RX 7900 GRE Vs RX 6950 XT [9 Games Tested]

Welcome to an in-depth exploration of the battle between the RX 7900 GRE vs RX 6950 XT, where we delve into their architecture, specifications, and gaming benchmarks. These two powerful graphics cards have been making waves in the gaming world, promising unparalleled performance and cutting-edge technologies. Join us as we unravel the intricacies of these GPUs and uncover the performance they bring to the table.

Key Takeaways

• Built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, the RX 6950 XT contrasts with the RX 7900 GRE, which boasts the more advanced RDNA 3.0 architecture, promising enhanced performance and efficiency.
• Despite its slight advantage, the RX 6950 XT edges out the RX 7900 GRE by 7.5% in FPS performance, suggesting competitive gaming capabilities.
• The RX 7900 GRE distinguishes itself by consuming 16.4% less power than the RX 6950 XT, contributing to energy savings and efficiency.
• As for thermal management, the RX 7900 GRE maintains a 2.7% lead over the RX 6950 XT, ensuring a cooler operating temperature for improved longevity and performance.

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Process Node: Starting off, the RX 7900 GRE boasts a cutting-edge 5nm process node, surpassing the RX 6950 XT’s 7nm process node for enhanced efficiency and performance.
2. Clock Speed: Embracing dynamic clocking, the RX 7900 GRE exhibits a Base Clock of 1500 MHz and a Boost Clock of 2245 MHz, differing from the RX 6950 XT’s Base Clock of 1860 MHz and Boost Clock of 2310 MHz.
3. VRAM: Moving on to the Virtual RAM category, both the RX 7900 GRE and RX 6950 XT equip themselves with substantial 16GB GDDR6 VRAM, ensuring smooth and seamless gaming experiences with ample memory resources.
4. TDP: Moving on to power efficiency, while the RX 7900 GRE maintains a responsible 260W TDP, the RX 6950 XT carries a slightly higher 335W TDP, catering to diverse power consumption preferences.
5. Supported Technologies: Summing it all up, the RX 7900 GRE and RX 6950 XT share the advantage of FSR technology, enhancing gaming visuals and performance across the board.

Also Read: RX 6950 XT Vs RX 6800 XT

RX 7900 GRE Vs RX 6950 XT: Gaming Benchmarks

As we delve into the world of gaming benchmarks, we’re all set to witness a head-to-head showdown between the RX 7900 GRE and RX 6950 XT. Our exploration will take us through a diverse range of games, putting these GPUs to the test in terms of FPS, power consumption, thermal performance, and 1% lows.

Brace yourselves for an in-depth analysis that will shed light on how these cards truly perform under the pressure of modern gaming titles

Testing Rig

Here are the specs of the testing rig:

• CPU: Intel Core i9-13900K
• GPU 1: Power Color AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE 16GB
• GPU 2: ASUS ROG Strix AMD Radeon RX 6950XT 16GB
• Motherboard: Asus ROG Strix Z790 E Gaming
• Memory: Corsair Dominator 32GB DDR5 6000MHz – CL36
• Power Supply: Corsair HX1500i 1500 Watt 80 Plus Platinum
• CPU Cooler: Corsair ICUE H150I ELITE
• Storage Drive: SAMSUNG 980 PRO 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2
• Operating System: Windows 10 pro

Note: When assessing the performance benchmarks of graphics cards, it’s essential to acknowledge that various external factors can influence the results. The benchmarking process involves running games and applications under controlled conditions to measure the GPUs’ capabilities.

Similar Comparison: RTX 4090 Vs RX 6950 XT

Let’s not waste any time and jump right into the gaming benchmarks to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the performance differences between the RX 7900 GRE and RX 6950 XT graphics cards.

Far Cry 6

• The RX 6950 XT maintains a 4.8% lead with an average FPS of 64, outperforming the RX 7900 GRE, which achieves 61 FPS, showcasing a discernible performance gap.
• Moreover, the RX 7900 GRE showcases its thermal management prowess with an average temperature of 62°C, outperforming the RX 6950 XT’s temperature of 59°C by a noticeable 4.9% difference.
• Furthermore, the RX 7900 GRE sets the stage for a power-efficient performance by drawing 212.7W, which underscores its prowess and establishes a commanding 18.6% lead over the RX 6950 XT’s power consumption of 256.4W.
• The RX 6950 XT demonstrates a notable 10% advantage in 1% low performance with 42 FPS, surpassing the RX 7900 GRE’s performance of 38 FPS.

Similar Read: RTX 4090 Vs RX 6950 XT

Cyberpunk 2077

• Demonstrating a 9.9% advantage, the RX 6950 XT achieves an average FPS of 53, overshadowing the performance of the RX 7900 GRE at 48 FPS, emphasizing the distinctions between these GPUs.
• Operating at an average temperature of 73°C, the RX 6950 XT demonstrates its thermal management, standing 4.1% warmer than the RX 7900 GRE’s temperature of 70°C.
• Power consumption takes a back seat as the RX 7900 GRE demonstrates its energy-efficient capabilities, consuming a modest 230.8W. This remarkable feat translates into a significant 22.9% advantage over the RX 6950 XT’s higher power draw of 290.7W.
• With a slight 5% lead, the RX 6950 XT achieves 1% lows of 41 FPS, outshining the RX 7900 GRE’s performance of 39 FPS.

Marvel Spiderman Remastered 

• With an average FPS of 63, the RX 6950 XT takes the lead by 17.2% compared to the RX 7900 GRE’s performance of 53 FPS, highlighting the evident performance difference between the two GPUs.
• Moreover, the RX 7900 GRE maintains effective thermal control with an average temperature of 64°C, showcasing a 3% cooler performance than the RX 6950 XT’s 66°C.
• The RX 7900 GRE commands attention with its exceptional power consumption profile, clocking in at 220.6W. This efficiency becomes even more pronounced compared to the RX 6950 XT’s consumption of 247.3W, resulting in a commendable 11.4% difference.
• In addition, the RX 6950 XT maintains a marginal 2.6% advantage in 1% low performance, achieving 38 FPS compared to the RX 7900 GRE’s 37 FPS.

Another Comparison: RX 7900 XTX Vs Radeon RX 6950 XT

Hitman III

• In terms of average FPS, the RX 6950 XT leads by 6.6% with a performance of 124, surpassing the RX 7900 GRE’s performance of 116 FPS, signifying a notable distinction in performance.
• With precision in thermal management, the RX 7900 GRE operates at an average temperature of 65°C, maintaining a 3% cooler stance than the RX 6950 XT’s temperature of 67°C.
• Power efficiency takes center stage as the RX 7900 GRE boasts a consumption of 234.4W, signifying a clear advantage over the RX 6950 XT’s consumption of 270.6W by a notable 14.3%.
• In 1% low performance, the RX 6950 XT excels with a remarkable 10.7% lead, achieving 88 FPS, while the RX 7900 GRE trails at 79 FPS.

Horizon Zero Dawn

• Outperforming the RX 7900 GRE, the RX 6950 XT secures a lead of 6.8% with an average FPS of 90, compared to the RX 7900 GRE’s performance of 84 FPS, illustrating a distinct difference in gaming performance.
• The RX 7900 GRE highlights its temperature control with an average temperature of 65°C, standing 3% cooler than the RX 6950 XT’s temperature of 67°C.
• With precision in power management, the RX 7900 GRE maintains its dominance, consuming just 237.4W while outperforming the RX 6950 XT’s 267.1W by an appreciable 11.7%.
• Demonstrating its strength, the RX 6950 XT achieves 1% lows of 69 FPS, showcasing a 2.9% advantage over the RX 7900 GRE’s 67 FPS.

Also Read: RTX 4080 Vs RX 6950 XT

God Of War

• The RX 6950 XT demonstrates a 5.4% lead with an average FPS of 94, outshining the RX 7900 GRE’s performance of 89 FPS, indicating a noteworthy disparity in gaming capabilities.
• Demonstrating its thermal management prowess, the RX 7900 GRE operates at an average temperature of 68°C, maintaining a 1.4% cooler stance than the RX 6950 XT’s temperature of 67°C.
• The RX 7900 GRE’s prowess is on full display as it achieves exceptional power efficiency with a consumption of 237.9W, a remarkable 22.5% lower than the RX 6950 XT’s 298.3W.
• In addition, the RX 6950 XT establishes a significant 21.8% lead in 1% low performance, achieving 71 FPS, while the RX 7900 GRE achieves 57 FPS.

Forza Horizon 5

• With an average FPS of 139, the RX 6950 XT establishes a 6.6% lead over the RX 7900 GRE, which achieves 130 FPS, marking a significant difference in gaming performance.
• Operating with efficiency, the RX 7900 GRE maintains an average temperature of 54°C, being outperformed by the RX 6950 XT’s temperature of 55°C by a slight 1.8% difference.
• Embracing power efficiency as a cornerstone, the RX 7900 GRE operates at 224.7W, marking a substantial 16.1% advantage over the RX 6950 XT’s consumption of 264.3W.
• Commanding the lead, the RX 6950 XT boasts 1% lows of 90 FPS, surpassing the RX 7900 GRE’s performance of 76 FPS by 16.8%.

Assasin’s Creed Valhalla

• In the realm of average FPS, the RX 6950 XT boasts a 7% lead with a performance of 103, compared to the RX 7900 GRE’s performance of 96 FPS, underscoring a noticeable performance difference.
• With precision in thermal control, the RX 7900 GRE showcases an average temperature of 64°C, standing 3.1% cooler than the RX 6950 XT’s temperature of 62°C.
• The RX 7900 GRE shines as a beacon of power efficiency, drawing 234.3W in contrast to the RX 6950 XT’s 266.8W consumption, leading by a noteworthy 12.9%.
• Moreover, the RX 6950 XT maintains a 5.4% advantage in 1% low performance, achieving 76 FPS, while the RX 7900 GRE achieves 72 FPS.

Overall Gaming Performance

The heart of any gaming GPU lies in its ability to deliver smooth and immersive experiences. Let’s take a step back and get a grasp of the average FPS performance showcased by the RX 7900 GRE vs RX 6950 XT across various games. These figures will serve as the foundation for our subsequent discussions, where we’ll dive into the specifics of each benchmark, unveiling the strengths and differences of these powerful graphics cards.

• The RX 6950 XT establishes its superiority with superior average FPS and 1% lows, engaging in a competitive showdown against the RX 7900 GRE.
• With an average FPS of 91.2, the RX 6950 XT outpaces the RX 7900 GRE’s average FPS of 84.6, showcasing its performance prowess.
• Emerging as the frontrunner, the RX 6950 XT boasts a 7.5% advantage over the RX 7900 GRE in terms of FPS, highlighting its gaming performance.

Average Power Consumption

Power consumption is pivotal in shaping the gaming experience, influencing system stability and energy efficiency. This segment dissects the average power consumption of the RX 7900 GRE and RX 6950 XT. Our insights into their energy requirements will pave the way for a deeper understanding of their real-world implications, ensuring you’re equipped with comprehensive knowledge about the costs and benefits of each GPU’s power efficiency.

• Starting off, the RX 7900 GRE firmly asserts its supremacy over the RX 6950 XT, highlighting its commanding performance.
• In addition, the RX 6950 XT demands 270.1W of power, while the RX 7900 GRE demonstrates greater efficiency with a consumption of 229.1W.
• With a substantial 16.4% advantage in power efficiency, the RX 7900 GRE takes the lead in surpassing the RX 6950 XT in terms of energy optimization.

Average Thermal Statistics

Amidst the heat of gaming, thermal management takes center stage in ensuring optimal performance and longevity of these graphics cards. Here, we’ll uncover the average thermal statistics of the RX 7900 GRE vs RX 6950 XT battle, exploring how effectively they handle temperature control during intense gaming sessions. Our exploration into these thermal realms will provide crucial insights into the cooling solutions adopted by each GPU.

• Evidently, the RX 7900 GRE outperforms the RX 6950 XT in thermal management, showcasing its superior temperature control.
• Additionally, the RX 7900 GRE maintains an average temperature of 63.3°C, providing better cooling compared to the RX 6950 XT’s average temperature of 65.1°C.
• Establishing a noteworthy standard, the RX 7900 GRE demonstrates a commendable 2.7% enhancement in thermal efficiency, underscoring its advantage over the RX 6950 XT.

Pricing And Availability

In the realm of GPUs, the balance between performance and price is a pivotal consideration for many enthusiasts and gamers alike. Regarding the Radeon RX 6950 XT and RX 7900 GRE, these graphics powerhouses are vying for attention with their distinct pricing strategies. The Radeon RX 6950 XT has a price tag hovering around the 700 USD mark on platforms like Newegg, positioning it as a more expensive option.

On the other hand, the RX 7900 GRE enters the scene with an MSRP price of 649 USD, offering an enticing alternative that promises an intriguing blend of power and affordability. The divergence in pricing by 7.5% presents potential buyers with a critical decision point as they weigh the benefits and costs associated with these GPUs’ performance capabilities.

The competitive nature of the graphics card market is a driving force behind these pricing variations. As these GPUs aim to cater to the demands of gamers and content creators, their pricing strategies reflect the intricate balance between advanced technology, performance optimizations, and market dynamics. Factor in the availability challenges that the industry has faced, and the decision-making process becomes even more difficult. 

RX 6950 XT Vs RX 7900 GRE: Which One To Buy?

• Despite its 7.5% lower price, the RX 7900 GRE lags behind the RX 6950 XT by 7.5% in FPS performance, showcasing a balance between cost and performance.
• With a substantial 16.4% lead in power efficiency, the RX 7900 GRE excels in optimizing energy consumption, and it also maintains a 2.7% advantage in temperature control.
• While the RX 6950 XT impresses with remarkable FPS performance, the RX 7900 GRE distinguishes itself by offering superior thermal management, cheaper cost, and power optimization.

Pros And Cons