Intel ARC B580 Rated: 9/10 Rycen RX 6600 Rated: 8.2/10
Pros And Cons
GPU | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
ARC B580 | ✅ Better gaming & productivity performance ✅ Better AV1 encoding support | ❌ Limited driver optimization ❌ Lesser RT Cores |
RX 6600 | ✅ More affordable ✅ More power & thermal efficient | ❌ Limited VRAM ❌ 128-bit memory bus |
- From our in-depth analysis, we saw the Arc B580 outperform the RX 6600 by 52.9% when tested side by side in 8 games at 1440p. It also performed 37.4% better when it comes to productivity.
- On the other hand, the RX 6600 compensates by being 13.3% more power-efficient and 19% more thermally efficient than the Arc B580.
- With higher performance, the Arc B580 is slightly more expensive, at $250. In contrast, the RX 6600 is widely available for $199.
- All-in-all, we recommend you go for the newer Arc B580 not only because of its gaming performance and productivity performance but also because of its lower price.
Comparison Table
Technical Specs | Arc B580 | RX 6600 |
---|---|---|
Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Slot Width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Shader Cores (CUDA) | 2560 | 1792 |
Tensor Cores | 160 | N/A |
RT Cores | 20 | 28 |
TMUs | 160 | 112 |
ROPs | 80 | 64 |
Suggested PSU | 450W | 300W |
GPU Review | Intel Arc B580 Review | - |
Architectural Difference
- Process Nodes: The Arc B580 utilises the newer and smaller 5nm process node, making it more efficient. While the RX 6600 uses the older 7nm node.
- Clock Speeds: The Arc B580 operates at a fixed clock speed of 2670 MHz. Whereas the RX 6600 has a base clock speed and a boost clock speeds of 1626 MHz and 2491 MHz respectively.
- VRAM: The Arc B580 overpowers its rival by having a larger 12GB GDDR6 VRAM and a wider 192-bus memory, making it a great choice when it comes to memory-intensive tasks. Whereas the RX 6600 sports only 8GB GDDR6 with a 128-bus width.
- TDP: With a TDP of 192W, the Arc B580 does consume a little more power than the RX 6600 which comes with a TDP of 132W, making it the more energy-efficient model among the two.
- Supported Technologies: The Arc B580 uses Intel’s new AI-based XeSS 2, which is better than RX 6600’s FSR. It also uses dual media engines that support two simultaneous 8K 10-bit workloads.
Today, we’ll be looking at Intel’s newest release with one of AMD’s finest GPUs. This is the comparison between Arc B580 vs RX 6600, and for each GPU, we’ll compare the performance, power, temperatures, and pricing. Ultimately, you’ll be the judge of which one’s the better choice.
Gaming Benchmark – 1440p
What better way to deduce the performance of two graphic cards than putting them to the test with one of the most demanding games? Here, we’ll provide you with the exact numbers obtained from each game. With games being played at 1440p and settings mostly ramping up to the highest.
Recommended Test Bench
- CPU – Intel Core i7 13700K 5.2GHz
- Mobo – MSI Z790 PZ
- RAM – G. Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB DDR5-6400 CL30
- Storage: Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus 1TB NVMe SSD
- CPU Cooler: Xigmatek Aurora 360mm Cooler
- Power Supply: Enermax Revolution D.F. X 1050W
- Operating System – Windows 11
Assassins Creed Mirage
- Right off the bat, we saw that the Arc B580 dominated the RX 6600 by obtaining an average of 70 FPS over RX 6600’s 45 FPS, getting a 43.5% head start.
- The average 1% lows weren’t as significant as the average FPS since the RX 6600 averaged 33 FPS over Arc B580’s 38 FPS – making for only a 14.1% difference.
Cyberpunk 2077
- On Cyberpunk 2077, we observed the Arc B580 overshadowed the RX 6600 with a 68.1% edge as it averaged 63 FPS. In contrast, the RX 6600 tried to catch up by averaging 31 FPS.
- Much similar to the average FPS, the 1% lows were also in favor of the Arc B580 as it achieved an average of 58 FPS over RX 6600’s 29 FPS, resulting in a 66.7% margin.
Ghost Of Tsushima
- The Arc B580 achieved an average of 53 FPS on Ghost Of Tsushima and displayed 28% better performance, while the RX 6600 acquired an average of 40 FPS.
- With a 74.6% lead, the Arc B580 outshines the RX 6600 as it has obtained an average of 46 FPS. Simultaneously, the RX 6600 performed with 21 FPS.
God Of War Ragnarok
- In this popular game, the Arc B580 showcased its supremacy as it had outperformed the RX 6600 by 36.9% since it averaged 61 FPS while the RX 6600 averaged 42 FPS.
- Yet again, the Arc B580 averaged 48 FPS and excelled with a 23.3% edge over the RX 6600, which managed to follow behind with an average 1% low of 38 FPS.
Indiana Jones And The Great Circle
- Here, we saw the Arc B580 absolutely crush the RX 6600, but this time with a whopping 101.6% since it averaged 46 FPS while the RX 6600 treaded behind with 15 FPS.
- The 1% lows broke the record for the Arc B580 since it won by 118.4%, gaining 39 FPS over the RX 6600’s 10 FPS on average.
Red Dead Redemption 2
- On Red Dead Redemption 2, the Arc B580 surpassed the 60 FPS mark by obtaining an average of 70 FPS. On the other hand, the RX 6600 was 69.2% behind as it averaged 34 FPS.
- As for the 1% lows, the Arc B580 reigned supreme by a 66.7% margin as it had averaged 64 FPS. Whereas, the RX 6600 performed with 32 FPS on average.
Senua’s Saga Hellblade 2
- Our analysis revealed that the RX 6600 was still far behind the Arc B580 by a 64.2% margin, as both the cards had acquired an average of 18 FPS and 35 FPS, respectively.
- Here, the RX 6600’s FPS and its 1% lows were exactly the same as they both averaged 18 FPS. The Arc B580, on the other hand, averaged 34 FPS, showcasing a 61.5% performance margin.
Stalker 2: Heart of Chornobyl
- In this recent release, the Arc B580 outperformed the RX 6600 with a 31.6% edge. This comes from its framerates averaging 44 FPS. However, the RX 6600 also performed better with 32 FPS.
- Lastly, the Arc B580 showed better performance than the RX 6600, with a 20.7% lead. The minimum framerates they had were 32 FPS and 26 FPS, respectively.
Productivity Benchmarks
With the gaming benchmarks out of the way, let’s test both of these GPUs on one of the most popular productivity tools.
Geekbench 6
- In the Geekbench 6 test, the Arc B580 outperformed the RX 6600 by a large margin of 34.4%, as it achieved a fascinating score of 94,306. In contrast, the RX 6600 obtained an OpenCL score of 66,630.
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
- As for the Time Spy Graphics rendered in 3DMark, the Arc B580 showcased a whopping 57.6% lead as it secured 14,662 points over the RX 6600’s 8,106 points.
Blender 4.3.0
- For rendering in the latest version of Blender, the Arc B580 once again rose to victory. This time, with a median score of 1695.8, which is 49.5% better than the RX 6600’s 1022.5.
Overall Performance
Graphic Cards | Arc B580 | RX 6600 |
---|---|---|
Average FPS | 📈55.3 | 📈32.1 |
1% Lows | 📉44.9 | 📉25.9 |
Productivity (Rating) | ✏️7/10 | ✏️4.5/10 |
Winner: Intel's Arc B580 |
Average Framerate
In our calculations, we saw a clear difference between the two graphic cards. In this test, the Arc B580 proved to be a clear winner since it had outperformed the RX 6600 in every single game by a 52.9% performance margin, getting over 60 FPS in four of the tested games.
1% Lows:
Similarly, the Arc B580 maintained its lead in terms of 1% low as well because it had consistently gained a higher 1% low framerate in every title, not only making it 53.7% better when compared to the RX 6600, which highlights its capabilities when it comes to gaming.
Productivity:
In terms of productivity, the Arc B580 secured the leading position with a 37.4% margin when compared to the RX 6600 in 3 productivity software. Its newer use of AI-based technology and dual media engine surely helped in making its performance better.
Average Power Consumption
Game | Arc B580 | RX 6600 |
---|---|---|
Assassins Creed Mirage | 98 | 99 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 126 | 99 |
Ghost of Tsushima | 101 | 100 |
God of War Ragnarok | 107 | 100 |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle | 95 | 69 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 127 | 99 |
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 | 105 | 91 |
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl | 106 | 100 |
Average Power Draw | 108.1⚡ | 94.6⚡ |
Winner: RX 6600 |
In terms of power consumption, the RX 6600 is the more power-efficient option of the two graphics cards. It consumed only around 100W of power throughout the entire test, making it 13.3% more energy-efficient than Intel’s Arc B580. Its lower TDP rating significantly contributes to its power efficiency.
Average Thermal Statistics
Game | Arc B580 | RX 6600 |
---|---|---|
Assassins Creed Mirage | 58 | 50 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 64 | 51 |
Ghost of Tsushima | 58 | 49 |
God of War Ragnarok | 60 | 50 |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle | 60 | 45 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 62 | 51 |
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 | 61 | 51 |
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl | 60 | 52 |
Average Temperatures | 60.4🌡️ | 49.9🌡️ |
Winner: RX 6600 |
As for the temperatures recorded in the eight tested games, the Arc B580 operated at high temperatures on average. Although the difference isn’t sky high but still, AMD’s RX 6600 graphics card is 19% more thermally efficient than the Arc B580, and it also didn’t exceed 52°C.
Pricing And Availability
GPU | Arc B580 | RX 6600 | Price Difference |
---|---|---|---|
MSRP | 💲250 | 💲329 | 27.3% |
Current Price | 💲250 | 💲199 | 22.7% |
Since RX 6600 is an old release, its price has been reduced over the years. So much so that the RX 6600 is currently around $50 cheaper than the Arc B580. However, some of the variants exceed the price of the Arc B580. Since Arc B580 is a new release, it isn’t as readily available as the RX 6600 at online stores.
Final Verdict—What We Recommend?
Radeon RX 6600: With all the tests out of the way, we get a clear picture of both GPUs, including RX 6600, which proves to be not only power-efficient and thermally efficient but also a bit lighter on the pocket. However, it does have poor performance when compared to Intel’s GPU.
Intel Arc B580: In contrast, we can see that the Arc B580 displayed better performance both in terms of gaming and productivity. It has a slightly higher price point, but it is justified because of what it brings to the table: higher performance at a reasonable price point.
From our extensive comparison, the Arc B580 undoubtedly stands out from the RX 6600, and we recommend you get this card not only because of its gaming performance but also because it is extremely effective when it comes to productivity – all of which is enclosed in an affordable price tag.
The Intel Arc B580 exceeded over 60 FPS in most games at 1440p, so it is decent for 1440p and excellent for 1080p gaming. However, the RX 6600 is a better choice for 1080p gaming. Any CPU that has less than 6 cores will bottleneck the Arc B580. For Intel CPUs, you need to have Intel 7th gen or news processors, and for AMD, it is best to avoid Ryzen 3 1200 or lower CPUs as well as the entire FX-series processors. Yes, both the Intel Arc B580 and the AMD Radeon RX 6600 support ray tracing. While RX 6600 has 28 RT cores compared to Arc B580’s 20 RT cores, other attributes in the Arc B580 make up for it and thus make it more efficient in ray tracing. The Intel Arc B580 is capable of 8K media encoding/decoding due to its AV1 encoding support. Whereas the RX 6600 only offers support for up to 4K encoding/decoding. The Arc B580’s XeSS 2 relies on AI to upscale image quality but is yet to be integrated into most games. In contrast, the RX 6600’s FSR is more widely present in games but isn’t AI-based.FAQs
More From RX 6600: More From Arc B580: Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋 How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔 [Comparisons Expert] Abdemanaf is a skilled creative writer who has been honing his craft since 2011. While initially working in different fields, he found a passion for technology and has been exploring the tech world since early 2015. Over the years, he has developed an in-depth knowledge of the latest tech trends and product offerings by various companies. Abdemanaf’s writing reflects his analytical mindset and ability to think critically. He has a knack for breaking down complex technical information into easily digestible pieces, making his articles engaging and accessible to readers from all backgrounds. In February 2022, he joined Tech4Gamers as a blog and product comparison writer, where he has been able to hone his skills further. As a writer, Abdemanaf is dedicated to staying up-to-date with the latest technological advancements and trends, enabling him to provide readers with the most relevant and accurate information. He is always eager to learn more and is constantly seeking new challenges to improve his skills. Get In Touch: manaf@tech4gamers.com