GuidesComparisonsRX 6600 XT Vs Arc A770

RX 6600 XT Vs Arc A770 [Gaming & Overall Performance]

We compared the RX 6600 XT and Arc A770 in Gaming Benchmarks, and discussed the differences in their specs and architecture.

Expert Verified By

Intel ARC A770
Rated:
8/10

AMD RX 6600 XT
Rated:
9/10


Pros And Cons

GPUProsCons
Intel Arc A770βœ… Ample 16GB GDDR6 VRAM
βœ… XeSS Technology Enhanced performance
❌ XeSS compatible with few games only
AMD RX 6600 XTβœ… Low Power Wattage
βœ… Great 1080p Experience
❌ Lags behind RTX 3060 Ti

Key Takeaways
  • In our benchmarks, the RX 6600 XT holds a slight edge over the ARC A770, delivering a 3.4% higher overall gaming FPS performance.
  • The RX 6600 XT proves more efficient than the ARC A770, consuming 33.4% less power and a 16.9% advantage in thermal efficiency.
  • The current prices of the ARC A770 and the RX 6600 XT hold a gap of 30%, with the RX 6600XT coming out as the more economical out of the two cards. 
  • We would recommend the RX 6600XT as the card delivered an exceptional performance in our benchmarks while being well under budget.

Comparison Table

Technical SpecsIntel Arc A770AMD RX 6600 XT
GPU NameDG2-512Navi 23
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7RDNA 2.0
Transistors21,700 million11,060 million
TMUs160128
ROPs12864
Suggested PSU600 W450W
Release DateOct 12th, 2022Jul 30th, 2021
MSRP329 USD450 USD

Architectural Difference

  1. Process Node: Firstly, the RX 6600 XT and Arc A770 exhibit contrasting process sizes, with the former utilizing 6nm and the latter using 7nm technology.
  2. Clock Speed: Moreover, Arc A770 has a Base Clock of 2100 MHz and a Boost Clock of 2400 MHz. In contrast, the RX 6600 XT has a Base Clock of 1968 MHz, expandable to a boost clock of 2589 MHz.
  3. VRAM: Furthermore, the RX 6600 XT features 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, while the Arc A770 boasts a higher capacity of 16GB of GDDR6 VRAM.
  4. TDP: Additionally, the RX 6600 XT has a lower TDP of 160W compared to the Arc A770’s slightly higher TDP of 225W.
  5. Supported Technologies: Lastly, to enhance graphics performance, the Arc A770 leverages XeSS technology, while the RX 6600 XT utilizes FSR technology.

As we shift gears from our previous comparison between the RTX 2070 vs RTX 2070 SUPER, we now embark on a new matchup that brings Intel and NVIDIA into the spotlight. Directing our attention toward the ARC A770 vs RX 6600 XT, we meticulously assess their different performance.


RX 6600 XT Vs Arc A770 – Gaming Benchmarks

Now, we will mention the various games we used as potential benchmarks to evaluate the performance of our subject GPUs in real-time stressed environments.

Testing Rig

A Plague Tale: Requiem

A Plague Tale: Requiem
A Plague Tale: Requiem 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting, the RX 6600 XT falls slightly behind the Arc A770, achieving an average FPS of 46 compared to the Arc A770’s 51 FPS, with a difference of 10.3%.
  • Notably, the RX 6600 XT impresses with superior 1% low performance, achieving a remarkable 41 FPS, outperforming the Arc A770’s 35 FPS by 10.5%.

Forza Horizon 5 – Ray Tracing

Forza Horizon 5 - Ray Tracing
Forza Horizon 5 – Ray Tracing 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Surprisingly, the RX 6600 XT lags behind the Arc A770, delivering an average FPS of 63 compared to the Arc A770’s 74 FPS, resulting in a significant difference of 16%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 showcases better 1% low performance at 67 FPS, while the RX 6600 XT lags at 54 FPS, resulting in a significant difference of 21.4%.

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Impressively, the RX 6600 XT exhibits remarkable performance, achieving an average FPS of 71, surpassing the Arc A770’s 58 FPS, resulting in a significant difference of 20.1%.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A770 exhibits a 1% low performance of 40 FPS, outshining the RX 6600 XT’s 58 FPS, showcasing a remarkable difference of 36.7%.

Cyberpunk 2077 – Ray Tracing

Cyberpunk 2077 Ray Tracing
Cyberpunk 2077 Ray Tracing 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting off, the RX 6600 XT falls short with an average FPS of 12, while the Arc A770 takes the lead with 26 FPS, showcasing a significant difference of 73.6%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 impresses with a 1% low performance of 23 FPS, leaving the RX 6600 XT far behind at 6 FPS, resulting in a staggering difference of 117.2%.

Halo Infinite

Halo Infinite
Halo Infinite 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The RX Arc A770 provided an average FPS of 53, while the RX 6600 XT delivered an impressive 76 FPS, with a difference of 35.6%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 demonstrates a 1% low performance of 29 FPS, surpassing the RX 6600 XT’s 55 FPS, showcasing a significant difference of 61.9%.

Spider-Man: Miles Morales – Ray Tracing

Spider-Man: Miles Morales - Ray Tracing
Spider-Man: Miles Morales – Ray Tracing 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • To begin with, the RX 6600 XT falls behind with an average FPS of 23, whereas the Arc A770 shines with 59 FPS, exhibiting a remarkable difference of 87.8%.
  • Furthermore, the Arc A770 exhibits a higher 1% low performance at 51 FPS, while the RX 6600 XT falls behind at 18 FPS, resulting in an astonishing difference of 95.6%.

F1 22

F1 22
F1 22 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting, the RX 6600 XT trails behind the Arc A770, delivering an average FPS of 172 compared to the Arc A770’s exceptional 115 FPS, showcasing a noticeable difference of 39.7%.
  • In addition, the RX 6600 XT impresses with a 1% low performance of 133 FPS, while the Arc A770 lags at 81 FPS, resulting in a substantial difference of 48.5%.

F1 22 – Ray Tracing

F1 22 Ray Tracing
F1 22 Ray Tracing 1080p Gaming Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Notably, the RX 6600 XT falls slightly behind the Arc A770, achieving an average FPS of 41 compared to the Arc A770’s 47 FPS, with a difference of 13.6%.
  • In addition, the Arc A770 showcases better 1% low performance at 38 FPS, while the RX 6600 XT achieves 32 FPS, resulting in a notable difference of 17.1%.

RX 6600 XT Vs Arc A770 – Overall Gaming Performance

ProcessorAverage FPS1% Lows
Intel ARC A770πŸ“ˆ 65.5πŸ“‰ 68.4
AMD RX 6600 XTπŸ“ˆ 67.8πŸ“‰ 71.9
Winner: AMD RX 6600 XT

The results of our benchmarks displayed the dominance of the Radeon RX 6600XT over the Intel ARC A770 as the former secured 3.4% more average gaming framerate than the latter. The same was the case for 1% low framerates where the RX 6600XT ld by 3.5 FPS on average.

Average Power Consumption

GamesIntel ARC A770 (W)AMD RX 6600 XT (W)
Average Power Consumption173⚑️123.7⚑️
Winner: AMD RX 6600 XT

Our benchmark testing showed that the RX 6600 XT stands out for its notable power efficiency, consuming an average of 33.4% less power than the ARC A770. This brings out the RX 6600 XT in the front as an economical and power-efficient GPU.

Average Thermal Statistics

GamesIntel ARC A770 (Β°C)AMD RX 6600 XT (Β°C)
Average Thermal Capacity70🌑️58🌑️
Winner: AMD RX 6600 XT

In our benchmarks, it is evident that the RX 6600 XT excels in thermal efficiency, outperforming the Arc A770. The RX 6600 XT outperforms the Arc A770 in terms of thermal efficiency with an advantage of 16.9%, making it more effective for maintaining lower temperatures during tasks.


Pricing And Availability

GPUMSRPCurrent Price
Intel ARC A770πŸ’²329πŸ’²379
AMD RX 6600 XTπŸ’²450πŸ’²290
Price Difference36.77%23.4%

The ARC A770 is priced at around 23.4% more than the AMD RX 6600 XT. This difference is colossal considering that the users can get better performance, thermals, and power consumption in 23% less amount. This ultimately puts the AMD 6600XT in the front for budget gamers.


Conclusion – Which One We Recommend?

AMD RX 6600XT: With a notable price difference of 23.4% and a modest 3.4% increase in average FPS performance, the RX 6600 XT is an appealing choice over the Arc A770, providing both cost savings and improved gaming capabilities.

Intel ARC A770: conversely, the ARC A770 may not be the best choice considering the higher thermals, power ratings, and a higher price tag just to get lower performance than the RX 6600XT. These reasons fail to get our recommendation for the Intel ARC A770.

Ultimately, we would recommend the RX 6600 XT as it outperforms the Arc A770 across the board, surpassing it in FPS performance, power consumption, and thermal efficiency.


FAQs

Which graphics card offers better gaming performance between the Arc A770 and RX 6600 XT?

The RX 6600 XT delivers superior gaming performance compared to the Arc A770, providing 3.4% higher FPS and smoother gameplay.

What are the main differences in architecture between the Arc A770 and RX 6600 XT?

The Arc A770 utilizes Intel’s Generation 12.7 architecture, while the RX 6600 XT is built on AMD’s RDNA 2.0 architecture.

Is the RX 6600 XT more expensive than the Arc A770?

No, the RX 6600 XT is priced 35.4% lower than the Arc A770, making it a more cost-effective option.


More From Intel ARC A770:

More From AMD RX 6600 XT:

Was our article helpful? πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. πŸ”‹

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. πŸ˜”

Related articles

RTX 4070 Super Vs RTX 3080: Super Or The OG?

We've compared the RTX 4070 Super Vs RTX 3080 to show you their main differences. Hint: One card is extremely good at everything

RTX 4070 Ti Super Vs RX 6800 XT: We Tested 7 Games

The RTX 4070 Ti Super VS RX 6800 XT comparison will compare one of Nvidia's heavy hitters to one of the best value GPUs on the market.

RTX 4080 Super Vs RTX 3090: Should You Upgrade?

In the RTX 4080 Super vs RTX 3090 comparison, we will see how a new card from Nvidia stands up against their best from the last generation.

GTX 1080 Ti Vs RX 5700 XT: Gaming Benchmarks

In this comparison we will be looking at the performance benchmarks of the GTX 1080 Ti vs RX 5700 XT in order to see who wins in this battle.

Ryzen 5 3600 Vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Should You Upgrade?

We compared the Ryzen 5 3600 Vs Ryzen 7 3700X to show you how well these two mid-range processors perform in 2024.

Similar Guides