In this in-depth analysis, we embark on a captivating journey to explore the battle of processors: AMD Ryzen 5 7640U vs Ryzen 5 6600U. Through an unbiased lens, we uncover the intricacies of their specifications and unveil real-world performance benchmarks, shedding light on the ultimate showdown between these two powerful contenders.
Key Takeaways
- The Ryzen 5 7640U’s cutting-edge 4nm process node and Ryzen 7 6800U’s advanced 6nm process node impact both performance and power efficiency.
- Moreover, the Ryzen 5 7640U’s support for DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 memory provides higher bandwidth and faster data access compared to Ryzen 7 6800U’s DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-6400 support.
- In addition, the Ryzen 5 6600U excels with a configurable TDP ranging from 15W to 28W, while the Ryzen 5 7640U’s TDP ranges from 15W to 30W, offering power efficiency options.
- In real-world scenarios, the Ryzen 5 7640U outperforms the Ryzen 7 6800U with impressive leads in single-core and multi-core performance, making it a versatile choice for computing tasks.
Ryzen 5 6600U Vs Ryzen 5 7640U: Comparison Table
| Key Specifications | Ryzen 5 7640U | Ryzen 5 6600U |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | AMD | AMD |
| Release Date | May 3, 2023 | January 4, 2022 |
| Device Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Integrated GPU | Radeon 760M | Radeon 660M |
| Performance Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Performance Threads | 12 | 12 |
| Base Clock (Performance) | 3.5 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock (Efficiency) | 4.9 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Total Cores | 6 | 6 |
| Total Threads | 12 | 12 |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 1MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Transistors | 25 billion | – |
| Fabrication Process | 4nm | 6nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 15-30W (configurable) | 15-28 W (configurable) |
| Socket | FP8 | FP6 |
| GPU Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 2600 MHz | 1900 MHz |
| Cuda Cores | 384 | 384 |
| Execution Units | 6 | 6 |
| Memory Support | – DDR5-5600 – LPDDR5x-7500 |
– DDR5-4800 – LPDDR5-6400 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| Memory Size | 256GB | 64GB |
Architectural Differences
A deeper understanding of their strengths and optimizations emerges as we delve into the architectural differences between the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and Ryzen 5 6600U. These distinctions play a pivotal role in shaping their performances and capabilities, setting the stage for a comprehensive comparison that uncovers which processor is better suited for specific computing tasks.
- Process Node: Embracing the forefront of technology, the Ryzen 5 7640U boasts a cutting-edge 4nm process node, while the Ryzen 5 6600U adopts an advanced 6nm process node, showcasing AMD’s commitment to innovation.
- Clock Speed: Showcasing unparalleled speed with the Ryzen 5 7640U leads with a swift 3.5 GHz base clock (boosting up to 4.9 GHz), while the Ryzen 5 6600U competes admirably with a solid 2.9 GHz base clock (boosting up to 4.5 GHz).
- Memory Support Variation: Elevating memory performance, the Ryzen 5 7640U’s support for DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 delivers higher bandwidth and faster data access than the Ryzen 5 6600U’s DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-6400 support.
- TDP: Moreover, the Ryzen 5 6600U excels with a configurable lower TDP ranging from 15W to 28W, guaranteeing power efficiency, while the Ryzen 5 7640U demands a configurable TDP of 15W to 30W.
- Supported Technologies: Expanding its capabilities, the Ryzen 5 7640U introduces ECC Memory support, a distinctive feature not present in the Ryzen 5 6600U, catering to users seeking enhanced error correction capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
With a solid grasp of their architectural differences, it’s time to put the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U and Ryzen 5 6600U to the test through rigorous performance benchmarks. These benchmarks serve as our window into real-world scenarios, gauging how these CPUs handle various tasks and applications.
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
- Starting off strong, the Ryzen 5 7640U leads the pack with an impressive 18% boost, achieving a score of 1781, while the Ryzen 5 6600U trails behind at 1503, showcasing the former’s superior single-core performance.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
- In multi-core performance, the Ryzen 5 7640U takes a significant leap with a 28% lead, scoring 12648, outperforming the Ryzen 5 6600U’s score of 9918, demonstrating its superior multitasking capabilities.
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
- While going over single-core tasks, the Ryzen 5 7640U again impresses with a 26% surge, reaching a score of 1869, while the Ryzen 5 6600U scores 1486, highlighting the former’s faster single-core processing.
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
- In the realm of multitasking, the Ryzen 5 7640U maintains its lead with an 18% advantage, scoring 8921, while the Ryzen 5 6600U scores 7575, reinforcing its superior performance in handling parallel tasks.
Ryzen 5 7640U Vs Ryzen 5 6600U: Which Chip Is Suitable For You?
- Firstly, the Ryzen 5 7640U boasts a state-of-the-art 4nm process node, while the Ryzen 7 6800U adopts an older 6nm process node, which can influence the performance and power efficiency of the chips
- Utilizing the support for the DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 memory, the Ryzen 5 7640U delivers better working speeds, outpacing Ryzen 7 6800U’s DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-6400 support.
- Furthermore, the Ryzen 5 6600U impresses with a configurable TDP ranging from 15W to 28W, ensuring optimal power efficiency, while the Ryzen 5 7640U offers configurability from 15W to 30W.
- In rigorous benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 7640U showcases its superiority with a lead in single-core and a substantial lead in multi-core performance over the Ryzen 7 6800U, making it a versatile choice for various computing tasks.
FAQs
The main difference lies in their process node; the Ryzen 5 7640U utilizes a cutting-edge 4nm process, while the Ryzen 5 6600U adopts an older 6nm process.
The Ryzen 5 7640U outperforms in memory support, boasting DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500, providing higher bandwidth than the Ryzen 5 6600U’s DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-6400.
The Ryzen 5 6600U excels with a configurable lower TDP of 15W to 28W, while the Ryzen 5 7640U demands a configurable TDP of 15W to 30W, catering to different power efficiency needs.
Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋
How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔
