At Tech4Gamers, I mainly cover new gaming news, leaks, and rumours. Aside from that, I love to write features about my favourite games while inserting my opinion about their different aspects.
Story Highlight
Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2, a highly anticipated 2025 game has finally been released.
The game has received a solid rating of 87 on the Metacritic with the majority highlighting only positive things about it.
The developers are also pretty confident about releasing it in a month that is packed with other great RPGs.
It has also received a pretty solid rating from the critics with the majority mainly saying how it evolves every aspect of its predecessor. The game was released in a month filled with behemoths like Civilization 7, Avowed, and Assassin’s Creed Shadows; however, in spite of that, the developers are pretty confident in their product.
Why it matters: KCD2 has received many praises from different video game outlets and nearly all of them claimed that this game makes every aspect of the old game better. So, it makes sense why the developers are confident.
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 Mocks Eurogamer For Giving The Game A Low Review Score
In an interview with Gamesradar+, Ondřej Bittner, a senior game designer at Warhorse Studios, revealed that if the prequel had been released right now, the developer wouldn’t have been able to withstand the pressure of releasing the game in the same month, other behemoths are being released.
I think, if this happened with the first game, morale would be crushed. After Plaion acquired Warhorse in 2019, the developer gained the opportunity to deliver glossy games with more self-assurance. Now we learn, kind of, to sit at the big boy table. “We’re positively confident in our own product.
It is good to see that the developers are confident in the product they have curated over the years, and rightfully so. Bittner further says that while some of the games are going to steal the media coverage, the player base isn’t the same, so there is nothing to be afraid of.
The fandom has been waiting for the Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 for a long time, so it makes sense why Bittner would make such claims.
What do you think about the game so far? Will you play it? Share your thoughts with us in the comment section below or join the discussion at the official Tech4Gamerms forums.
At Tech4Gamers, I contribute as a Senior News Reporter, combining my skills and gaming enthusiasm to keep our audience updated on the latest developments.
[Press Release] G.Skill’s latest memory presents the ideal choice for overclockers looking to strike a balance between higher performance and large capacities. The company’s brand new DDR5-6800 CL32-42-42 memory is available in capacities up to 96GB(2x48GB) and supports the latest Intel Core Ultra processors.
Memtest Validation Screenshot Provided by G.Skill
According to G.Skill, the memory is available under the Trident Z5 Royal, RGB, and Ripjaws M5 series. Furthermore, it supports Intel XMP 3.0, offering users the opportunity to overclock to their heart’s content.
DDR5-6400 CL28 memory kits are also being offered in addition to the DDR5-6800 CL32 options. These will only be available in 32GB(2x16GB) capacities but will live up to the same high-performance standard set by the faster memory.
G.Skill has tested the memory kits on Intel motherboards like the ASUS ROG Maximus Z890 Hero and Z790 Dark Hero paired with the Core Ultra 7 265K and Core i9-14900K, respectively.
A Memtest validation screenshot for the DDR5-6800 CL32 kit is also shown above. You can find more information on the DDR5 memory through the company’s official website.
I’ve previously worked for eXputer as a Senior News Writer for several years. Now with Tech4Gamers, I love to devoutly keep up with the latest gaming and entertainment industries. I have a Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science and years of experience reporting on games and breaking exclusive stories. Besides my passion for gaming journalism, I love spending my leisure time farming away in Stardew Valley. VGC, IGN, GameSpot, Game Rant, TheGamer, GamingBolt, The Verge, NME, Metro, Dot Esports, GameByte, Kotaku Australia, PC Gamer, and more have cited my articles.
Story Highlight
Creative Director at Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 has called out Eurogamer for a low Metacritic score.
Daniel Vavra revealed that the site refused to review the first game.
Fans also amplified Vavra’s feelings, calling it disgraceful journalism.
After some controversy and much anticipation from fans, Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 is finally out on all platforms today. And, players will be delighted to know that the RPG has received overwhelmingly positive reviews from critics all over the world, debuting with an 89 Metacritic rating.
However, not all reviews have been positive, with some outlets giving the game a low score. Eurogamer is one such site, rating Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 rather poorly on Metacritic with the developer calling out the website for this score.
Why it matters: Developers calling out journalists over unusually low review scores is a significant change in gaming culture that shouldn’t be taken lightly.
Daniel Vavra didn’t hold back on the Eurogamer Meta score. | Source: Twitter/X
Daniel Vavra called out Eurogamer for the average score of 60 among a flurry of extremely positive reviews, saying that last time the outlet refused to give them a score.
Fans in the replies also pointed out that Eurogamer gave the universally panned Dragon Age: Veilguard a perfect score of 100 on Metacritic and declared its criticism of Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 disgraceful journalism.
Many fans supported Daniel Vavra’s critique of Eurogamer, pointing to the perfect review of Veilguard as proof of the site’s questionable credibility and claiming the low score reflects the outlet’s bias. Considering how gamers panned the BioWare RPG across the board and it failed to be a commercial success, the fans do have a point.
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 is shaping up to be the perfect sequel to KCD 1.
Overall, the RPG has received acclaim from critics and fans alike, surpassing its predecessor by a mile. The Eurogamer review might have soured the proceedings for Daniel Vavra but the creative director has a lot of positives to be happy about.
As a News Reporter at Tech4Gamers, I bring the latest findings from the tech industry to our readers. Specializing in processors, graphics cards, and more, I strive to deliver detailed insights that keep our audience well-informed and engaged. Periodically, I also delve into the vibrant world of gaming to share captivating stories.
Story Highlight
Nvidia claims that the RTX 5090 is up to 2.2 times faster than the RX 7900 XTX in AI benchmarks.
In contrast, AMD’s results suggest that the RX 7900 XTX is faster than both the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080 in several tests.
Both tests reveal a significant difference in benchmark results between Nvidia and AMD.
Nvidia has fired back after losing to AMD’s Radeon RX 7900 XTX in the DeepSeek AI test, asserting that its RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 GPUs are noticeably better than the RDNA 3 flagship.
Nvidia wrote a blog post stating that the RTX 5090 is up to 2.2 times faster than the RX 7900 XTX.
Why it matters: The difference in benchmark results justifies the need for caution when evaluating marketing claims, as manufacturers may optimize their tests to favor their own products.
Nvidia used Distill Qwen 7b, Llama 8b, and Qwen 32b to benchmark the RTX 5090, RTX 4090, and RX 7900 XTX in three DeepSeek R1 AI model variants. The RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 were said to be 124% and 47% faster than the RX 7900 XTX, respectively, while using the Qwen LLM with the 32b setting.
The RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 outperformed the RX 7900 XTX by 106% and 47%, respectively, using Llama 8b. Compared to the RX 7900 XTX, the RTX 5090 was 103% faster, while the RTX 4090 offered 46% faster performance with Qwen 7b.
When compared to AMD’s testing, which includes the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080, Nvidia’s results are stunning. In comparison to the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080, AMD claimed that the RX 7900 XTX was up to 113% and 134% faster, respectively.
With the RTX 4090, Nvidia presents a quite different image, demonstrating that it is significantly faster than the RX 7900 XTX rather than the other way around. The GeForce RTX 5090 in comparison destroyed the RX 7900 XTX, offering more than double the performance.
This serves as a helpful reminder to be skeptical of benchmark results offered by the manufacturer. However, it’s always best to wait for third-party results, instead of relying on Nvidia or AMD marketing claims.
Currently serving as a News Reporter at Tech4Gamers, I have the privilege of combining my love for gaming with the art of storytelling. My role involves crafting engaging narratives that keep our audience abreast of the latest developments in the gaming world.
Story Highlight
Battlefield 6 requires an RTX 3060Ti and 16 GB RAM to run the game’s playtest.
With a minimum requirement of just an RTX 2060, the title is looking to be optimized for the PC platform.
Battlefield Labs is speculated to ensure that the game will run smoother and be optimized compared to past titles launched in poor states.
With almost four years since the last title’s release, EA is taking its time and resources to develop Battlefield 6. Yesterday, pre-alpha footage showing 10 seconds of gameplay was released, revealing the first look at the upcoming FPS.
EA also introduced Battlefield Labs, a playtesting program for the game that will help shape its development. The first sign-up for the playtest is now available, and it also reveals the required system configuration to run the game.
From what it seems, Battlefield 6 is looking to be an optimized port for PC, requiring just an RTX 3060Ti and 16GB RAM as the recommended system requirement.
Why it matters: Battlefield games are notorious for being unforgiving on even the most powerful rigs. However, Battlefield 6 looks optimised, and EA is learning from its past mistakes.
System Requirements For Battlefield 6’s Playtest. | Source: EA
Moreover, the minimum system requirements state that only an RTX 2060 is needed, along with the exact 16GB RAM requirement and 30 GB of SSD space.
While it’s just a playtest for now, the official system requirements will be revealed in the coming months before its release. The playtests are only open to players from NA and Europe, but more regions will be added with time.
Latest Releases Are So Unoptimized, They Struggle To Reach 60FPS Even With A RTX 5090
With ongoing announcements and updates following Battlefield Labs, it’s speculated that Battlefield 6 will launch in a much better state than its predecessors, which were plagued by technical issues and bugs.
Currently serving as a News Reporter at Tech4Gamers, I have the privilege of combining my love for gaming with the art of storytelling. My role involves crafting engaging narratives that keep our audience abreast of the latest developments in the gaming world.
Story Highlight
Leaks suggest Valve is working on a Steam console to compete with the PS5 and Xbox.
The console is allegedly powered by AMD’s RDNA 4 technology.
Unlike Steam Deck’s success, the console’s feasibility remains questionable
Update: One of the senior Valve employees, Pierre-Loup Griffais, has taken to social media to debunk the rumor that Valve is working on a Steam console. The original report was based on rumors, which we already recommended taking with a grain of salt.
The Steam Deck isn’t the first time that Valve entered the console market. The gaming giant previously attempted to enter the hardware market with Steam Machines, but it was a terribly failed attempt.
However, new leaks suggest that the company is willing to enter the console market again. According to eXtas1s, a reliable leaker, Valve is currently developing a Steam console that would compete with the PS5 and Xbox consoles.
Why it matters: Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft hold the console market. The barrier to entry is so high that it’s almost exciting to see what innovation Valve will bring to the market after failed attempts and experience.
Valve Reportedly Working On A Steam Console | Source: eXtas1s on XCancel
The console is allegedly being powered by AMD’s RDNA 4 technology, something we’re still in the dark about despite its announcement a month ago at CES 2025.
Steam Deck 2 Won’t Arrive Until Valve Finds A Generational Leap.
Previously, data mining revealed that Valve was developing a Steam console, a Steam controller 2, and a VR headset.
It’s important to notice that these leaks should be taken with a grain of salt until official confirmation.
While a Valve Steam console idea doesn’t sound too bad, competing with the PS5 and Xbox Series consoles this late into the generation seems confusing. The PS5 and Xbox Series also started showing their age quite early, and the next-gen consoles have already begun to leak.
The PS5 Pro Not Strong Enough For CDPR To Work On A Cyberpunk 2077 Patch
Moreover, Valve’s hardware availability is also very scarce, with the Steam Deck not being available in every region. They clearly lack the budget to compete with Microsoft and Sony’s marketing and production.
The console would have to be extremely niche and likely expand the Steam OS, which is already an ecosystem that Valve is pushing to other handhelds like the Asus Rog Ally, similar to what Xbox is trying to do.
What do you think about the rumored Valve console so far? What do you think it’ll offer against the likes of PS5 and Xbox Series consoles? Let us know in the comments below or head towards the Tech4Gamers forum.
I’ve previously worked for eXputer as a Senior News Writer for several years. Now with Tech4Gamers, I love to devoutly keep up with the latest gaming and entertainment industries. I have a Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science and years of experience reporting on games and breaking exclusive stories. Besides my passion for gaming journalism, I love spending my leisure time farming away in Stardew Valley. VGC, IGN, GameSpot, Game Rant, TheGamer, GamingBolt, The Verge, NME, Metro, Dot Esports, GameByte, Kotaku Australia, PC Gamer, and more have cited my articles.
Story Highlight
Dragon Age: The Veilguard director Corinne Busche has been quietly hired by Wizards of the Coast after leaving BioWare.
Corinne has been placed in the newly formed Skeleton Key Studios as a game director, which might develop Baldur’s Gate 4.
Wizards of the Coast kept the hiring process of the director discreet, likely to steer away from any controversies.
Dragon Age: The Veilguard’s lead developer, Corinne Busche, has already secured a highly reputable position after recently leaving BioWare. The director has been hired by Wizards of the Coast under the newly formed studio, Skeleton Key Studios.
Baldur’s Gate 3 fans are immediately concerned with this unexpected development.
Why it matters: Dragon Age: The Veilguard director left BioWare after the game’s colossal flop, leaving gamers with questions due to the developer’s controversial role. Fans of Baldur’s Gate are now anxious about the possibility of Corrine heading the next project.
‘I just heard a rumor that Corinne Busche was hired on at Skeleton Key, but sure enough, I checked my Teams Org chart, and he’s there.’
-SMASHJT’s Source
For those not in the know, Corinne Busche is one of the lead figures who are blamed for ruining the Dragon Age series with the highly controversial approach to Veilguard.
Wizards of the Coast has not officially confirmed Corinne’s move to Skeleton Key Studios. This is likely done to prevent heavy backlash from Baldur’s Gate and Dungeons & Dragons fans.
Do you think Dragon Age: The Veilguard director will potentially lead the Baldur’s Gate 4 development? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below, or join the discussion on the Tech4Gamers forum.
Currently serving as a News Reporter at Tech4Gamers, I have the privilege of combining my love for gaming with the art of storytelling. My role involves crafting engaging narratives that keep our audience abreast of the latest developments in the gaming world.
Story Highlight
The Nintendo Switch has sold over 150 million units and has over 1.3598 billion copies in software sales.
The handheld console saw 4.82 million sales just within the last 3 months of 2024.
Nintendo Switch is now the third-most-sold console, just 10 million sales shy of dethroning the PS2 as the most-sold console.
Just a few months away from Switch 2’s launch, the original Nintendo Switch is still going strong. Nintendo has just published its earnings release for the past year, revealing a massive milestone for the Switch.
The Nintendo Switch has officially sold 150.68 million units in just eight years of its release. It is just 10 million units shy of becoming the highest-selling console and dethroning the PS2, which has sold over 160 million units.
Why it matters: It’s a massive achievement for a handheld console to sell this much in just 8 years. The Nintendo Switch is one of the biggest successes in gaming history, and it’s exciting to see it break more records.
The Switch Has Surpassed PS2 Sales Within The US.
A staggering 4.82 million Switch hardware units were sold in the three months ending December last year. Thus, the holidays seemed quite profitable for Nintendo.
While the Switch currently ranks third among the highest-selling consoles, the second spot is also secured by another Nintendo console, the DS, which has sold 154.02 million units.
Moreover, the earnings call also revealed software sales for the handheld console, which stood at a whopping 1.3598 billion units. Mario Kart 8 Deluxe is now the highest-selling game for the Switch, with 67.35 million copies sold to date.
A Nintendo Direct Likely Happening In The Upcoming Days
With just a few months away from Switch 2‘s launch, as confirmed by Nintendo, it’s exciting to see what the Japanese gaming giant will do to squeeze the last phase of the Switch’s life to sell as many units as possible.
Surprisingly, the handheld device hasn’t even seen a price cut, making it potentially more profitable than any other gaming console.
Do you think the Switch 2 will live up to the original handheld’s hype and potential? Let us know in the comments below, or join the discussion on the Tech4Gamers Forum.
Lead the comparison and blog writing teams at Tech4Gamers.
Oversee teams with a keen eye for detail and precision.
Ensure hands-on writing, with benchmarks and testing as guiding principles.
Guarantee the delivery of the best possible results in concise yet impactful tech tales.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super
Rated: 8.4/10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
Rated: 8.6/10
Pros And Cons
GPU
Pros
Cons
RTX 5080
✅ More modern fabrication process
✅ Better in terms of performance
❌ Small performance uplift
RTX 4080 Super
✅ Old enough to be bought used
✅ Lower power consumption
❌ A larger design
Key Takeaways
The average framerates were around 13% higher on the RTX 5080, with the productivity test also indicating better performance.
Our power consumption tests showed that the RTX 5080 can take about 16% more power than the RTX 4080 Super at its highest.
The RTX 4080 Super is 10% more expensive than the RTX 5080 as of the time of writing, though this is gonna change with the RTX 4080 Super getting cheaper and the RTX 5080 probably getting price hikes.
The decision between buying the RTX 4080 Super or the RTX 5080 should be based on the price at which you find them.
Why Trust Tech4Gamers
Shehryar is our comparison expert who has been comparing graphics cards, and processors.
500+ components tested and compared by our team of comparison experts (Tech4Gamers Team).
1000+ hours spent testing different components for our comparisons.
At Tech4Gamers, ensuring you get reliable information is our priority. That’s why every comparison undergoes a meticulous review process by our team of experts and editors. Each comparison is carefully examined against our strict editorial guidelines, guaranteeing you trustworthy insights you can depend on.
Process Nodes: The RTX 5080 has a 4nm manufacturing process, whereas the RTX 4080 Super has slightly older 5nm processing nodes.
Clock Speeds: The older card has a base clock of 2295MHz, which the RTX 5080 matches, and a boost clock of up to 2550MHz. The RTX 5080 has a boost of up to 2617MHz.
VRAM: Both cards have 16 gigabytes of VRAM over a 256-bit bus, but the RTX 5080 uses a more advanced GDDR7 memory type compared to the GDDR6X memory of the RTX 4080 Super.
TDP: The TDP of the RTX 5080 is a bit higher at 360 watts compared to the 320-watt TDP of the RTX 4080 Super.
Supported Technologies: The headlining feature of the RTX 5080 is its multi-frame generation, which will unfortunately not be coming to the RTX 4080 or any older generation.
Nvidia has launched the RTX 5080 to middling reviews, with most people criticizing it for only bringing a marginal performance improvement over the RTX 4080/4080 Super. What exactly is this difference, and is it big enough to justify the existence of the RTX 5080? Let’s fiind out!
Gaming Benchmarks – 4K
For most people, gaming will be the biggest use case of these graphics cards. The target customers will also expect excellent performance, so we will test these cards at 4K with everything cranked up to the maximum. The specs of the test bench we have used for this comparison are written below:
The first game we tested had an average framerate of 65 FPS on the RTX 5080, which was 16% higher than the 56 FPS we saw with the RTX 4080 Super – a larger difference than we expected.
Minimum framerates was 41 FPS on the RTX 5080, which was only about 5% higher than the 39 FPS we saw with the RTX 4080 Super.
Stalker 2
Stalker 2 @4K (Image By Tech4Gamers)
In Stalker 2, the performance of the Blackwell card was 9% higher than its rival. It had a framerate of around 48 FPS, while the RTX 4080 Super got an average of about 44 FPS.
Nvidia’s newer card performed about 14% better when it came to the 1% lows. It had a framerate of 41 FPS, while the older card hung around 36 FPS.
God Of War Ragnarok
God Of War Ragnarok @4K (Image By Tech4Gamers)
Our test of this game resulted in the RTX 5080 getting an average framerate of 117 FPS, which was about 8% higher than the 108 FPS of the RTX 4080 Super.
We noticed a small difference in God Of War Ragnarok, where the RTX 5080 had a framerate of 98 FPS, only 3% higher than the 95 FPS of the RTX 4080 Super.
Warhammer 40K: Space Marine 2
Space Marine 2 @4K (Image By Tech4Gamers)
The average framerate was a whopping 21% higher on the RTX 5080 in Space Marine 2, with a framerate of 85 FPS compared to the 70 FPS of the RTX 4080 Super.
There was a very noticeable difference in the 1% lows, with the RTX 5080 getting a framerate of 75 FPS, which was 27% higher than the 59 FPS of the 4080 Super.
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor @4K (Image By Tech4Gamers)
Our Blackwell card took a notable 19% lead in the averages of Star Wars Jedi: Survivor with a framerate of 69 FPS, while the RTX 5080 trailed behind with a framerate of 58 FPS.
The RTX 5080 got 1% lows of 58 FPS, about 23% higher than the 47 FPS of the RTX 4080 Super. This difference was a welcome improvement over the last generation.
Alan Wake 2 (RT High + DLSS Q)
Alan Wake 2 (RT) @4K (Image By Tech4Gamers)
Alan Wake had both the cards struggling with its knobs and dials cranked up, with the RTX 5080 getting an average of 38 FPS while the RTX 4080 Super was 12% behind, getting a framerate of only 34 FPS.
Performance as poor with both cards when it came to the 1% lows. The RTX 4080 Super had a framerate of 27 FPS in this regard, while the RTX 5080 was 15% faster with a less-than-ideal framerate of 31 FPS.
Cyberpunk 2077 (RT Ultra + DLSS Q)
Cyberpunk 2077 (RT) @4K (Image By Tech4Gamers)
With high RT and DLSS quality, Cyberpunk ran with an average of 50 FPS on the RTX 5080, whereas the RTX 4080 Super was 6% slower with a framerate of 47 FPS.
1% lows were around 40 FPS on the RTX 4080 Super, while the RTX 5080 was only 2.5% or a single frame faster with a minimum of 41 FPS.
Black Myth Wukong (RT Very High + DLSS Q)
Black Myth Wukong (RT) @4K (Image By Tech4Gamers)
Finally, Black Myth Wukong had an average framerate of 39 FPS on the RTX 5080, which was about 11% higher than the 35 FPS of the RTX 4080 Super, both with RT enabled.
The minimum framerates were only a single frame apart, like our previous test, with the RTX 5080 getting 1% low of 29 FPS, just a tad ahead of the 28 FPS of the RTX 4080 Super.
Productivity Tests
Now that we have checked the performance of these cards in games, we will have a look at how they perform in productivity tests. The system we used for this part of the comparison is the same as the one we used for the gaming tests.
Blender Barbershop
Blender Barbershop (Image By Tech4Gamers)
In our Optix render of the Barbershop scene in Blender, the RTX 5080 finished the render only about 5% faster than the RTX 4080 Super rendered the same scene.
The RTX 5080 finished the render in about 41 seconds, whereas the RTX 4080 Super finished it in about 43 FPS.
Davinci Resolve
Davinci Resolve (Image By Tech4Gamers)
We noticed a 16% lead with the RTX 5080 in Davinci Resolve using the Pudget Systems test bench, which was a noticeable advantage for the Blackwell card.
Scores were around 11273 points for the RTX 5080, while the RTX 4080 Super hung closer to a score of 9726 points.
Premiere Pro
Premier Pro (Image By Tech4Gamers)
There was a smaller 7% increase in performance with the newer card in Premiere Pro compared to the performance uplift we saw with the scores in Davinci Resolve.
The RTX 5080 got a score of around 14252 points, while the RTX 4080 Super got a score of around 13350 points.
Overall Performance
Processor
RTX 5080
RTX 4080 Super
Average FPS
📈66.87
📈56.5
1% Lows
📉53.37
📉46.37
Productivity (Rating)
✏️9/10
✏️8.3/10
Winner: RTX 5080
Average Framerate
On average, the RTX 5080 had very little improvement over the RTX 4080 Super, though some games did perform much better, like Space Marine 2 and Star Wars Jedi. Most games saw only a single-digit percentage improvement, though the RTX 5080 got 13% more improvement on average.
1% Lows
The minimum framerates suffered from the same problems that the averages had. The RTX 5080 had an average improvement of 12% in this regard, though most games only saw a few frames of improvement, with some outliers. Maxed-out settings seemed like too much trouble for both of these cards.
Productivity
We saw little performance uplift in the productivity tests as well, with the RTX 5080 only getting a substantial improvement in Davinci Resolve. This can likely be attributed to the new 4:2:2 encoding and decoding in the new cards, which give it a small yet noticeable edge in tasks involving video.
Power Consumption
Game
RTX 5080
RTX 4080 Super
Idle
21⚡
19⚡
Gaming
326⚡
302⚡
Ray Tracing
333⚡
290⚡
Maximum
376⚡
318⚡
Winner: RTX 4080 Super
Surprisingly, the RTX 5080 took a noticeable amount more power than the RTX 4080 Super. It took about 8% in our gaming tests, whereas the spikes in power consumption were a whopping 15% apart. We will talk about how this change is disappointing in a later section.
Price
CPU
RTX 5080
RTX 4080 Super
Price Difference
Launch MSRP
💲999
💲999
0%
Current Price
💲999
💲1099
10.01%
As of early February 2025, the RTX 5080 is 10% cheaper than the RTX 4080 Super, though this might change in the future because of scalping and supply shortages. Be sure to do your due diligence after reading this article if you wish to purchase either of these cards.
What We Recommend
RTX 5080: With a small improvement in performance and a regression in power consumption, the RTX 5080 is a very disappointing generational increment to the RTX 4080 Super. Sure, it has added some extra AI features, but apart from that, there is barely any difference.
RTX 4080 Super: Though not a spectacular card in its own right when considering things like price-to-performance ratios, the RTX 4080 Super did us a favor at launch by reducing the price of entry to an 80-class card by $200 and kept everything else about exactly the same.
In conclusion, the RTX 5080 seems more like an RTX 4080 Super Ti than a generational upgrade. With how similar both these cards are, we would advise basing your buying decision on the price and whether the new multi-frame generation is of value to you.
FAQs
Is the RTX 4080 Super any better than the vanilla RTX 4080?
Yes, but barely. The RTX 4080 Super was more of an excuse for Nvidia to decrease the price from $1200 to $1000.
Is the RTX 5080 an upgrade over the RTX 4080 Super?
Technically, yes, it does give you more performance for the same MSRP. However, the price of the RTX 4080 Super may fall a few notches in the future to equalize this.
Where does the RTX 5080 lie with the rest of the GPU hierarchy?
Despite its myriad shortcomings, the RTX 5080 is still the third fastest graphics card on the consumer market, beat only by the RTX 4090 and RTX 5090.
When should I use Multiframe generation with the RTX 5080?
If your game is running around the 60 FPS mark with no frame generation, multi-frame generation will likely have little distracting visual artifacts.
Should I hold off on upgrading if I have an RTX 4080 Super?
For most cases with most people, upgrading from the RTX 4080 Super to the RTX 5080 is not worth it.
At Tech4Gamers, I mainly cover new gaming news, leaks, and rumours. Aside from that, I love to write features about my favourite games while inserting my opinion about their different aspects.
Story Highlight
With Kingdom Come Deliverance 2’s reviews finally being out, the game has received an average score of 87 on Metacritic.
The game is being highly praised for improving every aspect of its predecessor.
The majority of the reviews are positive, but some reviewers have claimed it to be a “miserable slog to deal with.”
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 has had a lot of hype behind it. The game is set to release tomorrow, but many fans have been waiting for reviews to drop so they could finally make up their mind about buying this game.
Nowadays, a lot of people wait for reviews before pre-ordering, and some even wait for reviews from gamers who spend their money on the game. That said, KCD2 reviews are finally out, and it has managed to obtain an average score of 87 on Metacritic.
Why it matters: while the first title in the series didn’t have a really high score on Metacritic, it was well-received by the fandom. So, it is good to see the sequel surpassing the former’s hype and glory.
KCD2 Has Received An Average Score of 87 On Metacritic
Gameliner – 100
Gamespot – 100
Dexetro – 100
Game Rant – 100
Windows Central – 100
Try Hard Guides – 100
PC Gamer 90
IGN – 90
Eurogamer – 60
GamesHub – 50
As you can see in the image above, the game has received an average score of 87 from 45 critic reviews, while its prequel received only 76. Most of the reviews highlight how the game has evolved from its prequel.
Many of the reviewers have given it straight up a 100 score because it is an improvement over its prequel in every way possible. That is the type of sequel the fandom longs for, and it seems like the Warhorse Studio has delivered.
Wow. Just… Wow. That was my feeling when I hit the credits roll after just over 150 hours. I really lost myself in the game world at times. More so than any other game I’ve played in many years, I found myself committed to finally seeing to the main objective the first game left unfinished.
-Gamer Escape
Other than that, the story, sidequests, and especially the hand-to-hand combat have received enormous praise from the reviewers, and rightfully so. Many have highlighted that Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 has provided them with a fantastic medieval RPG experience with a world that offers countless activities.
While the majority has praised the game, some have highlighted its negative aspects. One reviewer mentions that they “constantly found it to be a miserable slog to engage with.”
Regardless, the majority’s experience has been positive. What do you think about the reviews so far? Are you excited for the game? Share your thoughts with us in the comments section below or join the official Tech4Gamers forums for discussion.
I’ve previously worked for eXputer as a Senior News Writer for several years. Now with Tech4Gamers, I love to devoutly keep up with the latest gaming and entertainment industries. I have a Bachelor’s Degree in Computer Science and years of experience reporting on games and breaking exclusive stories. Besides my passion for gaming journalism, I love spending my leisure time farming away in Stardew Valley. VGC, IGN, GameSpot, Game Rant, TheGamer, GamingBolt, The Verge, NME, Metro, Dot Esports, GameByte, Kotaku Australia, PC Gamer, and more have cited my articles.
Story Highlight
Egypt is the perfect next stop for Kratos in his mythological journey.
The rich history, complex gods, and widespread lore of Egyptian mythos will give a fresh start to the franchise.
Considering the game will be released on PlayStation 6, Egypt in the game will be a sight to behold.
In the last two generations, PlayStation has cemented itself as one of the industry’s leaders with exclusives being a big reason for this success. It has built a consumer base with millions of loyal fans and arguably the IP that has won over the most players is one of its oldest; God of War.
From its beginning in Greek mythology to its most recent outing in the nine realms, the series has been a critical and commercial success. God of War has sold over 66 million copies globally and with the game possibly moving to Egypt there is every chance that this triumph continues.
Why it matters: The reason God of War has been able to deliver AAA juggernauts for two decades now is its ability to deliver fresh narratives and new settings every few games and Egyptian mythology is perfect for a new foray.
Nuanced Gods And Rich Mythos
Egypt will give Kratos battles even harder than Zeus
So far, Kratos has encountered and killed gods of two different mythologies, both of which have excessive mainstream attention. However, the same is not true for Egyptian mythology, as all the common man knows about it is through a failed Gerald Butler movie.
But, just like the Greek and Norse myths, it is filled with complex figures, extremely powerful Gods, and daddy issues. For starters, Horus is the Egyptian God of War and is also credited as the god of the sun and the sky.
Hence, the Egyptian deity is not just a rage monster like Ares and could be a formidable opponent for the first game. Horus’ descendants, on the other hand, are even more nuanced with his father Osiris making Egypt a prosperous society by teaching them agriculture.
Alongside his wife Isis, the goddess of motherhood and life, he ruled Egypt until he was eventually betrayed by his brother Set, The god of deserts and violence, who enclosed him in a tomb and cut him into 42 pieces.
Osiris was resurrected With the help of Anubis, the goddess of death, and became the God of the dead himself while Isis gave birth to the falcon god Horus, who fulfilled his prophecy of taking over the throne after decades of fighting Set.
When you add the angle of all-powerful grandfather Ra, who literally birthed humans in Egyptian mythos, to such family dynamics, you get a trilogy worth of gods to fight and drama to explore.
A Fresh Take On God Of War
Just like 2018’s God of War, a foray into Egypt will give the franchise another chance to reinvent itself
The first God of War came out back in 2005 and the franchise has seen several mainline entries and spin-offs since then. The main reason this IP has held up even after two decades is its ability to freshen things up after every new title.
Following the first trilogy, which focused on an angry Kratos killing gods and avenging his wife, the PlayStation 4 reinvention gave us the same character but with a different demeanor and a brand-new world filled with interesting characters. And, when you consider the sales and reception of the last two games, this move fired on all cylinders.
Hence, setting the next God of War title in Egypt will let the franchise reinvent itself once again, giving us a fresh cast and a new mythology to explore. This prevents the series from going stale and also allows new creative ideas to come to the foray.
For instance, the Egyptian idea of Ra’s sun boat could be an interesting plot device, working in the same vein as Ragnarok but with a different narrative. Furthermore, Egyptian magic is also going to be interesting to behold after seeing the effect of Norse runes in recent titles.
When you add the aspect of mummies and the chance to revisit one of the most prosperous eras of history with giant pyramids, unique gods, and the most extraordinary beasts in all of the mythos, a trilogy almost feels too less.
A Next-Gen Egypt Will Be A Fan Favourite
Egyptian mythos will allow players to explore other worlds and fight new monsters
Unsurprisingly, the Egyptian God of War will not be coming before the PlayStation 6 launches. But, that makes this project even more exciting as the idea of exploring an Egypt filled with powerful gods, built using next-gen hardware is something all fans will be into.
God of War: Ragnarok already set high standards in this aspect even though it came out on the PlayStation 4 alongside the PS5. Hence, we can only imagine how detailed and lively Egypt will be when Kratos arrives to fight its gods this upcoming generation.
At Tech4gamers, I cover all sorts of gaming news. Whether it’s a leak of any upcoming game or an update, an announcement, or a rumour, I like to write about it all. Over the weekend, I sit and write features where I talk about games that I miss or want to see return.
Story Highlight
Following the recent leak, EA has finally revealed the pre-alpha gameplay of Battlefield 6.
Although the developers have only shared 10-second footage, it highlights realistic destruction mechanics.
The team has also introduced Battlefield Labs, aclosed testing environment for the series.
Recently, it was reported that Electronic Arts is sending Battlefield 6 playtest invites to select players.
Following the recent leak, EA has just confirmed the Battlefield Labs, a new closed testing environment for the series. The team has also revealed the first pre-alpha gameplay footage.
Why it matters: While the recent entries in the franchise have failed to meet fans’ expectations, the demand for Battlefield 6 is still strong.
Just now, the official Battlefield YouTube channel released a new video confirming Battlefield Labs, a place for developers to test concepts and experiences with fans.
We want our community to play a key role in the future of Battlefield and this is an opportunity for many of you to do just that.
-EA
It looks like the developers want to hear more from the fans and get their feedback to develop Battlefield 6. This might be great for the franchise, as many fans have felt disappointed following the recent releases in the series.
Battlefield 6 Is Still Many Years Away
The developers have also shared 10 seconds of gameplay footage at the end of the video, which looks stunning already. However, it should also be noted that the shared footage is from pre-alpha gameplay and nowhere close to the actual gameplay.
The gameplay also showcased the classic Battlefield destruction mechanics, which appeared more realistic than in past games. We previously reported that the next Battlefield would feature highly realistic destruction, and the trailer proves it.
While recent reports have suggested that almost all the developers working on Battlefield 6 have never worked on the franchise before, it’s great to see that the developers have introduced a community testing program that will keep fans connected to the series.
Nonetheless, Battlefield 6’s gameplay looks incredible, setting massive expectations already. Are you excited for the next Battlefield entry? Let us know in the comments or join Tech4Gamers Forums.