GuidesComparisonsA750 Vs RTX 4060: Which One Do We Recommend

A750 Vs RTX 4060: Which One Do We Recommend

In this article we will be inspecting the performance benchmarks of the A750 Vs RTX 4060, taking a closer look at their FPS performance, power consumption and temperature management.

Expert Verified By

As Intel steps into the GPU arena with its first-generation offering, I examine how it compares to NVIDIA’s latest budget-friendly option. Join us as I analyze their performance, benchmarks, and other key aspects to determine who wins the battle between the Arc A750 vs RTX 4060.

Key Takeaways

  • Starting off, the RTX 4060 and Arc A750 differentiate in architecture, with the former using the Ada Lovelace as its foundation while the latter utilizing Generation 12.7.
  • Based on my time gaming with these GPUs, the RTX 4060 seizes the throne, boasting an impressive 25% advantage in average FPS over the Arc A750. 
  • In the battle of power efficiency, I noticed that the RTX 4060 emerges as the undisputed victor, showcasing a remarkable 36.6% reduction in average power consumption compared to the energy-demanding Arc A750.
  • The RTX 4060 emerges triumphant, as per my testing, leveraging advanced cooling solutions to maintain optimal performance with a remarkable 26.4% advantage over the Arc A750.
Why Trust Tech4Gamers
  • Shehryar is our comparison expert who has been comparing graphics cards, and processors.
  • 500+ components tested and compared by our team of comparison experts (Tech4Gamers Team).
  • 1000+ hours spent testing different components for our comparisons.
  • Objective testing criteria (See how we compare PC hardware).

At Tech4Gamers, ensuring you get reliable information is our priority. That’s why every comparison undergoes a meticulous review process by our team of experts and editors. Each comparison is carefully examined against our strict editorial guidelines, guaranteeing you trustworthy insights you can depend on.

Comparison Table

Technical Specs Intel Arc A750 GeForce RTX 4060
GPU Name DG2-512 AD106
Architecture Generation 12.7 Ada Lovelace
Transistors 21,700 million 22,900 million
Base Clock 2050 MHz 1830 MHz
Boost Clock 2400 MHz 2535 MHz
CUDA Cores 3584 3840
Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Bus Width 256 bit 128 bit
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s 288.0 GB/s
Suggested PSU 600W 550W
Release Date Oct 12th, 2022 June 29th, 2023
Approximate Price 289 USD 299 USD
Best Variants Best RTX 4060

Architectural Difference

  1. Process Node: Emphasizing technological advancements, the RTX 4060 takes the lead with its cutting-edge 5nm process, surpassing the Arc A750’s older 6nm process, showcasing a leap in manufacturing capabilities.
  2. VRAM: Equipped with equal 8GB GDDR6 VRAM, both the Arc A750 and RTX 4060 provide ample memory capacity for immersive gaming experiences.
  3. TDP: When it comes to thermal power, the RTX 4060 shines with its lower TDP of 200W, highlighting its efficiency compared to the Arc A750, which demands a higher power consumption with its 225W TDP.
  4. Supported Technologies: Unleashing cutting-edge graphics enhancements, the RTX 4060 utilizes DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), while the Arc A750 incorporates XeSS (Xe Super Sampling) to elevate the gaming experience.

RTX 4060 Vs Arc A750: Gaming Benchmarks

Now I shall compare the two competitors in some gaming benchmarks.

Testing Rig

Here are the specs of the testing rig:

Star Wars Jedi Survivor (Epic Settings)

Star Wars Jedi Survivor (Epic Settings)
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (Epic Settings) 1440p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The Arc A750 achieved an average FPS of 41, but the RTX 4060 took the lead with 44 FPS, revealing a notable 7% performance difference in favor of the latter.
  • 1% lows had a similar tale to tell. The RTX 4060 was at 44 FPS. Compared to that, the Arc A750 was at 33 FPS.  

Layers Of Fear (High Settings)

Layers of Fear (High Settings)
Layers of Fear (High Settings) 1440p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • It’s truly impressive to see that the Arc A750 achieves an average FPS of 49. However, it lags significantly behind the RTX 4060’s exceptional performance, which reaches an outstanding 59 FPS.
  • Lastly, for 1% low performance, the Arc A750 falls significantly behind with a performance of 41 FPS. Meanwhile, the RTX 4060 maintains a strong 48 FPS.

A Plague Tale Requiem (Ultra Settings)

A Plague Tale Requiem (Ultra Settings)
A Plague Tale Requiem (Ultra Settings) 1440p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • As per my testing, it’s quite remarkable to observe that the RTX 4060 maintains its lead with a consistently steady average FPS of 45. It only slightly edges out the Arc A750, which manages 44 FPS.
  • Finally, when examining 1% low performance, the Arc A750 faces the challenge of significantly lower performance at 33 FPS, while the RTX 4060 maintains a steady 35 FPS

The Last Of Us Part 1 (High Settings)

The Last of Us Part 1 (High Settings)
The Last of Us Part 1 (High Settings) 1440p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In my own hands-on experience, the Arc A750 delivers a modest average FPS of 20, yet it struggles to match the exceptional performance of the RTX 4060, which achieves a remarkable 61 FPS
  • In striking contrast, the Arc A750 struggles with a substantially lower 1% low performance at 18 FPS, in stark contrast to the impressive stability of the RTX 4060, which consistently maintains 56 FPS.

Returnal (Epic Settings)

Returnal (Epic Settings)
Returnal (Epic Settings) 1440p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The Arc A750 delivers a commendable average FPS of 52. However, it falls short of the RTX 4060’s impressive 61 FPS.
  • When scrutinizing 1% low performance, I noticed that the Arc A750 faces challenges with a performance of 36 FPS, while the RTX 4060 maintains a commendable 41 FPS. 

Call Of Duty Modern Warfare II (Balanced Settings)

Call of Duty Modern Warfare II (Balanced Settings)
Call of Duty Modern Warfare II (Balanced Settings) 1440p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Notably, as per my observation, the RTX 4060 impressively achieves a stunning average FPS of 74, yet it falls short of the Arc A750’s 99 FPS.
  • From 1% low performance, it becomes evident that the Arc A750 encounters challenges, delivering a substantially lower performance at 56 FPS. On the other hand, the RTX 4060 consistently maintains a solid 66 FPS.

Resident Evil 4 Remake (Ray Tracing On)

Resident Evil 4 Remake (Ray Tracing On)
Resident Evil 4 Remake (Ray Tracing On) 1440p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • During my time testing Resident Evil 4, the Arc A750 demonstrated a respectable average FPS of 34. However, it lags behind the RTX 4060’s remarkable performance of 42 FPS
  • When evaluating 1% low performance, it becomes evident that the Arc A750 grapples with a significantly lower performance at 30 FPS. In contrast, the RTX 4060 maintains a stable 34 FPS.

Overall Gaming Performance

Overall Gaming Performance
Overall Gaming Performance 1440p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

After thorough testing and benchmarking, now is the time to turn our attention to the overall gaming performance.

In the realm of gaming benchmarks, the RTX 4060 reigns supreme with a remarkable average FPS of 52.8, overshadowing the Arc A750’s modest 41 FPS performance.

Emerging as the true gaming champion, the RTX 4060 commands a formidable 25% lead in FPS performance over the Arc A750, solidifying its position as the ultimate choice for performance seekers.

Average Power Consumption

Average Power Consumption
Average Power Consumption 1440p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

In addition to evaluating gaming performance, I also take into account the average power consumption of the RTX 4060 vs Arc A750.

With meticulous power management, the RTX 4060 boasts an average power consumption of a mere 114W, outperforming the Arc A750’s higher average of 165.2W. In the realm of power efficiency, the RTX 4060 establishes an impressive 36.6% advantage over the Arc A750, reinforcing its position as the better power-saver in these gaming benchmarks.

Average Thermal Statistics

Average Thermal Statistics
Average Thermal Statistics 1440p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

As I delve into the world of thermal performance, the RTX 4060 asserts its dominance with impeccable temperature management, surpassing the Arc A750 by a significant margin.

With a notable temperature gap of 17.9°C, the RTX 4060 maintains a cool operating temperature of 58.8°C, while the Arc A750 struggles to keep its thermals under control at 76.7°C. In the grand scheme of things, the RTX 4060 establishes a substantial 26.4% lead in thermal efficiency over the Arc A750, solidifying its position as the superior choice for gamers seeking optimal thermal performance.

Pricing And Availability

When it comes to pricing and availability, the RTX 4060 and Arc A750 present distinct options for consumers. The RTX 4060 carries a slightly 3.4% higher price point at 299 USD, but it offers a range of advanced features and performance capabilities that justify the investment.

On the other hand, the Arc A750 delivers an impressive combination of performance and value at a more affordable price of 289 USD. It aims to provide an accessible entry point for gamers seeking reliable performance without breaking the bank.

Considering availability, both GPUs may experience initial stock limitations due to their popularity and demand. As the market stabilizes and supply chains improve, it’s important to stay informed about restocks and availability updates to secure these GPUs at the desired price point.

Arc A750 Vs RTX 4060: Which One Would I Recommend?

In my opinion, the RTX 4060 and Arc A750 stand at opposite ends of the gaming spectrum. According to my testing, despite the Arc A750’s 3.4% cost advantage, it falls behind the RTX 4060 with a significant 25% loss in average FPS performance.

Moreover, I also observed throughout the benchmark that the RTX 4060 shines in terms of power efficiency, delivering a remarkable 36.6% reduction in power consumption. It also maintains temperatures that are 26.4% cooler than the Arc A750.

After a thorough evaluation, the RTX 4060 emerges as the victor, as per my recommendation, showcasing superior performance, temperature management, and power efficiency. The Arc A750, on the other hand, remains a viable option for those prioritizing budget considerations.

Pros And Cons

GPU Pros Cons
GeForce RTX 4060
  • Ray tracing. 
  • DLSS and Frame Generation support.
  • Memory bandwidth limitations.
  • Slightly more expensive.
Intel Arc A750
  • Competitive price point. 
  •  Decent Build quality 
  • Underwhelming performance.
  • Inconsistent driver support.

More From RTX 4060:

More From ARC A750:

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Related articles

Core Ultra 7 265K Vs Ryzen 7 9700X: Our Evaluation

In the Core Ultra 7 265K Vs Ryzen 7 9700X comparison, we will see how these two processors stack up against eachother!

Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: What Our Benchmarks Say

In the Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D comparison, we will outline the results of our testing with both these processors!

Ryzen 7 9800X3D Vs Core i7 14700K: Our Recommendation

I’m testing Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Core i7 14700K to see how they stack up in gaming and productivity benchmarks. Let’s find out who wins!

Best Black Friday Early CPU Deals 2024: Which One To Get

Get the most out of Black Friday deals season with the best CPU discounts on different Intel and AMD processors.

Similar Guides