GuidesComparisonsCore i5-13500 Vs i5-13400: Should You Upgrade?

Core i5-13500 Vs i5-13400: Should You Upgrade?

We compare the Core i5-13500 and i5-13400 in gaming benchmarks and discuss the overall performance of the two processors.

Expert Verified By

Intel Core i5-13500

Rated: 6.5/10

Intel Core i5-13400

Rated: 8/10


Pros And Cons

CPUProsCons
Core i5-13500✅Better performance.
✅Better price-to-performance ratio.
❌Slightly more expensive.
❌Higher power consumption.
Core i5-13400✅Lower price.
✅More power-efficient.
✅More thermally-efficient.
❌Worse gaming performance

Key Takeaways
  • Performance-wise, the Core i5-13500 is 11.1% faster than the Core i5-13400 in 1080P gaming, which is a difference that might swell over the years you have this chip.
  • The Core i5-13400 was 41.1% more power-efficient and 16.4% more thermally efficient than the Core i5-13500 across the 1080p gaming benchmarks.
  • The Core i5-13500 is about 18% more expensive than the Core i5-13400, on average. Thus, it provides better performance-per-dollar value. 
  • For most people, the Core i5-13400 has a similar performance to its counterpart at a lower price, which is why we think most consumers should choose this chip if deciding between the two.

Comparison Table 

CPUCore i5-13500Core i5-13400
ArchitectureHybrid CoreHybrid Core
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
Processing NodeIntel 7 (10nm)Intel 7 (10nm)
SocketLGA1700LGA1700
Supporting ChipsetsIntel 600 Series
Intel 700 Series
Intel 600 Series
Intel 700 Series
L2 Cache11.5MB9.5MB
L3 Cache24MB20MB
Memory SupportDDR5 (up-to 4800 MT/s)
DDR4 (up-to 3200 MT/s)
DDR5 (up-to 4800 MT/s)
DDR4 (up-to 3200 MT/s)
Integrated GraphicsIntel® UHD Graphics 770Intel® UHD Graphics 730
Max Operating Temperature100°C100°C
Base Power65 watts65 watts
Boost Power154 watts154 watts
Launch Date Q1'23Q1'23

Architectural Differences

  1. Core And Thread Counts: The Core i5-13500 boasts 14 cores, split into 6 P-cores and 8 E-cores. In contrast, the i5-13400 has 10 cores, halving the E-cores and resulting in 20 threads, 4 fewer than the i5-13500.
  2. Boost Clock Speeds: Both CPUs share base clock speeds but differ in boosts. The i5-13500 reaches 4.80 GHz (P-cores) and 3.50 GHz (E-cores) with Turbo Boost. The more budget-friendly i5-13400 achieves 4.60 GHz (P-cores) and 3.30 GHz (E-cores).
  3. L2 and L3 Cache: The i5-13500’s extra cores increase the L2 cache by 2MB to a total of 11.5MB, while the i5-13400 has 9.5 MB. In the L3 cache, the i5-13500 boasts 24MB, surpassing the i5-13400’s 20.
  4. Integrated Graphics: The i5-13500 has upgraded Intel UHD 770 graphics with 32 execution units and 2 multi-format codec engines, whereas the i5-13400 features Intel UHD 730 graphics with 24 execution units and a single codec engine.

Intel’s Core i5-13500 and Core i5-13400 are two entry-level offerings of their mid-range Core i5 lineup. You might already know the Core i5-13500 is a costlier chip, but does it provide higher value with its higher price? We’ll find out today as we compare the Core i5-13500 vs Core i5-13400. 


Core i5-13500 Vs Core i5-13400: Gaming Benchmarks

To test the capabilities of these processors, we have paired them with a graphics card that is sure to leave the chips as the only bottleneck of the system. You can read the specifications of the test bench below:

Test Bench

Marvel’s Spiderman Remastered

Marvel's Spiderman: Remastered at 1080P, in terms of average FPS, %1 lows, temperatures, and power consumption.
Spiderman: Remastered – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • When we tested Marvel’s Spiderman Remastered on both processors, we found that the Core i5-13500 had an average framerate of 198 FPS3.6% greater than the 191 FPS average of the 13400.
  • The 1% lows of the 13500 were also higher at around 136 FPS instead of the 129 FPS of the i5-13400, which was around 5.4% slower.

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 (2022)

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II at 1080P, in terms of average FPS, %1 lows, temperatures, and power consumption.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The narrative was flipped when we tested CoD MW II, with the 13400 leading by almost 2%. It had an average framerate of 156 FPS, which was marginally higher than the 153 FPS average of the Core i5-13500.
  • The margin was stretched a bit within the 1% lows. The 13400 led by 4.3%, with a minimum of 98 FPS, while the 13500 had a minimum framerate of 94 FPS.

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080P, in terms of average FPS, %1 lows, temperatures, and power consumption.
Cyberpunk 2077 – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The lead of the 13400 continued into Cyberpunk 2077, with the processor getting an average framerate of 157 FPS, while its rival was 2.6% slower with an average framerate of 153 FPS.
  • The 1% lows remained the same on both chips at 105 FPS.

Overwatch 2

Overwatch 2 at 1080P, in terms of average FPS, %1 lows, temperatures, and power consumption.
Overwatch 2 – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The i5-13500 was marginally better than the i5-13400 in our test of Overwatch 2. It racks up 336 FPS on average compared to the i5-13400, which scores 331 FPS, leading to a difference of around 1.5%.
  • The status quo continued into the 1% lows, with the 13500 getting a minimum framerate 2.5% higher than its counterpart at 247 FPS instead of the 241 FPS of the 13400.

Lost Ark

Lost Ark at 1080P, in terms of average FPS, %1 lows, temperatures, and power consumption.
Lost Ark – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • This game marks another win for the i5-13500K, which scored a framerate 6.2% higher than its rival. It had an average framerate of 338 FSP, while the 13400 had an average framerate of 318 FPS.
  • The i5-13500 maintained its lead in terms of the 1% low framerates, scoring 187 FPS. The Core i5-13400 scores 164 FPS, accounting for a rather large 14% difference between the two processors.

Red Dead Redemption 2

Red Dead Redemption 2 at 1080P, in terms of average FPS, %1 lows, temperatures, and power consumption.
Red Dead Redemption 2 – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Punches were traded once again in our test of RDR2, which had an average framerate of 148 FPS on the 13400, while the 13500 had an average of around 146 FPS, making up a 1.4% difference between the two.
  • A minuscule frame marked the difference between the 1% low framerate of these processors, with the 13500 getting lows of 97 FPS while the 13400 had lows of 98 FPS.

PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds

PUBG at 1080P, in terms of average FPS, %1 lows, temperatures, and power consumption.
PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The i5-13500 averaged a framerate of 244 FPS in our test of PUBG, while the i5-13400 averaged 233 FPS, which marked a 4.7% advantage for the higher-end chip. 
  • The 1% lows flipped the findings of the average framerates, with the 13400 getting lows of 150 FPS, whereas the 13500 had a minimum framerate of 150 FPS.

League of Legends

League of Legends at 1080P, in terms of average FPS, %1 lows, temperatures, and power consumption.
League of Legends – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In our League of Legends test, the i5-13500 secured a lead with an average framerate of 217 FPS. In contrast, the i5-13400 fell approximately 6% behind, averaging 205 FPS.
  • In terms of the 1% lows, the i5-13500 had a lead of around 2% with a framerate of 143 FPS, while the i5-13400 had a minimum framerate of 139 FPS

Overall Gaming Performance

FeaturedCore i5 13500Core i5 13400
Average FPS241 📈217 📈
%1 lows144 📉140 📉
Winner: Intel's Core i5 13500

The i5-13500 outperformed the i5-13400 by 11% in average framerates, mainly noticeable at 1080p with potent GPUs. Minimum framerates had a 3% gap in favour of the i5-13500, likely invisible to most users.


Power Consumption

ProcessorPower Consumption
Core i5-13500⚡55.2
Core i5-13400⚡39.1
Difference41%

The Core i5-13400 exhibited 41% better power efficiency than the i5-13500. Both CPUs are power-efficient, indicating that this difference is unlikely to affect gaming experiences significantly. Opting for the i5-13400 could be advantageous if you have strict power constraints.


Thermal Performance 

ProcessorTemperatures
Core i5-13500🌡️41.1
Core i5-13400🌡️35.5
Difference16%

In our testing, the i5-13400 exhibited a notable 16.4% higher thermal efficiency compared to the i5-13500. This shows the 13400 might be less prone to thermal throttling, which might equivalate the performance between it and the 13500 in some work scenarios.


Price And Value

Graphics CardLaunch MSRPCurrent Price
Core i5-13400💲221💲189
Core i5-13500💲242💲244
Difference9.5%18%

During our research, we found that the price of the Core i5-13500 has not fallen below MSRP yet, with sites like eBay selling this processor for large markups. Newegg had it listed for the above price, whereas BestBuy had listed the 13400 for the mentioned price. 


Which One Should You Go For?

Core i5-13400: Being a rather low-end processor, the Core i5-13400 holds itself well in our comparison. It performed respectably in some games, with excellent thermal performance and power efficiency. If you are looking for a budget processor, the Core i5-13400 is a processor that will meet all your needs.

Core i5-13500: This processor was shaping into a great option until we got the price. It has good performance and low power consumption, but being sold for more than its MSRP would not sit right with most consumers. Still, if you need extra performance for a bit more money, the Core i5-13500 is not a terrible choice.

For most users, the Core i5-13400 offers comparable performance to its counterpart at a more affordable price. This cost-effective proposition positions the i5-13400 as a sensible choice for most consumers deciding between the two processors. Still, the Core i5-13500 can do a better job if you want higher performance.


Frequently Asked Questions

Does the Core i5-13500 / Core i5-13400 support overclocking?

No, the Core i5-13500 and Core i5-13400 are not unlocked for overclocking. However, it’s possible to increase their frequencies using Intel’s Turbo Boost feature.

Is the Core i5-13500 better than the Core i5-13400?

The Core i5-13500 is 11.1% faster than the Core i5-13400 in 1080P gaming. At the same time, it’s about 7.2% more costly. 

Does the Core i5-13500 / Core i5-13400 have integrated graphics? 

Yes. The Core i5-13500 uses Intel’s UHD 770 graphics, while the Core i5-13400 contains Intel’s UHD 730 GPU.


Related Articles

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

Is It Safe To Use Public USB Chargers?

The potential dangers of using public USB chargers and how you can protect yourself from cyber attacks carried out using by them.

Is Moore’s Law Really Dead?

The long-running Moore's Law is slowly coming to a halt, but there's plenty to look forward to in the future.

Why CPU Frequency Doesn’t Matter These Days In Gaming

CPU frequency has always been considered a key metric for measuring gaming performance, but it's not as important as you think.

RTX 4070 Ti Super vs RTX 4070: Should You Upgrade?

In the RTX 4070 Ti Super vs RTX 4070 comparison, we will see how the beefed up version of the 4070 compares with its vanilla counterpart.

RTX 4080 Super vs RTX 4080: Does Super Make Any Difference?

In the RTX 4080 Super vs RTX 4080 comparison, we will distinguish Nvidia's latest and greatest GPU with its vanilla variant.

Similar Guides