GuidesComparisonsRyzen 9 7950X3D Vs i9-13900KS: Gaming & Overall

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs i9-13900KS: Gaming & Overall

We compare the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core i9-13900KS in Gaming Benchmarks and find out how they perform in a total of seven games.

Both large CPU manufacturers have left no stone unturned in the pursuit of getting as much gaming performance as possible. In the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs i9-13900KS comparison, we will compare the magnum opus from both companies to declare a definitive winner.

Key Takeaways

  • In gaming performance, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the Core i9-13900KS  at 1080p with its 4% higher rendering capability.
  • The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses 12.1% less energy and performs better per watt than the i9-13900KS. It also has a 5.2% higher thermal efficiency.
  • The launch MSRP of the Intel i9-13900KS is $689-$699, whereas the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $699.

Comparison Table

FeatureAMD Ryzen 9 7950X3DIntel Core i9-13900KS
ArchitectureZen 4Raptor Lake Hybrid architecture
Former CodenameRaphael AM5Raptor Lake
SocketAM5FCLGA 1700
Integrated GraphicsAMD Radeon GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 770
iGPU Base Clock400 MHz300 MHz
iGPU Boost Clock2200 MHz1650 MHz
PCI Express Version55.0 and 4.0
Total PCIe Lanes2820
Unlocked For OverclockingYesYes
MotherboardMotherboards For Ryzen 9 7950X3DMotherboards For i9-13900KS
RAMRAM For Ryzen 9 7950X3DRAM For Core i9-13900KS
CoolerCPU Coolers For Ryzen 9 7950X3DCPU Coolers For Core i9-13900KS

Architectural Differences

  1. Core Count: The Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 16 performance cores that add up to 32 threads, while the Core i9 13900KS has 8 performance cores in addition to 16 efficiency cores, totalling 32 threads.
  2. Cache: Where the i9 has its advantage in terms of core count, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is undefeated when it comes to its 128MB L3 cache, while the Core i9 only had 36MB in comparison.
  3. TDPThe 13900KS has a significantly higher TDP than the Ryzen, around 253 watts versus the 162 watts of the Ryzen. Bear in mind both of these are PL2 TDPs.
  4. Processing Nodes: The Ryzen 9 has a 5nm manufacturing process, which is significantly more advanced than the 10nm processing nodes that the 13900KS uses.
  5. Memory: The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128GB of DDR5-5200 RAM, while the Intel processor supports faster DDR5 RAM at 5600MHz; in addition to the DDR4-3200 RAM, it can also be used in junction with.

Gaming Benchmarks

The performance of a processor in challenging games is its primary defining characteristic over any other processor. When the processor’s capabilities are fully unlocked, a particular game runs at its peak performance, showcasing its prowess in high-stress situations. To analyze the gaming performance of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs i9-13900KS, we will compare their capabilities in seven demanding games at 1080p resolution with ultra settings.

Gaming Rig

Hitman 3

Gaming Performance Graph
Hitman 3 Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • When we tested Hitman 3, it only had a 3.9% difference in performance between the two processors. The 13900KS had an average of 238 FPS, while the Ryzen 7950X3D was a bit further ahead with an average of 247 FPS.
  • 1% lows hung around 167 FPS for the 13900KS, while the 7950X3D had lows of around 182 FPS, making the gaming experience smoother by a significant amount.

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

Gaming Performance Graph
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The i9-13900KS produced an average frame rate of 187 FPS in our test of AC Valhalla, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D produced 186 FPS in the same conditions.
  • Considering the 1% low performance in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D mustered up 153 FPS, while the Core i9-13900KS provided 151 FPS.

Far Cry 6

Gaming Performance Graph
Far Cry 6 Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • When we tested Far Cry 6 on both processors, the 7950X3D had a 6.25% lead over its rival. Its framerate hovered around 187 FPS, while the 13900KS sat closer to 176 FPS.
  • When considering the 1% low performance in Far Cry 6, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D managed 137 FPS compared to the Core i9-13900KS’s 155 FPS.

Forza Horizon 5

Gaming Performance Graph
Forza Horizon 5 Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The Ryzen overtook the i9 in our test of Forza Horizon 5 by about 2.04%, with an average framerate of around 200 FPS compared to the 196 FPS of the 13900KS
  • The 1% lows were about the same between the two processors, with the 13900KS recording 172 FPS as its minimum, while the Ryzen 9 recorded 171 FPS as its minimum.

God Of War

Gaming Performance Graph
God Of War Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The 13900KS displayed an average framerate of 213 FPS in our short test of God Of War, while the Ryzen was around 9% faster with a framerate of 230 FPS on average.
  • The 1% lows were almost equivalent on both processors in this game, with the i9 getting a minimum of around 181 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 fell closer to a minimum of 180 FPS.

Cyberpunk 2077

Gaming Performance Graph
Cyberpunk 2077 Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • When we tested Cyberpunk 2077, the i9 was around 6.54% faster with an average framerate of 163 FPS, while the Ryzen had a framerate of around 153 FPS.
  • Regarding the 1% low FPS, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D managed 131 FPS compared to the Core i9-13900KS’s 140 FPS.

Horizon Zero Dawn

Gaming Performance Graph
Horizon Zero Dawn Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The Ryzen regained its advantage in our test of Horizon Zero Dawn, with a framerate of 249 FPS as opposed to the 226 FPS average of the i9. This came out to an advantage of around 10.2%.
  • The minimums hit around 180 FPS on the i9, while the Ryzen was ahead by a significant margin with 1% lows of 192 FPS.

Overall Gaming Analysis

Let us discuss the overall statistics of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs i9-13900KS comparison.


Overall FPS
Overall performance at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

After evaluating the frame rates average for the above-mentioned games, the figures indicate that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers 3.91% better gaming performance than the Core i9-13900KS. The overall frame rate delivered by the Core i9-13900KS was 199.6 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D crossed the boundary of two hundred by averaging the frame rate at 207.4 FPS.

Regarding the 1% low performance, there was little to no change between these two processors. The 1% low frame rate supplied by the Ryzen 9 7950X3D was 163.8 FPS, while the Core i9-13900KS managed an average of 163.6 FPS at its worst performance during the above-mentioned games at 1080p resolution.

Individual FPS
Frame rates in individual games – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

The graph above shows that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D generated higher frame rates in almost all of the games. The Core i9-13900KS performed better than its rival in Cyberpunk 2077. In Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the Core i9-13900KS won the competition with one FPS lead.

Power Consumption

Average Gaming Power Consumption
Average Power consumption at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

If we look at the power consumption of the two processors, the Core i9-13900KS combusted 126.7 watts of power on average in the above games, whereas the Ryzen 9 7950X3D’s average combustion is 113.0 watts. Hence, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses 12.1% less power than the Core i9-13900KS when running games at 1080p resolution.

When we compare the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core i9-13900KS as alternatives for low-income users, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D would be the best choice. The reason is the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 12.1% more power efficient than the Core i9-13900KS, thus saving electricity costs.

CPU Temperature

Average Gaming Temperature
Average Gaming Temperature at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

Regarding the CPU gaming temperature, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D ran at an average of 65.5°C, whereas the Core i9-13900KS ran at an average temperature of 68.9°C. The Core i9-13900KS’s temperature was 3.4 degrees higher on average. These figures lead us to conclude that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D exhibits 5.2% more thermal efficiency when compared to the Core i9-13900KS.

Price And Availability

When buying a processor, it is vital to compare the two processors’ costs and levels of availability. AMD launched the Ryzen 9 7950X3D with a price tag of $699. In contrast, Intel launched the Core i9-13900KS at an MSRP of $689-699.

The prices of processors are influenced by demand and time. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is now selling for roughly $698 to $719, while the Core i9-13900KS costs $730 to $750.

Regarding availability, the two processors are available in markets, but as mentioned above, the suppliers are currently selling them at black. It would be better to order these processors from the official stores of Intel and AMD.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs Core i9-13900KS: Which One Is Better For You?

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the processor to consider for the highest gaming performance. It has a 4% superior gaming performance than the Core i9-13900KS and is also the most recent and greatest processor available.

However, considering the availability and current market prices, the Core i9-13900KS appears to be the more suitable option with greater performance per dollar.

Pros And Cons

Intel Core i9-13900KSHigh count of 24 cores and 32 threads.

Record Max turbo clock of up to 6.0 GHz.

Premium binned silicon.
Quite expensive compared to the i9-13900K real-world incentive.

Minimal gains over the standard model.

Consumes more power.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3DThe R9 7950X3D performs admirably across the board.

It has intelligent workload management (CCX Parking).

Regarding performance per watt, this CPU is also energy-efficient.
High price.

Limited overclocking.

No support for DDR4.


Is the Ryzen 9 7950X3D more power efficient than the Core i9-13900KS?

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D consumes less power than the Core i9-13900KS. The R9 7950X3D is about 12.1% more power efficient than the Core i9-13900KS.

Does the Ryzen 9 7950X3D render better gaming performance than the Core i9-13900KS?

Undoubtedly, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers excellent game performance. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D performs about 4% better than the Core i9-13900KS.

Which processor offers better value for money, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D or the Core i9-13900KS?

The Core i9-13900KS offers better value for money. However, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a lower running cost because of its lower power consumption.

Related Articles

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

RTX 3060 Vs 3060 Ti: Should You Upgrade? [2023 Tests]

In RTX 3060 Vs. 3060 Ti comparison, we will benchmark these cards at 1440p to determine if the extra VRAM makes any significant difference.

Core i9-12900K vs Ryzen 7-5800X3D [We Tested 11 Games]

In the i9-12900K vs Ryzen 7-5800X3D CPU war, even though the same processor node, the 5800X3D can go head-to-head with Intel's best CPU.

RTX 4070 Vs RTX 4080 [Worth Upgrading?]

In this comparison we will test the RTX 4070 Vs RTX 4080 and check the performance difference between the two GPUs.

Intel i9-13900k Vs Ryzen 9 7900X [Benchmarks Tested]

Our Intel Core i9-13900k vs. AMD Ryzen 9 7900X guide is here to tell you all the differences between these two processors.

Core i5-14600k Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D [10 Games Tested]

In Core i5-14600K vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D, we'll discuss specifications and architectural distinctions and analyze their gaming benchmarks...

Similar Guides