GuidesComparisonsRTX 4060 Vs Arc A770: Which Is Better?

RTX 4060 Vs Arc A770: Which Is Better?

This comparison will focus on the maximum potential the RTX 4060 and the Arc A770 can reach, and the delta between the two by measuring their performance in several games. We will also discuss their difference in architecture.

In this comparison, we will compare the RTX 4060 to the Intel Arc A770 to see if the scrappy underdog can defeat the greedy monolith that is Nvidia. We will go over their specs, differences, and see how well they perform in gaming benchmarks. 

Key Takeaways

  • The RTX 4060 was about 14% faster on average than the Arc A770 in our gaming tests.
  • The Arc A770 drew about 40% more power than the RTX 4060 on average in our gaming tests.
  • The Arc A770 ran about 10% hotter than the RTX 4060 in our 1440p gaming tests.

RTX 4060 Vs Arc A770: Comparison Table

Technical Specs Intel Arc A770 Nvidia RTX 4060
GPU DG2-512 AD107
Architecture Generation 12.7 Ada Lovelace
Process Size 6nm 5nm
Transistors 21,700 million
Base Clock 2100 MHz 1830MHz
Boost Clock 2400 MHz 2460MHz
CUDA Cores 4096 3072
Compute Units 512 96
RT Cores 32 24
TMUs 160 96
ROPs 128 32
Memory Size 16GB 8GB
Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Bus 256-bit 128-bit
Memory Speed 512.0 GB/s 272.0 GB/s
L2 Cache 16MB 24MB
TDP 225W 115W
MSRP $329 $299
Best Variants Best RTX 4060

Architectural Differences

  1. Process Size: The Intel Arc A770 is based on a 6nm process size, while the Nvidia RTX 4060 utilizes a more advanced 5nm process size, helping it be more power efficient. 
  2. Clock Speeds: The base clock of the Intel Arc A770 is 2100MHz, with a boost clock of 2400MHz. The Nvidia RTX 4060 has a base clock of 1830MHz and a boost clock of 2460MHz. The lower base clock of the RTX 4060 allows it to use any power or generate heat when idle barely.
  3. VRAM: The Intel Arc A770 features 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM. The Nvidia RTX 4060 has 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, which may impact its performance in modern memory-intensive games.
  4. Bus Width: The Intel Arc A770 has a wide 256-bit memory bus. On the other hand, the Nvidia RTX 4060 has a narrower 128-bit bus width, which is borderline unacceptable for a modern card.
  5. TDP: The Intel Arc A770 has a TDP of 225W. In comparison, the Nvidia RTX 4060 has a significantly lower TDP of 115W, which reflects that it is more suited to server workloads.
  6. Other Features: Both the RTX and Arc card have RT cores, though they are much more mature on the RTX 4060. The Upscaling implementation is also more impressive on the 4060, using frame generation technology in the latest DLSS 3.

Arc A770 Vs RTX 4060: Gaming Benchmarks 

Now that we’ve examined the core specifications of each card, in this section, where we compare the RTX 4060 vs Arc A770, we will look at the performance of these cards in realistic gaming scenarios.

These tests are designed to maximize the capabilities of each graphics card and evaluate their performance in handling graphics bottlenecks. The tests were conducted at the resolution of 1440p on a suitable test bench. Below are the specifications of the test bench:

Hogwarts Legacy (RT On, DLSS 3/XeSS Q)

Hogwarts Legacy Performance
Hogwarts Legacy @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • In the first game of our benchmark tests, the RTX 4060 got 69 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 got around 45 FPS. Do note that the higher result of the RTX 4060 is due to the frame generation technology we left on.
  • 1% lows were also unpleasant on the Intel card. The RTX 4060 had 1% lows of about 54 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had lows of about 37 FPS
  • Despite Intel’s lower performance, it was less power efficient than the RTX 4060. The Arc A770 had a power draw of about 216 watts, whereas the RTX 4060 had a power draw closer to 118 watts
  • The Intel card’s higher power draw also made it warmer. It had a peak temperature of about 76°C, whereas the RTX 4060 had a lower peak temperature of 68°C.

Also Read: RTX 4060 Vs RX 7600

Star Wars Jedi Survivor (RT On, FSR Q)

Star Wars Jedi Survivor Performance
Star Wars Jedi Survivor @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • Being a less optimized game, Star Wars Jedi Survivor did not run great on either card. The RTX 4060 had a barely playable average framerate of 52 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had an average of 37 FPS.
  • Fortunately, the 1% lows of both cards did not dip much more than the average framerates, reducing stutters. The Arc A770 had 1% lows of about 32 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 had higher 1% lows of about 43 FPS.
  • Power consumption was once again greater on the Arc GPU, though this game’s difference was not as drastic. The Arc A770 managed to get by with 188 watts, whereas the RTX 4060 had a peak power draw of about 117 watts.
  • Temperatures did not improve in this title. The RTX 4060 had a peak temperature of 66°C, whereas the Arc A770 was much hotter at around 75°C.

Also Read: ARC A750 Vs RTX 3060 

Atomic Heart (Native)

Atomic Heat Performance
Atomic Heat @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • This controversial game ran similarly on both cards. The Arc A770 managed to get 61 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 still eked out a victory with 66 FPS. This shows that with the Arc A770 can keep up with the Nvidia card, and it just needs some more tweaking with the drivers and software.
  • The 1% lows were also acceptable for this game. The RTX 4060 had lows of 54 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had 58 FPS as its lows.
  • Though the framerate was more or less equalized in this game, the power consumption was still much improved on the RTX 4060. The Arc 770 consumed about 190 watts, whereas the RTX 4060 was more power efficient, with a peak power consumption of just 115 watts.
  • Temperatures still remained different on both cards in Atomic Heart. The RTX 4060 had a temperature of 66°C, whereas the Arc A770 had a temperature closer to 72°C.

Also Read: ARC A770 Vs RX 6600 XT

Dying Light 2 (Native)

Dying Light 2 Performance
Dying Light 2 @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • Continuing the wins for the Arc A770, Dying Light 2 managed to run better on the Intel card. It had an average framerate of about 68 FPS on the A770, whereas the RTX 4060 managed to get about 59 FPS. Note that this test was not making use of any upscaling technologies or ray tracing.
  • 1% lows were closer between the two cards compared to the average FPS. The Arc A770 had lows of about 50 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 had lows closer to 48 FPS.
  • The story with power consumption remained largely unchanged, though the Arc did seem to consume a bit more power to beat the 4060. It had a peak power draw of about 200 watts, whereas the RTX 4060 had a power draw of 114 watts.
  • The RTX 4060 had a peak temperature of about 70°C, whereas the RTX 4060 had a peak temperature of 66°C.

Also Check: RTX 4060 Vs RTX 3070 Ti

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 (DLSS 3/FSR Q)

Microsoft Flight Simulator Performance
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • The winning streak of the Arc A770 ended when we booted up Flight Sim 2020 on both cards. The RTX 4060 managed to get 74 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 got 61 FPS. 
  • 1% lows were closer between the two cards than their average framerate. The RTX 4060 had 1% lows of 55 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had lows closer to 51 FPS.
  • Power continued to show the same trend we noticed since the first game. The RTX 4060 remained power efficient, consuming 101 watts, whereas the Arc A770 had a power consumption closer to 214 watts.
  • The story of temperatures is the same as discussed with the power consumption. The Arc A770 ran hot at about 76°C, whereas the RTX 4060 ran cool at a temperature of 62°C.

Also Read: ARC A770 vs RTX 3060 Ti

Doom Eternal (Native)

Doom Eternal Performance
Doom Eternal @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • Doom Eternal proved what we thought was true a few games ago; without Nvidia’s software tricks, the Arc A770 can keep up with the RTX 4060. The A770 averaged a framerate of 126 FPS in this game, whereas the RTX 4060 got a framerate of 123 FPS.
  • 1% lows were also better on the Arc graphics card. It had 1% lows of 118 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 came in at 103 FPS.
  • The power consumption showed an unchanged ratio from the previous games. The Arc A770 had a peak power consumption of 195 watts, whereas the RTX 4060 came in much lower at 120 watts.
  • Temperatures got closer in this game. The Arc A770 had a peak temperature of 69°C, whereas the RTX 4060 had a peak temperature of 66°C.

Also Read: ARC A770 vs RTX 3070

The Last Of Us (DLSS 2/ FSR Q)

Last Of Us Performance
Last Of Us @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • Coming to the last game of our tests, The Last Of Us ran sub-par on both GPUs. The RTX 4060 had an average framerate of 53 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had an average of 36 FPS.
  • 1% lows dipped below 30 FPS for the first time in the testing for these cards in this title. The Arc A770 had 1% lows of 27 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 had 1% lows of 49 FPS.
  • Finishing up, the Arc A770 only consumes 165 watts in this title, while the RTX 4060 consumes 117 watts. The abnormally low power consumption of the A770 suggests that the card is not being utilized fully.
  • The Arc A770 had a peak temperature of 67°C, whereas the RTX 4060 had a peak temperature of 63°C.

Also Read: A750 Vs RTX 4060

Overall Gaming Performance

Framerate

Average FPS Performance
Average FPS @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • We witnessed that the Arc A770, despite its various driver problems, outdid the RTX 4060 when games were played on native resolution. Credit was due; the RTX 4060 handily beat the A770 wherever upscaling was used.
  • The Arc A770 had an average framerate of 62 FPS in the seven games tested, whereas the RTX 4060 managed to get 70 FPS on average.
  • The Arc A770 had 52 FPS in terms of 1% lows, whereas the RTX 4060 had 1% lows of 58 FPS.

Both graphics cards fell short in terms of performance. The Arc A770 can be forgiven as a first-gen product, but the RTX 4060 only slightly outperformed an older, unoptimized card with software tricks.

To maximize the performance of your graphics card, we suggest checking out our guide on the top GPU overclocking software.

Also Read: RTX 4060 Vs RX 6800

Power

Average Power Consumption
Average Power Consumption @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • Despite the Arc A770 being manufactured on an advanced 6nm process, it was outdone by the 5nm process that Nvidia used. This can be attributed to Nvidia fighting tooth and nail to maximize the performance per watt of their card to be profitable when used in large server rooms. The Arc A770 used 69% more power than the RTX card.
  • The Arc A770 had an average power consumption of around 195 watts in the games tested today.
  • The RTX 4060 was much more power efficient, with an average power consumption matching its TDP of 115 watts.

If you’re interested in knowing how many watts a gaming PC consumes to manage the power draw of your computer, check out our article on the topic. 

Temperature

Average Temperature Performance
Average Temperature @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • The lower power draw of the RTX 4060, along with its rather capable cooler, made the card quite significantly cooler than the Arc A770.
  • The Arc A770 had a toasty average temperature of 72°C in the games tested.
  • On the other hand, the RTX 4060 remained relatively cool, with an average temperature of about 65°C in the benchmarks we ran.

It’s crucial to monitor temperatures if you want to extend the lifespan of your GPU. To discover safe GPU idle temperatures for your GPU, check out our comprehensive guide on the subject.

Price And Availability

The RTX 4060 has a launch MSRP of $299, whereas the Arc A770 launched with an MSRP of $329.

As for availability, the RTX 4060 should be present at any PC parts store of your choosing, though the unpopularity of the Arc A770 might make it hard to pin down.

Similar Comparison: RTX 4060 Vs RX 6700

RTX 4060 Vs Arc A770: Final Verdict 

  • The RTX 4060 card is equipped with many smart features, making it a good choice for those who prioritize features over raw performance.
  • The RTX 40 series frame generation technology on the RTX 4060 is remarkable but, unfortunately, underutilized on weaker hardware.
  • The performance of the RTX 4060 is impressive compared to its low power usage.
  • The Arc A770 is designed to offer more brute-force hardware but lacks software and optimization, making it a better choice for those looking for a first-generation product with a lot of potential.

Pros And Cons 

RTX 4060 Arc A770
Pros Cons  Pros Cons 
When pushed to its limits, it does outperform the Arc A770 by a wide margin. Testing the card at 1440p certainly struggles with the settings turned up at that resolution. Because of its status in the market, Intel has priced this GPU substantially lower than the price its hardware would suggest. The ray tracing and upscaling implementation on the Arc A770 cannot hold a candle to the mature software and hardware found on Nvidia GPUs.
DLSS 3 and the accompanying frame generation technology are exclusively found in the series of cards the RTX 4060 belongs to. Running DLSS 3 on hardware that can barely crank 30 FPS on a given game will cause substantial artifacts. Intel is making strides to improve the software implementation on these graphics cards, resulting in the performance of these cards increasing week after week. It consumes substantially more power while also running hotter than the RTX 4060.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Arc A770 a good deal?

Though the card’s hardware is exceptional for the price, it has some drawbacks, like the driver support, that make it less than ideal as a daily driver.

Which card better suits a small form factor build?

The RTX 4060 packs a lot of performance for its size due to its use of an advanced manufacturing process, allowing Nvidia to build dense circuits.

Is buying the RTX 4060 for frame generation a good idea?

Yes, for some games. Frame generation only works well when the game is already rendered at a smooth FPS, ideally above 40. Any game that runs at 60 FPS after using frame generation will not provide an enjoyable experience.


More From RTX 4060

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

RX 7700 XT Vs RX 7800 XT: Worth Upgrading?

The RX 7700 XT vs RX 7800 XT will evaluate whether the new cards from AMD are all hits or if some fall short of others.

RX 7800 XT Vs RX 6950 XT: Ultimate Comparison

In today's face-off, the RX 7800 XT vs RX 6950 XT are the ones who are entering the colosseum to see who outperforms the other.

RX 7700 XT Vs RX 6700 XT: 9 Games Tested

This comparison will delve into the improvements AMD has made from the RX 7700 XT vs RX 6700 XT in terms of performance and efficiency.

RX 7800 XT Vs RX 6800: Worth Upgrading?

In the battle of the RX 7800 XT vs RX 6800, let's find out if the RX 7800 XT is equivalent, worse, or better than the RX 6800.

RTX 4060 Ti Vs RX 7600: Which One To Get In 2023?

In this comparison, we will test the latest RTX 4060 Ti Vs RX 7600 in different games and see which one wins in the performance battle.

Similar Guides

Abde Manaf
Abde Manaf
Abdemanaf has been a creative writer since 2011. He first dwelled in the tech world in early 2015 and has since compared many product offerings by different companies. Abdemanaf started working for Tech4Gamers in February 2022 as a blog and comparison writer.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here