GuidesComparisonsCore i5-13400 Vs Ryzen 5 7600

Core i5-13400 Vs Ryzen 5 7600 [Full Comparison 2023]

We compare the Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 5 7600 in Gaming Benchmarks and learn about their overall gaming performance.

The Ryzen 5 7600 is the fundamental processor of AMD’s latest Ryzen 7000 series. It features 6 CPU cores, 12 threads, and a turbo boost clock of up to 5.1 GHz. In contrast, the Core i5-13400 is a fundamental processor of Intel’s latest 13th generation. The i5-13400 offers 10 cores, 16 threads, and a turbo boost clock of up to 4.6 GHz. In Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 5 7600, we shall meticulously examine the features and capabilities of these two processors.

Key Takeaways

  • The gaming performance of the Ryzen 5 7600 is about 13.2% better than the Core i5-13400.
  • At 1080p, the Core i5-13400 offers 20.3% more power efficiency and 35.8% more thermal efficiency than the Ryzen 5 7600.
  • There is only an $8 difference in the MSRPs of the Ryzen 5 7600 ($229) and the Core i5-13400 ($221).

Basic Differences 

Comparison Table

Feature AMD Ryzen 5 7600 Intel Core i5-13400
Architecture Zen 4 Raptor Lake Hybrid architecture
Socket AM5 FCLGA 1700
Former Codename Raphael Raptor Lake
No. of Cores Total: 6 Performance Cores: 4

Efficiency Cores: 6

Total Cores: 10

No. of Threads 12 16
Base Clock 3.80 GHz P-core base: 2.80 GHz

E-core base: 1.80 GHz

Boost Clock Max Turbo: Up to 5.1 GHz P-core boost: 4.60 GHz

E-core boost: 3.30 GHz

Max Turbo: 4.60 GHz

Integrated Graphics AMD Radeon Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 730
iGPU Base Clock 400 MHz 300 MHz
iGPU Boost Clock 2200 MHz 1.55 GHz
iGPU Core Count 2 2
CPU Memory Support DDR5 only DDR4 and DDR5
Memory Capacity 128GB 128GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Bandwidth 83.2 GB/s 76.8 GB/s
ECC Support Yes (Requires mobo support) No
L1 Cache 384KB 80K per core
L2 Cache 6MB 9.5MB
L3 Cache 32MB 20MB Intel Smart Cache
TDP 65  watts Base Power: 65 W

Turbo Power: 154 W

Max Temperature Up to 95°C Up to 100°C
Thermal Solution AMD Wraith Stealth PCG 2020C
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0 and 4.0
Total PCIe Lanes 28 20
Unlocked For Overclocking Yes No
Fabrication Resolution 5nm FinFET at TSMC 10nm
Launch Date 1/14/2023 Q1’2023
Launch Price $229 $221.00
Motherboards X670E, X670, B650E, B650 B760, Z790

Architecture

The Core i5-13400 employs Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, whereas the Ryzen 5 7600 employs AMD’s Zen 4 architecture.

Intel’s newest hybrid architecture, Raptor Lake, is a successor to the Alder Lake architecture. About Raptor Lake, Intel claims, Our new 13th Gen Intel Core processor isn’t just a chip. It’s a multiverse where everyone can have it all and be it all. This hybrid architecture feature up to 24 cores and 32 threads in top variant CPUs.

It is designed for gamers who want the best performance possible to play the newest games while also being able to handle other workloads. It offers a framework that maximizes multitasking and configurability options.

AMD Zen 4 excels its predecessor (Zen 3) by a double-digit IPC margin, further establishing AMD’s reputation for cutting-edge design, flawless implementation, and award-winning “Zen” architecture delivery.

According to AMD, the Zen 4 processors provide up to 57% more effective content creation in V-Ray Render than the rivals. AMD also claims that the Zen 4 processors are more energy-efficient than the competitors by up to 47%.

Also Read: Core i5-13500 Vs i5-13400

Clock Speed

When it comes to the CPU clock speed, the Ryzen 5 7600 again takes a lead of about 10.9%.

The base clock of the Ryzen 5 7600 is 3.80 GHz, while that of the performance core of the i5-13400 is 2.50 GHz. E-cores of the i5-13400 have a base clock of 1.80 GHz.

Regarding the maximum clock speed, the Ryzen 5 7600 can operate up to 5.1 GHz, while the Core i5-13400 can reach a maximum speed of 4.6 GHz. The Ryzen 5 7600 is unlocked for overclocking, but the Core i5-13400 can not be overclocked. The Core i5-13400 has Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0.

Integrated Graphics

Where the Core i5-13400 offers Intel’s UHD Graphics 730, the Ryzen 5 7600 presents AMD’s Radeon Graphics as its iGPU.

The peak graphics frequency of the Intel UHD Graphics 730 is 1.55 GHz, containing 24 execution units (EUs). Its base frequency is 300 MHz. The outputs of this iGPU include eDP 1.4b, DP 1.4a, and HDMI 2.1. It has a single Multi-Format Codec Engine and supports up to four displays.

Regarding the Radeon Graphics of the R5 7600, they have a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. This iGPU has two multi-format codec engines. It supports the USB Type-C DisplayPort Alternate Mode.

The Radeon Graphics of R5 7600 tackles the games and tasks better than the UHD Graphics 730 of the Core i5-13400.

CPU Socket

The Ryzen 5 7600 proffers AMD’s first LGA socket, the AM5 (LGA 1718). In contrast, the Intel Core 15-13400 features an FCLGA 1700 socket.

AM5 (LGA 1718) is a premium socket of AMD that provides dual-channel DDR5 memory and cutting-edge connectivity features. It is AMD’s most advanced desktop socket offering up to 24 PCIe 5.0 lanes.

The socket has 1718 protruding pins for connection with the motherboard. AM5 motherboard family includes four new chipsets, offering customers the freedom and flexibility to select their desired distinct specs.

FCLGA 1700 (Socket V) is a zero insertion force flip-chip land grid array (LGA) socket introduced in November 2021. It is compatible with Intel desktop Alder Lake and Raptor Lake processors. FCLGA 1700 socket is bigger (7.5 mm longer) than LGA 1200.

It has a pin count of 1700, making data transmission quicker and cooling the CPU. This socket is compatible with DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 (28 lanes).

Memory

The Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 5 7600 have 128GB DDR5 memory. Both CPUs have two memory channels. The Core i5-13400 additionally supports DDR4 memory, while the Ryzen 5 7600 lacks the support for DDR4.

In memory processing speed, the Ryzen 5 7600 leads with a margin of 400 MHz in DDR5 speed, making it 8.33% faster. The DDR5 speed of the Ryzen 5 7600 is up to 5200 MT/s, while that of the Core i5-13400 is 4800 MT/s. The DDR4 memory speed of the Core i5-13400 is up to 3200 MT/s.

Regarding the memory bandwidth, the Core i5-13400 has a max bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, whereas the Ryzen 5 7600 has a max bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

The main (Level 3) cache of the Ryzen 5 7600 (32MB) is 60% bigger than that of the Core i5-13400 (20MB Intel Smart Cache).

TDP And Maximum Temperature

If we see the thermal design powers of two CPUs, the default TDP of the R5 7600 is 65 watts. On the other hand, the Core i5-13400 has its base power set at 65 watts and its boost power set at 154 watts.

Although the core i5-13400’s higher power may enable it to give improved performance, rising energy expenditures are a side effect. As a result, this is detrimental to consumers on a strict budget.

Meanwhile, the Ryzen 5 7600’s operating temperature range is only 95°C. The Core i5-13400, on the other hand, can operate up to 100°C.

AMD offers the Wraith Stealth thermal solution with the Ryzen 5 7600X. In contrast, Intel provides the PCG 2020C thermal solution for the Core i5-13400 to encourage cooling under hot situations. Thermal Monitoring Technology is another feature of the Core i5-13400.

Also Read: How To Lower CPU Temperature?

Ryzen 5 7600 Vs Core i5-13400: Gaming Benchmarks

After reviewing the technical details of the Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 5 7600, let’s now talk about the gaming performance of the two processors. We will discuss their performance in eight demanding games played at 1080p resolution. The system used for playing games had the following specifications.

Gaming Rig

  • OS: Windows 11
  • CPU 1: Intel Core i5-13400
  • Motherboard 1: GIGABYTE Z790 Aorus Master LGA 1700
  • CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 7600
  • Motherboard 2: GIGABYTE X670 Aorus Master AM5
  • GPU: Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
  • RAM: Crucial DDR5 32GB 4800 MHz cl40
  • SSD: Samsung 980 PRO M.2 1TB PCIe NVMe Gen 4.0
  • Cooler: Be Quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 360mm Water Cooler

Red Dead Redemption 2

Gaming Performance Graph
Red Dead Redemption 2 Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In Red Dead Redemption 2, the average rendition by the Ryzen 5 7600 was 7 FPS or  4.5% greater than the Core i5-13400.
  • The Core i5-13400 produced an average of 147 FPS at its best, while the Ryzen 5 7600 provided a flawless average of 154 FPS.
  • During the gameplay, the Core i5-13400 ran at a lower power of 45 W, whereas the Ryzen 5 7600 ran at 62 W.
  • Regarding the CPU gaming temperature, the Ryzen 5 7600 was running at a higher temperature of 71°C, while the Core i5-13400 ran at as low a temperature as 46°C.
  • Moving to a Low 1% frame rate, the Ryzen 5 7600 delivered 105 FPS, while the Core i5-13400 could only muster up 97 FPS.

Also Read: Core i5-13400 Vs Ryzen 5 5600X

COD: Modern Warfare 2

Gaming Performance Graph
Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • On average, the Core i5-13400 rendered Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 only one FPS smoother than the Ryzen 5 7600.
  • At its finest, the Core i5-13400 delivered an average frame rate of 146 FPS, while the Ryzen 5 7600 delivered an average of 145 FPS.
  • While gaming, the Ryzen 5 7600 operated at 44 W, and the Core i5-13400 ran at a lower power of 38 W.
  • The Core i5-13400 operated at a low temperature of 35°C while the Ryzen 5 7600 ran at a higher temperature of 50°C.
  • Considering the Low 1% performance, the Ryzen 5 7600 produced 120 FPS, and the Core i5-13400 provided 119 FPS.

Cyberpunk 2077

Gaming Performance Graph
Cyberpunk 2077 Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • While testing Cyberpunk 2077 in our Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 5 7600 benchmarks, the average rendition by the Ryzen 5 7600 was 3 FPS or 1.9% greater. 
  • The Ryzen 5 7600 produced an average frame rate of 162 FPS, while the Core i5-13400 generated 159 FPS.
  • Ryzen 5 7600 employed 60 W of electricity during Cyberpunk 2077, in contrast to the Core i5-13400’s consumption of 47 W.
  • While the Ryzen 5 7600 ran at a greater temperature of 62°C, the Core i5-13400 ran at a lower temperature of 51°C.
  • At its low 1% performance, the Core i5-13400 provided 130 FPS, and the Ryzen 5 7600 produced 127 FPS.

League Of Legends

Gaming Performance Graph
League Of Legends Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In League Of Legends, the Ryzen 5 7600 produced an average performance of 46 FPS higher or 22.4% better than the Core i5-13400.
  • During this game, the Core i5-13400 generated 205 FPS on average, compared to 251 FPS from the Ryzen 5 7600.
  • The Ryzen 5 7600 consumed 52 W of electricity, while the Core i5-13400’s power consumption was 44 W.
  • Regarding gaming temperature, the Core i5-13400 ran at 36°C, whereas the Ryzen 5 7600 ran at 46°C.
  • The Ryzen 5 7600 generated 156 FPS at a low 1% performance, while the Core i5-13400 produced 136 FPS in League Of Legends.

Lost Ark

Gaming Performance Graph
Lost Ark Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The Ryzen 5 7600 outperformed the Core i5-13400 by an average of 89 FPS, or 27.2%, in Lost Ark.
  • While playing the game, the average frame rate achieved by the Core i5-13400 was 327 FPS, while the average frame rate achieved by the Ryzen 5 7600 was 416 FPS.
  • Compared to the Core i5-13400’s 41 W power usage, the Ryzen 5 7600 used 45 W in Lost Ark.
  • The Core i5-13400 ran at 47°C, compared to the Ryzen 5 7600’s operating temperature of 57°C.
  • In Lost Ark, the Ryzen 5 7600 produced 283 FPS at a low 1% performance compared to the Core i5-13400’s 165 FPS.

Overwatch 2

Gaming Performance Graph
Overwatch 2 Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In Overwatch 2, the Ryzen 5 7600 outscored the Core i5-13400 on average by 24 frames per second or 7.4%.
  • While playing the game, the Core i5-13400 managed an average frame rate of 326 FPS, while the Ryzen 5 7600 managed a 350 FPS average.
  • The Ryzen 5 7600 consumed 51 W of electricity, while the Core i5-13400 ran at a higher power of 52 W in Overwatch 2.
  • In this game, the operating temperatures of the Core i5-13400 and Ryzen 5 7600 were 43°C and 58°C, respectively.
  • During the gameplay, the low 1% performance of the Ryzen 5 7600 was at 268 FPS, while that of the Core i5-13400 was at 245 FPS.

Also Read: Ryzen 5 7600X Vs Core i5-13400

PUBG

Gaming Performance Graph
PUBG Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The average performance of the Ryzen 5 7600 was 33 FPS or 14.8% better than the Core i5-13400 in PUBG.
  • During the gameplay, the Ryzen 5 7600 managed an average frame rate of 256 FPS, while the Core i5-13400 delivered a 223 FPS average.
  • The Core i5-13400 ran at a power of 44 W, whereas the Ryzen 5 7600 used 51 W of electricity.
  • At 1080p resolution, the Core i5-13400’s running temperature of 40°C is stunning. The Ryzen 5 7600 operated at 61°C in the same conditions.
  • Regarding the low 1% frame rate, the Core i5-13400 produced 146 FPS, and the Ryzen 5 7600 managed 143 FPS.

Spider-Man Remastered

Gaming Performance Graph
Spider-Man Remastered Benchmarks at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In Spider-Man Remastered, the Ryzen 5 7600 yields 26 FPS or 13.5% better performance than the Core i5-13400.
  • The Core i5-13400 could only muster up an average of 192 FPS, while the Ryzen 5 7600 managed to furnish an average of 218 FPS.
  • During the gameplay, the Core i5-13400 ran at a lower temperature of 48°C, compared to the Ryzen 5 7600’s higher 65°C operating temperature.
  • The power consumption of the Ryzen 5 7600 was 66 W during Spider-Man Remastered, while the Core i5-13400 performed at 47 W.
  • Concerning the low 1% performance, the Core i5-13400 mustered up 131 FPS, and the Ryzen 5 7600 provided 140 FPS.

Overall Gaming Analysis

Performance

Overall Performance
Average frame rates of the two CPUs at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

The overall gaming performance of the Ryzen 5 7600 is 13.2% better than the Core i5-13400 at 1080p resolution. In the games mentioned above, the Core i5-13400 produced an average frame rate of 215.6 FPS, while the Ryzen 5 7600 rendered a brilliant average of 244 FPS.

In terms of low 1% performance, the Ryzen 5 7600 outperformed the Core i5-13400 by 14.8%. The Ryzen 5 7600 managed an average of 167.8 FPS at its low 1%, while the Core i5-13400 could only produce 146.1 FPS at its low 1% performance.

Power Consumption

Powe
Overall power consumption of the two CPUs at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

The Ryzen 5 7600 ran at an average power of 53.9 watts during the above-discussed games, while the Core i5-13400 executed the same games at 44.8 watts. Thus, the Core i5-13400 is about 20.3% more power efficient than the Ryzen 5 7600.

Related Guide: Gaming PC Power Usage

Thermal Conditions

Temperature
Average gaming Temperature of the two CPUs at 1080p – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

Regarding the CPU gaming temperature, the Core i5-13400 operated at an average temperature of 43.3°C, whereas the Ryzen 5 7600 operated at an average of 58.8°C. Thus, the Core i5-13400 is 35.8% thermally more efficient than the Ryzen 5 7600.

Related Guide: CPU Temperature While Gaming.

Price And Availability

After a detailed review of the performance and specifications, let’s discuss the cost and availability of the two processors. AMD launched the Ryzen 5 7600 for $229, and Intel launched the Core i5-13400 with an MSRP of $221.

The launch MSRPs of these processors are almost the same, and the trend in their current prices is also the same.

Concerning the availability of these processors, both the CPUs, being the latest processor of 2023, are readily available in markets. You can also order them from the official online shops of Intel and AMD.

Which One Is Better For You?

After the in-depth Core i5-13400 vs Ryzen 5 7600 comparison, it’s time to choose between the two processors.

  • If you want the best gaming experience, we recommend the Ryzen 5 7600 for its 13% better gaming performance than the rival.
  • But the Ryzen 5 7600 has a higher running cost due to more power consumption.
  • So, if your monthly spending is limited, we recommend the Core i5-13400 for its about 20% greater power efficiency.

Pros And Cons

CPU Pros Cons
Intel Core i5-13400
  • Low price.
  • High thermal efficiency.
  • Greater power efficiency.
  • Does not support high data visualization technology.
  • Not unlocked for overclocking.
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
  • Attractive price.
  • Higher gaming performance for a low price.
  • High base and boost clock frequencies.
  • Lesser cores than the rival Intel processors.
  • Consumes more power.
  • Attains higher temperature in gaming.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the Ryzen 5 7600 maintain a lower gaming temperature than the Core i5-13400?

During the 1080p gaming session, the Core i5-13400 maintains a lower temperature. The Core i5-13400 displayed a 35.8% higher thermal efficiency than the Ryzen 5 7600.

Does the Core i5-13400 provide better gaming performance than the Ryzen 5 7600?

No, the gaming performance of the Ryzen 5 7600 is better than the Core i5-13400 at stock.

Can we overclock the Ryzen 5 7600 and Core i5-13400?

We can overclock the Ryzen 5 7600, but the Core i5-13400 is not unlocked for overclocking.


Related Articles

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

Intel i7-12700k vs Ryzen 7 5800x: Which Is Better?

We compare Intel's i7 12700K vs AMD's Ryzen 7 5800x in various aspects to help you choose your next mid-to-high range CPU.

i9-13900K Vs i9-12900K: Which Is Better In 2023?

In this guide, we will cover all the topics related to Core i9-13900K vs Core i9-12900K, including their gaming benchmarks.

Core i5-12600k Vs Ryzen 7 5800x: Gaming & Productivity [2023]

We put Team Blue against Team Read in the form of the i5-12600K vs Ryzen 7 5800x comparing Gaming Benchmarks, Productivity, and other factors.

Ryzen 5 7600x vs Ryzen 5 5600x [Gaming & Productivity]

To help you make the right decision, we have decided to do a Ryzen 5 7600x vs Ryzen 5 5600x comparison to see which one is better.

Core i9-12900KS vs i7-13700K [All Differences]

We compare Core i9-12900KS vs Core i7-13700K as we put them to a test in gaming benchmarks to see how they perform.

Similar Guides

Abde Manaf
Abde Manaf
Abdemanaf has been a creative writer since 2011. He first dwelled in the tech world in early 2015 and has since compared many product offerings by different companies. Abdemanaf started working for Tech4Gamers in February 2022 as a blog and comparison writer.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here