Intel recently released its 13th gen Raptor Lake processor line-up, delivering amazing performance as expected. Above all, even though Intel hasn’t changed much in its processors, the performance gain is massive. For that reason, today, let’s look at how enormous these gains are. So, we will test the Intel Core i7 13700K Vs Intel Core i7 12700K processors and look at their performance in a realistic environment.
- The Intel Core i7 13700K Vs Intel Core i7 12700K processor comparison is not only based on terms of raw FPS. For next-gen processors, thermal capabilities have become an important issue.
- Although the 13700K performs better than the 12700K in almost all games, frame latencies in Cyberpunk 2077 defy the norms.
- While the 13700K performs better overall, the 12700K shows better thermal capabilities.
Intel 12th Vs 13th Gen Architecture
Before we look into the specifics of the two processors, it’s important to look at their architecture. For example, what sets Raptor Lake apart from its ancestor, Alder Lake, to gain a feasible advantage? For that reason, let’s dive deeper into both technologies.
Alder Lake Architecture
Looking into the Alder Lake architecture, there are a few things worth noting because 12th Gen changed Intel’s entire game. On the contrary, Intel managed to stop AMD on its tracks through technological improvements and creative uplifts.
Although the term is widely used now, a few consumers might not know what Hybrid Architecture is. In summary, through Alder Lake, Intel introduced two different CPU cores in a single chip. In other words, we know these cores as Performance (P) Cores and Efficiency (E) Cores.
P-Cores are full-sized cores that help in intensive tasks, while E-Cores are smaller ones that help in background tasks. So, technically, consumers have two separate processors combined in one. Also, P-Cores have the usual two threads per core, but the E-Cores have a single thread per core.
DDR5 RAMOf course, DDR5 RAM still isn’t famous, but Intel was the first company to release DDR5 RAM-compatible processors and motherboards. As such, you can use DDR4 and DDR5 RAM with Intel 12th Gen processors. However, Alder Lake only supports up to 4800 MT/s speeds for their DDR5 variants.
On the other hand, buying DDR5 RAM will be compatible with Intel 13th gen processors and Ryzen 7000 series processors. So, depending on your build path, DDR5 RAM, albeit slow, might not be a bad choice during your upgrade.
Also Read: Ryzen 5 7600X Vs Intel i5-12600K
Raptor Lake Architecture
Going towards the successor, there aren’t a lot of unique takeaways with Intel’s 13th gen architecture. On the contrary, Raptor Lake has higher temperatures, more wattage, and an extra E-Core CPU.
Hybrid Architecture Improvements
As stated above, all Raptor Lake processors have four extra E-Cores, than their 12th gen variants. Subsequently, doing so has improved performance for all 13th gen processors by ~15-20% on average.
Similarly, taking the Intel Core i7 13700K and Intel Core i7 12700K processors in mind, the 12700K has 4 E-Cores. On the other hand, the 13700K has 8 E-Cores. Consequently, the number of P-Cores is the same for both processors, staying at 8 P-Cores each. Thus, whatever performance increase we’re seeing is due to the thread and E-Core increase, along with any IPC improvements.
Because AMD released their Ryzen 7000 series processors with DDR5 compatibility, Intel had to answer accordingly. For that reason, Raptor Lake processors support faster DDR5 RAM than their Alder Lake counterparts. To explain, the 13th gen processors support up to 5600 MT/s DDR5 sticks.
Furthermore, the 5600 MT/s DDR5 RAM will be compatible with Ryzen 7000 series processors if you change platforms. Therefore, looking into the best DDR5 RAM might not be a bad move.
Thermal Design Power
Although Intel’s 13th gen processors perform better than their 12th gen counterparts, Raptor Lake’s power usage is off the roof. For example, the 12700K’s power requirements stand at 190W. On the other hand, the 13700K’s power requirements stand at 253W. So, the 13700K will inadvertently consume more power and, in turn, be hotter.
Even so, we shall confirm these numbers and speculations through practical benchmarking tests. But we advise you to be prepared for some absurd numbers from both sides!
Intel Core i7 13700K Vs Intel Core 12700K Specifications
Before we get into the nitty gritty of both processors, we must check their on-paper specifications. Because doing so will enable us to determine the common differences between both processors. Also, we’ll know which processor has a better performance per dollar ratio.
|Product Line||Intel i7 series||Intel i7 series|
|Product Generation||Intel 12th Generation||Intel 13th Generation|
|Core Architecture||Hybrid Core Architecture||Hybrid Core Architecture|
|Processing Node||TSMC 10nm||TSMC 10nm|
|Socket||LGA 1700||LGA 1700|
|Motherboard Chipset Support||Z790, B760, Z690, B660, H610||Z790, B760, Z690, B660, H610|
|Number of P-Cores (Threads)||8 (16)||8 (16)|
|Number of E-Cores (Threads)||4 (4)||8 (8)|
|L2 Cache||12 MB||24 MB|
|L3 Cache||25 MB||30 MB|
|Base Clock Speeds (P-Cores)||3.60 GHz||3.40 GHz|
|Base Clock Speeds (E-Cores)||2.70 GHz||2.50 GHz|
|Boost Clock Speeds (P-Cores)||4.90 GHz||5.30 GHz|
|Boost Clock Speeds (E-Cores)||3.80 GHz||4.20 GHz|
|Base Power Draw||125W||125W|
|Turbo Power Draw||190W||253W|
|Integrated Graphics||Intel UHD Graphics 770||Intel UHD Graphics 770|
|Memory Support||DDR4 up to 3200 MT/s and DDR5 up to 4800 MT/s||DDR4 up to 3200 MT/s and DDR5 up to 5600 MT/s|
|PCIe Support||PCIe 4.0 & 5.0||PCIe 4.0 & 5.0|
|Launch Date||November 4, 2021||October 20, 2022|
To explain in summary, the i7 13700K is better overall. Also, the only massive change in both generations is that the 13700K has an “extra” E-Core processor. In other words, the 13700K has four more E-Cores than its rival.
Other than that, the 13700K requires a greater power draw at max boost clock and offers better DDR5 support. Lastly, the 13700K is ~22.5% more expensive, so it needs to perform well.
After looking at the basic specifications of the processors, we can now test them in multiple games. As stated before, conducting practical tests is vital because they provide consumers with valuable information. For example, for processors, we must know their thermal capabilities, power draw, frame times, and bottlenecks in games. As such, Benchmarks For Gamers has conducted the following benchmarks at 1080P resolution for Intel Core i7 13700K vs Intel Core i7 12700K.
- Motherboard: ASUS TUF Gaming Z690 Plus
- Graphics Card: MSI RTX 4090 Suprim X
- RAM: G.Skill Trident Z5 2 x 16 GB, 6000 MHz; CL36-36-36-96
- CPU Cooler: Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360mm
- Processor: Intel i7 12700K & Intel i7 13700K
While analyzing gaming performance is important, it’s equally important to look at the testing rig. Therefore, let’s start with the motherboard; the ASUS Z690 should be perfect for the tests. Also, because both processors are compatible with the Z690, no other motherboard will be used for the benchmarks. On the other hand, while the Z790 chipset is available, consumers only gain greater access to PCIe 5.0 lanes.
Moreover, looking at the graphics card, the RTX 4090 will ensure that no games bottleneck the GPU. Because, in CPU benchmarks, we push the CPU to its limits, which only happens when the GPU isn’t bottlenecking.
Additionally, peeking at the RAM, we notice the G. Skill Z5 32 GB DDR5 RAM. Although 32 GB is slightly overkilling, it’s not an issue for benchmarks. Furthermore, the fast RAM will be useful for both Intel processors because faster RAM equates to faster data transfer.
Lastly, talking about the CPU cooler, we see the Arctic 360mm AIO CPU cooler. To explain, the latest Intel and AMD processors need a lot of cooling because of their unlocked temperatures. What’s more, it might be challenging to get decent temperatures even with a 360mm AIO. However, we shall only find out through the practical tests later on. So, without waiting any longer, let’s move to the gaming benchmarks!
Forza Horizon 5
By all means, we have a few interesting results starting with the famous racing game Forza Horizon 5. Because the game is CPU and GPU intensive, it’s perfect for a benchmark test.
Firstly, looking at the power draw, there is a freakishly massive difference in power consumption. To explain, the i7-12700K is drawing a minimum of 84W. On the other hand, the i7-13700K is drawing one-third more, at upwards of 120W. So, if you’re looking to upgrade from the 12700K, you might want a better power supply. Also, don’t expect the temperatures for the i7-13700K to be forgiving for the power draw.
Secondly, glancing at the temperatures, we see another tremendous temperature gap. For example, the i7-12700K has a cool temperature ranging from 40C. But, the i7-13700K goes leaps ahead, closing in at 56C. Of course, 56C isn’t truly hot, but compared to the 12700K’s 40C, the temperature gap is nothing to scoff at.
Thirdly, talking about the frame times, the i7-13700K starts to take the lead. In brief, the 13700K showcases frame times up to 3.5ms while the 12700K is ~17% slower at 4.1ms. So, the 13700K might be the better option due to its lower frame latencies if you’re playing competitive games.
Lastly, analyzing the average FPS, we see a slight difference between both processors. Although the i7-13700K costs ~22.5% more, it’s only ~7.8% faster than the i7-12700K in Forza Horizon 5. To clarify, the 12700K scores an average of 230 FPS, while the 13700K scores an average of 248 FPS. Therefore, not only is the 12700K better at preserving power, but it also has a better performance per dollar ratio.
Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord
Now, for our next benchmark, we have Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord. Because the game is an open-world type, it is extremely CPU intensive, making it a great title for processor comparisons.
For that reason, looking at the power draw, we notice massive differences in the consumption between both processors. For example, the i7-12700K has an average consumption of 108W of power. However, the i7-13700K has an average consumption of 155W of power. So, the 13700K requires almost one-third more power, increasing its temperature too.
Furthermore, talking about the temperatures, we see a great contrast between temperatures. To explain, the 12700K’s average is 43C, but the 13700K crosses 60C, averaging 62C. Although 62C isn’t considered extremely hot, the increase is magnanimous at stock settings and in comparison to the 12700K’s 43C. Also, while using a 360mm AIO cooler, one expects temperatures to drop significantly.
Similarly, glancing at the frame times, we see no difference between both processors. To clarify, the 12700K and 13700K have average frame times of 3.5ms. While 3.5ms frame latencies aren’t bad, gamers always look for that extra edge in competitive gaming. So, because both processors have similar frame times, the 12700K might be better due to its lower pricing.
In conclusion, analyzing the average FPS, there is a great performance difference between both CPUs. But, the 13700K is not as price-efficient as the 12700K. Because the 12700K averages 236 FPS, while the 13700K is ~16% faster, averaging 274 FPS. On the other hand, the 12700K is ~22.5% less expensive than its competitor. Thus, the 12700K has a greater performance per dollar ratio, making it worth the cost.
Microsoft Flight Simulator
Continuing with the benchmarks, the next game for Intel Core i7 13700K vs Intel Core i7 12700K is Microsoft Flight Simulator. Because the game is supposed to portray reality, it is extremely heavy on the CPU and GPU. Also, this is why it’s an amazing title for benchmarking processors.
Firstly, looking at the power draw, we see a similar pattern, with the Intel i7-13700K showcasing much more power usage. To clarify, the 12700K uses 66W power in Microsoft Flight Simulator. On the other hand, the 13700K uses 84W power in the same game. So, the increased power draw will drastically increase temperatures too.
Secondly, talking about the temperatures, we notice that the Intel i7-12700K runs superbly cold. To explain, the 12700K has an average temperature of 36C at full load. Meanwhile, the 13700K is 11C hotter, running at 47C. However, the 13700K performs better, so the temperature increase is justified.
Thirdly, by analyzing the frame times, we realize the tremendous differences between the frame latencies of both processors. For example, the i7-13700K has frame times of 11.2ms while the i7-12700K has latencies of 14.2ms. So, the 12700K’s latencies are ~26.8% slower. Although gamers won’t notice much difference in Microsoft Flight Simulator, it can cost them competitive matches of shooter games.
In conclusion, reviewing the average FPS, we see a noticeable difference between the 12700K and 13700K processors. In summary, the 12700K averages 65 FPS while its competitor averages 78 FPS. Moreover, the 13700K is ~20% faster than the 12700K, while the latter is ~22.5% less expensive. So, if you’re looking for a better value processor, the 12700K wins the crown in Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Far Cry 6
For our next benchmark title, the next game is the infamous Far Cry 6. Consequently, due to the game’s intensive requirements, it makes for a great CPU benchmarking tool. Also, as the game is extremely popular, consumers may be interested in determining which processor performs better.
Subsequently, talking about the power draw, we see that the 12700K processor utilizes 78W power. On the other hand, the 13700K averages a power utilization of 106W. While 13th gen processors have a higher TDP, their thermal conductivity should not be a problem. However, due to the higher power consumption, temperatures are skyrocketing.
That is to say, by analyzing the temperatures, we realize that the 12700K is running incredibly cold at 37C. But, the 13700K has a higher temperature, reaching the mid-50s, averaging 56C. So, the 12700K has a better TDP with a lower power draw and lower temperatures. Although, its performance is limited too.
Furthermore, looking at the frame times, we see a decent latency difference between the two processors. For example, the i7-12700K has latencies up to 7.9ms. Meanwhile, the i7-13700K has latencies up to 6.7ms, roughly 18% faster than its competitor’s. While there are no competitions in Far Cry 6, gamers might experience a small stutter due to the slower frames with the 12700K.
Summing up, reviewing the average FPS of both i7 processors, we see a moderate performance gap between both. To explain, the i7-12700K has an average FPS of 120 while the i7-13700K averages 135 FPS. Because raytracing is enabled, there might be a crash in overall FPS. Moreover, the 13700K is ~12.5% faster, making the 12700K the better value processor.
Marvel’s Spiderman Remastered
Moving on to our next test, we have Marvel’s Spiderman Remastered. While the game is famous on all platforms, its system requirements are difficult to reach on PCs. Additionally, with raytracing capabilities, for the test, RT has been enabled.
Firstly, analyzing the power draw, we realize that the 12700K uses significantly lower power than its competitor. Furthermore, the lower power usage will also lead to lower temperatures. However, due to its power limitations, we can expect lower FPS from the 12700K. On the other hand, the 13700K uses almost one-third more power, capping at 144W.
Secondly, looking at the temperatures, as predicted, the 12700K has lower temperatures than the 13700K. To explain, the 12700K averages 44C, while the 13700K averages 59C. Although both processors show great temperatures at full load, with a 360mm AIO, 59C is slightly higher than expected.
Thirdly, talking about the frame times, we see that the i7-13700K has slightly lower latencies than the i7-12700K. For example, the 12700K has latencies up to 8.2ms, but the 13700K has latencies up to 7.7ms. So, the 12700K has ~6.5% slower frames when compared to its rival. Therefore, if you’re looking to buy a processor for competitive shooting games, we recommend going with the 13700K.
Lastly, reviewing the average FPS, there’s a slight gap between the 12700K and 13700K processors. While the 12700K is ~22.5% less expensive than the 13700K, the latter cannot produce FPS comparable to the price increase. To summarize, the 12700K averages 114 FPS, and the 13700K averages 124 FPS. To clarify, the 13700K is ~8.7% faster than the 12700K. Thus, the 12700K has a better value for its price.
By and large, going to the next test, we have Cyberpunk 2077. Not only is the game infamous for being extremely CPU intensive, but it’s also GPU intensive. For that reason, Cyberpunk 2077 is the perfect game for all benchmarking tests.
By and large, looking at the power draw, we see tremendous differences between the i7-12700K and i7-13700K processors. To explain, the 12700K utilizes 101W power, while the 13700K utilizes 141W power. So, with a surge in temperatures, we see a one-third increment in power usage.
Moreover, talking about temperatures, we notice that the 13700K’s temperatures are higher than the 12700K’s. For example, the 12700K averages 46C at full load on base settings. On the other hand, the 13700K goes above 60C, averaging 62C on base settings. So, the 12700K has better thermal capabilities while utilizing lower power. However, there’s a slight difference in FPS between both processors.
All things considered, analyzing the frame times of both processors, we see almost no differences. Because both processors have almost similar frame times, there won’t be a difference in frame stutter either. Therefore, you can go with both processors and feel similar frame speeds in Cyberpunk 2077.
In conclusion, we notice a slight difference after reviewing the average FPS of the i7-12700K Vs i7-13700K processors. To clarify, the 12700K averages 131 FPS, while the 13700K averages 137 FPS. Although the 13700K is ~22.5% more expensive, it’s only giving ~4.9% more FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. Thus, the 12700K emerges with a better value for its price.
Call of Duty: Warzone
Moving towards the next benchmark, we have Call of Duty: Warzone for the next game for our Intel Core i7 13700K vs Intel Core i7 12700K guide. While an old title, Call of Duty: Warzone, requires a high-end CPU if you want to enjoy it without problems. For that reason, the game is a great benchmarking tool for processor comparisons.
Firstly, talking about the power draw, we notice that the power differences between both processors are massive. To explain, the 12700K utilizes 97W power while the 13700K utilizes 133W power. Furthermore, due to the greater power utilization, the 13700K might perform better but will have higher temperatures.
Secondly, looking at the temperatures, we see a respectable difference in temperatures between both processors. For example, the i7-12700K has an average temperature of 46C. On the other hand, the i7-13700K has an average temperature of 62C. Not only is the 13700K eating more power, but it’s also significantly hotter. Except for losing out on a slight performance increase, the 12700K is a decent processor.
Thirdly, reviewing the frame times, we realize that both processors show a slight latency gap. That is to say; the 12700K has average frame times of up to 4.4ms. Meanwhile, the 13700K has average frame times of up to 4.1ms. So, in numbers, the 12700K’s frames are ~7.3% slower than its competitors.
Lastly, by analyzing the average FPS, we understand that both processors have a moderate performance difference. To summarize, the 12700K averages 192 FPS, while the 13700K averages 216 FPS. Therefore, the 13700K is ~12.5% faster, but the 12700K is ~22.5% more affordable. Thus, the 12700K has a better performance per dollar ratio if you’re looking for value.
Looking at the second-last game for the benchmark test, we have F1 2022. While the game is famous among consumers, it requires a heavy CPU to run properly. For that reason, it’s a great game to use as a benchmarking tool for processor comparisons.
Be that as it may, looking at the power draw, we see that the 13700K uses one-third more power than the 12700K. Although we shouldn’t be surprised anymore due to the frequent power usage, it’s not viable with the performance uplift. In any case, the 12700K uses 79W power, while the 13700K uses 110W power. So, the 13700K is prone to higher temperatures than its rival.
Furthermore, talking about temperatures, we notice that the 12700K is moderately cooler than the 13700K. To explain, the 12700K has an average temperature of 40C, while the 13700K has an average temperature of 50C. So, the 12700K not only consumes lower power but is also cooler. Therefore, the 12700K is a great processor if temperatures concern you.
Moreover, by analyzing the frame times, we understand that both processors have a major difference in frame latencies. While the numbers seem to be alike, the percentages state otherwise. For example, the 12700K has latencies of 3.0ms, and the 13700K has 2.7ms. So, the i7-13700K’s frames are ~11.11% faster than the 12700K’s.
In conclusion, reviewing the average FPS, we realize that the 13700K is significantly faster than the 12700K. However, the performance increase is not enough to defeat the 12700K’s performance per dollar value. In summary, the 12700K averages 306 FPS, while the 13700K averages 363 FPS. On the other hand, the 13700K is ~18.6% faster than the 12700K. But, the 12700K is ~22.5% less expensive, making it the better value processor.
Counter Strike: Global Offensive
For our last game, we have Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. Famous for its competitive mode, CSGO doesn’t require a heavy computer to run. But, the game is CPU-intensive, making it a great benchmarking tool for CPU comparisons.
Firstly, talking about power draw, there isn’t a big difference in power draw between the 12700K and 13700K processors. To explain, the 12700K utilizes 68W power, while the 13700K utilizes 74W. For the first time in the benchmarks, the 13700K isn’t utilizing much power. Rather, there isn’t even a 10W power difference between the processors.
Secondly, looking at temperatures, we see that the temperature difference doesn’t align with the power differences. Although in other games, the temperature increase was due to the power, in CSGO, there isn’t a big power usage difference. Even so, the 12700K averages 40C, while the 13700K averages 50C. In summary, aligning a 10C difference with an 8W power gap is incorrect. Therefore, the 13700K’s TDP isn’t on par with the 12700K’s.
Thirdly, by analyzing the frame times, we understand that there is a tremendous latency difference between the processors. However, because both latencies are already extremely low, players might not find any stutters. But, for the sake of comparisons, the 12700K averages 1.8ms, while the 13700K averages 1.2ms. So, the 13700K’s latencies are ~38.46% faster.
Lastly, reviewing the average FPS gained through both processors, we see that the 13700K is significantly faster than the 12700K. To explain, the 12700K averages 874 FPS, while the 13700K averages 1035 FPS. Although, the 12700K retains its performance per dollar victory because the 13700K is ~18.42% faster. Thus, if you’re short on cash, the 12700K performs great. But if the value isn’t a concern, the 13700K wins.
Intel Core i7 13700K Vs Intel Core i7 12700K Gaming Benchmarks Verdict
After judging multiple games at 1080P resolution in our Intel Core i7 13700K vs Intel Core i7 12700K guide, let’s consider which processor consumers should buy. While the 13700K wins in a few places, the 12700K takes the lead in others. The following verdict stands on multiple points discussed in all the benchmark tests.
Firstly, looking at the TDP winner, we look at the overall temperatures and power usage. For that reason, the winner is the i7-12700K due to its lower temperatures and significantly lower power utilization. Also, the i7-13700K shows a consistent increase in power usage and higher temperatures. So, if you’re planning to buy the 13700K, you may want to look for better LGA 1700 coolers.
Secondly, analyzing the frame times, overall, the i7-13700K has lower latencies than its competitor. However, the competition is close in a few games, such as Cyberpunk 2077. Therefore, the winner will differ depending on the games you plan to play. Because a minimal difference in latencies might not be worth the $100 extra cost. Moreover, if you want to play competitive games, you should go with the 13700K without any doubts in mind.
Lastly, talking about the value, we need to take an average of the average FPS in all games. In summary, the i7-12700K averages 2,268 FPS, while the i7-13700K averages 2,610 FPS. To explain, the 13700K is ~15% faster than the 12700K. On the other hand, the 12700K is 22.5% cheaper, increasing its performance per dollar ratio. Thus, if you’re short on cash and want the best value processor, your best bet is the i7-12700K.
Who Is This Article For?
In summary, the Intel Core i7 13700K Vs Intel Core i7 12700K article is for consumers who might be looking to upgrade their processors. Therefore, we have discussed several differences between Intel’s 12th and 13th gen processors.
Also, we looked into both processors’ on-paper specifications and the cost differences. After all, by comparing the prices, we can figure out which processor showcases better value for its price.
Moreover, we analyzed each game during the nine-game benchmark test, providing an in-depth overview. For example, we looked at the power draw, temperatures, frame times, and average FPS for each game.
In conclusion, we shared our verdict of the benchmarks, providing consumers with insight into which processor to buy. To explain, consumers buy processors based on their performance per dollar ratio and average FPS in the games they love to play.
Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋
How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔