted that the i9-14900K (164 FPS) established a greater lead of 16 FPS in this game, beating the i7-13700K’s 148 FPS.

Assetto Corsa Competizione

Assetto Corsa Competizione
Assetto Corsa Competizione Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • During my test of Assetto Corsa Competizione, the i9-14900K outperformed the i7-13700K by 6.2%, achieving a brilliant 172 FPS compared to later’s 162 FPS.
  • Regarding low 1% performance, the i7-13700K managed 135 FPS, whereas the i9-14900K mustered a higher frame rate of 149 FPS.

Baldur’s Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3
Baldur’s Gate 3 Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In my evaluation of Baldur’s Gate 3, the i9-14900K topped the i7-13700K by 4.5%, attaining an impressive 155 FPS compared to the latter’s 148 FPS.
  • The i7-13700K yielded 127 FPS at low 1% performance, while the i9-14900K demonstrated a higher frame rate of 132 FPS.

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • During my assessment of Cyberpunk 2077, the i9-14900K defeated the i7-13700K’s 163 FPS by 3.7%, achieving a superb 169 FPS.
  • Per my testing, the i9-14900K delivered a higher frame rate of 142 FPS, while the i7-13700K provided 137 FPS at the low 1% performance.

Hitman 3

Hitman 3
Hitman 3 Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • While playing Hitman 3, I got 282 FPS with the i9-14900K, an 8.05% better average performance than the i7-13700K’s 261 FPS.
  • Additionally, the i9-14900K exhibited superior low 1% performance with a frame rate of 253 FPS, outshining the i7-13700K’s 238 FPS.

Hogwarts Legacy

Hogwarts Legacy
Hogwarts Legacy Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • According to my test of Hogwarts Legacy’s gameplay, the i7-13700K was only 2 FPS or 2.7% behind the i9-14900K’s average frame rate of 76 FPS.
  • In the low 1% performance domain, the i9-14900K excelled further with a notable 50 FPS, eclipsing the i7-13700K’s performance at 45 FPS.

Spider-Man Remastered

Spider-Man Remastered
Spider-Man Remastered Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Assessing my Spider-Man Remastered gameplay, the i7-13700K lagged behind the i9-14900K’s 156 FPS by 11 FPS, or 7.6%, with an average frame rate of 145 FPS.
  • Regarding low 1% framerates, the i9-14900K exhibited superior prowess with an impressive 128 FPS, outshining the i7-13700K’s performance at 123 FPS.

Star Wars Jedi: Survivor

Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • During my assessment of Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, the i9-14900K outpaced the rival by 6.3%, achieving a beautiful 168 FPS on average compared to 158 FPS for the i7-13700K.
  • Furthermore, per low 1% framerates, the i9-14900K showcased its supremacy again, boasting an impressive 152 FPS against the i7-13700K’s performance at 144 FPS.


Starfield Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In scrutinizing my experience with Starfield, the i7-13700K fell short of the i9-14900K’s 108 FPS by 11 FPS or 11.3%, maintaining an average frame rate of 97 FPS.
  • At the low 1% performance, the i9-14900K proved its superiority, achieving a remarkable 91 FPS contrasted to the i7-13700K’s 84 FPS.

The Last of Us Part I

The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • While playing The Last of Us Part I, the i9-14900K overtook the i7-13700K’s 177 FPS by 2.8% with an impressive average score of 182 FPS.
  • About the low 1% performance of two CPUs in this game, I observed that the i7-13700K could only manage 158 FPS, while the i9-14900K turned 169 FPS.

Watch Dogs: Legion

Watch Dogs: Legion
Watch Dogs: Legion Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Considering my Watch Dogs: Legion gameplay results, I found that the i9-14900K heads the i7-13700K’s 161 FPS by 4.3%, attaining an average of 168 FPS.
  • In my test, the i9-14900K delivered a prominent low 1% performance with a frame rate of 124 FPS, while the i7-13700K produced only 117 FPS.
Editor`s Note

For a well-rounded choice that delivers strong gaming and work performance without straining your budget, my top recommendation is the i7-13700K. It’s cost-effective, providing excellent value with a 51.8% lower price tag compared to the Core i9-14900K, making it an easier selection for balanced performance on a budget. You can read more about it in another review of ours where we put the i7-14700K to test against the i7-13700K.

– Abde Manaf

Overall Gaming Performance

Average Framerates
Average frame rates produced by two CPUs at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

Average Frame Rate

When I analyzed my overall benchmark metrics of the Core i9-14900K vs i7-13700K, the i9-14900K came out the top in gaming mastery. It produced a striking average of 158.0 FPS at 1080p, surpassing the i7-13700K’s 150.0 FPS average enactment.

I played 12 challenging games at 1080p, and the i7-13700K could not beat the i9-14900K’s performance in any game. Hence, the i9-14900K demonstrates a 5.33% gaming performance edge over the i7-13700K at 1080p.

Here is a glimpse of the gameplay that we captured while conducting these benchmarks:

YouTube video

Low 1% Frame Rate

Analyzing the metrics of low 1% performance, the i9-14900K demonstrates a mean of 132.0 FPS, surpassing the i7-13700K’s 124.0 FPS. So, at the low 1% gaming performance, the i9-14900K prevails over the i7-13700K by a margin of 6.4%.

Winner: Intel's Core-i9 14900K

Gaming Power Consumption

GameIntel Core i9-14900K (W)Intel Core i7-13700K (W)
A Plague Tale: Requiem8178
Assassin's Creed Mirage134125
Assetto Corsa Competizione120122
Baldur's Gate 39687
Cyberpunk 2077134129
Hitman 3123109
Hogwarts Legacy8073
Spider-Man Remastered145146
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor117104
The Last of Us Part I140139
Watch Dogs: Legion137131
Average Power Draw120.75115.5
Winner: Intel's Core-i7 13700K

During my gaming spell, the i9-14900K dissipated an average power of 120.75 watts. On the other hand, the i7-13700K had a comparatively lower power draw of 115.5 watts.

About the performance-to-power ratio, the i7-13700K yielded 1.31 frames per watt, while the i9-14900K registered 1.30 frames per watt. Accordingly, the i7-13700K leads the i9-14900K by an average of 4.5% in terms of power efficiency, leading to savings in electricity costs.

To learn more about energy consumption in gaming, read Gaming PC Power Usage.

Gaming Temperatures

GameIntel Core i9-14900K (°C)Intel Core i7-13700K (°C)
A Plague Tale: Requiem6564
Assassin's Creed Mirage6367
Assetto Corsa Competizione6862
Baldur's Gate 37065
Cyberpunk 20776664
Hitman 36968
Hogwarts Legacy6865
Spider-Man Remastered7271
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor6966
The Last of Us Part I6764
Watch Dogs: Legion6462
Average Gaming Temperature67.865.6
Winner: Intel's Core-i7 13700K

During the course of my testing, the  i9-14900K maintained an average gaming temperature of 67.8°C. In contrast, the i7-13700K exhibited a cooler thermal profile, registering an average temperature of 65.6°C.

The i7-13700K exhibited elevated temperatures relative to the i9-14900K in specific gaming scenarios. However, it concurrently maintained a lower average temperature across the tested games. My results indicate that the i7-13700K proves a thermal efficiency superiority of 3.3% over the i9-14900K.

To save your processor from overheating, check our guide on How To Lower CPU Temperature.

Price And Availability

Regarding the MSRP, Intel launched the i7-13700K at a price point of $419 and introduced the i9-14900K with a price tag of $599.

Nevertheless, the pricing dynamics of processors fluctuate with market demands and the introduction of newer models. The i7-13700K presently commands a retail price of $364 on Amazon, while the i9-14900K is available at a rate of $575.

Coming to performance per dollar, the i7-13700K offers 0.41 FPS per dollar, while you get 0.27 FPS for every $1 with the i9-14900K. Thus, the i7-13700K surpasses the i9-14900K by 51.8% in cost-effectiveness.

Finally, about availability, both of the processors are easily available in both online and offline markets. You can also order them from Intel’s official store.

Which One Should You Go For?

To conclude the comparison of the Core i9-14900K vs i7-13700K, let us decide which of these processors aligns more suitably with your preferences and computational requirements.

If you are looking for an optimal processor that balances excellent performance for gaming and routing work at a lower cost, I recommend the judicious selection of the i7-13700K. It is 51.8% more cost-effective than the i9-14900K, providing duly justified performance in budget.

Notwithstanding, for those inclined to invest without constraint in pursuit of paramount gaming prowess, I recommend the i9-14900K. It also performs incredibly well in terms of productivity and content generation.

Pros And Con

Intel Core i9-14900KIntel Core i7-13700K
Gaming and productivity performanceHigh Power UsageGreat multi-threaded performanceLimited overclocking
6.0 GHz boost clockSlight BIOS tuning is requiredJustified priceHigh Power Consumption

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference in clock speed between the Core i9-14900K and the Core i7-13700K?

The Core i9-14900K has an 11.1% higher maximum turbo clock than the Core i7-13700K, which features a 6.25% higher base clock of performance cores.

How much does the Core i9-14900K outperform the Core i7-13700K in gaming performance?

The Core i9-14900K exhibits a plain 5.33% domination in gaming performance over its counterpart, the Core i7-13700K, at the 1080p resolution.

Which processor is more power efficient, the Core i9-14900K or the Core i7-13700K?

The Core i7-13700K beats the Core i9-14900K by an average of 4.5% in power efficiency, inducing economized electricity expenditure.

More From Core i7-13700K:

More From Core i9-14900K:

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

The Reality Of 8K Gaming: Should You Bother?

While 8K resolution shows promise, the reality of 8K gaming is quite different with a lack of games supporting 8K assets and technology.

Buying A Used Processor? Keep These Points In Mind

Although buying a used processor is frowned upon, the recent price hikes make it a viable option for budget gamers looking for an upgrade.

Can A $500 Gaming PC Beat The PS5 In 2024?

Can a $500 gaming PC beat the PS5 in 2024 because of other factors such as future-proofing and another usage of PCs?

RTX 4070 Super Vs RTX 3080: Super Or The OG?

We've compared the RTX 4070 Super Vs RTX 3080 to show you their main differences. Hint: One card is extremely good at everything

RTX 4070 Ti Super Vs RX 6800 XT: We Tested 7 Games

The RTX 4070 Ti Super VS RX 6800 XT comparison will compare one of Nvidia's heavy hitters to one of the best value GPUs on the market.

Similar Guides