In this Ryzen 9 7900X3D vs Core i7-13700K comparison, we’ll explore their specifications, architectural differences, and performance benchmarks, providing insights for gaming builds. Both CPUs offer great performance and specifications, making it an exciting head-to-head contest to determine the better choice for gaming.
- When it comes to architectural differences, the Core i7-13700K utilizes Raptor Lake architecture, while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D uses the Raphael foundation.
- Moreover, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the Core i7-13700K by 4% in terms of overall performance.
- Furthermore, during gaming, the Core i7-13700K exhibits 3% better power efficiency compared to the Ryzen 9 7900X3D.
- Finally, both CPUs demonstrate similar thermal efficiency, effectively managing heat during demanding tasks.
|CPU Name||Ryzen 9 7900X3D||Core i7-13700K|
|Core Architecture||Zen 4||Raptor Lake|
|Number of Cores||12||16|
|Number of Threads||24||24|
|Base Clock Speed||4.4 GHz||3.4 GHz|
|Boost Clock Speed||5.6 GHz||5.4 GHz|
|Integrated Graphics||Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)||Intel UHD graphics 770|
|GPU Base Clock||400 MHz||300 MHz|
|GPU Boost Clock||2200 MHz||1600 MHz|
|iGPU Execution Units||2||32|
|CPU Memory Support||DDR5||DDR4 and DDR5|
|L1 Cache||768 KB||80 K(per core)|
|L2 Cache||12 MB||2 MB (per core)|
|L3 Cache||128 MB||30 MB (shared)|
|Memory Capacity||128 GB||128 GB|
|Bandwidth||83 GB/s||89.6 GB/s|
|PCIe Express Version||PCIe 5.0||PCIe 4.0, PCIe 5.0|
|Total PCIe Lanes||24||16 (PCIe 5.0), 4 (PCIe 4.0)|
|Unlocked for Overclocking?||Yes||Yes|
|I/O Die (IOD) Size||122 mm2||Unknown|
|Transistor Count||13.1 Billion||Unknown|
|Launch Date||28th February 2023||27th September 2022|
|Best Motherboards||Best CPU Coolers For Ryzen 9 7900X3D||–|
|Best CPU Coolers||Best Motherboards For Ryzen 9 7900X3D||–|
- Process Node: The Ryzen 9 7900X3D boasts a cutting-edge 5nm process node, while the Core i7-13700K utilizes a 10nm process node, showcasing differences in fabrication technology.
- Clock Speeds: The Ryzen 9 7900X3D features a Base Clock of 4.4 GHz and a Boost Clock of up to 5.6 GHz. On the other hand, the Core i7-13700K offers a Base Clock of 3.4 GHz and a Boost Clock of up to 5.4 GHz, delivering distinct performance capabilities.
- TDP: Finally, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D operates with a TDP of 120W, while the Core i7-13700K supports a slightly higher TDP of 125W, providing a comparison of power consumption between the two CPUs.
Ryzen 9 7900X3D Vs Core i7-13700K: Gaming Benchmarks
After reviewing the specifications and features of the two CPUs in our comparison, it’s time to see which processor is better at playing some of the latest games.
This benchmark test was held to check the performance of CPUs in terms of FPS, power usage, and thermal efficiency. All the games were tested on 1080p resolution for both processors.
Similar Comparison: Ryzen 9 7900X3D Vs i9-13900K
- OS: Windows 10 Pro
- Motherboard: ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming, MSI MEG X670E ACE
- RAM: 32 GB DDR5
- GPU: ASUS RTX 4090 24 GB
- CPU Cooler: Corsair ICUE H150I ELITE
- SSD: SAMSUNG 980 Pro 2TB
- PSU: CORSAIR RMX SERIES RM1000X 1000 W
We have a great-looking build for this benchmark test, as all the components used are top-notch. The RAM selection is impressive, as we have 32 GB DDR5 RAM. Because of this, the CPUs will face no problems when running heavier games, and we will get to see smooth gameplay from both processors.
The ASUS RTX 4090 also makes itself on the list of top-notch components as it is one of the best graphic cards available in the market. The motherboards used for the CPUs were two different motherboards.
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D was tested on MSI MEG X670E ACE, while the i7-13700K was tested on ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming. We cannot conclude which motherboard is a better choice out of these two, but it is for sure that both are great performing motherboards. A CPU cooler also keeps the temperatures lower for both processors.
- The i7-13700K ran Hitman 3 at 210 FPS on average, whereas Ryzen the nine 7900X3D ran it at 226 FPS.
- The i5-13400 surpasses the Ryzen 9 7900X3D by 8% when running Hitman 3.
- Both the CPUs required the same amount of power, i.e., 114W, when running Hitman 3.
- The Ryzen 9 7900X3D has a greater temperature rating when running Hitman 3 as it ran the game at 63°C. The i7-13700K, on the other hand, heats up to 58°C.
Far Cry 6
- Far Cry 6 can run at 172 FPS on the i7-13700K. While on the Ryzen 9 7900X3D, it can go up to 185 FPS.
- In terms of percentage, the i7-13700K can run Far Cry 6 with 4% more FPS than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D.
- The power required to run Far Cry 6 on i7-13700K is 97W, while in the case of Ryzen 9 7900X3D, it was 106W.
- While running Far Cry 6, the i7-13700K heated up to 65°C while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D went up to a temperature of 59°C.
Also Read: i9-13900KF Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Horizon Zero Dawn
- In the case of Horizon Zero Dawn, the i7-13700K averaged 235 FPS, whereas the Ryzen 9 7900X3D provided some extra FPS as it averaged 246 FPS.
- The Ryzen 9 7900X3D surpasses the i7-13700K by 5% in terms of FPS when running Horizon Zero Dawn.
- The difference in the power usage of the two CPUs is almost zero, as both chips require 106W to run Horizon Zero Dawn.
- As for the temperatures, the difference here is also less as the Ryzen 9 7900X3D was at 67°C, while the i7-13700K’s temperature was recorded to be 69°C.
- The i7-13700K beats the Ryzen 9 7900X3D by a little margin when running Cyberpunk 2077, as the i7-13700K averaged at 165 FPS while the Ryzen 9 7900X3D followed up with an average FPS of 160.
- In terms of percentage, the i7-13700K was 3% better performing while running Cyberpunk 2077.
- The i7-13700K surpassed the Ryzen 9 7900X3D in power usage for this game, requiring 105W to run the game. The Ryzen 9 7900X3D, on the other hand, required 112W.
- The temperatures were almost the same for both chips; the Ryzen 9 7900X3D had a temperature of 64°C, whereas the i7-13700K had a temperature of 65°C.
Similar Comparisons: Intel i7-13700k Vs. Ryzen 7 7700X
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
- When running Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the i7-13700K gave 197 FPS. The Ryzen 9 7900X3D was better in this game by delivering 204 FPS for this game.
- The difference isn’t much, but the Ryzen 9 7900X3D was 3% better than the i7-13700K when running Assassin’s Creed Valhalla.
- The Ryzen 9 7900X3D was better in power usage as it consumed 110W. The i7-13700K, however consum, ed 112W when tested for Assassin’s Creed Valhalla.
- The temperature ratings were once again close to each other as the Ryzen 9 7900X3D went up to 62°C, and the i7-13700K had a temperature of 61°C.
God Of War
- Both processors’ performance was almost the same when running God Of War, as the Ryzen 9 7900X3D provided 219 FPS on average while the i7-13700K managed to provide 220 FPS.
- There was only a 0.5% difference in the performance of both processors when running God of War.
- The i7-13700K was more power efficient when tested for God of War as it required 102W, which is a bit less when compared to the Ryzen 9 7900X3D, which required 109W.
- We again got the same temperature readings approximately as the Ryzen 9 7900X3D heated up to 63°C, and the i7-13700K heated up to 62°C.
Forza Horizon 5
- In our last test, wheatear Horizon 5, in which the Ryzen 9 7900X3D proved to be by giving 205 FPS. The i7-13700K was behind by 13 FPS as it provided 192 FPS.
- The Ryzen 9 7900X3D leads by 7% when running Forza Horizon 5.
- The power usage for both CPUs was recorded to be the same once again, as both processors required 106W to run the game.
- As for the temperature readings, they were recorded to be 64°C for both processors.
Similar Comparisons: i9-13900KF vs. Ryzen 9 7900X3D
Overall Gaming Benchmarks
After taking a quick look at the individual results of the games tested above, let’s combine all the above outcomes to conclude our winner in the Ryzen 9 7900X3D Vs Core i7-13700K battles in performance, power efficiency, and thermal efficiency.
PerformanceThe overall FPS of the Ryzen 9 7900X3D delivered during the benchmark test was 206 FPS. On the other hand, the i7-13700K provided an average overall FPS of 198. The Ryzen 9 7900X3D won the race by giving eight more Frames Per Second than the i7-13700K. Percentage-wise, it’s a 4% improvement in performance.
There were games like God of War and Cyberpunk 2077 in which the i7-13700K performed as well as its opponent, but the Ryzen 9 7900X3D led most of the games and declared itself the winner in the performance department.
Also Read: Core i9-12900KS vs i7-13700K
Power EfficiencyCombining all the consumed watts for each game, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D consumed 109W on average. Whereas the i7-13700K consumed 106W. The Ryzen 9 7900X3D won in the performance section, but when it comes to power efficiency, the i7-13700K takes the lead. This suggests the i7-13700K is almost 3% more power efficient than the Ryzen 9 7900X3D.
However, in Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, and Forza Horizon 5, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D was equally power efficient as the i7-13700K. But the better power management in the rest of the games helped the i7-13700K take the lead.
Thermal EfficiencyRegarding thermal efficiency, the Ryzen 9 7900X3D had an average overall temperature of 63°C. The average overall temperature readings for the i7-13700K were also 63°C. Therefore, comparing their overall performances, both processors are equally thermal efficient.
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D was more efficient in some games like Horizon Zero Dawn. While in other games, the i7-13700K was better performing. However, the overall results conclude that both CPUs are equal in temperature management when running the above-tested games.
Price And Availability
This Ryzen 9 7900X3D Vs Core i7-13700K comparison should give you an idea about the performance of the two processors regarding frame rates, temperature efficiency, and power consumption. But these things aren’t the deciding factor alone. The price also plays an important role when purchasing PC components, especially if you don’t have a heavy wallet.
The price difference of these processors might interest you as they have a difference of 40% in their price tags. The Ryzen 9 7900X3D sits for 585$, and the price for the i7-13700K is 418$.
A few dollars have dropped the Ryzen 9 7900X3D’s price as its launch price was 599$. In the case of the i7-13700K, the opposite happened as its current price is slightly increased compared to its launch price, which was 409$.
Both of these CPUs are currently available in the online and offline markets. So you won’t have any problems shopping for either of these chips.
Core i7-13700K Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: Which One Should You Go For?
After reviewing the benchmark test and the specifications in the comparison, it is hard to conclude which would be a better choice for your build. The Ryzen 9 7900X3D does a better job in terms of performance, and the i7-13700K is comparatively more power efficient.
However, both processors are equally thermal efficient, so you won’t have to consider that factor when choosing one of these CPUs. There may not be many differences in the performances, but the prices of these two chips are very different.
So if you don’t have any budget problems, you should check your priorities for performance or power efficiency and decide accordingly. For users with a low budget, it would be wise to go with the i7-13700K, as there aren’t a lot of differences between the two CPUs.
Pros And Cons
|Ryzen 9 7900X3D||
Frequently Asked Questions
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D features an advanced 5nm process node, while the Core i7-13700K is built on the 10nm process node.
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D boasts higher clock speeds with a Base Clock of 4.4 GHz and a Boost Clock of up to 5.6 GHz, surpassing the Core i7-13700K.
The Ryzen 9 7900X3D has a TDP of 120W, while the Core i7-13700K supports a slightly higher TDP of 125W.
Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋
How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔
Abdemanaf is a skilled creative writer who has been honing his craft since 2011. While initially working in different fields, he found a passion for technology and has been exploring the tech world since early 2015. Over the years, he has developed an in-depth knowledge of the latest tech trends and product offerings by various companies.
Abdemanaf’s writing reflects his analytical mindset and ability to think critically. He has a knack for breaking down complex technical information into easily digestible pieces, making his articles engaging and accessible to readers from all backgrounds. In February 2022, he joined Tech4Gamers as a blog and product comparison writer, where he has been able to hone his skills further.
As a writer, Abdemanaf is dedicated to staying up-to-date with the latest technological advancements and trends, enabling him to provide readers with the most relevant and accurate information. He is always eager to learn more and is constantly seeking new challenges to improve his skills.
Get In Touch: [email protected]