Intel Core Ultra 5 245K Rated: 8.2/10 Intel Core i5-14600K Rated: 8.4/10
Pros And Cons
CPU | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | ✅ Capable integrated graphics ✅ Power Efficient | ❌ Performance degrades ❌ Costly for this performance |
Intel Core i5-14600K | ✅ Superb gaming performance ✅ Support DDR5 and DDR4 | ❌ Power Hungry ❌ No upgrade path |
- In our gaming tests, the Core i5-14600K delivers a remarkable 6.3% performance boost, whereas the Ultra 5 245K shows a 4.5% improvement in productivity.
- Despite only a 6.3% performance difference, the Core Ultra 5 245K uses 28.8% less energy and stays approximately 10.6% cooler than the Core i5-14600K.
- As of January 2025, the Ultra 5 245K retains its launch MSRP of $319, while the Core i5-14600K is listed for approximately $214.
- We suggest the Core i5-14600K for enjoying an enhanced gaming experience, whereas the Ultra 5 245K excels in operational efficiency and productivity.
Comparison Table
Feature | Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Intel Core i5-14600K |
---|---|---|
Codename | Arrow Lake | Raptor Lake |
CPU Cores | P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8 Total Cores: 14 | P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8 Total Cores: 14 |
Threads | 14 | 20 |
CPU Max Turbo Clock | Up to 5.2 GHz | Up to 5.3 GHz |
Cache | 24MB Intel Smart Cache | 24MB Intel Smart Cache |
Memory Speed | Up to DDR5 6400 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s |
TDP | 125-159 watts | 125-181 watts |
Max. Operating Temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
Best Motherboards | - | Best Motherboards For Core i5-14600K |
Best CPU Coolers | - | Best CPU Coolers For Core i5-14600K |
Best RAM | - | Best RAM For Core i5-14600K |
Best GPU | - | Best GPU For Core i5-14600K |
Processor Review | Intel Core Ultra 5 245K Review | - |
Architectural Difference
- Architecture: Intel’s new Ultra 5 245K employs an inventive and efficient Arrow Lake architecture, whereas the Core i5-14600K utilizes the power-hungry Raptor Lake Refresh.
- Process Node: The Ultra 5 245K is built on TSMC’s cutting-edge 3nm process, a significant upgrade over the older 10nm technology of the Core i5-14600K.
- CPU Socket: Intel used its FCLGA1700 socket for the previous generation Core i5-14600K processor. In contrast, the Ultra 5 245K features the FCLGA1851 socket, which has 1851 pins for better processing speed.
- Clock Speed: The Ultra 5 245K features a 0.7 GHz faster P-Core base clock. It also provides a 0.6 GHz higher E-Core turbo clock, whereas the Core i5-14600K offers a 0.1 GHz higher P-Core turbo clock.
- CPU Memory: The Ultra 5 245K and Core i5-14600K support up to 192GB of DDR5 memory across two channels. The Ultra 5 245K has a 14.3% greater memory bandwidth than the Core i5-14600K.
- Integrated Graphics: Intel equips the Ultra 5 245K with Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU, while the Core i5-14600K features UHD Graphics 770. The graphics max dynamic frequency of Ultra 5 245K is 22.6% greater.
The Core Ultra 5 245K arrives with a fresh design and ambitious performance claims. Can it outperform the affordable Core i5-14600K for budget-conscious gamers and content creators? Let us start with the performance analysis of the Core Ultra 5 245K vs Core i5-14600K to find a better value option.
Gaming Benchmarks
Evaluating processors’ performance in intensive gaming provides deeper insights into their potential. To this end, we tested the performance of the Core Ultra 5 245K vs Core i5-14600K in eight taxing games at 1080p resolution.
Test Bench
The test bench specifications used with these processors are listed below.
- OS: Windows 11
- GPU: Gigabyte RTX 4090 Gaming OC 24G
- Motherboards: MSI Meg Z790 Ace Max, MSI MPG Z890 Edge Ti WiFi
- RAM: Kingston Fury Renegade RGB DDR5 32GB 7200MHz
- SSD: Teamgroup T-Force Z540 2TB Gen5 NVMe SSD
- PSU: be quiet! Dark Power Pro 13 1300W
- CPU Cooler: Corsair iCUE Link Titan 360 RX RGB
Cyberpunk 2077
- Starting with Cyberpunk 2077, the Core i5-14600K delivers 13.6% better average performance at 117 FPS compared to the 103 FPS of the Ultra 5 245K.
- The Core i5-14600K achieves a 20.3% higher low 1% frame rate (83 FPS) compared to the Ultra 5 245K (69 FPS).
Forza Horizon 5
- In Forza Horizon 5, the Core i5-14600K reaches 233 FPS, offering a 4.9% boost over the 222 FPS achieved by the Ultra 5 245K.
- The Core i5-14600K achieves 177 FPS for low 1% performance, which is 9.9% higher than the 161 FPS recorded by the Ultra 5 245K.
Ghost of Tsushima
- During Ghost of Tsushima, the Core i5-14600K delivered a 172 FPS average, a 3.0% improvement over the 167 FPS achieved by the Ultra 5 245K.
- For the low 1% performance, the Ultra 5 245K took the lead with 99 FPS, a 6.5% advantage compared to the 93 FPS rendered by the Core i5-14600K.
Microsoft Flight Simulator
- While playing Microsoft Flight Simulator, the Core i5-14600K achieved an average of 126 FPS, marking a 5.88% higher performance than the Ultra 5 245K with 119 FPS.
- We observed that the Core i5-14600K scores 104 FPS at its worst 1% performance in this gameplay, 1.96% more than the Ultra 5 245K with 102 FPS.
Red Dead Redemption 2
- In Red Dead Redemption 2, the Core i5-14600K(182 FPS) delivered a 5.2% higher average performance than the Ultra 5 245K (173 FPS).
- At the 1% low, the Core i5-14600K maintained a slight edge, achieving 117 FPS, which is 2.63% higher than the Ultra 5 245K’s 114 FPS.
Silent Hill 2
- For Silent Hill 2, we saw that the Core i5-14600K and the Ultra 5 245K delivered an identical average FPS of 139, showcasing equal performance.
- At the 1% low, the Core i5-14600K (77 FPS) held a 6.94% advantage compared to the Ultra 5 245K (72 FPS).
Star Wars Outlaws
- While playing Star Wars Outlaws, the Core i5-14600K achieved an average of 131 FPS, outperforming the Ultra 5 245K by 3.14% (127 FPS).
- In the worst-case 1% scenario, the Core i5-14600K maintained 100 FPS, surpassing the Ultra 5 245K’s 97 FPS by a solid 3.0%.
Starfield
- In our last gaming session of Starfield, the Core i5-14600K offered a 120 FPS average, 19.4% higher than the 113 FPS average furnished by the Ultra 5 245K.
- In the worst 1% performance scenario, the Core i5-14600K maintained 85 FPS, nearly 16.4% better than the Ultra 5 245K’s 73 FPS.
Productivity Benchmarks
The Core i5-14600K demonstrated dominance across the majority of our gaming benchmarks. Now, let’s explore which processor leads in the realm of productivity performance.
Cinebench R24
- The Core i5-14600K’s single-core score was 122 points in our Cinebench R24 benchmarks, around 14% lower than that of the Ultra 5 245K, which scored 137 points.
- In multi-core performance, the Core i5-14600K achieved an impressive 1390 points, trailing the Ultra 5 245K’s 1522 points, a striking 9.49% lead.
Blender Open Data
- Our Blender Open Data test results show that the Ultra 5 245K performs around 7.1% better than the Core i5-14600K in rendering complex 3D scenes.
- In our benchmarks, the Ultra 5 245K rendered 150 samples per minute, while the Core i5-14600K rendered 140 samples per minute.
Adobe Photoshop 2025
- In Adobe Photoshop 2025 performance test, the Core i5-14600K scored 10,289 points, while the Ultra 5 245Kh scored 9,684.
- This means that the Core i5-14600K provides a performance advantage of roughly 6.25% over the Ultra 5 245K in speedy rendering and complex image processing.
Overall Performance
Stats | Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Intel Core i5-14600K |
---|---|---|
Average FPS | 📈 143.4 | 📈 152.5 |
Low 1% FPS | 📉 98.4 | 📉 104.5 |
Productivity | ✏️ 9.3 | ✏️ 8.9 |
Winner: Intel Core i5-14600K |
Average Frame Rate
During our 1080p gaming benchmarks, the Core i5-14600K exhibited amazing prowess, offering an outstanding 152.5 FPS. In contrast, the Ultra 5 245K achieved an average of only 143.4 FPS. These results show that the Core i5-14600K outperformed by 6.3%, highlighting its gaming prowess.
Low 1% Frame Rate
During the worst 1% scenarios, the Core i5-14600K offers a notable 6.2% advantage over the Ultra 5 245K. The Core i5-14600K produced a better average of 104.5 FPS at low 1%, compared to the Ultra 5 245K’s 98.4 FPS.
Productivity Performance
In our productivity tests, the Ultra 5 245K was approximately 4.5% more efficient than the Core i5-14600K, showcasing its expertise in handling demanding tasks. However, the Core i5-14600K offered better performance in our Adobe Photoshop performance test.
Power Efficiency
Game | Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (W) | Intel Core i5-14600K (W) |
---|---|---|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 76 | 104 |
Forza Horizon 5 | 60 | 88 |
Ghost of Tsushima | 44 | 68 |
Microsoft Flight Simulator | 43 | 67 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 66 | 94 |
Silent Hill 2 | 63 | 80 |
Star Wars Outlaws | 78 | 103 |
Starfield | 82 | 115 |
Average Gaming Power Draw | 64.0 ⚡ | 89.9 ⚡ |
Winner: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K |
During our power efficiency tests for the Core Ultra 5 245K vs Core i5-14600K, the Ultra 5 245K drove incredibly lower power, averaging 64.0 watts, which is 28.8% less than the Core i5-14600K’s 89.9 watts. This efficiency helps it to yield enhanced performance for every unit of energy expended.
Thermal Efficiency
Game | Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (°C) | Intel Core i5-14600K (°C) |
---|---|---|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 53 | 61 |
Forza Horizon 5 | 51 | 55 |
Ghost of Tsushima | 46 | 53 |
Microsoft Flight Simulator | 48 | 52 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 51 | 56 |
Silent Hill 2 | 52 | 55 |
Star Wars Outlaws | 54 | 59 |
Starfield | 54 | 61 |
Average Gaming Temperature | 51.1 🌡️ | 56.5 🌡️ |
Winner: Intel Core Ultra 5 245K |
The temperature difference between the Ultra 5 245K and the Core i5-14600K is evident across various games. On average, the Ultra 5 245K maintained a cooler 51.1°C, while the Core i5-14600K reached 56.5°C. So, we conclude that the Ultra 5 245K is approximately 10.6% more thermally efficient.
Price And Value
Prices | Intel Core Ultra 5 245K | Intel Core i5-14600K | Price Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Launch MSRP | 💲319 | 💲319 | 0.0% |
Current Price | 💲319 | 💲214 | 49.1% |
The Intel Core i5-14600K delivers impressive performance and exceptional value at its current price of $214, offering a 49.1% savings compared to the Ultra 5 245K. Regarding availability, these processors are readily available in the online and offline markets.
What Do We Recommend?
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K: This efficient processor offers reliable productivity capabilities. It is well-suited for multitasking while maintaining low power draw and temperatures. However, its overall performance could be better for this price.
Intel Core i5-14600K: This Processor excels in 1080p and 1440p gaming and productivity tasks. Its strong performance metrics and attractive price point make it a good option for low-budget users who demand more performance per dollar spent.
We recommend the Core i5-14600K to gamers seeking higher performance at a more affordable price. The Core Ultra 5 245K is good for office work where users need productivity, multitasking capabilities, and operating efficiency
The Core Ultra 5 245K is an efficient processor more suitable for productivity. However, we find the Core i5-14600K better for gaming performance. The answer depends on the situation. One crucial point is that the coming generations integrate advanced motherboards, which can not be used with 14th-generation processors. Yes, it works well for multitasking, handling multiple applications smoothly without slowing down. The max turbo clock speed of the Ultra 5 245K is up to 5.2 GHz. No. The Ultra 5 245K has an FCLGA1851 socket, and this processor requires a Z890 motherboard.Frequently Asked Questions
More From Intel Core Ultra 5 245K:
More From Intel Core i5-14600K:
Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋
How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔
[Comparisons Specialist]
I’m a passionate computer hardware expert specializing in CPUs and GPUs. With a lifelong curiosity for hardware and extensive hands-on experience, I provide valuable insights, practical advice, and in-depth analysis on these components. Engaging with the hardware community, I exchange knowledge and stay at the forefront of technological advancements.
Get In Touch: uzair@tech4gamers.com