Core i9-13900KS Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: Ultimate Comparison

We have seen the i9-13900KS trample over many processors to mark its superior performance. Today, we contest the Core i9-13900KS vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D. As always, we will evaluate the processors by their architectures, properties, thermal and power intakes, and most importantly, based on their performance against some highly demanding games’ benchmarks.

Key Takeaways

• Firstly, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D emerges as the frontrunner, boasting an average 8.5% higher framerate compared to the Intel i9-13900KS, showcasing its gaming superiority.
• Moreover, the Intel i9-13900KS grapples with higher heat levels, with an average 2-degree Celsius temperature increase compared to the Ryzen 9 7900X3D, underscoring the latter’s cooler operation.

Comparison Table

Architecture Comparison

1. Process Node: Starting off, the Core i9-13900KS employs the advanced 10nm process, contrasting with the Ryzen 9 7900X3D’s innovative 5nm process node, showcasing distinct manufacturing technologies.
2. Frequency: When it comes to frequency, the Core i9-13900KS commands a Base Clock of 3.2 GHz and a Boost Clock of an impressive 6 GHz, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D maintains a Base Clock of 4.4 GHz and a Boost Clock of up to 5.6 GHz, reflecting diverse frequency capabilities.
3. TDP: Furthermore, operating within 150W TDP, the Core i9-13900KS achieves its performance balance, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D harmonizes with a 120W TDP, highlighting distinct thermal profiles.

Also Read: Core i9 13900KS Vs Ryzen 9 7950X

Core i9-13900KS Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: Gaming Benchmarks

The main feature of any processor’s strength is its performance in different products and gaming benchmarks. As the processor is opened to maximum capabilities, it performs at maximum parameters for a particular game and thus displays its strength when subjected to high-tension scenarios. 

Note: However, remember that the upcoming benchmarks are not entirely accurate and constant in each case. A consumer may find variable values based on the supporting rig, the surrounding temperature, involved software availability, and other essential factors.

Testing Rig 

The following testing rig was used to carry out all the benchmarks.

• Motherboard: Gigabyte X670E AORUS MASTER / ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming
• Graphics Card: GeForce RTX 4090 24GB
• RAM: G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL32
• SSD: 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB
• CPU Cooler: be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
• Power Supply: Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W 
• Operating System: Windows 11

Forza Horizon 5

• The i9-13900KS had an aggregate 315 FPS while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D had a 5% less average of 306 FPS.
• The %1 low was handed over to the Ryzen 9 7900X3D as the processor had a 6.5% faster rate of 204 FPS, whereas the i9-13900KS had a %1 low framerate of 191 FPS.
• The maximum FPS of the i9-13900KS was recorded at 322 FPS, which was 4% lesser than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D’s 309 FPS.
• The power consumed by the i9-13900KS was 109W, which was 39% more than the 7900X3D’s 73W.
• The i9-13900KS ran 9.6% hotter with a thermal capacity of 65°C, while the 7900X3D reached a temperature of 59°C.

Similar Comparison: Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs i9-13900KS

Call Of Duty Warfare 2.0

• The average FPS of the i9-13900KS was recorded at 196 FPS, which was 3 FPS more than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D’s 193 FPS. 
• The i9-13900KS again overthrew the 7900X3D with a %1 low framerate of 148 FPS, while the 7900X3D could only deliver a 10 FPS lower %1 low framerate of 138 FPS.
• The i9-13900KS again managed to slip past the Ryzen 9 7900X3D with a 2 FPS ahead framerate of 209 FPS, whereas the 7900X3D delivered 207 FPS.
• The power conditions better suited the Ryzen 9 7900X3D as it secured a much lesser power of 120W, while the i9-13900KS delivered the output at a power rating of 75W.
• The thermal capacity of the two processors was 6°C apart as the i9-13900KS ran hotter with a temperature of 64°C, while the 7900X3D ran at 58°C.

Also Read: i9 13900K Vs i9 13900KS

God Of War

• The benchmark put the i9-13900KS in the lead as the processor had a 6% more framerate recorded to be 255 FPS, whereas the Ryzen 9 7900X3D secured a framerate of 240 FPS on average.
• i9-13900KS also had 20 FPS higher %1 low framerate of 168 FPS. In competition, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D managed to bring 148 FPS forth.
• Speaking of the maximum FPS, the i9-13900 led with 285 FPS, followed by the 7900X3D’s 255 FPS.
• Both processors’ power consumption was 52% deviant, whereas the i9-13900KS consumed power at 129W. The Ryzen 9 7900X3D, on the other hand, finished 75W.
• Moreover, the thermal capacity inclined towards the i9-13900KS as the processor sat at 66°C. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D remained 4°C cooler and stayed behind the 62°C mark. 

Hogwarts Legacy

• Setting the average framerate mark at 86 FPS, the i9-13900KS again led the benchmark by 4 FPS. On the flip side, the 7900X3D followed with 82 FPS.
• Concurrently, the %1 low framerates favored i9-13900KS, too, as the processor delivered 79 FPS, compared with the 7900X3D’s 66 FPS, which was 13 FPS lesser.
• Maximum FPS was dedicated to the i9-13900KS as well. The processor bagged 97 FPS in comparison with the 7900X3D’s 85 FPS.
• The power consumption segment remained in i9-13900KS’s court because the processor had a power intake of 75W. In contrast, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D consumed 34% less power, i.e., 52W.
• The thermal capacity of the 7900X3D remained 3°C cooler than the i9-13900KS. The 7900X3D ran at 57°C. At the same time, the i9-13900KS ran at a temperature of 60°C.

Similar Read: i9 13900KS Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D

Horizon Zero Dawn

• The benchmark crowned the Ryzen 9 7900X with a barely more framerate of 259 FPS, while the i9-13900KS had an average framerate of 257 FPS.
• Simultaneously, the recorded %1 low for the i9-13900KS was 151 FPS, which was 19% lesser than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D’s %1 low of 183 FPS.
• Moreover, the i9-13900KS led the maximum FPS section with a reach of 266 FPS. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D followed with a maximum framerate of 261 FPS.
• Speaking of the power consumption, the i9-13900KS drained 26% more power as it consumed 115W throughout the benchmark. In contrast, the Ryzen 9 7900 took only 88W to complete.
• The thermal capacities were 4 degrees apart, whereas the i9-13900KS ran cooler at a thermal level of 60°C. The Ryzen 9 7900X3D ran at 64°C on the same benchmark.

Spiderman

• The average framerate of the i9-13900KS was recorded at 126 FPS, compared to the 7900X3D’s 119 FPS, which was 7 FPS lesser.
• Additively, the %1 low of the i9-13900KS was also 7 FPS more, i.e., 89 FPS. Concurrent to this, the 7900X3D delivered 82 FPS.
• Finally, the i9-13900KS provided 130 FPS max framerate, 5 FPS more than the 7900X3D’s 125 FPS.
• Power consumption analysis put i9-13900KS’s 125W in front of the 7900X3D’s power intake of 83W. The difference between the two parameters was recorded to be 40%.
• The thermal level of the i9-13900KS was 63°C, surpassing the temperature of the 7900X3D, which sat 4 degrees cooler at 59°C.

Also Read: i9-13900KF Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D

The Witcher 3

• Comparing the average framerates, the i9-13900KS led with an average of 89 FPS, while the 7900X3D followed with a 5 FPS lesser average framerate of 84 FPS.
• Simultaneously, the %1 low framerate delivered by the i9-13900KS was 63 FPS, whereas the 7900X3D gave out 5 FPS lesser %1 low framerate of 58 FPS.
• Moreover, the i9-13900KS peaked with a maximum of 101 FPS. Meanwhile, the 7900X3D lagged with a maximum framerate of 92 FPS.
• The i9-13900KS drained 46% more power than the 7900X3D, i.e., 108W. Meanwhile, the 7900X3D consumed only 67W.
• Finally, the thermal level of the i9-13900KS was 2 degrees higher as the processor attained a temperature of 58°C. The 7900X3D, on the other hand, ran at 56°C.

Counter Strike – Global Offensive

• Setting the average framerate mark at 845 FPS, the i9-13900KS again led the benchmark by 19%. On the flip side, the 7900X3D followed with 694 FPS.
• Concurrently, the %1 low framerates favored i9-13900KS, too, as the processor delivered 232 FPS, compared with the 7900X3D’s 194 FPS, which was 18% lesser.
• Maximum FPS was dedicated to the i9-13900KS as well. The processor bagged 852 FPS in comparison with the 7900X3D’s 702 FPS.
• The power consumption segment remained in i9-13900KS’s court because the processor had a power intake of 80W. In contrast, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D consumed 46% less power, i.e., 50W.
• The thermal capacity of the 7900X3D remained 1 degree cooler than the i9-13900KS. The 7900X3D ran at 54°C. At the same time, the i9-13900KS ran at a temperature of 55°C.

Cyberpunk 2077

• The benchmark put the i9-13900KS in the lead as the processor had a 3% more framerate recorded to be 142 FPS, whereas the Ryzen 9 7900X3D secured a framerate of 138 FPS on average.
• i9-13900KS also had 2 FPS higher 1% low framerate of 109 FPS. In competition, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D managed to bring 107 FPS forth.
• Speaking of the maximum FPS, the i9-13900 led with 149 FPS, followed by the 7900X3D’s 141 FPS.
• Both processors’ power consumption was 37% deviant, whereas the i9-13900KS consumed power at 135W. The Ryzen 9 7900X3D, on the other hand, finished 92W.
• Moreover, the thermal capacity inclined towards the i9-13900KS as the processor sat at 64°C. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D remained 2°C cooler and stayed behind the 62°C mark.

Microsoft Flight Simulator

• The i9-13900KS dominated with an aggregate 122 FPS while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D had a 4 FPS lesser average of 118 FPS.
• The %1 low was handed over to the Ryzen 9 7900X3D as the processor had a 4 FPS higher rate of 101 FPS, whereas the i9-13900KS had a %1 low framerate of 105 FPS.
• The maximum FPS of the i9-13900KS was recorded at 137 FPS, which was 17 FPS lesser than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D’s 120 FPS.
• The power consumed by the i9-13900KS was 89W, which was 48% more than the 7900X3D’s 54W.
• The i9-13900KS ran 1.6% hotter with a thermal capacity of 60°C, while the 7900X3D reached a temperature of 59°C.

Overall Gaming Performance

It is time to look at the overall gaming performance of the Core i9-13900KS vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D battle. 

• The overall gaming performance of the two processors shows that the i9-13900KS was slightly better than the Ryzen 7900X3D under 1080p resolution tests.
• The Intel i9-13900KS gained an average of 8.5% over the Ryzen 9 7900X3D throughout all 10 games.
• The maximum difference between the framerates arose during the CS GO benchmark (151 FPS).
• Whereas the minimum difference to appear between the processors’ framerates was during the Horizon Zero Dawn benchmark (2 FPS).

Overall Power Consumption

• The Ryzen 9 7900X3D took much less power as it drained 70W throughout the gaming benchmarks.
• On the other hand, the Intel i9-13900KS took about 107W during the benchmarks.
• Generally, the leading power intake was done by the Intel i9-13900KS, which took around 33% more power than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D.

Overall Thermal Capacity

• The Ryzen 9 7900X3D took a thermal intake of 59.1°C to deliver the results throughout all gaming benchmarks.
• The Intel i9-13900KS remained ahead as it took 61.4°C to deliver the above results during the benchmarks.
• The difference between the two processors was almost 2°C, with i9-13900KS being the hotter processor than the 7900X3D.

Price & Stock Alert

One of the many factors to consider when buying a new processor is the prices demanded for the product. Consumers are inclined to look for readily available products across all platforms. Fortunately, both the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the Intel Core i9-13900KS are available across all platforms for users.

Moreover, they are often restocked frequently to be open to consumers. However, the price tags on the processors vary across all the major tech platforms like Amazon and BestBuy. 

• The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D is available for a price between 462-500$.
• The Intel Core i9-13900KS is available for a price between 650-750$.

Core i9-13900KS Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: Which Processor To Opt For?

Concluding our article, we can indeed say that the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D and the Intel Core i9-13900KS have their tradeoffs in each domain considered. The consumer can choose their final option by considering the below factors:

Suppose the consumer is prone to the best graphics and wants a complete experience and maximum performance from their processor. In that case, they should go for the Intel i9-13900KS as it showed a distinct potential across all the benchmarks and more framerates than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D across the benchmarks.

If the consumer needs to cut back power or has a limited watt power supply, they should go for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D as the processor had a lot lesser power intake than the Intel core i9-13900KS in each benchmark that we observed.

However, if our consumer wishes to have an efficient thermal processor and needs a product that heats up less and requires more cooling solutions and thermal maintenance, then the 7900X3D is a clear choice. The processor ran significantly more relaxed than the Intel i9-13900KS across all the observed benchmarks.

Finally, if the consumer has a limited amount of cash in hand, they should go for the Ryzen 9 7900X3D. But the consumer will have to sacrifice a few FPS for this choice as the 7900X3D falls a few framerates short of the i9-13900KS in all the tested benchmarks above.

Pros And Cons