At Tech4Gamers, I mainly cover new gaming news, leaks, and rumours. Aside from that, I love to write features about my favourite games while inserting my opinion about their different aspects.
Story Highlight
The last Nier title was released in 2017, and fans have been asking for a new one ever since.
Recently, Nier Automata reached a new sales milestone, and the game’s producer took the opportunity to tease a new title.
Yousuke Saito has teased an announcement of a new game in the series during the series’ 15th anniversary next year.
Nier is arguably one of the fan-favourite franchises not only because of 2B but also because of its story and gameplay. Nier: Automata and Replicant are the most loved titles from the series, with the former one being more popular.
It has been nearly 8 years since we have had a new Nier game despite the franchise’s popularity, which seems like a crime. However, that might be changing as the producer has shared some interesting news.
The producer of Nier Automata and Nier Replicant, Yousuke Saito, has just recently teased a new Nier game that will be announced in 2025.
Why it matters: 2B is one of the most adored characters and we have seen her presence in tons of games. Thanks to this character, the Nier franchise has received a lot of attention, which may guarantee massive success for a future title now.
2B Is One of The Most Liked Characters In Gaming History
In the 4Gamer’s annual end-of-year project, Yousuke Saito teased an announcement regarding a new game next year. 2025 will be the 15th anniversary of the franchise, so it will be a memorable moment, which is a perfect opportunity to treat fans with a new game announcement.
2025 will be a milestone year as it marks the 15th anniversary of the NieR series, so I’d like to do something for it! What should we do… maybe something with the next game, or developments related to that… I’ve been hearing the fans’ expectations.
-Yousuke Saito
It is almost confirmed that the developer has something special ready for the fans, and it is most likely to be the game, as Saito has said so too. A new Nier game being announced in 2025 has just made the year way more exciting.
It Has Nearly Been 8 Years Since The Last Nier Game Was Released
There have been plenty of rumors going on about a new Nier game being in development. Saito has also previously teased a game being developed without clarifying whether it is a Nier title.
All in all, fans are excited, thanks to the producer’s recent comments. An announcement will be made in April 2025 during the franchise’s 15th anniversary.
What do you think about Yosuke Saito’s comments on a new title in the franchise? Are you excited for the announcement next year? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below, or join the discussion at the official Tech4Gamers forums.
In my role as a news writer, I’ve covered a wide range of topics, from breaking news to in-depth analyses of the latest developments in the gaming world. My articles have garnered attention and citations across the industry, reflecting my commitment to delivering accurate and engaging content.
Story Highlight
Metal Gear Solid 3 Remake has been in intense anticipation since its announcement.
Recent adjustments to merchandise shipping dates, with buyers receiving shipping notifications, hint at a nearing release.
A Chile store has also started accepting reservations for a February 2025 release of the game.
There is considerable excitement surrounding Konami’s highly anticipated Metal Gear Solid 3 Remake, a reimagining of the 2004 classic Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater. With the game’s release approaching, new details about the project are gradually emerging.
A recent adjustment to official merchandise shipping dates may have hinted at the game’s release window. A Chilean store began accepting pre-orders for the game with a projected February 2025 launch, aligning well with the shipping information provided.
Why it matters: The Metal Gear Solid 3 Remake holds significant importance for both the franchise and Konami, as fans have long been asking for modern remakes of the series’ older entries.
The merchandise in question is a tactical bag inspired by the game, which Konami opened for pre-orders back in 2023. Initially scheduled for release in October 2024, the launch was delayed to November 2024 and later to a timeframe between December 2024 and January 2025.
Although the recent shipping notifications for the bag do not necessarily indicate that the game’s release is imminent, there is a strong possibility that they do, as aligning the merchandise release closely with the game’s launch would make strategic sense.
It’s important to note that these are merely speculations, and the February 2025 release window from the Chilean store does not confirm them either. For now, fans will need to wait for an official release date from Konami.
If the speculations prove accurate, significant updates about the game will likely arrive in January, as the marketing push will ramp up in preparation for its launch.
The Metal Gear Solid 3 Remake is shaping up to be an exciting title, and everything revealed so far has left a great impression. Staying true to its original roots, the remake has us eagerly anticipating its release.
One of the franchise’s standout features is its stealth gameplay, which even inspired titles like Splinter Cell.
On that note, what are your thoughts on the potential February 2025 release of the Metal Gear Solid 3 Remake? Let us know in the comments below, or join the conversation on the official Tech4Gamers forums!
Lead the comparison and blog writing teams at Tech4Gamers.
Oversee teams with a keen eye for detail and precision.
Ensure hands-on writing, with benchmarks and testing as guiding principles.
Guarantee the delivery of the best possible results in concise yet impactful tech tales.
Story Highlights
Steams Christmas sale offers a treasure trove of games on discount perfect for all types of gamers.
Get your hands on games like the Witcher 3, It Takes Two etc.
If you’re willing to buy a few titles, this is the time to avail big discounts on some of the best games out there.
As we all are well aware the festive season is here, and it brings with it Steams Christmas Sale. The sale brings a plethora of massive discounts on games and only comes once a year. This year Steam is offering discounts of up to 90% on some games such as Batman Arkham: Origon, Dishonored 2 etc.
Whether you’re into RPGs, indie titles or multiplayer games Steam is offering something for gamers of every taste this year. The sale will last up to 2 January and as time is less, therefore, for your ease here are some of the games that I recommend for you.
Red Dead Redemption 2
On Steams top 10 list and one of Rockstar games biggest achievements, Red Dead Redemption 2 released in 2018, immerses players in the late 19th century American frontier. The game is the third entry of the series where players take on the role of an outlaw Arthur Morgan and was the 7th bestselling game ever in February 2024.
Read Dead Redemption 2 – Image Credits [Pinterest]Arthur being a member of the Van der Linde gang must deal with the decline of the Wild West and must try to survive against government forces. The game shows the morally complex life of an outlaw amid the beautiful landscapes of the Wild West and is at 60% off on Steams Christmas Sale.
Cyberpunk 2077
After having a bumpy start Cyberpunk 2077 has emerged as a must-play thanks to multiple updates and has generated over 750 million USD. The game released in 2020 transports players into the vibrant yet dangerous streets of Night City. You play as a mercenary on a high stakes journey of survival.
Cyber Punk 2077 – Image Credits [Steam]Being enhanced with new content and updates the game offers customizable characters and playstyles giving players a personalized feel for the game. Each decision taken in the game is impactful to the story and gameplay. The game is currently at 55% off on Christmas sale so now’s the best chance to bag it.
Hades
Hades released in 2020 by Supergiant games now at 60% discount on Steams Christmas Sale is a standout title for fans of roguelike games. Gamers play as Zagreus the son of hades, attempting to escape the underworld.
Hades Gameplay Setting – image Credits [Steam]As players uncover the story, they gradually deepen bonds with Olympian gods. The gameplay alongside the games fluid combat mechanics paired with its stunning visuals and soundtrack make the game a truly unforgettable experience.
It Takes Two
Released in 2021 It Takes Two is the perfect choice for anyone seeking to share the experience with a friend or a partner. The game takes collaboration to another level with its imaginative mechanics and everchanging gameplay that requires constant teamwork.
It Takes Two Gameplay – Image credits [Steam]This coupled with a story about love, reconciliation and working together offers a deeply rewarding experience. Whether its solving puzzles or tackling other challenges every step brings players closer together. The game is at 80% discount on Steams Christmas Sale right now.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt – Complete Edition
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, widely regarded as the bar to meet for RPG games places you in the shoes of a seasoned monster hunter Gerlat of Rivia. The games vast open world setting is brought to life by its stunning landscapes, compelling characters and intricate quests.
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt – Image Credits [Steam]With all expansions included this complete edition gives players the ultimate Witcher experience. The game is at 80% discount on Steams Christmas Sale.
Control Ultimate Edition
For those looking for something surreal “Control” at 80% off delivers a mind-bending experience with an exhilarating gameplay. You take on the role of Jesse Faden as she unravels the mysteries of a secret government facility while wielding supernatural abilities.
Control Ultimate Edition – Image Credits [Pinterest]
Steams Christmas Sale is the best opportunity for gamers to get their hands on the best titles at ridiculously low prices. Doesn’t matter if your attracted to cinematic adventures, co-op games, or indie masterpieces, the sale has something for everyone.
These games promise to offer players with countless hours of joy. So, we suggest that you add them to your cart and get to purchasing before the sale ends to treat yourself to some well-deserved holiday gaming.
Lead the comparison and blog writing teams at Tech4Gamers.
Oversee teams with a keen eye for detail and precision.
Ensure hands-on writing, with benchmarks and testing as guiding principles.
Guarantee the delivery of the best possible results in concise yet impactful tech tales.
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Rated: 8/10
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Rated: 7.5/10
Pros And Cons
CPU
Pros
Cons
Core Ultra 5 245K
✅ Has 6 more physical cores
✅ Unlocked multiplier
❌ Slightly worse in terms of performance
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
✅ Has 73 MB larger L3 cache size
✅ Better in terms of performance
❌ Much more expensive
Key Takeaways
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D was a whopping 30% faster when it came to gaming benchmarks, while the 245K was overall a bit faster in productivity.
The 7800X3D took 22% less power than the Intel chip in our testing, while the difference in temperature was only about 2.5%, with the Ryzen being cooler.
The 7800X3D is about $120 dollars more expensive than the Core Ultra 5 245K. These prices might change in the future.
If you have the budget for a 7800X3D, we would say that it is definitively the better processor.
Core Count: The 7800X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the 245K has 14 cores and 14 threads, made up of 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores.
Clock Speed: The base frequency of the 7800X3D is about 4.4GHz, while the 245K has a base frequency of 4.2GHz. The former boosts to 5GHz, while the latter boosts to 5.2GHz.
Process Node: Intel’s 245K uses a newer, more advanced 3nm manufacturing process, while the 7800X3D has a slightly older 5nm process size.
TDP: The Ryzen has a TDP of 120 watts, whereas the 245K takes around 125 watts of power.
Cache: The L3 cache of the 7800X3D is about 96 megabytes, whereas the 245K has an L3 cache size of 24 megabytes, much smaller than the Ryzen’s.
Intel has lacked innovation in the releases building up to these new Core Ultra chips. However, these new chips might be the change we require to get greatness out of this company again. This Core Ultra 5 245K vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D comparison will gauge the extent of these changes!
Gaming Benchmarks – 1080p
Having detailed the comparative specs of these chips, the following sections of the Core Ultra 5 245K vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D comparison will take a look at how they perform against each other in games. The specs of the test bench we used for these tests are written below:
Star Wars Jedi Survivor @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
The first title of our comparisons showed a framerate of 142 FPS on the 245K, which was about 45% behind the 206 FPS we saw with the 7800X3D.
The 7800X3D went down to a framerate of 185 FPS on the 1% lows, which was still 62% higher than the 114 FPS of the 245K in our test of Star Wars Jedi: Survivor.
The Last Of Us Part 1
The Last Of Us @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
The difference in framerate was lower in The Last Of Us, but the 7800X3D was still 10% ahead with a framerate of about 197 FPS, while the 245K hovered closer to 179 FPS on average.
There was barely any difference in the 1% lows, with the 7800X3D getting a minimum of about 136 FPS, whereas the 245K had a 1.5% lower performance at around 134 FPS.
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
The 7800X3D got an average framerate of 202 FPS in Cyberpunk, which was about 51% higher than the 134 FPS that the 245K got.
The minimum framerates were around 143 FPS on the 7800X3D in our testing, which was about 41% higher than the 101 FPS that the 245K got.
Hogwarts Legacy
Hogwarts Legacy @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
The 7800X3D enjoyed a 22% boost in performance in Hogwarts Legacy, where it got a framerate of 141 FPS, whereas the 245K had a framerate closer to 115 FPS in our testing.
We measured a difference of around 27% when it came to the 1% lows, with the 7800X3D having a framerate of 103 FPS, while the 245K hovered closer to 81 FPS.
Remnant 2
Remnant 2 @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
Remnant 2 saw an average framerate of 138 FPS with the 7800X3D, whereas the 245K was about 25% slower with an average framerate of only around 110 FPS.
The minimum framerates were around 24% higher on the 7800X3D, which had a framerate of 120 FPS, while the 245K offered 1% lows of around 97 FPS.
Homeworld 3
Homeworld 3 @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
Our test of Homeworld 3 ran much better on the 7800X3D, with an average framerate of 117 FPS, which was about 45% higher than the 81 FPS of the 245K.
There was a huge difference in the 1% lows, with the 7800X3D having a minimum of 52 FPS, while the 245K was about half as stable with a minimum of 27 FPS.
A Plague Tale: Requiem
A Plague Tale Requiem @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
Testing these chips with A Plague Tale: Requiem, we saw the 7800X3D had an average framerate of 178 FPS, which was about 48% higher than the 120 FPS of the 245K.
The minimum framerates were around 73 FPS with the 245K, which was around 74% lower than the 127 FPS we saw with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
Hitman 3
Hitman 3 @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
The last game of our testing had an average framerate of 268 FPS on the 7800X3D, whereas the Core Ultra 5 245K hovered around 232 FPS in Hitman 3, marking the 245K as about 15% faster.
The minimum framerates were around 238 FPS on the Ryzen, which was once again 15% higher than the 206 FPS that the 245K managed.
Productivity Benchmarks
Now that we’ve taken a look at the gaming benchmarks of these processors, we will see how they compare against each other in terms of productivity benchmarks. These tests were done with the same test bench as we used in the gaming tests.
Cinebench R24
Cinebench R24 (Image By Tech4Gamers)
In the single-bench Cinebench tests, the 245K pulled ahead with a score of 137 points, whereas the 7800X3D got a score closer to around 120 points. This difference computes to around 14%.
The multi-core score was also higher on the 245K, with a score of 1522 points. It led the 7800X3D by around 36%, with the Ryzen getting around 1115 points.
7-Zip
7-Zip (Image By Tech4Gamers)
In the compression part of this test, the 7800X3D pulled behind with a score of 124 points, while the 245K was around 8% faster with a score of 134 points.
The decompression tests ran around 11% faster on the Ryzen, where we saw a score of 134 points, while the Core Ultra had a score of about 121 points.
Photoshop
Photoshop (Image By Tech4Gamers)
The Pudget systems benchmark ran a bit better on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, which was about 5% faster than the Core Ultra 5 245K in our testing.
The Intel chip got a score of 10465 points, whereas the AMD chip got around 10984 points.
The difference we saw between these chips was remarkable when it came to the average framerates. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D was about 30% faster than the 245K on average in our tests, with the difference shooting up close to 50% in some games. The 7800X3D consistently beat the Core Ultra in all the games we tested.
1% Lows
The minimum framerates were no better. The 7800X3D ran these games about 32% better than the 245K when it came to the 1% lows, which made a night and day difference in some of the games like Homeworld 3. The 7800X3D was consistently remarkably faster than the Core Ultra.
Productivity
The overall win in productivity goes to the Core Ultra 5 245K in our testing. The 7800X3D was a bit faster in the 7-Zip decompression test as well as the Photoshop test, but it did not add up too much. However, GPU-bound tasks might run better on the 7800X3D because of the extra headroom it clears.
Power Consumption
Game
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Core Ultra 5 245K
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
58
73
The Last Of Us Part 1
59
71
Cyberpunk 2077
54
74
Hogwarts Legacy
57
73
Remnant 2
57
70
Homeworld 3
55
69
A Plague Tale: Requiem
53
73
Hitman 3
58
71
Average Power Draw
56.375⚡
71.75⚡
Winner: Ryzen 7 7800X3D
When we tested the power consumption of these chips, we saw that the Ryzen 7 7800X3D took about 22% less power than the Core Ultra 5 245K, which is remarkable as the Intel chip already barely sips power. AMD has continued to impress with the power consumption of the X3D chips with this processor.
Temperatures
Game
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Core Ultra 5 245K
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
68
68
The Last Of Us Part 1
66
64
Cyberpunk 2077
67
76
Hogwarts Legacy
69
78
Remnant 2
67
67
Homeworld 3
68
65
A Plague Tale: Requiem
65
68
Hitman 3
67
64
Average Temperatures
67.125🌡️
68.75🌡️
Winner: Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The temperatures were barely different between these two chips, with the 7800X3D being about 3% cooler than the Core Ultra 5 245K. Overall, temperatures were very manageable on both processors and should not be seen as a pivotable deciding factor between these chips.
Price And Value
CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Core Ultra 5 245K
Price Difference
Launch MSRP
💲499
💲319
56.43%
Current Price
💲399
💲279
43.01%
The Core Ultra 5 245K was released at a lower price than the 7800X3D, and the recent changes in the price of both these chips have kept a sizeable difference between them. As of late December 2024, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D costs around 43% more than the 245K.
Our Recommendation
Core Ultra 5 245K: To be honest, we weren’t sold on this chip while making this comparison, but the price painted it in a new light. This chip did drag behind in the gaming tests, but there might be a difference you might notice at 1440p and 4k gaming if you choose to use this chip with a better GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Though the price of this chip has not dropped significantly since its release, it still is one of the most powerful gaming processors on the planet while still being extremely efficient in terms of power consumption. The performance-per-watt of this chip is truly marvellous.
After all this discussion, we would recommend the Core Ultra 5 245K to people who want to build a low-budget build to play games at higher resolutions, while the 7800X3D takes the win in overall performance if you have the budget for it.
Lead the comparison and blog writing teams at Tech4Gamers.
Oversee teams with a keen eye for detail and precision.
Ensure hands-on writing, with benchmarks and testing as guiding principles.
Guarantee the delivery of the best possible results in concise yet impactful tech tales.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Rated: 7.9/10
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
Rated: 8/10
Pros And Cons
CPU
Pros
Cons
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
✅ Has 73 MB larger L3 cache size
✅ Better in terms of performance
❌ Lower power consumption
Core Ultra 5 245K
✅ Has 6 more physical cores
✅ More modern manufacturing process
❌ Worse in terms of performance
Key Takeaways
The 5800X3D was about 3% faster in gaming performance than the Core Ultra 5 245K, whereas the 245K pulled very significantly ahead in the productivity tests.
The 5800X3D took about 7% less power than the 245K while being about 4% cooler in testing.
The 5800X3D is about equivalent in price to the 245K as of late December 2024, though this might be subject to change in the future.
If you have an existing AM4 system, the 5800X3D might be the better option, but if you are making a system from scratch, the 245K makes more sense.
Core Count: The 245K has 14 cores (6 performance and 8 efficiency) and 14 threads, compared to 8 cores and 16 threads in the 5800X3D.
Clock Speed: The base frequency of the Core Ultra is about 4.2GHz, whereas the 5800X3D has a base clock of 3.4GHz. The boost clock is 5.2GHz on the 245K, while the 5800X3D boosts to 4.5GHz.
Process Node: The 5800X3D is an older processor with a 7nm manufacturing process, while the 245K has a 3nm manufacturing process.
TDP: Though Intel has boasted great power claims, the 245K has a TDP of 125 watts, which is a bit higher than the 5800X3D’s 105-watt TDP.
Cache: The 5800X3D has a large L3 cache buffer of 96 megabytes, whereas the 245K has a 24-megabyte buffer.
The AMD X3D line stands out with impressive performance and efficiency, outperforming even top-tier competitors. In the Core Ultra 7 245K vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D comparison, we will see if Intel’s latest release holds up to the processor that started it all!
Gaming Benchmarks
In this section of the comparison, we will see how these two chips perform each other when we put them head-to-head in gaming tests. These tests were conducted on a measured test bench, the specs of which are written below:
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
In this Star Wars title, the 5800X3D had a framerate of 162 FPS, which was about 13% greater than the 143 FPS that the Core Ultra 5 245K managed to sustain.
The minimums showed a difference closer to 14%,with the 5800X3D dropping to around 141 FPS in some scenes, whereas the 245K hovered closer to about 124 FPS.
The Last Of Us Part 1
The Last Of Us @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
There was a 13% difference in our test of this PS port, with the 245K getting a framerate of 179 FPS, while the 5800X3D hovered closer to about 158 FPS.
We saw a difference of around 23% in the 1% lows, where the 245K got a framerate of 134 FPS, while the 5800X3D dipped to around 109 FPS in our testing.
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
Framerates were around 164 FPS on the 5800X3D, which was about 22% higher than the 134 FPS of the Core Ultra 5 245K when we tested Cyberpunk 2077.
The 5800X3D managed 1% lows of around 117 FPS in the hard-to-render scenes, whereas the 245K went down to around 101 FPS.
Hogwarts Legacy
Hogwarts Legacy @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
The 245K came out ahead, with an average framerate of about 115 FPS, whereas the 5800X3D got a framerate closer to 110 FPS in our testing, showcasing a 4.5% difference.
The 5800X3D’s framerate dropped to around 68 FPS in the 1% lows, whereas the 245K had a 19% higher framerate of 81 FPS.
Remnant 2
Remnant 2 @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
In our testing, there was a small difference between these two chips. The 5800X3D got an average framerate of about 108 FPS, while the 245K was two frames ahead with a framerate of 110 FPS.
The 1% lows pulled a few frames ahead, with the 245K getting lows of 97 FPS in our testing, which was about 7% higher than the 5800X3D’s 91 FPS.
Homeworld 3
Homeworld 3 @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
There was an 11% difference in Homeworld 3, where the 5800X3D got a framerate of 90 FPS on average in our testing, whereas the 245K hovered closer to 81 FPS.
The 47 FPS rendered by the 5800X3D in the lows gave it a big 74% lead over the 245K in this game. The Intel processor could only manage 27 FPS as a minimum.
A Plague Tale: Requiem
A Plague Tale: Requiem @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
The 5800X3D got a framerate of 144 FPS as its average in A Plague Tale, which was 20% higher than the 120 FPS that the 245K managed.
The minimums were around 106 FPS on the 5800X3D, while the 245K was 45% behind with a framerate of only 73 FPS.
Hitman 3
Hitman 3 @1080p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
Finally, the last game of our testing showed that the 5800X3D had a framerate of around 214 FPS on average, about 8% lower than the 232 FPS of the 245K.
The minimum framerates were about 7% higher on the Intel chip at around 206 FPS, while the 5800X3D hovered around 192 FPS.
Productivity Benchmarks
Now that we have taken a look at how these chips perform in gaming tests, the following few sections will focus on the productivity performance of the Core Ultra 7 245K vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D. The setup we used for these tests is the same as the one we used for the gaming benchmarks.
Cinebench
Cinebench R24 (Image By Tech4Gamers)
The 245K had a single-core performance of only 137 points, which was about 44% higher than the 5800X3D’s 95 points.
In the multi-core test, the 5800X3D got a total of 858 points, which was massively lower than the 1522 points that the Core Ultra had. This difference translates to a 77% lead for the Intel chip.
7-Zip
7-Zip (Image By Tech4Gamers)
In the compression test, the 5800X3D scored a total of 89 points, while the 245K had a performance of 134 points, leading to about a 50% lead.
In the decompression test, the 5800X3D had a score of 116 points, which was only 4% lower than the 121 points that the 245K achieved.
Photoshop
Photoshop (Image By Tech4Gamers)
Finally, Photoshop also ran much better on the 245K. The Core Ultra was about 21% faster than the 5800X3D in this test.
The Core Ultra 245K got a score of 10465 points in the Pudget systems test in Photoshop, while the 5800X3D got only 8638 points.
In the congregated average framerates, the 5800X3D came out ahead but only by a very small margin. The 5800X3D was only about 3% faster than the 245K, which is good news because it means Intel’s budget CPUs are catching up to the performance of the legendary first X3D chip.
1% Lows
The difference in the averages carried over almost one-to-one when it came to the lows, with the 5800X3D being ahead by only 3% as well. Though this is, once again, great for the Intel chip, it means that the 5800X3D has started to show its age.
Performance
As we expected, the 245K crushed it in these tests. It came out leaps and bounds ahead of the 5800X3D in all the tests we ran. The X3D chips weren’t ever known for their productivity performance, and these tests reminded us why this is.
Power Consumption
Game
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Core Ultra 5 245K
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
68
73
The Last Of Us Part 1
67
71
Cyberpunk 2077
68
74
Hogwarts Legacy
66
73
Remnant 2
67
70
Homeworld 3
65
69
A Plague Tale: Requiem
68
73
Hitman 3
67
71
Average Power Draw
67⚡
71.75⚡
Winner: Ryzen 7 5800X3D
In our power consumption tests, the Ryzen 7 5800X3D came out ahead even though the Core Ultra had 2 extra years to catch up to this level of efficiency. This difference is small, though, with the 5800X3D only consuming about 7% less power than the Core Ultra 5 245K.
Temperatures
Game
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Core Ultra 5 245K
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
67
68
The Last Of Us Part 1
65
64
Cyberpunk 2077
66
76
Hogwarts Legacy
65
78
Remnant 2
67
67
Homeworld 3
68
65
A Plague Tale: Requiem
64
68
Hitman 3
67
64
Average Temperatures
66.12🌡️
68.75🌡️
Winner: Ryzen 7 5800X3D
The Core Ultra ran about 4% hotter in our test, though both of these processors were completely in safe temperature ranges. Neither of these chips ran too hot in our testing, and we think these temperatures should not be factored into the buying decision because of their very low difference.
Price And Availability
CPU
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Core Ultra 5 245K
Price Difference
Launch MSRP
💲499
💲319
56.43%
Current Price
💲309
💲299
3.34%
Both these chips are about the same price at the moment, with the 5800X3D being only around 3% more expensive than the Core Ultra 5 245K. This makes us believe that the 245K is fairly priced, though it won’t be winning any bang-for-your-buck awards.
What We Recommend
Core Ultra 5 245K: After going through all these factors in this comparison, we can safely say that the Core Ultra 5 245K is not a bad deal. Yes, it only beats the 2-year-old chip in productivity and almost matches it in gaming, but for the benefits you get with the 245K being a new chip, it might be worth it for a lot of people.
Ryzen 7 5800X3D: The oldness of this chip is a marvel, as it still outperforms recent processors. It performed better in the gaming tests, the power consumption is still excellent, and the price has decreased to be passable in this day and age, though we’d still like to see it go down further.
The 245K is a close competitor to the 5800X3D in the gaming tests, while it massively outperforms it in productivity. From this, we can say that the 245K is the better deal, though you might be able to find a 5800X3D pretty cheap on the used market, in which case the tables turn.
At Tech4Gamers, I’m a Senior Error Fix Writer specializing in troubleshooting problems. Each article results from deep research, testing fixes and providing solutions.
The latest generation of RAM, DDR5, significantly enhances data transfer speeds, starting at 4,800 MT/s, a 50% improvement over DDR4’s maximum of 3,200 MT/s. DDR5 also offers double the bandwidth compared to DDR4, making it highly beneficial for data-intensive tasks. Whether upgrading for gaming, professional work, or everyday multitasking, DDR5 RAM offers unparalleled efficiency and speed.
These days, there’s an incredible sale on DDR5 RAM on Amazon, with discounts ranging from 10% to 40%. Leading brands like Kingston, Corsair, Crucial, and others offer various deals, making upgrading your system easier without exceeding your budget. To simplify your search, I’ve compiled a list of top deals on DDR5 RAM to help you quickly find the right one.
These offers cater to every need, from faster communication between the RAM and CPU to enhanced overall system performance. Therefore, this is the perfect opportunity to grab your desired DDR5 RAM at an affordable price.
Capacity 32GB, Base Frequency: PC5-38400 (4800MHz), Base Timings: 40-40-40-77, Base Voltage: 1.1V; Tested...
Now, with these DDR5 RAM deals, you can enjoy faster load times and smoother multitasking. It also minimizes bottlenecks in resource-intensive software like CAD or video editing tools and ensures more responsive systems for AI and machine learning applications, particularly useful for gamers, video editors, and professionals handling heavy workloads.
If your system supports DDR5, upgrading now will provide future-proofing for advanced applications. Be sure to check your system’s compatibility before upgrading. These deals won’t last long, so if you’ve been eyeing a particular RAM module, don’t hesitate to grab it before it’s gone!
FAQs
How much does DDR5 RAM offer speed?
DDR5 RAM operates at speeds starting from 4,000 MHz (MT/s) and can reach up to 8,300 MHz or more with certain default XMP profiles, while some high-end models achieve even greater speeds when overclocked.
From where can we enable the DDR5 XMP profile?
You can enable XMP profiles through the BIOS or a tuning application. Contact the board manufacturer to locate the appropriate BIOS menu or tuning utility for your system.
What should we check before upgrading RAM?
Before upgrading RAM, ensure system compatibility, check existing RAM specifications, and consider factors like capacity, speed, and compatibility with your motherboard and operating system.
What should I check after installing new RAM?
After installing the new RAM, please make sure that the RAM is working properly. The recommended tools are Windows Memory Diagnostic and MemTest86 to check for errors and defects.
Currently serving as a News Reporter at Tech4Gamers, I have the privilege of combining my love for gaming with the art of storytelling. My role involves crafting engaging narratives that keep our audience abreast of the latest developments in the gaming world.
Story Highlight
Unreal Engine 5 has revolutionized game development with efficiency and stunning visuals, but its overreliance has led to poorly optimized releases.
Many developers lean on the engine’s preexisting tools, resulting in visually homogenous games with performance issues.
Despite its capabilities, the engine’s widespread adoption raises concerns about creativity stagnation, outsourcing inconsistencies, and monopolistic control by Epic Games.
Despite looking groundbreaking initially and having contributed to some of the most visually stunning titles, Unreal Engine 5 has ruined the video game industry. However, the engine isn’t to blame; instead, it is the developers.
Most studios are shifting towards Unreal Engine 5, and it is a double-edged sword since the development becomes efficient and easier with some great visuals. However, many are undermining the severe negative effects the engine has to offer. Even bigger studios are ditching their in-house game engines developed for decades in favor of Unreal Engine 5.
Why It Matters: Ever since the release of Unreal Engine 5, big titles have launched with poor optimization since developers have started to become accustomed to the ease that comes with video game development with that engine.
Unreal Engine 5 Has Unified Video Game Development
Future Halo Games Shifting To UE5
Almost every video game that has come out within the past few years was based on Unreal Engine 5, whether it’s an Indie title or a AAA project. The engine has a lot of artistic freedom, as developers can create visually stunning games no matter what art style it has.
Also, for future titles, studios like CD Projekt Red have shifted to Unreal Engine 5 for the development of Witcher 4 after the disastrous launch of Cyberpunk 2077 on Red Engine, and I fear that Witcher 4 may follow the same suit.
EA is also moving to Unreal Engine 5 for the next Battlefield game, leaving Frostbite Engine behind, and the entire feel of the franchise will change. Knowing EA and how Unreal Engine 5 works for large-scale, visually stunning games, I’m calling it quits for Battlefield.
If this isn’t all, 343 Industries is also moving towards Unreal Engine 5 with the next Halo project instead of utilizing the Slipspace Engine. It’s mind-boggling that for most of these titles, game engines weren’t even the issue but rather the actual development, and these engines worked just as fine for the game.
Moving To UE5 Is Just Lazy Development
Lords of the Fallen Was Held Back By UE5
While the engine is amazing and groundbreaking, developers have become reliant on the engine’s pre-existing presets, such as Lumination, Nanite, and other features that Unreal Engine 5 has to offer.
There’s no limit to innovation; it’s just that developers have become too lazy with the pre-existing tools and don’t bother too much beyond that. The games do look visually amazing with the results, but you’ve probably noticed that all Unreal Engine 5 games look homogenous.
Moreover, Unreal Engine 5 has also become cost-effective, and most of the time, studios outsource certain segments of production to other foreign studios for a fraction of the production price. That outsourced work doesn’t look good at times and is a severe drawback to the game’s overall quality.
The Drawbacks
Unreal Engine 5 Games Are Quite Performance-Intensive
With great visuals come greater drawbacks. It’s no secret that Unreal Engine 5 games are quite performance-intensive, and it takes a really powerful system to run games based on those engines to run the games on a decent preset without upscaling.
Beyond that, every game needs to compile shaders, which can take a lot of time. Due to more complex materials and so many assets used, engine bloat, and a higher game size, shader compilation can sometimes take more than 30 minutes before actually playing a game
Epic Games Has A Monopoly On UE5 Games
Epic Games 5 Has An Inclusiveness Heavy Policy
Since Epic owns Unreal Engine 5, it has a hold on games being developed using the same engine. Getting paid a fraction of the sales made by the same engine does make sense, but Epic has certain restrictions on the engine, which alters the game’s direction overall.
Moreover, their gender, racial, and ethnic inclusiveness is also quite sensitive and absurd. They don’t allow gender languages, which doesn’t make sense. One regulation also states that nothing in the game should be used to assume someone’s gender, such as using collective nouns such as “Guys.”
Forced inclusiveness is always bad for video game development, as we’ve seen countless times before, but the requirements Unreal Engine 5 has is just ridiculous. I wonder how much humor will be cut down from Borderlands 4.
Firstly, I’m not a video game developer, but I need to highlight all the problems surrounding games utilizing Unreal Engine 5. Most developers working as lead game designers and environmental artists are fairly new to the game engine.
Older developers who previously worked on the proprietary engines were laid off, and the Unreal Engine 5 proved to be too much for the newer devs, rather than focusing on the visuals and physics of individual objects, which don’t matter if the game doesn’t run well, developers should be focusing on optimizing the game and reducing clutter.
Despite all this notion towards Unreal Engine 5, some studios are still using their in-house engine. One such example is the recent Indiana Jones and The Great Ciricle by MachineGames, which uses Id Tech 7, an amazing engine that looks and runs quite well. The result is amazing, and the game performs quite well on the Xbox Series X|S.
At Tech4Gamers, I mainly cover new gaming news, leaks, and rumours. Aside from that, I love to write features about my favourite games while inserting my opinion about their different aspects.
Story Highlight
Black Myth: Wukong, a tech marvel, was being a burden on current-gen consoles.
So, fans were expecting it to run better on the latest mid-gen refresh.
The game’s patch for PS5 Pro was just recently released, and its performance mode still runs almost the same as the base console, but the quality mode offers better image quality thanks to PSSR.
Black Myth: Wukong, while the biggest release this year, had some technical issues, especially on the consoles. The game didn’t really offer ideal performance, so fans were hoping PS5 Pro would be able to run it better.
Before the patch was released, the console’s raw power wasn’t enough to deliver solid results. However, the patch has now been released, and it still doesn’t look that promising. The console fails to maintain 60FPS in performance mode at 1080P resolution using frame-gen and FSR 3.
Why it matters: While the PSSR implementation over FSR has proven to be better in the game it seems like the pro variant still is unable to deliver the solid 60FPS experience.
Digital Foundry has done an in-depth analysis of Black Myth: Wukong on PS5 Pro and the base console for comparison. The analysis revealed a lot of positive things about PSSR, but the tech expert doesn’t seem to be satisfied with the 120 HZ and performance modes.
The quality mode runs at 30 FPS with the image quality being a lot better than the base console. The native resolution is around 1296P which is upscaled to 4K. The resolution looks crisp enough and sharp, giving a clearer image quality and more stable lightning.
In the 120 HZ mode, the game runs at 40 FPS, which is a little disappointing. However, the relay concern lies in performance mode. The PS5 Pro can’t maintain 60FPS and still uses frame-gen and FSR 3 at 1080P resolution. The frames drop to as low as 46 FPS, as per the analysis by Digital Foundry.
Black Myth: Wukong Drops To As Low As 46 FPS In PS5 Pro Performance Mode
The PS5 Pro performance mode doesn’t have many improvements over the base console, so that’s a little disappointing. However, the PSSR implementation and the differences in other areas are impressive.
What do you think about the PS5 Pro performance mode still not running Black Myth: Wukong, ideally? Do you think the console’s pros outweigh its cons? Share your thoughts with us in the comments section below or join the discussion at the official Tech4Gamers forums.
At Tech4Gamers.com, I cover the latest news and rumours in the gaming industry, from new game releases to hidden gems and video game leaks. Furthermore, I occasionally write tech articles about video game consoles, providing insights into the hardware and software that powers our gaming experiences.
Story Highlight
Dragon Age: The Veilguard failed to reach even the top 50 best-selling new games in Europe.
BioWare originally expected to sell 10 million copies within 3 months but fell far short.
On the other hand, Star Wars: Outlaws was the 45th best-selling game this year, at least better than The Veilguard.
In 2024, the European video game market saw a major drop, with new game sales falling by 29% compared to the previous year. During this slump Dragon Age: The Veilguard, didn’t make it into the top 50 best-selling new games in the region.
On the other hand, Star Wars: Outlaws was the 45th best-selling game of 2024, despite mixed reviews and struggles with overall sales.
Why it matters: According to an insider, BioWare expected The Veilguard to sell 10 million copies within 3 months. However, GamesIndustry’s data shows the game was certainly miles off the expectation.
Dragon Age: The Veilguard has a very poor user score on Metacritic.
According to a microcast hosted by GamesIndustry.biz, Dragon Age: The Veilguard launched at number seven on the European monthly sales chart. However, its first-week sales were much lower than other role-playing games released in 2024.
Overall, BioWare’s new title is ranked 68th in the European sales chart for 2024, much worse than Star Wars: Outlaws. This poor performance is reflected in user reviews on Metacritic, with the game receiving a score of 3.7 out of 10 on consoles and a lower 2.2 on PC.
Due to low sales and people not giving the game a chance, Dragon Age: The Veilguard is already 30% off on different platforms.
Star Wars: Outlaws ranked second in PC game sales for September 2024. However, it fell short of Ubisoft’s sales expectations, leading to a 13% drop in the company’s stock after the delay of Assassin’s Creed Shadows.
The Veilguard’s director blamed “hate campaign” for the game’s failure.
The drop in new game sales across Europe is due to several factors, including fewer new releases and changing consumer preferences. Christopher Dring, head of the GamesIndustry portal, pointed out that sales of new games in the region have fallen by nearly a third compared to 2023.
What do you think of The Veilguard not even making it to the top 50 in the European sales chart for 2024? Let us know in the comments, or join the discussion on the Tech4Gamers forum.
At Tech4Gamers, I mainly cover new gaming news, leaks, and rumours. Aside from that, I love to write features about my favourite games while inserting my opinion about their different aspects.
Story Highlight
Black Myth: Wukong is the most-played single-player title of all time on Steam.
Not only that, but it has now become the best-rated title on Steam of 2024 by peak players.
This is a massive milestone for the Chinese RPG that has been breaking records every now and then.
Black Myth: Wukong surprised everyone with its launch. Many were expecting high numbers for the game on Steam, but it surpassed everyone’s expectations by almost every single record on the platform.
It destroyed every other single-player game and became the second-most-played title on Seam, tailing just behind PUBG. Now, it has achieved yet another massive milestone, becoming the best-rated title of 2024 on Steam by peak players.
Why it matters: The Chinese action RPG took the world by surprise, and it wasn’t just a fluke, given the positive reviews. Those who have actually played the game have nothing but praise for it.
Black Myth: Wukong Is The Best-Rated Title of 2024 on Steam, Ranked By Peak Player Count | Source: SteamDB
There are some games that are better rated than Black Myth: Wukong on Steam like Balatro and Satisfactory. However, looking at how many reviews they got, the comparison is just not fair.
For instance, Wukong has nearly 1.1 million reviews; meanwhile, Balatro has just over 100k. With more reviews, there tend to be more negative ones, especially when the title has such a massive scale.
That said, the ranking here is determined by the player count, and of course, there isn’t any game released in 2024 that has more player count than the Chinese RPG. So, ranked by the peak players, it has the most positive reviews, which makes total sense.
It is highly unlikely for another single-player game to reach this level of success, but the gaming industry is full of surprises, and we hope to be surprised more often. No one could have imagined, possibly not even the developers, that this title would destroy records like nothing.
Unfortunately, Black Myth: Wukong didn’t winGame of the Year 2024, but it has won the hearts of over a million players, which matters the most.
What do you think about the famous Chinese RPG being the best-rated game of 2024 by peak players? Do you think it deserved the GOTY award over Astro Bot? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below, or join the official Tech4Gamers forums for further discussion.
I’ve previously worked for eXputer as a Senior News Writer for several years. Now with Tech4Gamers, I love to devoutly keep up with the latest gaming and entertainment industries. I have a Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science and years of experience reporting on games and breaking exclusive stories. Besides my passion for gaming journalism, I love spending my leisure time farming away in Stardew Valley. VGC, IGN, GameSpot, Game Rant, TheGamer, GamingBolt, The Verge, NME, Metro, Dot Esports, GameByte, Kotaku Australia, PC Gamer, and more have cited my articles.
Story Highlight
Valve employees are reportedly making more money per person than tech giants like huge conglomerates like Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and Netflix.
Exact Valve figures are redacted, and the data is now half a decade old.
Valve is one of those irreplaceable presences in the gaming industry that has carried PC gaming for decades. Such a conglomerate also has a dark underbelly—such as CS2 gambling and a lack of moderation on Steam—which are seldom explored in the industry. Whether you explore the company’s virtues or vices, however, it has long surpassed yet another milestone that no one saw coming.
A new report has revealed that the company is making much more per employee—even when all the massive tech giants are counted together.
Why it matters: Valve employees earning more than all the tech giants combined is an astounding fact that confirms just how much of a little giant the conglomerate has become over the decades since launching Steam.
Valve is making more money per employee than all the popular tech titans combined. | Image Credit: PC Gamer.
As pointed out in a report by PC Gamer, Valve is making much more per person than all the other tech conglomerates. Yes, this leak accounts for Apple, Netflix, Amazon, and even Microsoft combined.
It is worth noting that Valve has quite a small team, consisting of approximately 470 employees early this year. This figure is staggeringly low when pitted against the likes of Ubisoft and even some smaller AAA studios.
Unfortunately, Valve’s exact net income and other tidbits are redacted for the safety of the leaker, so we’ll never likely find out the figure. However, if Facebook stands at over $780,400, then Valve surpassing that is alone a huge milestone.
All in all, the data is also now half a decade old and might not factor in the many tech and global economic trends we have seen developing since then.
Do you think the amount of earnings made by every Valve employee is justified, or are the other tech giants paying too little? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below, or join the discussion on the official Tech4Gamers forum.
As a News Reporter at Tech4Gamers, I bring the latest findings from the tech industry to our readers. Specializing in processors, graphics cards, and more, I strive to deliver detailed insights that keep our audience well-informed and engaged. Periodically, I also delve into the vibrant world of gaming to share captivating stories.
Story Highlight
Navi 44 GPUs may lack hardware encoders, affecting streaming and content creation.
The Navi 44-based Radeon RX 9000 GPUs are expected to be priced between $179 and $349.
The Navi 44 GPUs will face competition from NVIDIA’s upcoming RTX 5050/5060 GPUs and Intel’s Arc B580.
The Navi 48 and Navi 44 dies will be the foundation for AMD’s future RDNA 4 GPU series. AMD’s best option for the GPU market will be the Radeon RX 9070 XT and RX 9070. However, the less expensive and lower-end cards don’t appear to provide much in terms of hardware or performance.
There are rumors that the Navi 44 GPUs won’t have any hardware encoders. According to well-known leaker @Kepler_L2, the N44 “may” not feature HW encoders. Since HW encoders are necessary for video encoding and are absent from the Radeon RX 6500 XT, this might be a possibility.
Why it matters: The performance and features of the Navi 44 GPUs will directly impact their market competitiveness. The lack of hardware encoders could make them unsuitable for tasks like video encoding, streaming, and content creation.
That said, the lower-end RDNA 4 RX 9000 cards might not be popular if the same pattern continues since users will have to rely on CPU encoding and streaming, and content creation will be nearly impossible on such cards.
While the RX 9070 XT, which is based on the Navi 48, leaks virtually every day in one form or another, the less expensive and lower-end Navi 44 GPUs are rarely seen in the leaks. As a result, nothing is confirmed yet, although it is possible.
According to rumors, Radeon RX 9000 GPUs with Navi 44 chip will cost between $179 and $349. In addition to lacking hardware encoders, the raster performance will also be a deciding factor for users.
The Navi 44 GPUs will compete with the RTX 5050 and 5060 GPU, which are expected to be released in Q1 2025, and Intel’s most recent Arc B580 GPU, which costs $249 and has 12 GB of VRAM.
