GuidesComparisonsRadeon RX 7600 Vs RX 6750 XT: We Tested 7 Games

Radeon RX 7600 Vs RX 6750 XT: We Tested 7 Games

In this comparison we will test the Radeon RX 7600 Vs RX 6750 XT to help you decide which one is better suited for your rig.

Expert Verified By

Radeon RX 6750 XT

Rated: 8.5/10

Radeon RX 7600

Rated: 9/10


Pros And Cons

FeaturedPros Cons
RX 7600โœ… Budget-friendly.
โœ… Newer architecture.
โŒ Inferior performance.
RX 6750 XTโœ… Superior gaming performance.ย 
โœ… Massive 12 GB Vram.
โŒWorse cost-to-performance ratio.
Key Takeaways
  • During my testing, the RX 6750 XT ended up performing 17.19% better than the RX 7600 on 1080p resolution. 
  • Slightly better thermals were observed throughout the benchmark on the RX 7600. 
  • At launch price, the RX 6750 XT is approximately 68.4% more expensive than the RX 7600. 
  • The price tag of RX 7600 is too attractive for me to recommend the RX 6750 XT over it.
Why Trust Tech4Gamers
  • Uzair is our comparison expert who has been benchmarking graphics cards, and processors.
  • 100+ components tested and reviewed by our team of hardware experts (Tech4Gamers Team).
  • 100+ hours spent testing different components for our comparisons.
  • Objective testing criteria (See how we compare PC hardware).

At Tech4Gamers, ensuring you get reliable information is our priority. That’s why every hardware round-up undergoes a meticulous review process by our team of experts and editors. Each review is carefully examined against our strict editorial guidelines, guaranteeing you trustworthy insights you can depend on.

Comparison Table

FeatureRadeon RX 7600Radeon RX 6750 XT
GPU NameNavi 33Navi 22
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0RDNA 2.0
Transistors13,300 million17,200 million
CUDA Cores20482560
Tensor Cores3240
RT Cores3240
TMUs128160
ROPs6464
Memory Speed288.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Launch Price$269$549
Release DateMay 24th, 2023Mar 3rd, 2022

Architectural Details

  1. Process Size: The RX 7600 is based on the newer RDNA 3.0 architecture, featuring the brand new 6 nm process size compared to the older 7 nm process size featured by the RDNA 2.0 architecture on the RX 6750 XT. 
  2. Frequency: The RX 6750 XT is able to clock higher at the base clocks at around 2150 MHz compared to the 1720 MHz by the RX 7600. However, the RX 7600 clocks higher at the boost clock at around 2655 MHz, whereas the 6750XT maxes out at 2489 MHz. 
  3. VRAM: The older RX 6750 XT boasts 40% more VRAM at 12 GB compared to the 8 GB on the RX 7600. Both are GDDR6 memories. However, the one on 6750 XT has a faster memory bus at 192-bit compared to the 128-bit bus on the RX 7600. 
  4. TDP: The RX 7600 has a 40% smaller TDP compared to the RX 6750 XT. Its TDP is around 165 watts. Compared to that, the RX 6750 XT has a higher TDP of around 250 watts.
  5. Supported Technologies: The RX 7600 and RX 6750 XT both rely on AMD’s FSR or Fidelity FX Super Resolution to boost frame rates and provide their users with a smoother experience. 

AMD just extended its RDNA 3.0 lineup with a new inclusion of the RX 7600 in it. But how does it differ in performance compared to the previously released RX 6750? Keep reading to find out as I get both these GPUs to go up against each other in a series of gaming benchmarks to help you decide which is better for your rig.


Gaming Benchmarks 

Testing Rig

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077 1080p benchmark - Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
Cyberpunk 2077 1080p benchmark – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Right off the bat, I saw the RX 6750 XT performing 10.7% better in Cyberpunk 2077.  On average, it provided 88 fps in Cyberpunk 20777. Contrary to that, the 7600 was roughly 9 frames behind, giving us an average of 79 fps. 
  • The difference in 1% lows remained roughly the same at around 10.3% in favor of the RX 6750 XT.  It managed to provide 61 fps in terms of 1% lows. At the same time, the RX 7600 was 5 frames behind at 55 fps. 

F1 2022

F1 22 1080p benchmark - Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
F1 22 1080p benchmark – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The RX 6750 XT dominates in F1 2022, as it is now providing 30% more frames and running the game at over 200 fps. Both GPUs provided a high refresh rate experience. The RX 7600 at 154 fps and the 6750 XT at 210 fps. 
  • This time, even its 1% lows are better than the average frame rate of the RX 7600. It was able to offer an average of 179 1% low fps. The RX 7600, on the other hand, had no chance of catching up as it maxed out at 132 fps.

The Last Of Us

Last of Us 1080p benchmark - Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
Last of Us 1080p benchmark – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Both GPUs seemed to struggle in The Last of US However, the 6750 XT still comes on top with a margin of 23%. It provided a total of 68 fps on average in this demanding title. The 7600, on the other hand, provided 54 average fps. 
  • 1% lows saw a much bigger difference, with the 6750 XT coming on top with a margin of 35.8%. It was yielding an average of 46 1% low fps. The RX 7600, on the contrary, could not go beyond 32 fps

Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6 1080p benchmark - Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
Far Cry 6 1080p benchmark – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The Far Cry 6 is the only title where the RX 7600 managed to get a lead in this benchmark. The RX 7600 was running at 120 fps. Compared to that, the RX 6750 XT was 6 frames behind, at 114 fps. 
  • The difference in 1% lows was slightly higher, at around 8%, in favor of the RX 7600.  On average at 98 fps. The RX 6750 XT, at the same time, was 8 frames behind, at 90 1% low fps. 

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla

AC Valhalla 1080p benchmark - Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
AC Valhalla 1080p benchmark – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • As per my observation, the average framerate yielded by the RX 6750 XT in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla was around 101 fps. Contrary to that, the RX 7600 was 18 frames behind, giving us an average of 83 fps.   
  • The difference in 1% lows has drastically escalated to a whopping 32%. 1% lows yielded by the RX 6750 XT were around 85 fps. Contrary to that, the RX 7600 was 23 frames behind, giving us an average of 62 1% low fps.   

Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2 1080p benchmark - Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
Red Dead Redemption 2 1080p benchmark – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The Red Dead Redemption preferred the 6750 XT over the RX 7600, as it provided 14% more fps. On average, it provided 90 fps. The RX 7600, on the other hand, was seen struggling as it was 12 frames behind, averaging nearly 78 fps.   
  • I was shocked to see that the difference in 1% lows has drastically increased to around 20% in favor of the 6750 XT. 1% lows by the RX 6750 XT were 68 fps. Twelve frames behind were the RX 7600, giving us an average of 56 1% low fps. 

God Of War 2018

God of War 1080p benchmark - Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
God of War 1080p benchmark – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The RX 6750 XT leads in my final benchmark by being 22% better in God of War 2018. It delivered 91 fps on average compared to the RX 7600, which was quite far behind this time, giving us an average of 73 fps. 
  • The results of 1% lows were not too different from what I saw previously, as the 6750 XT is still 22% ahead here. It managed to yield 69 1% low fps on average. The 7600 maxed out at 55 fps. 

Overall Gaming Performance 

FeaturedRX 7600RX 6750 XT
Average FPS91.75 ๐Ÿ“ˆ108.8 ๐Ÿ“ˆ
1% lows70 ๐Ÿ“‰85.42 ๐Ÿ“‰
Winner: AMD's RX 6750 XT

At 1080p, I observed that the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT outperformed the AMD Radeon RX 7600 by approximately 17.19% in terms of average fps. Based on my testing, the difference in the mean of 1% lows between both GPUs was slightly larger at around 19.84% in favour of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT.


Editor`s Note
Image

In terms of raw power, the 6750 Xt does seem to have a significant edge. However, there are more aspects too while buying a GPU. For example, in terms of longevity and driver support, we can surely rely on RX 7600.

โ€“ Uzair Qureshi


Thermal Efficiency  

GameRX 7600 (ยฐC)RX 6750 XT (ยฐC)
Cyberpunk 207765๐ŸŒก๏ธ65๐ŸŒก๏ธ
F1 2265๐ŸŒก๏ธ66๐ŸŒก๏ธ
Red Dead Redemption 265๐ŸŒก๏ธ66๐ŸŒก๏ธ
God Of War 201865๐ŸŒก๏ธ65๐ŸŒก๏ธ
The Last of Us65๐ŸŒก๏ธ64๐ŸŒก๏ธ
Assassin's Creed Valhalla66๐ŸŒก๏ธ65๐ŸŒก๏ธ
Average Temperature65.1๐ŸŒก๏ธ65.18๐ŸŒก๏ธ
Winner: RX 7600

Both of the GPUs were closely matched in terms of thermals during my testing. However, I observed that the RX 7600 ran slightly cooler than the RX 6750 XT, with very slim margins. In my testing, it maintained an average temperature that was 0.21% lower than that of the RX 6750 XT. 


Pricing And Availability

GPUMSRPCurrent Price
RX 7600๐Ÿ’ฒ269๐Ÿ’ฒ269
RX 6750 XT๐Ÿ’ฒ549๐Ÿ’ฒ549
Price Difference 68.5%68.5%

Now, this makes the RX 6750 XT a whopping 68.45% more expensive than the RX 7600 at the launch price. To make matters worse, since both of these GPUs have been released recently, chances are you will not find either of them cheaper than what they launched for.


RX 7600 Vs RX 6750 XT: Which One Would I Recommend?

RX 7600: At launch price, in my opinion, my recommendation would be to consider the RX 7600  since it provides much more value for the price it’s being sold at. It is roughly 68% cheaper than the RX 6750 XT, and on average, it performs 17% worse in games. Lastly, it does lag behind in some of the architectural specs since it is one generation behind the 7600, but it makes up for it with its top-tier price-to-performance ratio. 

RX 6750 XT: However, I personally believe all this does not make the 6750 XT a bad deal either. It has a massive 12 GB GDDR6 memory that will come in really handy in a time like this when games start consuming more and more VRAM. Secondly, I think chances are you can find a good deal on it as well and get it for cheaper than what it launched for since it has been out for a while.  

AMD Radeon RX 7600 and Radeon RX 6750 XT are two of the most popular Low to mid-ranger GPUs that you could find for 1080-1440p gaming these days. However, which one I would recommend will depend greatly on your use case and how much you are willing to spend.


Frequently  Asked Questions

Which one is better for gaming?

During my testing, the RX 6750 XT ended up performing 17.19% better than the RX 7600 on 1080p resolution.

Which is better bang for the buck?

The RX 7600 is easily the better bang for the buck since it is considerably cheaper and does not lag behind in performance nearly as much. It has a superior cost-to-performance ratio.

Which GPU is better for a warmer climate?

Both GPUs were extremely neck-to-neck in terms of thermals. The 7600 was slightly cooler, but the margin was not significant enough to make a difference.


More from RX 7600:

More From Radeon RX 6750 XT:

Was our article helpful? ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. ๐Ÿ”‹

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. ๐Ÿ˜”

Related articles

Power Limits – Do You Need To Change Them?

Power limits are maximum amount of power PC components like CPU and GPU are allowed to draw from a power supply.

What Is BIOS? [Function And How To Access It]

BIOS is a firmware directly embedded in the motherboard that provides an interface between a PC's hardware and operating system.

RTX 4070 Ti Super Vs RTX 3090: Worth Upgrading? [Tested]

Check out our in-depth comparison of RTX 4070 Ti Super vs RTX 3090 where we closely monitor and highlight performance differences and key features of both GPUs.

RTX 4080 Super Vs RX 7800 XT: Gaming Performance Tested

Check out our comparison of RTX 4080 Super vs RX 7800 XT as we highlight the performance, price and architectural difference of both GPUs.

RTX 4080 Super Vs RX 7900 XTX: Gaming Benchmarks Tested

See the differences in both GPUs' pricing, performance, and architecture as we compare the RX 7900 XTX vs RTX 4080 Super.

Similar Guides