GuidesComparisonsRyzen 9 5950X Vs Intel i9-10900K: Which Is Better?

Ryzen 9 5950X Vs Intel i9-10900K: Which Is Better?

Our Ryzen 9 5950X Vs. Core i9-10900K guide is here to help you choose the right processor for your next rig.

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X and Intel Core i9-10900K were two of the best processors of 2020. The most modern architecture, sockets, other specifications, and technologies were installed in both CPUs. Their performance in taxing applications and games is comparative. This guide aims to figure out the conqueror of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Vs. Core i9-10900K.


Major Differences Summarized 

  • The Ryzen 9 5950x has an advantage over the Core i9-10900K due to its 6 additional cores and 12 additional threads.
  • A shortcoming of the Ryzen 9 5950X is that it doesn’t have integrated graphics like the Core i9-10900K, which has Intel UHD Graphics 630.
  • Due to its higher TDP of 125 W, the Core i9-10900K draws around 20% more power than the Ryzen 9 5950X.
  • At 1080p, the Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Core i9-10900K by 2.65% and ran at a 3.9°C hotter operating temperature. However, the difference was not prominent in 1440p gaming.
  • The Core i9-10900K offers a higher performance per dollar and currently costs $380 to $420, ~$150 less than Ryzen 9 5950X, which costs above $500.

Ryzen 9 5950X Vs Core i9-10900K Comparison Table

Specifications

Feature Intel Core i9-10900K AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Architecture Comet Lake Zen 3
Former Codename Comet Lake Vermeer
Socket FCLGA1200 AM4 (LGA 1331)
Processor Technology for CPU Cores 14 nm FinFET 7 nm FinFET
Number of Cores 10 16
Number of Threads 20 32
Processor Base Clock 3.70 GHz 3.40 GHz
Processor Turbo Clock Up to 5.30 GHz Up to 4.90 GHz
Unlocked For Overclocking Yes Yes
Max TDP 125 W 105 W
Max Junction Temperature 100°C 90°C
Thermal Solution PCG 2015D Not Included
Integrated Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 630 NA
Memory DDR4-2933 DDR4-3200
Storage 128GB 128GB
Memory Execution Units 2 2
Max Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s 51.2 GB/s
Support ECC Memory No Yes
L1 Cache 640KB 1MB
L2 Cache 2.5MB 8MB
L3 Cache 20MB 64MB
PCIe Version 3.0 4.0
PCIe Lanes 16 20
Launch Price $488 $799
Best Motherboards Best Motherboards For i9-10900k Best Motherboards For Ryzen 9 5950x
Best Coolers  Best CPU Coolers For i9-10900k Best CPU Cooler For Ryzen 9 5950x

Cores And Threads

The main benefit of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is that it has 16 cores compared to the 10 cores of Intel i9-10900K. In the case of threads, the Ryzen 9 5950X appears with a greater number of 32 threads, while the Intel i9-10900K has only 20.

Also Read: Ryzen 9 7950X Vs Ryzen 9 5950X

The benefit of having more cores is that each core can manage a separate data thread concurrently, enabling a substantially faster stream of information at any fixed instant. The advantage of having more threads or cores is that a CPU can finish more activities simultaneously.

Hence, the performance of a CPU improves with an increased number of cores and threads. And AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has more cores and threads than the Intel i9-10900K.

Architecture

AMD released the Ryzen 9 5950X with its Zen 3 architecture, while Intel launched the Core i9-10900K with the Comet Lake architecture.

The 10th generation Intel Comet Lake architecture improved the predecessor Coffee Lake architecture. Comet Lake enhanced performance by adding new capabilities and instructions, especially integer and floating point calculations. Additionally, it supports Thunderbolt 3.0, PCIe 3.0, and faster memory. Because some of Intel’s Comet Lake CPUs have more cores, they can perform better than processors from earlier generations. The Raptor Lake architecture is currently Intel’s latest architecture that has boosted the effectiveness and performance to unprecedented levels.

The AMD Zen 3 architecture, constructed using a 7nm technology, promised considerable performance improvements over the predecessor Zen 2 architecture. The architecture also endured some big improvements, which could boost efficiency even more. Improvements in AMD Zen 3 include a revised cache hierarchy, enhanced branch prediction, and faster clock frequencies.

CPU Socket

The CPU sockets have a major role in data transportation and ventilation of the CPU. Intel launched the Core i9-10900K with an FCLGA1200 socket, while AMD released the Ryzen 9 5950X with its AM4 (LGA1331) socket.

The Intel FCLGA1200 socket was released in 2020 and is used by the 10th-generation Intel Core processors. This socket is compatible with the LGA 1151 socket and has 1200 connecting pins. It is incompatible with any other socket, and replaced the LGA 1151 socket. The socket has a maximum TDP of 125 watts and is compatible with DDR4-2933 memory.

The AMD AM4 socket is a land grid array (LGA) socket that’s still employed in AMD’s central processing units (CPUs) and accelerated processing units (APUs). AM4 was introduced with the debut of AMD’s Zen-based CPUs in September 2016. The socket contains 1331 connecting pins and has a 1.27 mm pin pitch.

A greater number of socket pins is always better for faster information transfer between the CPU and motherboard. Thus, the AM4 socket of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is better than the FCLGA1200 socket of Intel Core i9-10900K.

Clock Speed

The clock speed represents the operational speed per second. A person always wishes for faster accomplishments of tasks, and the CPU with higher clocks helps him save time.

In Ryzen 9 5950X vs. Core i9-10900K, both the base clock (3.7 GHz) and turbo clock (5.3 GHz) of Intel i9-10900K are higher than the 3.4 GHz base and 4.9 GHz turbo clock of Ryzen 9 5950X. Thus, according to clock speed, the Core i9-10900K can perform faster than its rival. Moreover, the Core i9-10900K has Turbo Boost Technology 2.0 and supports Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0.

Thermal Management

Intel Core i9-10900K can bear a maximum junction temperature of 100°C, while the maximum for AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is 90°C. Intel provides a PCG 2015D thermal solution with Core i9-10900K. However, AMD does not provide any thermal solution for Ryzen 9 5950X. The Core i9-10900K also has the thermal monitoring technologies of Intel, while AMD does not provide any thermal monitoring technology in Ryzen 9 5950X. You can read our guide on how to lower CPU temperatures in case you face any overheating issues.

Regarding thermal design power, the Core i9-10900K has a max TDP of 125 watts and a Configurable down TDP of 95 W. On the other hand, AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has a default TDP of 105 W. A greater TDP can help improve a CPU’s performance, but higher power consumption will increase the cost of electricity.

Memory

The supported memory version of the Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K is DDR4, and none supports the latest DDR5. The maximum memory speed of Ryzen 9 5950X (3200 MHz) is higher than the Intel Core i9-10900K (2933 MHz). However, the storage capacity of both CPUs is the same at 128GB, and both have two memory channels.

The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X supports the ECC Memory, while the Intel Core i9-10900K does not. ECC memory has the capability to identify and fix memory faults automatically. Thus, no ECC memory support is a negative punch of Core i9-10900K.

Regarding memory bandwidth, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X has a larger bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s compared to 45.8 GB/s of Core i9-10900K. Greater memory bandwidth makes processing and loading data easier for the CPU.

All three types of caches (L1, L2, L3) of the AMD RYzen 9 5950X are greater than those of the Intel i9-10900K. Larger caches can store more data, which means the processor will need to access memory less frequently. They can decrease the number of memory visits, and the time the processor must wait for data. So, they are more energy efficient than smaller caches.

Integrated Graphics

Regarding inbuilt graphics, the Core i9-10900K is superior because of its Intel UHD Graphics 630, while the Ryzen 9 5950X has no integrated graphics.

The Intel UHD Graphics 630 has a base frequency of 350 MHz, while its maximum dynamic frequency is 1.20 GHz. The video memory of graphics is 64GB and supports 4K videos at 60 Hz. It supports DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.5, Intel Quick Sync Video, InTru 3D Technology, Clear Video HD Technology, and Clear Video Technology.

Important Technologies

The advanced technologies of Core i9-10900K include

  • Intel Optane Memory
  • Intel Thermal Velocity Boost
  • Idle States
  • Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology
  • Intel Identity Protection Technology.

The advanced technologies of the Ryzen 9 5950X include

  • AMD Zen 3 Core Architecture
  • AMD StoreMI Technology
  • AMD Ryzen Master Utility
  • AMD Ryzen VR-Ready Premium

Productivity Benchmarks

To procure the productivity performance results of Ryzen 9 5950X vs. Core i9-10900K, let us discuss the performance of two CPUs in demanding applications and activities. We will also discuss the results of benchmarking softwares like Cinebench, Blender Opendata, Corona 1.3, etc. We have compiled the following benchmark results of two CPUs from HWBen and Jarrod’s Tech.

7-Zip

The 19.0 version of 7-Zip was used for the compression and decompression of data by Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K.

Performance of two CPUs in 7-Zip
Compression and Decompression rates of two CPUs

Stock

The data compression speed of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X was 130,921 MIPS at stock, while that of the Core i9-10900K was 83,409 MIPS. Calculations say that the Ryzen 9 5950X was ~57% faster in data compression than Core i9-10900K.

The data decompressing speed of Core i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 5950X was 110,429 MIPS and 208,199 MIPS, respectively. Thus, at stock, the Ryzen 9 5950X decompressed the data ~88.5% faster than Core i9-10900K.

Similar Guides: Best RAM for Ryzen 9 5950x

Overclocked

In overclocked CPUs, the performance and processing speed are always higher than those at stock. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 4.7GHz OC had a compression rate of 132,877 MIPS, and the compression rate of the Intel Core i9-10900K 5.2GHz OC was 85,840 MIPS. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X completed compression ~54.8% quicker than Core i9-10900K in overclocked condition for both CPUs.

The overclocked Ryzen 9 5950X performed decompression at a rate of 228,329 MIPS, and the decompressing speed of overclocked Intel Core i9-10900K was 116,109 MIPS. Thus, the data was decompressed by the Ryzen 9 5950X ~96.6% faster than the Core i9-10900K.

Adobe Software

Performance of two CPUs in Adobe Software
Performance scores of two CPUs in Adobe software

The performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (1085 scores) was ~32.2% better than the Core i9-10900K (821 scores) in Adobe Premium Pro 2022.

In Adobe Photoshop 2022, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (1229 scores) performance scores were ~24.4% greater than the Core i9-10900K (988 scores).

The effectiveness of the Ryzen 9 5950X (1085 scores) in Adobe After Effects 2022 was ~10.4% better than the Core i9-10900K (983 scores).

Chromium Code Compile

Performance of two CPUs in Chromium Code Compile
Code compilation time of two CPUs

Intel core i9-10900K consumed 4979 seconds in Chromium Code Compile, while the Ryzen 9 5950X took 3129 seconds. Thus, the efficiency of the Ryzen 9 5950X was ~59.1% greater than the Core i9-10900K.

Corona 1.3

It is a free application used to evaluate and compare the performance of CPUs.

Corona 1.3 Benchmarks
Corona 1.3 Benchmarks

Stock

The rendering time of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X was 48 seconds in Corona Benchmark 1.3 and 74 seconds for Intel Core i9-10900K. Thus, according to Corona Benchmark 1.3, the stock Ryzen 9 5950X is ~54.2% more efficient than the Intel Core i9-10900K.

Overclocked

The 4.7 GHz overclocked AMD Ryzen 9 5950X was rendered in 41 seconds. Whereas the 5.2 GHz OC Intel Core i9-10900K required 71 seconds. Thus, the overclocked AMD Ryzen 9 5950X is ~73% more efficient than the overclocked Intel Core i9-10900K, according to Corona Benchmark 1.3.

Cinebench R20

Cinebench R20 Benchmarks
Cinebench R20 Benchmarks

Stock

The single-core scores of the Ryzen 9 5950X are 638, and Intel Core i9-10900K has 544 scores. Thus, the single-core performance of the Ryzen 9 5950X is ~17.3% better than the Core i9-10900K, according to Cinebench R20.

In the multi-core performance test, the Core i9-10900K achieved 6356 scores, while the Ryzen 9 5950X got 9921 scores. Thus, the Cinebench R20 predicts that the multi-core performance of the Ryzen 9 5950X is ~56.1% finer than the Core i9-10900K.

Overclocked

The Ryzen 9 5950X was overclocked to 4.7 GHz, while the Core i9-10900K was overclocked to 5.2 GHz. In the single-core performance test of Cinebench R20, the Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K earned 608 and 540 scores, respectively. Hence, the stock Ryzen 9 5950X is ~12.6% superior to the Core i9-10900K.

The multi-core performance of the Ryzen 9 5950X vs. Core i9-10900K acquired 12152 and 6684 scores, respectively. Thus, the overclocked Ryzen 9 5950X can provide ~81.8% greater performance than the Core i9-10900K, according to the multi-core test of Cinebench R20.

Cinebench R23

Cinebench R23 Benchmarks
Cinebench R23 Benchmarks

The single-core performance test of Cinebench R23 states that the Ryzen 9 5950X can perform ~14.64% greater than the Core i9-10900K. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X got 1527 scores in the single-core test, while the Core i9-10900K had 1332 scores.

The Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K got 24071 and 16089 scores in the multi-core test. These Cinebench R23 results indicate that the multi-core performance of Ryzen 9 5950X is ~49.6% more profitable than the Core i9-10900K.

Handbrake

In this test, the two processors converted a 16-minute 13 seconds long 4K video at 30 FPS to a 1080p video using Handbrake 1.3.3.

Performance of two CPUs in Handbrake
Two CPUs take time in video conversion

Stock

The Intel Core i9-10900K converted the video in 613 seconds, while the AMD Ryzen completed the same process in 483 seconds. Thus, the Ryzen 9 5950X was ~27% more efficient than the Core i9-10900K in video concession in Handbrake 1.3.3.

Overclocked

The overclocked Ryzen 9 5950X converted the given video to the same format mentioned above in only 447 seconds, whereas the overclocked Core i9-10900K took 582 seconds this time. These figures suggest that the Ryzen 9 5950X is ~30.2% more efficient.

Also Check: Ryzen 7 5800X Vs Ryzen 7 5700G

Veracrypt

Performance of two CPUs in Veracrypt
Encryption and Decryption rates of two CPUs

Stock

The Core i9-10900K encrypted the data at 17.53 GB/s, while the Ryzen 9 5950X had an encryption rate of 16.74 GB/s. So, the stock Core i9-10900K encrypts the data ~4.7% quicker than the Ryzen 9 5950X.

Regarding the data decompression, the Ryzen 9 5950X was doing the task at 16.65 GB/s, and the Core i9-10900K was doing it at 17.68 GB/s. So, the stock Core i9-10900K is ~6.2% more efficient than the Core i9-10900K in decompression.

Overclocked

The encryption rate for the data was 17.49 GB/s for the Core i9-10900K and 15.24 GB/s for the Ryzen 9 5950X. Thus, the data is encrypted ~14.7% faster by the overclocked Core i9-10900K than the Ryzen 9 5950X.

Regarding data decompression, the Core i9-10900K operated at 17.53 GB/s while the Ryzen 9 5950X performed it at 15.13 GB/s. In decompression, the overclocked Core i9-10900K is ~15.9% more effective than the Core i9-10900K.

Gaming Benchmarks

The gaming performance of a processor is a crucial factor in determining which CPU has the best performance. We have discussed the gaming performance of the Ryzen 9 5950X vs. Core i9-10900K in two series, first for 1080p resolution and second for 1440p resolution.

1080p Series

The games played at 1080p resolution include Hitman 2, Kingdom Come Deliverance, Mafia Definitive Edition, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Project Cars, PUBG, and The Witcher 3. We collected the benchmarks of these games from Testing Games.

Gaming Rig

  • OS: Windows 10 Pro
  • GPU: MSI Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 10GB GDDR6X PCI Express 4.0
  • Motherboard 1 for Ryzen 9 5950X: ASUS AMD AM4 ROG X570 Crosshair VIII Hero ATX
  • Motherboard 1 for Core i9-10900K: MSI MPG Z490 GAMING PLUS LGA 1200 Intel Z490 SATA 6GB/s ATX
  • RAM: G.SKILL TridentZ RGB Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR4 3600 (PC4 28800)
  • SSD: Samsung 1TB 970 EVO PLUS NVMe SSD
  • PSU: Corsair RM850i 850W ATX
  • CPU Cooler: ZALMAN CNPS10X Performa 120mm

Hitman 2

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
Hitman 2 Benchmarks at 1080p
  • AMD Ryzen 9 5950X provided ~4.35% greater performance than the Core i9-10900K in CPU-intensive Hitman 2.
  • The Core i9-10900K performed to furnish an average of 161 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 5950X delivered a 168 FPS average performance.
  • The Ryzen 9 5950X (61°C) was operating at one degree higher temperature compared to the Core i9-10900K (60°C).
  • During gameplay, the CPU load on Core i9-10900K (54%) was 23% greater than the Core i9-10900K (31%).

Kingdom Come: Deliverance

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
Kingdom Come: Deliverance Benchmarks at 1080p
  • In the CPU-intensive Kingdom Come: Deliverance, AMD Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Core i9-10900K by 2.01 percent.
  • The Ryzen 9 5950X produced an average performance of 152 FPS compared to the Core i9-10900 K’s 149 FPS on average.
  • During the Kingdom Come: Deliverance working temperature of the Ryzen 9 5950X (57°C) was two degrees higher than the Core i9-10900K (55°C).
  • The CPU load on the Core i9-10900K (37%) was 15% higher during gameplay than the Core i9-10900K (22%).

Mafia Definitive Edition

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
Mafia Definitive Edition Benchmarks at 1080p
  • The Core i9-10900K outscored the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by 2 FPS or ~1.3% superior performance in the GPU-demanding Mafia Definitive Edition.
  • Compared to the Core i9-10900 K’s average of 156 FPS, the Ryzen 9 5950 could only make up an average of 154 FPS.
  • During Mafia Definitive Edition, the Ryzen 9 5950X’s operating temperature (60°C) was seven degrees higher than the Core i9-10900 K’s (53°C).
  • The Core i9-10900K had a CPU load of 32% during the game, while the load on the Ryzen 9 5950X was 18% of full load capacity.

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
Microsoft Flight Simulator Benchmarks at 1080p
  • In the GPU-intensive Microsoft Flight Simulator, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Core i9-10900K by 2 FPS.
  • The Ryzen 9 5950X could only produce an average of 110 FPS, equated to the Core i9-10900 K’s 108 FPS average.
  • When playing Microsoft Flight Simulator, the Ryzen 9 5950X ran at 56°C, five °C hotter than the Core i9-10900K (51°C).
  • During the gameplay, the Core i9-10900 K’s CPU load was 26%, while the Ryzen 9 5950X’s load was only 12% of its maximum.

Similar Comparisons: Intel i9-13900k Vs Ryzen 9 7900X

Project Cars

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
Project Cars Benchmarks at 1080p
  • AMD Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Core i9-10900K in the CPU-intensive Project Cars by ~5.8%.
  • The Ryzen 9 5950X delivered an average performance of 146 FPS compared to the Core i9-10900 K’s 138 FPS.
  • During Project Cars, the Ryzen 9 5950X and the Core i9-10900K had the same operating temperature of 60°C.
  • The Core i9-10900K had a 24% CPU load during gameplay, compared to a 7% load on the Ryzen 9 5950X.

PUBG

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
PUBG Benchmarks at 1080p
  • AMD Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Core i9-10900K by 3 FPS greater average in the CPU-demanding PUBG.
  • The Ryzen 9 5950X produced an average frame rate of 211 FPS compared to the Core i9-10900 K’s 208 FPS average.
  • Compared to the Core i9-10900K (51°C), the Ryzen 9 5950X (57°C) operated at seven degrees higher.
  • During gameplay, the CPU load on the Core i9-10900K (23%) was 15% higher than the Core i9-10900K (8%).

The Witcher 3

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt Benchmarks at 1080p
  • In the GPU-intensive The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, AMD Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Core i9-10900K by ~4.15%.
  • The Ryzen 9 5950X yielded an average of 227 FPS compared to the Core i9-10900 K’s 218 FPS.
  • The Ryzen 9 5950X performed at 60°C, six °C hotter than the Core i9-10900 K’s 54°C operating temperature.
  • During gameplay, the Core i9-10900 K’s CPU load (34%) was 16% higher than the Ryzen 9 5950X’s 18% load.

1440p Series

The games played in the 1440p series of Ryzen 9 5950X vs. Core i9-10900K include Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, Cyberpunk 2077, Horizon Zero Dawn, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Watch Dogs Legion. We compiled the 1440p games’ benchmarks from Mike Benchmark.

Gaming Rig

  • GPU: MSI Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 LHR 12GB GDRR6X 384-Bit
  • Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK Gaming Motherboard
  • RAM: G.SKILL F4-3600C16Q-32GTZR 32 GB (8 GB x 4) Trident Z RGB Series
  • SSD: SAMSUNG 970 EVO Plus SSD 1TB NVMe M.2 Internal SSD
  • CPU Cooler: Lian Li GALAHAD AIO 360 RGB UNI FAN SL120 EDITION WHITE
  • PSU: Cooler Master V850 SFX Gold Full Modular, 850W, 80+ Gold Efficiency, ATX Bracket Included

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Benchmarks at 1440p
  • In highly GPU-intensive Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the Intel Core i9-10900K outperformed the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X by 12.2%.
  • Compared to the Core i9-10900 K’s performance of 83 FPS average, the Ryzen 9 5950X offered a lower average of 74 FPS.
  • The Core i9-10900K had an operating temperature of 58°C, while the Ryzen 9 5950X was working at 59 °C.
  • During the gameplay, the Core i9-10900K experienced a 21% CPU load, while the Ryzen 9 5950X had an 18% CPU load of its full capacity.

Cyberpunk 2077

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
Cyberpunk 2077 Benchmarks at 1440p
  • The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X was surpassed by the Intel Core i9-10900K by 2 FPS in CPU-demanding Cyberpunk 2077.
  • The Ryzen 9 5950X offered an average of 85 FPS compared to the Core i9-10900 K’s average frame rate of 87 FPS.
  • During the gameplay, the Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K were operating at a temperature of 65°C.
  • The Core i9-10900K experienced a 34% CPU load in Cyberpunk 2077, while the Ryzen 9 5950X experienced a 33% CPU load.

Horizon Zero Dawn

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
Horizon Zero Dawn Benchmarks at 1440p
  • In the GPU-intensive Horizon Zero Dawn, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Intel Core i9-10900K by three frames per second.
  • During the gameplay, the Core i9-10900 K’s average frame rate was 132 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 5950X delivered an average of 135 FPS.
  • The Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K ran at 60 °C during the gameplay.
  • Horizon Zero Dawn put a 43% CPU load on the Core i9-10900K and a 47% CPU load on the Ryzen 9 5950X.

Also Read: Ryzen 5 7600x vs Ryzen 5 5600x

Red Dead Redemption 2

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
Red Dead Redemption 2 Benchmarks at 1440p
  • The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X made a superb lead of 7 FPS or ~7% greater performance than the Core i9-10900K in the highly GPU-taxing RDR 2.
  • The Ryzen 9 5950X produced an average frame rate of 108 FPS, whereas the Core i9-10900K averaged 101 FPS.
  • During the gameplay, the Core i9-10900K was performing at 52°C, and the Ryzen 9 5950X was operating at 53°C.
  • The CPU load in RDR 2 was 15% for the Core i9-10900K and 16% for the Ryzen 9 5950X.

Watch Dogs Legion

Gaming performance of Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K
Watch Dogs Legion Benchmarks at 1440p
  • In GPU-intensive Watch Dogs Legion, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Core i9-10900K by 4 FPS, or by ~4.7%.
  • The Core i9-10900K produced an average frame rate of 86 FPS compared to the Ryzen 9 5950X’s 90 FPS.
  • During the gameplay, the Core i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 5950X executed at 59°C and 58°C, respectively.
  • In Watch Dogs Legion, the Core i9-10900K encountered a 35% CPU load, while the Ryzen 9 5950X faced a 40% CPU load.

Overall Gaming Analysis

Let’s take a look at the overall gaming performance. 

Performance

At 1080p

Overall gaming performance during 1080p gaming
Average, Low 1%, and Low 0.1 FPS supplied by two CPUs during 1080p gaming.

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X furnished a brilliant performance of 166.9 overall FPS during the 1080p games, while the Intel Core i9-10900K could muster up an average of 162.6 FPS. So, the Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Intel Core i9-10900K by 4.3 FPS or ~2.65%. The Intel Core i9-10900K performed better than the Ryzen 9 5950X in only Mafia Definitive Edition during the 1080p series.

If we talk about Low 1% FPS during the games, the Core i9-10900K delivered a Low 1% average of 111.9 FPS, while the Ryzen 9 5950X made an average of 114.7 as its Low 1% FPS. So, the Ryzen 9 5950X performed ~2.5% better than the Core i9-10900K. However, the Low 1% FPS of Core i9-10900K was greater than the Ryzen 9 5950X in Kingdom Come Deliverance, Mafia Definitive Edition, PUBG, and The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.

Considering the Low 0.1 FPS, the Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Core i9-10900K by 7.7 FPS or ~10.2%. The average Low 1% FPS of Core i9-10900K and the Ryzen 9 5950X were 75.7 and 83.4 FPS, respectively. The Low 1% FPS supplied by the Core i9-10900K was greater than the Ryzen 9 5950X in Kingdom Come Deliverance and PUBG.

At 1440p

Overall gaming performance during 1440p gaming
Average, Maximum, and Minimum FPS supplied by two CPUs during 1440p gaming.

The overall performance difference between Ryzen 9 5950X vs. Core i9-10900K was negligible during 1440p games. A 0.6 FPS overall lead was made by the Ryzen 9 5950X. The average frame rate offered by the Core i9-10900K was greater than the Ryzen 9 5950X in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla and Cyberpunk 2077 while gaming at 1440p resolution.

Regarding the maximum CPU performance, the Intel Core i9-10900K delivered an overall max of 164.8 FPS, while the maximum FPS average of the Ryzen 9 5950X was 162.8 FPS. Hence, the Ryzen 9 5950X outperformed the Core i9-10900K by 2 FPS at its peak performance.

While both CPUs were operating at their minimum performance, the Ryzen 9 5950X led the Core i9-10900K with 17.2 FPS or ~75% greater performance. The minimum FPS provided by the Core i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 5950X were Cyberpunk 2077 and Horizon Zero Dawn.

Thermal Efficiency

At 1080p

Overall Temperature of two CPUs during 1080p gaming
Overall Temperature of two CPUs during 1080p gaming

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X had an average 3.9°C higher operating temperature than the Core i9-10900K while playing games at 1080p resolution. The average gaming temperature of the Core i9-10900K was 54.8°C, while the Ryzen 9 5950X had an average of 58.7 degrees. The operating tempering temperature of these two CPUs was the same in Project Cars.

Also Check: Ryzen 7 5800X3D Vs Ryzen 7 7700X

Now let us compare the 1080p gaming temperature of Ryzen 9 5950X vs. Core i9-10900K with their maximum junction temperatures. The Ryzen 9 5950X was 31.3 degrees below its max temperature (90°C), while the Core i9-10900K was 45.2 degrees below its max temperature (100°C). In light of these statistics, we can say that the Core i9-10900K is more thermally efficient.

At 1440p

Overall Temperature of two CPUs during 1440p gaming
Overall Temperature of two CPUs during 1440p gaming

The Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K operating temperatures were not significantly different throughout the 1440p gaming series. The Ryzen 9 5950X was at 0.2 degrees overall higher temperature than the Core i9-10900K.

During Cyberpunk 2077 and Horizon Zero Dawn, both CPUs had the same working temperature. However, the operating temperature of the Core i9-10900K was even one degree higher than Ryzen 9 5950X in Watch Dogs Legion. This implies that during 1440p games, both CPUs experienced similar thermal conditions.

Price And Availability

The Ryzen 9 5950X was launched by AMD with a price tag of $799, while Intel released the Core i9-10900K with a price of $488. The Ryzen 9 5950X was much more expensive than the Intel Core i9-10900K at the start. However, the price of the Ryzen 9 5950X has greatly reduced in the past two years. Nowadays, the Ryzen 9 5950X is available for $490 to $550, and the Intel Core i9-10900K can be bought on a budget of $380 to $420.

Regarding accessibility, both CPUs, the top models of their eras, are still widely available in marketplaces. You can also order them from sites like Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, etc.

Which One Should You Go For?

Before making a recommendation, It would be sage to revise the specifications and performance of the Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K. They are two of the most powerful CPUs of 2020. The Ryzen 9 5950X has an advantage of 6 additional cores and 12 CPU threads over the Core i9-10900K. The turbo clock frequency of the Core i9-10900K is up to 5.3 GHz, which is higher than the max of the Ryzen 9 5950X (up to 4.9 GHz).

Compared to Ryzen 9 5950X, the Core i9-10900K has higher values of max temperature and TDP. Moreover, the Core i9-10900K provides a thermal solution, while the Ryzen 9 5950X does not.

Regarding memory, both CPUs support DDR4, but the memory speed and bandwidth of Ryzen 9 5950X are higher. And the Intel Core i9-10900K does not support ECC memory, while the Ryzen 9 5950X does.

The Ryzen 9 5950X’s lack of integrated graphics compared to the Core i9-10900 K’s Intel UHD Graphics 630 is a drawback.

In productivity tests, the Ryzen 9 5950x was better in all tests except data encryption and decryption.

There was a notable difference in gaming performance and thermal efficiency at 1080p gaming resolution. The Ryzen 9 5950X led the Core i9-10900K by 2.65% performance and had a 3.9°C higher operating temperature than the Core i9-10900K. However, both these differences were not significant at 1440p.

Given all the factors, we advise you to go for the Intel Core i9-10900K because it offers greater value for the money. Because the Core i9-10900K performs well enough for gaming and productivity, you should choose this CPU and save roughly $150. However, if your budget is unlimited, you should choose the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X because of its greater specs and performance.

FAQs

Which CPU has more cores and threads, Ryzen 9 5950X or Core i9-10900K?

The Ryzen 9 5950X has more cores and threads. The Ryzen 9 5950X has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i9-10900K offers 10 cores and 20 threads.

Do Ryzen 9 5950X and Core i9-10900K have integrated graphics?

The Core i9-10900K has integrated graphics, Intel UHD Graphics 630. However, AMD does not provide in-built graphics with Ryzen 9 5950X.

Which CPU provides better gaming performance, Ryzen 9 5950X or Core i9-10900K?

The Ryzen 9 5950X delivers a ~2.65% superior gaming performance than the Core i9-10900K.

Which CPU offers greater bang for the buck, Ryzen 9 5950X or Core i9-10900K?

The Core i9-10900K is more cost-effective than the Ryzen 9 5950X when all the factors are considered, including integrated graphics and overall performance differences in apps and games.


Related Articles:

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

Intel i7-12700k vs Ryzen 7 5800x: Which Is Better?

We compare Intel's i7 12700K vs AMD's Ryzen 7 5800x in various aspects to help you choose your next mid-to-high range CPU.

i9-13900K Vs i9-12900K: Which Is Better In 2023?

In this guide, we will cover all the topics related to Core i9-13900K vs Core i9-12900K, including their gaming benchmarks.

Core i5-12600k Vs Ryzen 7 5800x: Gaming & Productivity [2023]

We put Team Blue against Team Read in the form of the i5-12600K vs Ryzen 7 5800x comparing Gaming Benchmarks, Productivity, and other factors.

Ryzen 5 7600x vs Ryzen 5 5600x [Gaming & Productivity]

To help you make the right decision, we have decided to do a Ryzen 5 7600x vs Ryzen 5 5600x comparison to see which one is better.

The BEST Motherboards For Ryzen 9 5950x In 2023

Here are the Best Motherboard For Ryzen 9 5950x; narrowed by Budget, Overclocking, Performance, B550, X570, and Comparisons In 2023.

Similar Guides

Ali
Ali
What started out as a love for PC gaming turned into an enthusiasm for PC tech and hardware. Ali is a high school graduate who aspires to be a dentist. On the side, Ali likes to keep up with the latest in PC tech, and write about it.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here