GuidesComparisonsARC A770 Vs RX 6600 XT

ARC A770 Vs RX 6600 XT [Gaming & Overall 2024]

We compare the RX 6600 XT and Arc A770 in Gaming Benchmarks, and discuss the differences in their specs and architecture.

As we shift gears from our previous comparison between the RTX 2070 and RTX 2070 SUPER, we now embark on a new matchup that brings Intel and NVIDIA into the spotlight. Directing our attention toward the ARC A770 vs RX 6600 XT, we meticulously assess their different performance.

Key Takeaways

  • Starting with the architectural differences, the Intel Arc A770 operates on Generation 12.7, whereas the RX 6600 XT utilizes the RDNA 2.0 architecture.
  • Additionally, regarding FPS performance, the RX 6600 XT holds a slight edge over the Arc A770, delivering a 3.4% higher overall gaming performance.
  • Moreover, the RX 6600 XT demonstrates superior power efficiency compared to the Arc A770, consuming an average of 33.4% less power.
  • Finally, in benchmark tests, the RX 6600 XT exhibits a significant 16.9% advantage in thermal efficiency over the Arc A770.

Comparison Table

Technical Specs Intel Arc A770 Radeon RX 6600 XT
GPU Name DG2-512 Navi 23
Architecture Generation 12.7 RDNA 2.0
Process Size 6nm 7nm
Transistors 21,700 million 11,060 million
Base Clock 2100 MHz 1968 MHz
Boost Clock 2400 MHz 2589 MHz
CUDA Cores 4096 2048
Tensor Cores 512 NA
RT Cores 32 32
TMUs 160 128
ROPs 128 64
Memory Size 16GB 8GB
Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Bus Width 256 bit 128 bit
Memory Bandwidth 512.0 GB/s 256.0 GB/s
TDP 225W 160W
Suggested PSU 600W 450W
Release Date Oct 12th, 2022 Jul 30th, 2021
MSRP 329 USD 450 USD

Architectural Difference

  1. Process Node: Firstly, the RX 6600 XT and Arc A770 exhibit contrasting process sizes, with the former utilizing 6nm and the latter using 7nm technology.
  2. Clock Speed: Moreover, Arc A770 has a Base Clock of 2100 MHz and a Boost Clock of 2400 MHz. In contrast, the RX 6600 XT has a Base Clock of 1968 MHz, Boost Clock of 2589 MHz.
  3. VRAM: Furthermore, the RX 6600 XT features 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, while the Arc A770 boasts a higher capacity of 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM.
  4. TDP: Additionally, the RX 6600 XT has a lower TDP of 160W compared to the Arc A770’s slightly higher TDP of 225W.
  5. Supported Technologies: Lastly, to enhance graphics performance, the Arc A770 leverages XeSS technology, while the RX 6600 XT utilizes FSR technology.

Also Read: RTX 2060 Vs AMD RX 6600 XT

Arc A770 Vs RX 6600 XT: Gaming Benchmarks

We will now extensively compare the ARC A770 vs RX 6600 XT, thoroughly evaluating their performance through benchmarks by analyzing crucial factors such as FPS, temperatures, power consumption, and 1% lows at 1080p ultra settings.

Testing Rig

Here are the specs of the testing rig:

  • CPUIntel Core i9-13900K
  • Motherboard: ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming
  • Memory: G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz
  • Operating System: Windows 10 Pro

Important Note: When examining benchmark test results, it’s crucial to consider external factors that can affect the data. These factors include the ambient temperature during testing, the quality of system cooling, and any background processes running concurrently.

Let’s delve into the gaming benchmarks and directly compare the performance of the Arc A770 and RX 6600 XT.

A Plague Tale: Requiem

A Plague Tale: Requiem
A Plague Tale: Requiem 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting off, the RX 6600 XT falls slightly behind the Arc A770, achieving an average FPS of 46 compared to the Arc A770’s 51 FPS, with a difference of 10.3%.
  • Moreover, in terms of thermal performance, the Arc A770 reaches a peak temperature of 72°C, while the RX 6600 XT maintains a significantly lower temperature of 60°C, showcasing a notable advantage of 18.1%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 exhibits lower power efficiency, consuming 190W, while the RX 6600 XT proves more energy-efficient with a power consumption of 140W, surpassing it by 30.3%.
  • Notably, the RX 6600 XT impresses with superior 1% low performance, achieving a remarkable 41 FPS, outperforming the Arc A770’s 35 FPS by 10.5%.

Also Read: RX 6600 XT Vs RTX 3060

Forza Horizon 5 – Ray Tracing

Forza Horizon 5 - Ray Tracing
Forza Horizon 5 – Ray Tracing 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Surprisingly, the RX 6600 XT lags behind the Arc A770, delivering an average FPS of 63 compared to the Arc A770’s 74 FPS, resulting in a significant difference of 16%.
  • Moreover, the RX 6600 XT surpasses the Arc A770 in thermal performance, recording an average of 56°C, while the Arc A770 reaches a higher temperature of 70°C, demonstrating a remarkable difference of 22.2%.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A770 demonstrates higher power consumption at 174W, while the RX 6600 XT showcases better power efficiency at 104W, showcasing a significant difference of 50.3%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 showcases better 1% low performance at 67 FPS, while the RX 6600 XT lags behind at 54 FPS, resulting in a significant difference of 21.4%.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Firstly, the RX 6600 XT showcases an exceptional performance, recording an average FPS of 108, while the Arc A770 trails behind with 84 FPS, showcasing a substantial difference of 25%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 maintains a temperature of 69°C, while the RX 6600 XT showcases better thermal management with an average temperature of 59°C, resulting in a significant difference of 15.6%.
  • Moreover, the Arc A770 consumes 158W of power, while the RX 6600 XT operates with improved power efficiency at 116W, resulting in a noticeable difference of 30.6%.
  • Furthermore, the RX 6600 XT exhibits 1% low performance of 53 FPS, surpassing the Arc A770’s 41 FPS, showcasing a substantial difference of 25.5%.

Kena

Kena
Kena 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Firstly, it’s worth mentioning that the Arc A770 outperforms the RX 6600 XT with an average FPS of 93 compared to 77 FPS, indicating a noticeable difference of 18%.
  • Moreover, the Arc A770 reaches a peak temperature of 73°C, while the RX 6600 XT manages to stay significantly cooler at 60°C, exhibiting a substantial advantage of 19.5%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 exhibits a higher power consumption of 190W, while the RX 6600 XT demonstrates superior power efficiency at 133W, showcasing a significant difference of 35.2%.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A770 demonstrates a higher 1% low performance at 57 FPS, while the RX 6600 XT falls short at 46 FPS, resulting in a notable difference of 21.3%.

Also Read: RX 6600 XT Vs RTX 3050

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Impressively, the RX 6600 XT exhibits remarkable performance, achieving an average FPS of 71, surpassing the Arc A770’s 58 FPS, resulting in a significant difference of 20.1%.
  • Moreover, the RX 6600 XT stands out in thermal performance, maintaining an average temperature of 59°C, while the Arc A770 records a higher temperature of 67°C, showcasing a significant difference of 12.6%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 consumes 158W of power, while the RX 6600 XT showcases better power efficiency at 129W, resulting in a notable difference of 20.2%.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A770 exhibits 1% low performance of 40 FPS, outshining the RX 6600 XT’s 58 FPS, showcasing a remarkable difference of 36.7%.

Cyberpunk 2077 – Ray Tracing

Cyberpunk 2077 Ray Tracing
Cyberpunk 2077 Ray Tracing 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting off, the RX 6600 XT falls short with an average FPS of 12, while the Arc A770 takes the lead with 26 FPS, showcasing a significant difference of 73.6%.
  • Moreover, the Arc A770 reaches a temperature of 70°C, while the RX 6600 XT exhibits superior thermal management, maintaining an average temperature of 58°C, resulting in a notable difference of 18.7%.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A770 demonstrates higher power consumption at 182W, while the RX 6600 XT proves more energy-efficient at 112W, showcasing a significant difference of 47.6%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 impresses with 1% low performance of 23 FPS, leaving the RX 6600 XT far behind at 6 FPS, resulting in a staggering difference of 117.2%.

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator
Microsoft Flight Simulator 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Firstly, the Arc A770 outshines the RX 6600 XT, delivering an average FPS of 61 compared to 57 FPS, demonstrating a modest difference of 6.7%.
  • Moreover, the Arc A770 reaches a peak temperature of 73°C, while the RX 6600 XT maintains a lower temperature of 63°C, demonstrating a difference of 14.7% in thermal performance.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A770 exhibits a power consumption of 190W, while the RX 6600 XT demonstrates improved power efficiency at 137W, resulting in a noticeable difference of 32.4%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 showcases better 1% low performance at 53 FPS, while the RX 6600 XT achieves 50 FPS, resulting in a marginal difference of 5.8%.

Also Read: ARC A770 vs RTX 3070

Halo Infinite

Halo Infinite
Halo Infinite 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting off, the RX Arc A770 struggles to keep up with the RX 6600 XT, providing an average FPS of 53, while the RX 6600 XT delivers an impressive 76 FPS, resulting in a substantial difference of 35.6%.
  • Moreover, the Arc A770 showcases a temperature of 64°C, while the RX 6600 XT maintains a cooler average temperature of 58°C, exhibiting a difference of 9.8% in thermal performance.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A770 consumes 141W of power, while the RX 6600 XT operates with better power efficiency at 109W, showcasing a significant difference of 25.6%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 demonstrates 1% low performance of 29 FPS, surpassing the RX 6600 XT’s 55 FPS, showcasing a significant difference of 61.9%.

Spider-Man: Miles Morales – Ray Tracing

Spider-Man: Miles Morales - Ray Tracing
Spider-Man: Miles Morales – Ray Tracing 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • To begin with, the RX 6600 XT falls behind with an average FPS of 23, whereas the Arc A770 shines with 59 FPS, exhibiting a remarkable difference of 87.8%.
  • Moreover, the Arc A770 reaches a peak temperature of 72°C, while the RX 6600 XT excels in thermal management with an average temperature of 55°C, showcasing a remarkable difference of 26.7%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 exhibits higher power consumption at 180W, while the RX 6600 XT demonstrates superior power efficiency at 94W, showcasing a remarkable difference of 62.7%.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A770 exhibits a higher 1% low performance at 51 FPS, while the RX 6600 XT falls behind at 18 FPS, resulting in an astonishing difference of 95.6%.

Also Read: ARC A770 vs RTX 3060 Ti

F1 22

F1 22
F1 22 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting off, the RX 6600 XT trails behind the Arc A770, delivering an average FPS of 172 compared to the Arc A770’s exceptional 115 FPS, showcasing a noticeable difference of 39.7%.
  • Moreover, the Arc A770 maintains a temperature of 68°C, while the RX 6600 XT exhibits better thermal performance with an average temperature of 61°C, resulting in a notable difference of 10.8%.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A770 consumes 159W of power, while the RX 6600 XT showcases better power efficiency at 138W, resulting in a notable difference of 14.1%.
  • In addition, the RX 6600 XT impresses with 1% low performance of 133 FPS, while the Arc A770 lags behind at 81 FPS, resulting in a substantial difference of 48.5%.

F1 22 – Ray Tracing

F1 22 Ray Tracing
F1 22 Ray Tracing 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Notably, the RX 6600 XT falls slightly behind the Arc A770, achieving an average FPS of 41 compared to the Arc A770’s 47 FPS, with a difference of 13.6%.
  • Moreover, the Arc A770 reaches a peak temperature of 72°C, while the RX 6600 XT demonstrates superior thermal management with an average temperature of 61°C, showcasing a significant difference of 16.5%.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A770 demonstrates higher power consumption at 181W, while the RX 6600 XT proves more energy-efficient at 145W, showcasing a significant difference of 22%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 showcases better 1% low performance at 38 FPS, while the RX 6600 XT achieves 32 FPS, resulting in a notable difference of 17.1%.

Overall Gaming Performance

Overall Gaming Performance
Overall Gaming Performance 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

Upon thorough examination of numerous benchmark tests, a certain graphics card emerges as the frontrunner in the highly competitive battle between the RX 6600 XT vs Arc A770.

  • At the forefront of the FPS performance battle, the Arc A770 and RX 6600 XT engage in a close matchup, where one card manages to showcase a slight advantage over the other across a range of games.
  • Moreover, when it comes to gaming performance, the RX 6600 XT takes a slight lead over the Arc A770, delivering an average of 67.8 FPS compared to the 65.5 FPS on the latter.
  • In summary, the RX 6600 XT outperforms the Arc A770 with a modest 3.4% advantage in FPS performance.

Average Power Consumption

Average Power Consumption
Average Power Consumption 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

As our analysis delves deeper, we uncover essential insights into the power consumption of the RX 6600 XT and Arc A770 graphics cards. Let’s explore the noteworthy observations from our testing:

  • Firstly, to maximize performance and ensure stability, it is recommended to pair the Arc A770 with a power supply of 600W or higher. This will meet the power requirements and TDP of 225W.
  • Moreover, to achieve optimal performance and ensure stable operation, pairing the RX 6600 XT with a power supply of at least 450W is recommended, considering its lower power draw of 160W.
  • Furthermore, our benchmark testing showed that the RX 6600 XT exhibits significantly lower power consumption, averaging 123.3W, while the Arc A770 consumes a higher average of 173W.
  • To summarize, the RX 6600 XT stands out for its notable power efficiency, consuming an average of 33.4% less power than the Arc A770.

Average Thermal Statistics

Average Thermal Statistics
Average Thermal Statistics 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

Next, we turn our attention to the average thermal statistics of the RX 6600 XT vs Arc A770, revealing insights into their heat dissipation and temperature management capabilities.

  • After conducting comprehensive benchmark tests, it is evident that the RX 6600 XT excels in thermal efficiency, outperforming the Arc A770 in this crucial aspect.
  • When it comes to thermal efficiency, the RX 6600 XT stands out with its impressive average temperature of 59°C. On the other hand, the Arc A770 falls slightly behind with an average temperature of 70°C.
  • In conclusion, the RX 6600 XT outperforms the Arc A770 in terms of thermal efficiency with a significant advantage of 16.9%, making it a more effective solution for maintaining lower temperatures during demanding tasks.

Also Read: How To Lower GPU Temperature 

Pricing And Availability

Regarding pricing and availability, there is a notable price difference between the RX 6600 XT and Arc A770 graphics cards. The Arc A770 is currently priced at around 329 USD, while the RX 6600 XT offers a more budget-friendly option with a price tag of approximately 230 USD.

This translates to a significant price difference of 99 USD or about 35.4%, making the RX 6600 XT a more affordable choice for gamers seeking a balance between performance and cost-effectiveness.

It’s important to consider that prices may vary depending on factors such as retailer, region, and market conditions. It’s recommended to check reputable platforms like Newegg for the most accurate and updated pricing information.

RX 6600 XT Vs Arc A770: Which One To Buy?

  • With a notable price difference of 35.4% and a modest 3.4% increase in average FPS performance, the RX 6600 XT is an appealing choice over the Arc A770, providing both cost savings and improved gaming capabilities.
  • In addition, the RX 6600 XT excels in thermal efficiency, with a 16.9% lower average temperature and 33.4% lower average power consumption than the Arc A770.
  • Ultimately, the RX 6600 XT outperforms the Arc A770 across the board, surpassing it in FPS performance, power consumption, and thermal efficiency.

Pros And Cons

GPU Pros Cons
Intel Arc A770
  • Provides 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM
  • Performance can be enhanced via the XeSS technology
  • XeSS is only compatible with some games
Radeon RX 6600 XT
  • Power consumption is pretty low
  • Provides great experience at 1080p resolution

When it comes to deciding between the Arc A770 and RX 6600 XT, we understand the difficulty you may face. But worry not! We’re here to provide more options to consider. Explore our website, where you’ll find comprehensive reviews of two other remarkable GPUs: the RTX 4070 Vs RX 7900 XT.

Our dedicated team has meticulously analyzed these graphics cards, evaluating their performance and technical aspects across a wide range of gaming benchmarks. By diving into our detailed assessments, you’ll gain valuable insights to help you make an informed decision that suits your gaming needs and preferences.

FAQs

Which graphics card offers better gaming performance between the Arc A770 and RX 6600 XT?

The RX 6600 XT delivers superior gaming performance compared to the Arc A770, providing 3.4% higher FPS and smoother gameplay.

What are the main differences in architecture between the Arc A770 and RX 6600 XT?

The Arc A770 utilizes Intel’s Generation 12.7 architecture, while the RX 6600 XT is built on AMD’s RDNA 2.0 architecture.

Is the RX 6600 XT more expensive than the Arc A770?

No, the RX 6600 XT is priced 35.4% lower than the Arc A770, making it a more cost-effective option.

Related articles

Ryzen 5 3600 Vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Should You Upgrade In 2024?

We compared the Ryzen 5 3600 Vs Ryzen 7 3700X to show you how well these two mid-range processors perform in 2024.

Ryzen 9 7950X Vs Ryzen 9 7900X [We Tested 10 Games]

With the same release date, the Ryzen 9 7950X Vs Ryzen 9 7900X are so similar yet so different. What makes them that way? Let's out!

Core i7-13700K Vs Core i5-13600K [Gaming Benchmarks]

To help users make the right decision, we are going to do an in-depth battle of Intel i7-13700K Vs Intel i5-13600K.

i9-12900K Vs i7-12700K: Should You Upgrade? [2024]

We compare two Alder Lake CPUs, Intel Core i9-12900k vs Intel Core i7-12700k, based on benchmarks, price, specs, architecture, and value.

RTX 4090 Vs RTX 3080 Ti: Should You Upgrade In 2024?

Our RTX 4090 vs. RTX 3080 Ti guide will tell you all the differences between the two graphics cards by comparing them in all categories.

Similar Guides