The Core i9-13900KS is the latest top-tier processor of Intel’s Raptor Lake generation. It has a phenomenal turbo frequency of up to 6.00 GHz, empowering the processor to execute as fast as possible. In contrast, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is AMD’s contemporary finest gaming processor with a turbo boost clock of up to 5.7 GHz. In Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs Core i9-13900KS, we’ll look for the processor with the best features and overall effectiveness.
- In gaming performance, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the Core i9-13900KS at 1080p with its 4% higher rendering capability.
- The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses 12.1% less energy and performs better per watt than the i9-13900KS. It also has a 5.2% higher thermal efficiency.
- The launch MSRP of the Intel i9-13900KS is $689-$699, whereas the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $699.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs Core i9-13900KS
|Feature||AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D||Intel Core i9-13900KS|
|Architecture||Zen 4||Raptor Lake Hybrid architecture|
|Former Codename||Raphael AM5||Raptor Lake|
|No. of Cores||Total: 16||Performance Cores: 8
Efficiency Cores: 16
Total Cores: 24
|No. of Threads||32||32|
|Base Clock||4.20 GHz||P-core base: 3.20 GHz
E-core base: 2.40 GHz
|Boost Clock||Max Turbo: Up to 5.7GHz||P-core boost: 5.40 GHz
E-core boost: 4.30 GHz
Max Turbo: 6.00 GHz
|Integrated Graphics||AMD Radeon Graphics||Intel UHD Graphics 770|
|iGPU Base Clock||400 MHz||300 MHz|
|iGPU Boost Clock||2200 MHz||1650 MHz|
|iGPU Core Count||2||2|
|CPU Memory Support||DDR5 only||DDR4 and DDR5|
|Memory Speed||Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s||Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s
Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s
|Bandwidth||83.2 GB/s||89.6 GB/s|
|L1 Cache||80K (per core)
|80K (per core)|
|L2 Cache||1MB (per core)
|2MB (per core)
|L3 Cache||128MB||36MB Intel Smart Cache|
|TDP||120 watts||Base Power: 150 W
Turbo Power: 253 W
|Max Temperature||Up to 89°C||Up to 100°C|
|Thermal Solution||Not Included||Not Included|
|PCI Express Version||5.0||5.0 and 4.0|
|Total PCIe Lanes||28||20|
|Unlocked For Overclocking||Yes||Yes|
|Fabrication Resolution||5nm FinFET at TSMC||10nm at Samsung|
|I/O Die (IOD) Size||122 mm²||257 mm²|
|Launch Price||$699||$689.00 – $699.00|
|Motherboard||Motherboards For Ryzen 9 7950X3D||Motherboards For i9-13900KS|
|RAM||RAM For Ryzen 9 7950X3D||RAM For Core i9-13900KS|
|Cooler||CPU Coolers For Ryzen 9 7950X3D||CPU Coolers For Core i9-13900KS|
The Core i9-13900KS features Intel’s current Raptor Lake architecture, whereas the most modern Ryzen 9 7950X3D employs AMD’s Zen 4 architecture.
Raptor Lake architecture is an improved update of Alder Lake (a single-ISA heterogeneous multi-core microarchitecture). It combines up to eight high-performance cores (also known as “P-Cores”) and up to sixteen small efficiency cores (also known as “E-Cores”) into a single monolithic integrated circuit.
The purpose of the big cores is to improve single-thread performance, whereas the objective of the small cores is to improve multi-thread power efficiency.
AMD created Zen 4 as the successor to Zen 3, a microarchitecture. The input/output die (I/O die) and core computing die (CCD) for the Zen 4 microarchitecture are produced using the 6nm and 5nm nodes, respectively.
Zen 4’s IPC gain is 13% higher than Zen 3. During the design of the Zen 4 architect, AMD’s primary objective was performance advancement, with a focus on gaming and content creation.
Must Read: Ryzen 7 7800X3D Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The i9-13900KS has UHD Graphics 770, whereas the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has AMD’s Radeon Graphics as its iGPU.
AMD Radeon Graphics are well known for their outstanding performance and cutting-edge features. One such feature is AMD’s FreeSync technology, which makes gaming more dynamic by synchronizing the monitor’s refresh rate with the graphics card’s frame rate. The Radeon graphics can run up to 2200 MHz and feature two graphics cores.
The Intel UHD Graphics 770 has two multi-format codec engines, 32 execution units (EUs), and a maximum graphics frequency of 1.65 GHz. It supports the eDP/DP/HDMI/DVI and up to three display outputs.
Moreover, this iGPU supports the Vulkan 1.2, OpenGL 4.5, and DirectX 12 APIs. The UHD Graphics 770 is a powerful graphics card and can easily handle everyday tasks like online browsing, movie playing, and office productivity software.
The i9-13900KS is compatible with both the DDR4 and the DDR5 memories. Its memory capacity is 128GB. The i9-13900KS’s maximum memory speed for DDR5 memory is up to 5600 MT/s, and the highest for DDR4 memory is 3200 MT/s. The bandwidth of the Intel i9-13900KS is up to 89.6 GB/s, and it also includes two memory channels.
Only DDR5 memory is compatible with the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D boasts an incredible speed of up to 5200 MT/s. It has a 128GB storage capacity and an 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth. This processor has two memory channels. The memory subtype of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is UDIMM.
It is also compatible with ECC memory (But mobo support is needed for ECC memory). Additionally, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has AMD 3D V-Cache technology. It has a 128 MB L3 cache to assist in gaming performance.
The lack of support for DDR4 memory in the case of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D can negatively affect users on restricted budgets due to the high cost of DDR5 memory. However, these processors are so expensive that the buyer, who can afford the Ryzen 9 7950X3D, can also afford the DDR5 memory.
TDP And Max Temperature
Regarding thermal design power, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a default TDP of 120 watts. On the other hand, the Core i9-13900KS offers a base power setting of 150 watts and a boost power setting of 253 watts.
The i9-13900KS’s higher power can help it deliver better performance. However, a more powerful CPU also consumes more energy, raising the cost of the electricity bill. This ultimately adversely affects users with limited budgets.
When it comes to the maximum possible temperature, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D’s working range is only up to 89°C. Whereas the i9-13900KS can function up to 100°C. One point is worth noting that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and i9-13900KS do not provide any cooling solution with the package. Therefore, a thermal solution must be purchased for these high-end processors.
To deal with high-temperature situations, the i9-13900KS features Thermal Monitoring Technology. However, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D does not have any such technology.
If you are experiencing overheating problems, read our article on how to lower CPU temperature.
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D comes with AMD’s first LGA socket, the AM5 model (LGA 1718). In contrast, the Intel Core i9-13900KS features an FCLGA 1700 socket.
FCLGA 1700 socket, used by the i9-13900KS, is a flip-chip land grid array CPU socket with negligible insertion force. It has 1700 protruding pins allowing it to contact the processor’s pads to boost the data rate and cooling. Both DDR4 and DDR5 memories work with FCLGA 1700.
AM5 is an AMD flip-chip land grid array CPU socket with zero insertion force. It is the AM4’s replacement. It attaches its 1718 pins to the motherboard, speeding up data flow and encouraging cooling. Advanced technologies, including DDR5 memory, Infinity Fabric, PCIe 5.0, Wi-Fi 6E, and others, are supported with the AM5 socket.
To contrast AMD’s most recent sockets, read AM5 vs AM4.
The maximum turbo frequency for the Core i9-13900KS is 6.00 GHz, while the maximum turbo frequency for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 5.70 GHz.
Related Article: Does Overclocking Reduce CPU Lifespan?
Due to its core division, the Core i9-13900KS has two figures for the base clock. The performance cores of the Core i9-13900KS are base clocked at 3.20 GHz, while efficiency cores are base clocked at 2.40 GHz. In contrast, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a base clock of 4.2 GHz. The figures indicate that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D might surpass the Core i9-13900KS in basic tasks.
Also Read: Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs Intel i9-13900K
Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs Core i9-13900KS Gaming
The performance of a processor in challenging games is its primary defining characteristic over any other processor. When the processor’s capabilities are fully unlocked, a particular game runs at its peak performance, showcasing its prowess in high-stress situations. To analyze the gaming performance of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs i9-13900KS, we will compare their capabilities in seven demanding games at 1080p resolution with ultra settings.
- OS: Windows 10 pro
- CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Motherboard 1: MSI MEG X670E ACE
- CPU 2: Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Motherboard 2: Asus ROG Strix Z790 – E Gaming
- GPU: Asus TUF Gaming RTX 4090 24GB
- RAM: Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz RAM
- SSD: Samsung 980 PRO 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2
- HDD: WD Blue 4TB Desktop Hard Disk Drive
- PSU: Cosair RMX Series RM1000X 1000 watt
- Cooler: Cosair ICUE H150I Elite
- In Hitman 3, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D surpassed the Core i9-13900KS by producing 9 more FPS, or a 3.9% performance bump.
- The i9-13900KS turned over an average of 238 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D provided an average frame rate of 247 FPS.
- Regarding power consumption, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D used 113.5 W of power compared to the i9-13900KS’s 129.6 W consumption.
- Considering the CPU temperature, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D hit 62°C in God of War, compared to the i9-13900KS operating at 63°C.
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
- During Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the average performance of the Core i9-13900KS was 1 FPS better than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
- The i9-13900KS produced an average frame rate of 187 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D produced 186 FPS in the same conditions.
- The power consumption by Core i9-13900KS during the gameplay was 132.9 W, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D combusted 112.7 W.
- Considering the 1% low performance in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D mustered up 153 FPS, while the Core i9-13900KS provided 151 FPS.
- While gaming, the temperature of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D was only 65°C, whereas the i9-13900KS ran at 69°C.
Far Cry 6
- The Ryzen 9 7950X3D unfailingly outperformed the Core i9-13900KS in Far Cry 6 by 11 FPS lead or 6.25% more excellent performance.
- During the gameplay, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D generated a marvellous 187 FPS average compared to the i9-13900KS’s average frame rate of 176 FPS.
- The Core i9-13900KS used 114.3 W of power, compared to the 111.0 W consumption by the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
- When considering the 1% low performance in Far Cry 6, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D managed 137 FPS compared to the Core i9-13900KS’s 155 FPS.
- The Ryzen 9 7950X3D barely reached a temperature of 65°C, compared to the Core i9-13900KS’s 70°C.
Forza Horizon 5
- In Forza Horizon 5, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D defeated the Core i9-13900KS by providing 4 more frames per second or a 2.04% performance advantage.
- The Ryzen 9 7950X3D produced an impressive 200 FPS average, while the Core i9-13900KS’s average frame rate was 196 FPS.
- In contrast to the Ryzen 9 7950X3D’s energy consumption of 114.0 W, the i9-13900KS consumed 129.9 W.
- Comparatively speaking, the Core i9-13900KS attained a temperature of 72°C in Forza Horizon 5, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D barely hit 67°C.
God Of War
- The Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperformed the Core i9-13900KS in God Of War by offering 19 more frames per second or a 9.0% speed gain.
- During the gameplay, the average frame rate delivered by the Ryzen 9 7950X3D was 230 FPS, while the i9-13900KS produced 211 FPS.
- The Core i9-13900KS used 123.8 W of electricity, whereas the Ryzen 9 7950X3D utilized 112.5 W.
- In God Of War, the Core i9-13900KS reached a temperature of 69°C, whereas the Ryzen 9 7950X3D reached 66°C.
- In Cyberpunk 2077, the Core i9-13900KS performed 6.54% better than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
- The Core i9-13900KS generated an average frame rate of 163 FPS, whereas the Ryzen 9 7950X3D generated 153 FPS.
- While playing the game, the i9-13900KS used 126.6 W of power, and the Ryzen 9 7950X3D used 115.2 W.
- Regarding the 1% low FPS, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D managed 131 frames per second compared to the Core i9-13900KS’s 140 FPS.
- The Ryzen 9 7950X3D reached a temperature of 70°C in Cyberpunk 2077, compared to the Core i9-13900KS’s 68°C.
Horizon Zero Dawn
- The Ryzen 9 7950X3D defeated the i9-13900KS in Horizon Zero Dawn by achieving 23 more frames per second, or 10.2% higher performance.
- During the gameplay, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D provided an average frame rate of 249 FPS compared to the Core i9-13900KS’s 226 FPS average.
- In terms of power usage, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D used 112.3 W, while the Core i9-13900KS’s usage was 129.9 W.
- In Horizon Zero Dawn, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D recorded a CPU temperature of 64°C, while the Core i9-13900KS recorded a temperature of 71°C.
Overall Gaming Analysis
Let us discuss the overall statistics of the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs i9-13900KS comparison.
After evaluating the frame rates average for the above-mentioned games, the figures indicate that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers 3.91% better gaming performance than the Core i9-13900KS. The overall frame rate delivered by the Core i9-13900KS was 199.6 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D crossed the boundary of two hundred by averaging the frame rate at 207.4 FPS.
Regarding the 1% low performance, there was little to no change between these two processors. The 1% low frame rate supplied by the Ryzen 9 7950X3D was 163.8 FPS, while the Core i9-13900KS managed an average of 163.6 FPS at its worst performance during the above-mentioned games at 1080p resolution.
The graph above shows that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D generated higher frame rates in almost all of the games. The Core i9-13900KS performed better than its rival in Cyberpunk 2077. In Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the Core i9-13900KS won the competition with one FPS lead.
If we see the power consumption of the two processors, the Core i9-13900KS combusted 126.7 watts of power on average in the above games, whereas the Ryzen 9 7950X3D’s average combustion of 113.0 watts. Hence, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses 12.1% less power than the Core i9-13900KS when running games at 1080p resolution.
When we compare the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Core i9-13900KS as alternatives for low-income users, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D would be the best choice. The reason is the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 12.1% more power efficient than the Core i9-13900KS, thus saving electricity costs.
Also Read: Gaming PC Power Usage
Regarding the CPU gaming temperature, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D ran at an average of 65.5°C, whereas the Core i9-13900KS ran at an average temperature of 68.9°C. The Core i9-13900KS’s temperature was 3.4 degrees higher on average. These figures lead us to conclude that the Ryzen 9 7950X3D exhibits 5.2% more thermal efficiency when compared to the Core i9-13900KS.
Must Read: CPU Temperature While Gaming
Price And Availability
When buying a processor, it is vital to compare the two processors’ costs and levels of availability. AMD launched the Ryzen 9 7950X3D with a price tag of $699. In contrast, Intel launched the Core i9-13900KS at an MSRP of $689-699.
The prices of processors are influenced by demand and time. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is now selling for roughly $698 to $719, while the Core i9-13900KS costs $730 to $750.
Regarding availability, the two processors are available in markets, but as mentioned above, the suppliers are currently selling them at black. It would be better to order these processors from the official stores of Intel and AMD.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs Core i9-13900KS: Which One Is Better For You?
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the processor to consider for the highest gaming performance. It has a 4% superior gaming performance than the Core i9-13900KS and is also the most recent and greatest processor available.
However, considering the availability and current market prices, the Core i9-13900KS appears to be the more suitable option with greater performance per dollar.
Pros And Cons
|Intel Core i9-13900KS||
|AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D||
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D consumes less power than the Core i9-13900KS. The R9 7950X3D is about 12.1% more power efficient than the Core i9-13900KS.
Undoubtedly, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers excellent game performance. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D performs about 4% better than the Core i9-13900KS.
The Core i9-13900KS offers better value for money. However, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has a lower running cost because of its lower power consumption.
Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋
How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔