Core i5 13400 Vs Core i5 10400 [Gaming & Overall]

In this analysis, we delve into the performance disparities, unique attributes, and detailed specifications of the Core i5 13400 vs Core i5 10400, unraveling the intricacies of these processors.

Key Takeaways

• Firstly, the Core i5-13400 adopts the Raptor Lake architecture, distinguishing itself from the Core i5 10400 based on the Comet Lake architecture.
• Moreover, surpassing the Core i5 10400, the Core i5-13400 exhibits an FPS boost of 36.2% at 1080p and an impressive 35.3% at 1440p.
• Outperforming the Core i5-13400, the Core i5 10400 boasts a substantial advantage, consuming 56% less power at 1080p and 58% less at 1440p.
• Finally, the Core i5-13400 excels in thermal performance, exhibiting lower temperatures of 2.3% at 1080p and 4.3% at 1440p compared to the Core i5 10400.

Comparison Table

Architectural Difference

1. Process Node: Starting off, going over process nodes, the Core i5-13400 sets itself apart by employing the advanced Intel 10nm process, whereas the Core i5 10400 utilizes the Intel 14nm process
2. Frequency: Furthermore, the Core i5-13400 showcases a frequency of 2.5 GHz and a turbo clock of up to 4.6 GHz. While the Core i5 10400 has a base clock of 2.9 GHz and a turbo clock of up to 4.3 GHz.
3. TDP: In addition, both the Core i5-13400 and Core i5 10400 shares a similar thermal design power (TDP) of 65W. 

Also Read: Intel i5 10400F Vs Ryzen 5 3600

Core i5 13400 Vs Core i5 10400: Gaming Benchmarks

Shifting our attention to the gaming domain, we thoroughly compare the Core i5 13400 and Core i5 10400. Our aim is to thoroughly evaluate their performance in various gaming scenarios, utilizing a diverse range of benchmarks and real-world gameplay tests

Testing Rig

Here are the specs of the testing rig:

• GPU: GeForce RTX 4090 24GB
• Motherboard: MSI X570 A Pro Gaming
• Memory: Crucial 32 GB DDR5 RAM 4800 MHz, Patriot 32 DDR4 GB RAM 3200 MHz
• CPU Cooler: AIO MarsGaming ML-ONE360 Black
• Power Supply: Gigabyte P850GM 850W
• Storage Drive: SAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB
• Operating System: Windows 10 Pro

Prepare yourself for an in-depth showdown as we thoroughly examine the Core i5 13400 and Core i5 10400 CPUs. Our review will dissect their performance capabilities across various tests, encompassing average FPS, 1% lows, power consumption, and temperature under demanding 1080p and 1440p ultra settings.

Note: Acknowledging and considering several crucial factors that can impact CPU performance during benchmark analysis is crucial. These factors encompass elements such as GPU performance, driver optimizations, game optimizations, and the overall configuration of the system. 

1080p

Now, let’s dive into the gaming benchmarks and explore the performance of the Core i5 13400 and Core i5 10400 CPUs, specifically focusing on their performance at 1080p resolution.

Hogwarts Legacy

• Stepping into the spotlight, the Core i5 13400 exhibits dominance by achieving an average FPS of 109, surpassing the Core i5 10400’s 82, resulting in a notable 28.2% difference.
• Furthermore, the Core i5 13400 boasts an impressive thermal advantage of 1.6%, maintaining a temperature of 60°C, while the Core i5 10400 lags behind at 61°C.
• Moreover, the Core i5 13400 falls significantly behind in power efficiency, consuming 55.8W, resulting in a substantial disadvantage of 51.9% compared to the Core i5 10400’s consumption of 32.8W.
• In addition, the Core i5 13400 surpasses the Core i5 10400 with a 2.1% advantage in 1% lows, achieving 47 FPS compared to the latter’s 46 FPS.

Also Read: Core i5-13400 Vs Ryzen 5 7600

Fortnite

• Taking the lead, the Core i5 13400 outshines the Core i5 10400 with an average FPS of 90, leaving its counterpart trailing at 68, demonstrating a significant 27.8% advantage.
• Additionally, the Core i5 13400 showcases superior thermal performance with a temperature of 60°C, leaving the Core i5 10400 trailing by 1.6% at 61°C.
• Moreover, the Core i5 13400 exhibits a significant 55.7% power consumption disadvantage, drawing 68.8W, while the Core i5 10400 consumes only 38.8W.
• Furthermore, the Core i5 13400 exhibits superior performance in 1% lows, recording 51 FPS, which results in an impressive difference of 10.3% compared to the Core i5 10400’s 46 FPS.

Mount & Blade 2 Bannerlord

• Showcasing its prowess, the Core i5 13400 delivers an outstanding average FPS of 170, leaving the Core i5 10400 behind with a mere 108, exhibiting a remarkable 44.6% difference.
• Moreover, the Core i5 13400 excels in thermal efficiency, maintaining a temperature of 60°C, while the Core i5 10400 falls behind by 1.6% at 61°C.
• In addition, the Core i5 13400 lags behind with a power consumption of 75.4W, showcasing a considerable 27.1% difference compared to the Core i5 10400’s consumption of 57.4W.
• Furthermore, the Core i5 13400 showcases remarkable performance in 1% lows, achieving 52 FPS, leading to a significant difference of 12.2% compared to the Core i5 10400’s 46 FPS.

Also Read: Core i5-13400 Vs Ryzen 5 5600X

Cyberpunk 2077

• Unleashing its power, the Core i5 13400 leaves the Core i5 10400 in its wake, achieving an average FPS of 100, while its competitor falls short at 62, resulting in a substantial 46.9% disparity.
• In addition, the Core i5 13400 demonstrates remarkable thermal performance, recording a temperature of 59°C, resulting in a substantial difference of 4.9% compared to the Core i5 10400’s 62°C.
• Moreover, the Core i5 13400 demonstrates a substantial power consumption of 81.5W, resulting in a notable 69.4% disadvantage compared to the Core i5 10400’s consumption of 39.5W.
• Furthermore, the Core i5 13400 outperforms the Core i5 10400 in 1% lows with 54 FPS, showcasing an 11.7% advantage over the latter’s 48 FPS.

Far Cry 6

• Surging ahead, the Core i5 13400 establishes its superiority with an average FPS of 118, outperforming the Core i5 10400’s 87, showcasing an impressive 30.2% lead.
• Furthermore, the Core i5 13400 exhibits exceptional thermal efficiency, operating at a temperature of 60°C, outperforming the Core i5 10400’s 61°C by 1.6%.
• In addition, the Core i5 13400 falls significantly behind in power efficiency, consuming 79.4W, resulting in a significant disadvantage of 79% compared to the Core i5 10400’s consumption of 34.4W.
• Moreover, the Core i5 13400 delivers improved performance in 1% lows, recording 52 FPS, resulting in a notable difference of 5.9% compared to the Core i5 10400’s 49 FPS.

Also Read: Ryzen 5 7600X Vs Core i5-13400

1440p

With the 1080p benchmarks concluded, our attention now shifts to the 1440p resolution in the Core i5 13400 vs Core i5 10400 comparison.

Hogwarts Legacy

• Making its mark, the Core i5 13400 sets the bar higher with an average FPS of 105, overshadowing the Core i5 10400’s 80, resulting in a significant 27% difference.
• Moreover, the Core i5 13400 stands out with its outstanding thermal management, operating at a temperature of 58°C, while the Core i5 10400 trails by 3.3% at 60°C.
• In addition, the Core i5 13400 showcases a considerable 54.9% power consumption disadvantage, drawing 55.7W, while the Core i5 10400 consumes only 31.7W.
• Furthermore, the Core i5 13400 maintains consistent performance in 1% lows with 52 FPS, exhibiting a slight advantage of 1.9% over the Core i5 10400’s 51 FPS.

Fortnite

• Seizing the spotlight, the Core i5 13400 shines brightly with an average FPS of 72, while the Core i5 10400 lags behind at 54, exhibiting a notable 28.5% advantage.
• Furthermore, the Core i5 13400 surpasses expectations in thermal performance, maintaining a temperature of 58°C, showcasing a substantial 5% advantage over the Core i5 10400’s 61°C.
• In addition, the Core i5 13400 exhibits a significant power consumption of 67.5W, showcasing a notable 64.7% difference compared to the Core i5 10400’s consumption of 34.5W.
• Moreover, the Core i5 13400 showcases a minor lead in 1% lows, delivering 37 FPS, which results in a difference of 2.7% compared to the Core i5 10400’s 36 FPS.

Mount & Blade 2 Bannerlord

• Demonstrating its superiority, the Core i5 13400 dominates with an average FPS of 169, leaving the Core i5 10400 far behind at 102, showcasing an impressive 49.4% difference.
• Additionally, the Core i5 13400 excels in thermal efficiency, recording a temperature of 59°C, resulting in a notable difference of 3% compared to the Core i5 10400’s 61°C.
• Furthermore, the Core i5 13400 lags behind with a power consumption of 75.4W, showcasing a considerable 27.1% difference compared to the Core i5 10400’s consumption of 57.4W.
• In addition, the Core i5 13400 demonstrates a slight advantage in 1% lows with 49 FPS, resulting in a 2% difference compared to the Core i5 10400’s 48 FPS.

Also Read: Core i5-13500 Vs i5-13400

Cyberpunk 2077

• Showcasing its strength, the Core i5 13400 triumphs with an average FPS of 81, surpassing the Core i5 10400’s 59, resulting in a remarkable 31.4% lead.
• Moreover, the Core i5 13400 showcases superior thermal management, operating at a temperature of 58°C, outperforming the Core i5 10400’s 61°C by 5%.
• Furthermore, the Core i5 13400 demonstrates a substantial power consumption of 82.5W, resulting in a notable 68.2% disadvantage compared to the Core i5 10400’s consumption of 40.5W.
• In addition, the Core i5 13400 exhibits significant performance in 1% lows with 47 FPS, showcasing a notable difference of 18.6% compared to the Core i5 10400’s 39 FPS.

Far Cry 6

• Leading the way, the Core i5 13400 establishes its dominance with an average FPS of 112, surpassing the Core i5 10400’s 82, showcasing a substantial 30.9% advantage.
• In addition, the Core i5 13400 demonstrates remarkable thermal performance, maintaining a temperature of 58°C, resulting in a substantial 5% difference compared to the Core i5 10400’s 61°C.
• Moreover, the Core i5 13400 falls significantly behind in power efficiency, consuming 79.1W, resulting in a significant disadvantage of 79.5% compared to the Core i5 10400’s consumption of 34.1W.
• Furthermore, the Core i5 13400 outperforms the Core i5 10400 in 1% lows, delivering 51 FPS vs 48 FPS, resulting in a 6% advantage.

Also Read: Core i5-13500 Vs Ryzen 5 7600

Overall Gaming Performance 

Based on our meticulous analysis of the FPS benchmarks for the Core i5 13400 and Core i5 10400 CPUs, a clear frontrunner has emerged, showcasing its dominance in terms of performance.

Our extensive evaluation leaves no room for uncertainty as we present the detailed findings of our benchmark tests for both resolutions.

1080p

• On the gaming front, the Core i5 10400 puts up a strong fight but ultimately trails behind the Core i5 13400 in both average FPS and 1% lows, indicating a noticeable gap in performance.
• Upon thorough benchmark testing, it becomes evident that the Core i5 13400 outshines the Core i5 10400, delivering an impressive average FPS of 117.4 compared to the latter’s 81.4 FPS across various tested games.
• Throughout the benchmark testing process, the Core i5 10400 fell short compared to the Core i5 13400, exhibiting a notable 36.2% difference in FPS performance across all tested games.

1440p

• While the Core i5 10400 delivers respectable gaming performance, it falls short when pitted against the Core i5 13400, demonstrating superior FPS and 1% lows, highlighting a significant disparity in gaming capabilities.
• Moreover, with comprehensive benchmark results in hand, it is clear that the Core i5 13400 takes the lead with a superior average FPS of 107.8, leaving the Core i5 10400 behind at 75.4 FPS in the games evaluated.
• In addition, after conducting extensive benchmark tests, it is evident that the Core i5 13400 outshines the Core i5 10400 with a substantial 35.3% lead in FPS performance across a range of games.

Average Power Consumption

Recognizing the importance of power consumption when making informed decisions about CPUs, we dedicated efforts to thoroughly test and compare the Core i5 13400 and Core i5 10400 in this aspect.

Our findings show their respective power consumption performance, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of these CPUs’ energy efficiency.

1080p

• Based on the benchmark tests, the Core i5 13400 exhibits a notable 56% difference in power efficiency compared to the Core i5 10400, consuming 72.1W in contrast to the Core i5 10400’s 40.5W.

1440p

• The benchmark results reveal a significant 58% gap in power efficiency between the Core i5 13400 and Core i5 10400, with the former consuming 72W while the Core i5 10400 draws 39.6W.

Average Thermal Statistics 

In addition to the comprehensive benchmark tests, we also carefully evaluated the thermal performance of the Core i5 13400 and Core i5 10400. Our analysis of their thermal statistics provides valuable insights into their cooling efficiency and temperature management capabilities.

1080p

• The Core i5 13400 demonstrated superior thermal performance, maintaining an average temperature of 59.8°C, while the Core i5 10400 fell behind at 61.2°C, showcasing a notable 2.3% difference.

1440p

• During the benchmark test, the Core i5 13400 operated at an average of 58.2°C, whereas the Core i5 10400 registered a higher temperature of 60.8°C, resulting in a discernible 4.3% variance.

Pricing And Availability

When considering the pricing and availability of the Core i5 13400 and Core i5 10400 processors, it’s important to note the variations in their price points. The Core i5 13400 is currently priced at around 221 USD, while the Core i5 10400 offers a more affordable option with a price of approximately 132 USD.

This results in a notable price difference of 50.4%, making the Core i5 10400 a more budget-friendly choice for users looking for solid performance without breaking the bank.

Additionally, availability may also vary depending on the region and stock levels, so it’s advisable to check with reputable retailers or online marketplaces for the latest availability and pricing information.