RX 7600 Vs ARC A750 [Gaming & Overall Comparison]

See full bio

Abde Manaf

At Tech4Gamers, I began as a comparison writer, analyzing GPU and CPU performance. Now, I focus on writing reviews and contributing to the best-ofs section, sharing personal insights after hands-on testing.

See full bio

Pros And Cons

Comparison Table

Architectural Difference

• Process Node: Firstly, regarding process size, both the Radeon RX 7600 and Arc A750 share the common ground of being built on a 6nm manufacturing process.
• Clock Speed: The RX 7600 exhibits a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz, while the Arc A750 has a base clock of 2050 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz.
• VRAM: Furthermore, the RX 7600 and Arc A750 offer the same capacity of 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, providing ample memory for handling demanding tasks.
• TDP: Additionally, Regarding TDP, the RX 7600 demonstrates a lower power consumption of 165W, while the Arc A750 requires a slightly higher power input of 225W.
• Supported Technologies: Lastly, the Arc A750 employs Intel’s XeSS technology, providing advanced upscaling capabilities, while the RX 7600 utilizes AMD’s FSR technology to achieve similar results.

The Radeon RX 7600 is a new AMD with the latest architecture and new technologies and is a base variant of the RX 7000 series, so the cost is low. In contrast, the Arc A750 is Intel’s economic GPU from late 2022. In this comparison of RX 7600 vs ARC A750, we will analyze the specifications and performance of these GPUs.

Gaming Benchmarks

Now, let’s discuss the in-game performance to unravel the true potential of the Arc A750 and RX 7600. Through careful analysis and extensive benchmarking, we’ll explore their gaming prowess and determine which card reigns supreme.

Testing Rig

• CPU: Intel Core i7-13700K
• Motherboards: ASRock B650E PG-ITX WIFI Motherboard
• RAM: XPG Lancer RGB 32GB 7200MHz DDR5 Ram
• SSD: Teamgroup T-Force Z540 2TB Gen5 NVMe SSD
• CPU Cooler: Deepcool Assassin II CPU Cooler

Forza Horizon 5

• Starting off our benchmarks with Forza Horizon 5, the RX 7600 demonstrates its superiority with an average FPS of 133, surpassing the Arc A750’s 97 FPS by a substantial 31.3%.
• Furthermore, in terms of 1% low performance, the RX 7600 boasts an impressive lead with 115 FPS, surpassing the ARC A750’s performance of 86 FPS by 28.8%.

Grand Theft Auto V

• In GTA V, the RX 7600 impresses with 141 FPS, leaving the Arc A750 behind at 95 FPS, resulting in a remarkable 38.9% difference.
• In addition, the RX 7600 showcases exceptional 1% low performance with 107 FPS, outperforming the ARC A750’s 68 FPS by a substantial 44.5%.

Cyberpunk 2077

• When comparing the average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077, we noticed that the RX 7600 had a solid performance of 88 FPS, outshining the Arc A750’s 74 FPS by a notable 17.2%.
• Coming to 1% low performance, the ARC A750 achieves 52 FPS, while the RX 7600 demonstrates superior performance with 63 FPS, resulting in a notable difference of 19.1%.

The Witcher 3 Next-Gen

• In The Witcher 3 Next-Gen, we noted that the Arc A750 records an average FPS of 113, while the RX 7600 follows closely with 116 FPS, resulting in a minor 2.6% disparity.
• Additionally, the ARC A750 achieves 83 FPS in 1% low performance, while the RX 7600 follows closely at 78 FPS, resulting in a marginal difference of 6.2%.

Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered

• During Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered, the RX 7600 showcases its capabilities with a respectable 111 FPS, surpassing the Arc A750’s performance of 96 FPS by 14.4%.
• Concerning 1% low performance, the ARC A750 achieves 56 FPS, while the RX 7600 demonstrates stronger performance with 65 FPS, resulting in a difference of 14.8%.

Hogwarts Legacy

• In Hogwarts Legacy, the Arc A750 falls behind with an average FPS of 83, whereas the RX 7600 delivers a commendable 112 FPS, establishing a significant 29.7% difference.
• Coming to 1% low performance, the ARC A750 achieves 46 FPS, while the RX 7600 outperforms with 59 FPS, showcasing a notable difference of 24.7%.

Mafia Definitive Edition

• The Arc A750 achieves an average FPS of 82, while the RX 7600 shines with a remarkable 130 FPS, resulting in an impressive 45.2% lead.
• Similarly, the ARC A750 achieves 49 FPS at 1% low performance, while the RX 7600 demonstrates superior performance with 81 FPS, resulting in a difference of 49.2%.

Red Dead Redemption 2

• In RDR 2, we saw the Arc A750 lag behind with an average FPS of 64, whereas the RX 7600 excels with a notable 106 FPS, showcasing a significant 49.4% difference.
• The ARC A750 achieves 57 FPS in 1% low performance, while the RX 7600 showcases stronger performance with 77 FPS, resulting in a notable difference of 29.8%.

Cyberpunk 2077 (Ray Tracing)

• During Cyberpunk 2077 with ray tracing, the Arc A750 achieves 55 FPS, while the RX 7600 shows a slightly better performance of 59 FPS, making a 7% lead.
• In the 1% lows performance test, the ARC A750 achieves 42 FPS, while the RX 7600 follows closely with 46 FPS, resulting in a difference of 9%.

Minecraft

• In our last Minecraft session, the Arc A750 delivered an average of 55 FPS, whereas the RX 7600 produced a lower 33 FPS, showing a significant 50% performance difference.
• The Arc A750 achieved 41 FPS in 1% low performance, while the RX 7600 showcases a lower performance with 27 FPS.

Overall Gaming Performance

In our gaming benchmarks for comparing the RX 7600 vs ARC A750, the RX 7600 truly shines, surpassing the Arc A750 with a remarkable average of 102.9 FPS. In comparison, the Arc A750 falls behind due to its average of 81.4 FPS. Thus, it is evident that the RX 7600 surpasses the Arc A750 in terms of gaming performance with a remarkable 26.4% lead.

Winner: AMD Radeon RX 7600

Power Consumption

During our gaming session, the Arc A750 demonstrated a slightly lower average power consumption of 155W, while the RX 7600 drew a bit higher power of 158.2W on average. Considering these results, we find that the Arc A750 is slightly more power efficient, using about 2.1% less power on average than the RX 7600.

Winner: Intel Arc A750

Thermal Efficiency

When considering the average thermal statistics from our benchmarks, the Arc A750 outshines the RX 7600 in temperature control, maintaining a cooler average temperature at 66.3°C compared to the RX 7600’s 68.1°C. Thus, the Arc A750 emerges as the victor in terms of thermal efficiency, exhibiting a notable 2.6% lead over the RX 7600.

Winner: Intel Arc A750

Pricing And Availability

The RX 7600 is still selling at its launch price because of high demand, its newness, and its value for lower budgets. In contrast, the Arc A750’s price has fallen about $80 or 28.6% after its launch. Regarding availability, these GPUs are easily available at various online stores.

Final Verdict: What Do We Recommend?

AMD Radeon RX 7600: The RX 7800 XT offers excellent gaming performance at 1080p, with AMD’s latest RDNA 3.0 architecture and FSR technology. It’s also power-efficient, reducing running costs.

Intel Arc A750: The Arc A750 is a cheaper Intel graphics card with an impressive 256-bit 8GB GDDR6 memory. It is powerful and efficient at managing heat.

Finally, if you want superior performance for a better gaming experience, the RX 7600 should be your first choice. However, if you want to go for a cheaper option, the Arc A750 is also a good option for 1080p gaming.

More From Radeon RX 7600:

• RTX 4060 Ti Vs RX 7600
• RX 7600 Vs ARC A770
• RX 7900 GRE Vs RX 7600

More From Arc A750:

• ARC A750 Vs RTX 2060 Super
• ARC A750 Vs RTX 3050
• ARC A750 Vs RTX 3060

Abde Manaf

[Comparisons Expert]

Abdemanaf is a skilled creative writer who has been honing his craft since 2011. While initially working in different fields, he found a passion for technology and has been exploring the tech world since early 2015. Over the years, he has developed an in-depth knowledge of the latest tech trends and product offerings by various companies.

Abdemanaf’s writing reflects his analytical mindset and ability to think critically. He has a knack for breaking down complex technical information into easily digestible pieces, making his articles engaging and accessible to readers from all backgrounds. In February 2022, he joined Tech4Gamers as a blog and product comparison writer, where he has been able to hone his skills further.

As a writer, Abdemanaf is dedicated to staying up-to-date with the latest technological advancements and trends, enabling him to provide readers with the most relevant and accurate information. He is always eager to learn more and is constantly seeking new challenges to improve his skills.

Get In Touch: manaf@tech4gamers.com