Turning our attention away from the i9-13900K vs i9-12900K comparison, we venture into a new battle of the processors, pitting the Core i9 13900KS vs Ryzen 9 7950X. We meticulously scrutinize the disparities in performance, unique features, and detailed specifications, shedding light on the distinctions between Intel and AMD’s offerings.
Key Takeaways
- First and foremost, the Ryzen 9 7950X stands out with its innovative Raphael architecture, while the Core i9 13900KS takes advantage of the advanced Raptor Lake architecture.
- Additionally, when it comes to gaming performance, the Core i9 13900KS excels with a significant 5.5% lead in FPS performance compared to the Ryzen 9 7950X.
- When it comes to power efficiency, the Ryzen 9 7950X takes the lead with a remarkable 6.6% reduction in power consumption compared to the Core i9 13900KS.
- Lastly, the Core i9 13900KS edges out the Ryzen 9 7950X in thermal efficiency, boasting a slight 10.7% advantage.
Comparison Table
CPU | Core i9 13900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Codename | Raptor Lake-S | Raphael |
Processing Node | Intel (10nm) | TSMC (5nm) |
Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket AM5 |
No. of Cores | 24 | 16 |
No. of Threads | 32 | 32 |
Frequency | 3.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
Turbo Clock | up to 6 GHz | up to 5.7 GHz |
L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
L3 Cache | 36MB (shared) | 64MB (shared) |
Memory Support | DDR4 Speed: 3200 MT/s DDR5 Speed: 5600 MT/sDual-channel |
DDR5-5200 MHz Dual-channel |
Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics |
Max Operating Temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
TDP | 150 W | 170 W |
PPT | 253 W | 230 W |
MSRP | $567 | $529 |
Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Best CPU Coolers | Best CPU Coolers For i9-13900KS | BEST CPU Coolers For Ryzen 9 7950x |
Best Motherboards | Best Motherboards For i9-13900KS | Best Motherboards for Ryzen 9 7950X |
Architectural Difference
- Process Node: Starting off, the Ryzen 9 7950X boasts a smaller 5nm TSMC process, while the Core i9 13900KS relies on a 10nm Intel process node.
- Frequency: Moreover, the Ryzen 9 7950X boasts a frequency of 4.5 GHz and a turbo clock of 5.7 GHz, while the Core i9 13900KS operates at a base clock of 3.2 GHz with a turbo clock that reaches up to 6 GHz, showcasing variations in processing speeds.
- TDP: Furthermore, the Core i9 13900KS features a TDP of 150W, whereas the Ryzen 9 7950X has a slightly higher TDP of 170W, indicating variations in thermal design power between the two processors.
Also Read: Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs i9-13900KS
Core i9 13900KS Vs Ryzen 9 7950X: Gaming Performance
Now that we have covered the technical aspects, it’s about time we pit the mighty Core i9 13900KS against the formidable Ryzen 9 7950X. With a wide array of modern, demanding games as our battleground, we embark on a thrilling exploration of frame rates, performance metrics, and the immersive gaming experiences these processors have to offer.
Testing Rig
Here are the specs of the testing rig:
- GPU: GeForce RTX 4090 24GB
- Motherboard: Gigabyte X670E AORUS MASTER, ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming
- Memory: G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz CL38
- CPU Cooler: be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
- Power Supply: CORSAIR HX Series HX1200 1200W
- Storage Drive: SAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB
- Operating System: Windows 10 Pro
Note: It’s important to remember that benchmark results should be interpreted cautiously, considering various factors influencing CPU performance. These factors include driver and game optimizations, GPU capabilities, and system configurations.
Get ready for a direct clash as we go head-to-head with the Core i9 13900KS and Ryzen 9 7950X in a thrilling array of gaming benchmarks.
Forza Horizon 5

- Starting off by boasting a lead of 6.6%, the Core i9-13900KS showcases its superiority with an average FPS of 325, surpassing the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 304 FPS.
- Moreover, showcasing its thermal superiority, the Core i9-13900KS maintains a temperature of 55°C, enjoying a 15.1% advantage over the Ryzen 9 7950X at 64°C.
- Furthermore, when it comes to its power efficiency, the Ryzen 9 7950X consumes only 97W, enjoying a 5.2% advantage over the Core i9-13900KS at 92W.
- In addition, in terms of 1% lows, the Core i9-13900KS delivers an impressive 244 FPS, surpassing the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 223 FPS by 8.9%.
Similar Processor Comparisons: Ryzen 7 7800X3D Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Cyberpunk 2077

- Firstly, with an impressive 11% advantage, the Core i9-13900KS takes the lead with an average FPS of 162, leaving the Ryzen 9 7950X behind at 145 FPS.
- Moreover, using a notable lead in thermal management, the Core i9-13900KS operates at 68°C, outperforming the Ryzen 9 7950X by 7°C.
- Furthermore, with a remarkable lead in power efficiency, the Ryzen 9 7950X consumes 118W, surpassing the Core i9-13900KS by 16.3% at 139W.
- In addition, when it comes to 1% lows, the Core i9-13900KS exhibits 128 FPS, outperforming the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 119 FPS by 7.2%.
Hitman 3

- To begin with, by demonstrating a slight edge, the Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the Core i9-13900KS by 2.7% with an average FPS of 254 compared to 247 FPS.
- Furthermore, enjoying a 7.7% advantage in thermal performance, the Core i9-13900KS maintains a temperature of 62°C, leaving the Ryzen 9 7950X behind at 67°C.
- In addition, going over power efficiency, the Ryzen 9 7950X consumes 106W, enjoying a 4.6% advantage over the Core i9-13900KS at 111W.
- Moreover, showcasing its prowess in 1% lows, the Ryzen 9 7950X showcases a performance of 175 FPS, enjoying a 6.6% advantage over the Core i9-13900KS’s 187 FPS.
Spider-Man Miles Morales

- Firstly, surging ahead with a significant lead of 10.6%, the Core i9-13900KS delivers an average FPS of 258, leaving the Ryzen 9 7950X in the dust at 232 FPS.
- Moreover, surpassing its counterpart, the Core i9-13900KS exhibits superior thermal management with a temperature of 71°C, enjoying a 5.4% lead over the Ryzen 9 7950X at 75°C.
- Furthermore, when it comes to power consumption, the Ryzen 9 7950X exhibits superior power efficiency with a consumption of 126W, enjoying an 18% lead over the Core i9-13900KS at 151W.
- In addition, while going over the 1% lows, the Core i9-13900KS delivers outstanding performance with 165 FPS, showcasing a 10.1% lead over the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 149 FPS.
Also Read: Ryzen 9 7950X3D Vs Intel i9-13900K
Player Unknown Battleground

- To begin with, by showcasing its dominance, the Core i9-13900KS maintains a lead of 3.4% with an average FPS of 409, surpassing the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 395 FPS.
- Furthermore, using an impressive lead of 22.9%, the Core i9-13900KS operates at a temperature of 54°C, outshining the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 68°C.
- Moreover, when it comes to power consumption, utilizing a lead of 8.4%, the Ryzen 9 7950X consumes 102W, outperforming the Core i9-13900KS at 111W.
- In addition, with a notable lead of 9%, the Core i9-13900KS exhibits exceptional performance in 1% lows with 276 FPS, surpassing the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 252 FPS.
A Plague Tale Requiem

- Starting off by showcasing a noticeable advantage of 4.6%, the Core i9-13900KS outshines the Ryzen 9 7950X, delivering an average FPS of 177 compared to 169 FPS.
- Furthermore, when it comes to thermal efficiency, the Core i9-13900KS maintains a temperature of 62°C, enjoying a 9.2% advantage over the Ryzen 9 7950X at 68°C.
- Moreover, while going over power consumption, the Core i9-13900KS consumes 100W, demonstrating its power efficiency, enjoying a 13% advantage over the Ryzen 9 7950X at 114W.
- In addition, demonstrating consistent performance, the Core i9-13900KS showcases 1% lows at 126 FPS, with a minimal difference of 0.7% compared to the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 127 FPS.
The Witcher 3

- Firstly, pulling ahead with a lead of 5.9%, the Core i9-13900KS impresses with an average FPS of 155, surpassing the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 146 FPS.
- Moreover, with a noticeable lead in thermal management, the Core i9-13900KS operates at 65°C, surpassing the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 71°C by 8.8%.
- In addition, showcasing similar power consumption, the Ryzen 9 7950X consumes 106W, with only a slight 0.9% difference compared to the Core i9-13900KS at 107W.
- Furthermore, when it comes to the performance in 1% lows, the Core i9-13900KS delivers 116 FPS, surpassing the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 99 FPS by an impressive 15.8%.
More From Ryzen 9 7950X: Intel i9-13900k Vs. Ryzen 9 7950X
Microsoft Flight Simulator

- Starting off, establishing a notable lead of 10.1%, the Core i9-13900KS delivers an average FPS of 114, outperforming the Ryzen 9 7950X at 103 FPS.
- Moreover, when it comes to thermal performance, the Core i9-13900KS operates at 56°C, enjoying an 11.7% advantage over the Ryzen 9 7950X at 63°C.
- In addition, surpassing its counterpart, the Ryzen 9 7950X showcases superior power efficiency, consuming 67W and enjoying a 7.1% lead over the Core i9-13900KS at 72W.
- Furthermore, with remarkable performance in 1% lows, the Core i9-13900KS exhibits 94 FPS, enjoying a 7.7% advantage over the Ryzen 9 7950X’s 87 FPS.
Overall Gaming Performance

In the realm of overall gaming performance of the Core i9 13900KS vs Ryzen 9 7950X battle, a clear victor emerges from the intense battle between the two CPUs, as evidenced by rigorous benchmark testing and meticulous analysis.
- Starting off, while both the Core i9 13900KS and Ryzen 9 7950X showcased impressive average FPS and 1% lows, determining a definitive winner becomes challenging due to their exceptional performance.
- However, in the battle for gaming supremacy, the Core i9 13900KS emerges victorious with an impressive average FPS of 230.8, surpassing the Ryzen 9 7950X’s respectable 218.5 FPS.
- After a thorough evaluation, it becomes evident that the Core i9 13900KS reigns supreme in terms of FPS performance, exhibiting a remarkable lead of 5.5% over the Ryzen 9 7950X.
Also Read: Ryzen 9 7950X Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
Average Power Consumption

Delving into their energy efficiency, our meticulous benchmark testing uncovers intriguing revelations surrounding power consumption patterns between the Core i9 13900KS and Ryzen 9 7950X CPUs.
- Firstly, to unleash the Ryzen 9 7950X’s true power, pairing it with a suitable power supply is essential. Given its TDP of 150W, opting for a high-quality power supply with a minimum wattage rating of 700W is recommended.
- On the other hand, the Core i9-13900KS boasts a slightly higher TDP of 170W, demanding a power supply with a recommended wattage of at least 800W to accommodate its power requirements.
- Moreover, delving into the power consumption aspect, the Core i9 13900KS exhibits a higher TDP compared to the Ryzen 9 7950X, resulting in a 12.5% increase in (Thermal Design Power) TDP.
- Furthermore, during extensive benchmark testing, it was evident that the Core i9-13900KS exhibited a higher power draw, averaging 111W, while the Ryzen 9 7950X maintained a relatively lower power draw of 103.8W.
- Finally, in terms of power efficiency, the Ryzen 9 7950X outshines the Core i9-13900KS, demonstrating a significant 6.6% higher power efficiency.
Average Thermal Statistics

Now, let’s shift our focus toward the realm of thermal performance. By analyzing temperature and assessing their heat dissipation capabilities, we can gain insights into the thermal efficiency of Core i9 13900KS and Ryzen 9 7950X.
- Embarking on a comprehensive thermal analysis, we found that the Ryzen 9 7950X demonstrates a marginally higher thermal output compared to the Core i9-13900KS.
- Moreover, during our rigorous thermal analysis, the Core i9-13900KS exhibited superior temperature management, maintaining an average of 61.6°C. In comparison, the Ryzen 9 7950X recorded a marginally higher average of 68.6°C.
- Additionally, in terms of thermal efficiency, the Core i9-13900KS demonstrated a notable advantage of 10.7% over the Ryzen 9 7950X, showcasing its ability to manage heat generation.
Pricing And Availability
When evaluating the Ryzen 9 7950X and Core i9 13900KS processors, it’s crucial to consider their pricing and availability. The Core i9 13900KS carries a higher price point of around 567 USD, while the Ryzen 9 7950X presents a more affordable option at approximately 529 USD, resulting in a 6.9% price difference.
Furthermore, availability can vary depending on factors such as production volumes and market demand. It’s advisable to check with reputable retailers and monitor pricing trends to make an informed decision based on individual budgets and requirements.
Ryzen 9 7950X Vs Core i9 13900KS: Which One To Buy?
- Regarding pricing, the Ryzen 9 7950X offers a more budget-friendly option with a 6.9% lower price than the Core i9 13900KS. However, this cost advantage has a trade-off as it delivers a 5.5% lower FPS performance.
- Additionally, regarding efficiency, the Ryzen 9 7950X demonstrates its superiority by consuming 6.6% less power than the Core i9 13900KS. But, it does come at the expense of a slightly higher average temperature of 10.7%.
- In the battle between the Core i9 13900KS and Ryzen 9 7950X, the former showcases superior benchmark performance and temperature management. However, the latter offers cost advantages and lower power consumption.
Also Read: Ryzen 7 7700X Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
Pros And Cons
CPU | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Core i9 13900KS |
|
|
Ryzen 9 7950X |
|
|
To assist you in making an informed decision between the Ryzen 9 7950X and Core i9 13900KS, we provide an array of alternatives for consideration. Visit our website, where you’ll find comprehensive reviews of two impressive CPUs: the Ryzen 5 7600X and the Ryzen 5 5600X.
Our team has diligently analyzed their performance and technical specifications across a range of gaming benchmarks. This enables you to gain valuable insights and choose the CPU that perfectly aligns with your gaming requirements and personal preferences. In any case, we hope our Core i9 13900KS vs Ryzen 9 7950X comparison was of help to you.
FAQs
The Ryzen 9 7950X consumes 6.6% less power compared to the Core i9 13900KS, resulting in higher power efficiency.
The Core i9 13900KS exhibits better thermal performance, operating at lower temperatures on average than the Ryzen 9 7950X.
The Core i9 13900KS is better suited for gaming due to its higher average FPS of 5.5% compared to the Ryzen 9 7950X.
Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋
How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔