GuidesComparisonsRTX 4060 Vs Arc A770: Which Is Better?

RTX 4060 Vs Arc A770: Which Is Better?

Find out what sets apart the RTX 4060 and the Arc A770 in terms of architecture, performance, power efficiency, and cost, in this comprehensive comparison.

Expert Verified By

Nvidia RTX 4060

Rated: 8.9/10

Intel Arc A770

Rated: 8.3/10


Pros And Cons

GPUProsCons
Nvidia RTX 4060✅Superior gaming performance
✅Better power efficiency
❌Slightly higher average temperatures
Intel Arc A770✅Lower temperatures during gaming sessions
✅Potentially more affordable
❌Higher power consumption
Key Takeaways
  • The RTX 4060 outperforms the Arc A770 significantly in most gaming scenarios, with an average framerate advantage of approximately 13% across various titles.
  • Although manufactured using a more advanced 6nm process, the Arc A770 consumes approximately 69% more power on average than the RTX 4060.
  • The RTX 4060 demonstrates superior thermal efficiency, operating at an average temperature of approximately 10% cooler than the Arc A770 in gaming scenarios.
  • The RTX 4060 is currently priced at $295, representing a 1.3% lower cost than the Arc A770, which is available at $299.

Comparison Table

Technical SpecsIntel Arc A770Nvidia RTX 4060
GPUDG2-512AD107
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7Ada Lovelace
CUDA Cores40963072
Compute Units51296
RT Cores3224
TMUs16096
ROPs12832
Memory Speed512.0 GB/s272.0 GB/s
Best VariantsBest RTX 4060

Architectural Differences

  1. Process Size: The Intel Arc A770 is based on a 6nm process size, while the Nvidia RTX 4060 utilizes a more advanced 5nm process size, helping it be more power efficient. 
  2. Clock Speeds: The base clock of the Intel Arc A770 is 2100MHz, with a boost clock of 2400MHz. The Nvidia RTX 4060 has a base clock of 1830MHz and a boost clock of 2460MHz
  3. VRAM: The Intel Arc A770 features 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM. The Nvidia RTX 4060 has 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM.
  4. Bus Width: The Intel Arc A770 has a wide 256-bit memory bus. On the other hand, the Nvidia RTX 4060 has a narrower 128-bit bus width.
  5. TDP: The Intel Arc A770 has a TDP of 225W. In comparison, the Nvidia RTX 4060 has a significantly lower TDP of 115W.
  6. Other Features: Both the RTX and Arc card have RT cores, though they are much more mature on the RTX 4060. The Upscaling implementation is also more impressive on the 4060, using frame generation technology in the latest DLSS 3.

In this comparison, we will compare the RTX 4060 to the Intel Arc A770. Come along with us as we explore different tests, details about technology, and advice from experts to figure out which graphics card is the best for gaming.


Gaming Performance Benchmarks

Now that we’ve examined the core specifications of each card, in this section, where we compare the RTX 4060 vs Arc A770, we will look at the performance of these cards in realistic gaming scenarios.

Testing Rig

Hogwarts Legacy (RT On, DLSS 3/XeSS Q)

Hogwarts Legacy Performance
Hogwarts Legacy @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • In the first game of our benchmark tests, the RTX 4060 got 69 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 got around 45 FPS
  • 1% lows were also unpleasant on the Intel card. The RTX 4060 had 1% lows of about 54 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had lows of about 37 FPS

Star Wars Jedi Survivor (RT On, FSR Q)

Star Wars Jedi Survivor Performance
Star Wars Jedi Survivor @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • Being a less optimized game, Star Wars Jedi Survivor did not run great on either card. The RTX 4060 had a barely playable 52 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had an average of 37 FPS.
  • The Arc A770 had 1% lows of about 32 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 had higher 1% lows of about 43 FPS.

Atomic Heart (Native)

Atomic Heat Performance
Atomic Heat @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • This controversial game ran similarly on both cards. The Arc A770 managed to get 61 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 still eked out a victory with 66 FPS
  • The 1% lows were also acceptable for this game. The RTX 4060 had lows of 54 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had 58 FPS as its lows.

Dying Light 2 (Native)

Dying Light 2 Performance
Dying Light 2 @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • Dying Light 2 managed to run better on the Intel card. It had an average framerate of about 68 FPS on the A770, whereas the RTX 4060 managed to get about 59 FPS
  • 1% lows were closer between the two cards than the average FPS. The Arc A770 had lows of about 50 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 had lows closer to 48 FPS.

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 (DLSS 3/FSR Q)

Microsoft Flight Simulator Performance
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • The winning streak of the Arc A770 ended when we booted up Flight Sim 2020 on both cards. The RTX 4060 managed to get 74 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 got 61 FPS. 
  • 1% lows were closer between the two cards than their average framerate. The RTX 4060 had 1% lows of 55 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had lows closer to 51 FPS.

Doom Eternal (Native)

Doom Eternal Performance
Doom Eternal @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • The Arc A770 can keep up with the RTX 4060. The A770 averaged a framerate of 126 FPS in this game, whereas the RTX 4060 got a framerate of 123 FPS while playing the game.
  • 1% lows were also better on the Arc graphics card. It had a 1% lows of 118 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 came in at 103 FPS.

The Last Of Us (DLSS 2/ FSR Q)

Last Of Us Performance
Last Of Us @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • Coming to the last game of our tests, the RTX 4060 had an average framerate of 53 FPS, whereas the Arc A770 had an average of 36 FPS.
  • The Arc A770 had a 1% lows of 27 FPS, whereas the RTX 4060 had a 1% lows of 49 FPS.

Overall Gaming Performance

FeaturedArc A770RTX 4060
Average FPS62📈70📈
%1 lows52📉58📉
Winner: NVIDIA's RTX 4060

The Arc A770 had an average framerate of 62 FPS in the seven games tested, whereas the RTX 4060 managed to get 70 FPS on average. The Arc A770 had 52 FPS in terms of 1% lows, whereas the RTX 4060 had 1% lows of 58 FPS.


Power

FeaturedArc A770 (W)RTX 4060 (W)
Average Power Consumption195⚡️115⚡️
Winner: NVIDIA's RTX 4060

The Arc A770 used 69% more power than the RTX card. The Arc A770 had an average power consumption of around 195 watts in the games tested today. The RTX 4060 was much more power efficient, with an average power consumption matching its TDP of 115 watts.


Temperature

FeaturedArc A770 (°C)RTX 4060 (°C)
Average Temperature 72🌡️65🌡️
Winner: NVIDIA's RTX 4060

The Arc A770 had a toasty average temperature of 72°C in the games tested. On the other hand, the RTX 4060 remained relatively cool, with an average temperature of about 65°C in the benchmarks we ran.


Price And Availability

GPUMSRPCurrent Price
Nvidia RTX 4060💲299💲295
Intel Arc A770💲329💲299
Difference10%1.3%

As for availability, the RTX 4060 should be present at any PC parts store of your choosing, though the unpopularity of the Arc A770 might make it hard to pin down.


Final Verdict – What We Recommend?

Nvidia RTX 4060: The RTX 4060 emerges as a clear winner, boasting superior gaming performance across various titles compared to the Intel Arc A770. With an average framerate advantage of approximately 13% and remarkable thermal efficiency operating at an average temperature of approximately 10% cooler, the RTX 4060 offers exceptional gaming experiences.

Intel Arc A770: The Intel Arc A770 falls short in gaming performance and power efficiency compared to the RTX 4060. Despite its manufacturing using a more advanced 6nm process, the Arc A770 consumes approximately 69% more power on average and exhibits higher temperatures during gaming scenarios.

The RTX 4060 is the preferred choice for gamers prioritizing high-performance gaming experiences, efficient power consumption, and superior thermal management. On the other hand, the Intel Arc A770, while offering impressive hardware specifications, may appeal to users interested in products with potential for optimization.


Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Arc A770 a good deal?

Though the card’s hardware is exceptional for the price, it has some drawbacks, like the driver support, that make it less than ideal as a daily driver.

Which card better suits a small form factor build?

The RTX 4060 packs a lot of performance for its size due to its use of an advanced manufacturing process, allowing Nvidia to build dense circuits.

Is buying the RTX 4060 for frame generation a good idea?

Yes, for some games. Frame generation only works well when the game is already rendered at a smooth FPS, ideally above 40. Any game that runs at 60 FPS after using frame generation will not provide an enjoyable experience.


More From RTX 4060

More From Intel Arc A770

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

Buying A Used Processor? Keep These Points In Mind

Although buying a used processor is frowned upon, the recent price hikes make it a viable option for budget gamers looking for an upgrade.

Can A $500 Gaming PC Beat The PS5 In 2024?

Can a $500 gaming PC beat the PS5 in 2024 because of other factors such as future-proofing and another usage of PCs?

RTX 4070 Super Vs RTX 3080: Super Or The OG?

We've compared the RTX 4070 Super Vs RTX 3080 to show you their main differences. Hint: One card is extremely good at everything

RTX 4070 Ti Super Vs RX 6800 XT: We Tested 7 Games

The RTX 4070 Ti Super VS RX 6800 XT comparison will compare one of Nvidia's heavy hitters to one of the best value GPUs on the market.

RTX 4080 Super Vs RTX 3090: Should You Upgrade?

In the RTX 4080 Super vs RTX 3090 comparison, we will see how a new card from Nvidia stands up against their best from the last generation.

Similar Guides