Radeon RX 7600 Vs RX 6700: Which Is Better?

Drawing from our previous comparison of the RTX 3090 Ti and RTX 2080 Ti, where we witnessed the impressive dominance of the former, we now turn our attention to the captivating duel between the RX 7600 vs RX 6700 from AMD.

Key Takeaways

• To begin, it is important to note that the RX 7600 distinguishes itself with the utilization of the cutting-edge RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the RX 6700 relies on the preceding RDNA 2.0 architecture.
• Moreover, the RX 6700 exhibits a slight 0.6% advantage over the RX 7600 in terms of FPS performance.
• Furthermore, highlighting the power efficiency aspect, the RX 6700 showcases an impressive 8.3% lower average power consumption compared to the RX 7600.
• Finally, based on the benchmark results, the RX 6700 emerges as the clear winner in terms of thermal efficiency, boasting a substantial 7% advantage over the RX 7600.

Comparison Table

Differences

1. Process Node: Starting off, the RX 7600, built on a 6nm process, outperforms the RX 6700, which utilizes a 12nm process.
2. Clock Speed: In terms of boost clock speeds, the RX 7600 leads the way with a base clock of 1720 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz, while the RX 6700 lags behind with a base clock of 1941 MHz and a boost clock of 2174 MHz.
3. VRAM: Furthermore, when it comes to VRAM, the RX 7600 packs 8GB of GDDR6 memory, while the RX 6700 boasts a larger capacity of 10GB of GDDR6 VRAM.
4. TDP: Additionally, in terms of thermal design, the RX 7600 operates with a lower TDP of 165W, while the RX 6700 has a slightly higher TDP of 175W.
5. Supported Technologies: Finally, both the RX 7600 and RX 6700 employ FSR technology for graphics enhancement.

Similar Comparisons: RX 5700 XT Vs RTX 3060

RX 7600 Vs RX 6700: Gaming Benchmarks

Now, let’s shift our attention from the technical specifications to the RX 7600 and RX 6700 gaming performance. By examining their in-game capabilities, we can gain valuable insights into how these graphics cards perform and handle the latest games on the market.

Testing Rig

Here are the specs of the testing rig:

• CPU: Intel Core i9-13900K
• Motherboard: ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming
• Memory: TridentZ5 RGB DDR5 6000 [32GB]
• CPU Cooler: be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
• Power Supply: CORSAIR RM850i 850W
• Storage Drive: SAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB
• Operating System: Windows 10 Pro

We have conducted a rigorous direct comparison between the RX 7600 and RX 6700, evaluating their performance in demanding 1080p ultra settings. Our analysis includes FPS, temperature assessment, power efficiency, and 1% lows, providing valuable insights for your decision-making process.

Note: Keep in mind that when interpreting benchmark test results, it’s important to consider external factors that may impact the data. Variables such as system ventilation, room temperature, and background software can influence the performance of graphics cards. 

Now let’s jump straight into the gaming benchmarks and compare the RX 7600 and RX 6700 performance.

Spider-Man Miles Morales

• Notably, the RX 6700 outperforms the RX 7600 by 11.9% in terms of average FPS, delivering a remarkable 91 FPS compared to the latter’s 86 FPS.
• Additionally, in terms of temperature management, the RX 6700 demonstrates a 4.7% advantage over the RX 7600, maintaining an average temperature of 62°C compared to the latter’s 65°C.
• In addition, when considering power consumption, the RX 7600 draws 6.3% more power than the RX 6700, with a consumption of 156.2W compared to the latter’s 166.5W.
• Moreover, the RX 6700 exhibits a 2.7% advantage in 1% low performance compared to the RX 7600, achieving 75 FPS versus the latter’s 73 FPS.

Forza Horizon 5

• Significantly, the RX 6700 showcases a 5.6% advantage over the RX 7600 in average FPS performance, achieving an impressive 100 FPS versus the latter’s 96 FPS.
• Furthermore, the RX 6700 showcases a 3.2% thermal advantage over the RX 7600, with an average temperature of 61°C compared to the latter’s 63°C.
• Moreover, the RX 6700 exhibits a 5.1% advantage in power consumption over the RX 7600, with a consumption of 148.5W compared to the latter’s 156.3W.
• Additionally, the RX 6700 showcases an impressive 20.7% improvement in 1% low performance over the RX 7600, achieving 85 FPS compared to the latter’s 69 FPS.

Red Dead Redemption 2

• Impressively, the RX 6700 demonstrates an 8.8% lead over the RX 7600 in terms of average FPS, achieving 76 FPS compared to the latter’s 83 FPS.
• In addition, the RX 6700 exhibits an impressive 13.9% lead in thermal management over the RX 7600, maintaining an average temperature of 60°C versus the latter’s 69°C.
• Moreover, during power consumption analysis, the RX 6700 demonstrates an impressive 9.8% lead over the RX 7600, with a consumption of 150.6W versus the latter’s 166.2W.
• Furthermore, the RX 7600 demonstrates a slight 1.4% lead in 1% low performance over the RX 6700, achieving 67 FPS compared to the latter’s 68 FPS.

Also Read: RX 6600 XT Vs RTX 3060

Hogwarts Legacy

• Noteworthy is the 4.3% performance advantage of the RX 6700 over the RX 7600, with an average FPS of 68 and 71, respectively.
• Furthermore, the RX 6700 demonstrates a significant 9.3% advantage in thermal management compared to the RX 7600, with an average temperature of 61°C compared to the latter’s 67°C.
• Additionally, the RX 6700 consumes 7.9% less power compared to the RX 7600, with a consumption of 151.1W compared to the latter’s 163.6W.
• Moreover, the RX 7600 exhibits a remarkable 29.2% advantage in 1% low performance compared to the RX 6700, achieving 35 FPS versus the latter’s 47 FPS.

Hitman 3

• Notably, using the slight 2.5% difference in average FPS performance, the RX 6700 surpasses the RX 7600 with 120 FPS compared to the latter’s 117 FPS.
• In addition, the RX 6700 showcases a slight 3% thermal advantage over the RX 7600, maintaining an average temperature of 64°C compared to the latter’s 66°C.
• Furthermore, the RX 6700 showcases a significant 10.3% advantage in power consumption over the RX 7600, drawing 156.6W compared to the latter’s 173.7W.
• Additionally, the RX 6700 showcases a 3.5% lead in 1% low performance over the RX 7600, achieving 85 FPS compared to the latter’s 82 FPS.

The Last of Us Part I 

• Remarkably, the RX 6700 exhibits a substantial 10.6% advantage over the RX 7600, delivering an impressive 79 FPS versus the latter’s 71 FPS in terms of average FPS performance.
• Additionally, the RX 6700 demonstrates a 3.2% thermal advantage over the RX 7600, with an average temperature of 61°C compared to the latter’s 63°C.
• Moreover, the RX 7600 exhibits a striking 17.5% higher power consumption compared to the RX 6700, consuming 137.5W versus the latter’s 163.9W.
• Furthermore, the RX 6700 demonstrates an 8.5% advantage in 1% low performance compared to the RX 7600, achieving 61 FPS versus the latter’s 56 FPS.

A Plague Tale: Requiem

• Interestingly, the RX 6700 demonstrates a slight 2.7% edge over the RX 7600, achieving an average FPS of 71 compared to the latter’s 73.
• Moreover, the RX 6700 exhibits an 11% lead in thermal management over the RX 7600, showcasing an average temperature of 60°C versus the latter’s 67°C.
• Furthermore, the RX 6700 demonstrates a 6.4% advantage in power consumption over the RX 7600, drawing 148.3W compared to the latter’s 158.2W.
• In addition, the RX 7600 exhibits a 5% lead in 1% low performance over the RX 6700, achieving 58 FPS compared to the latter’s 61 FPS.

Cyberpunk 2077

• It is worth mentioning that the RX 6700 exhibits a 6.1% advantage over the RX 7600, delivering an average FPS of 63 compared to the latter’s 67.
• Furthermore, the RX 6700 showcases a 7.7% advantage in thermal management compared to the RX 7600, with an average temperature of 62°C compared to the latter’s 67°C.
• Moreover, the RX 6700 showcases a 3.4% lead in power consumption over the RX 7600, with a consumption of 154.1W compared to the latter’s 159.5W.
• Additionally, the RX 7600 showcases a 5.7% advantage in 1% low performance compared to the RX 6700, achieving 51 FPS versus the latter’s 54 FPS.

Overall Gaming Performance

In a battle of graphics cards, where performance and features are key, the clash of the RX 7600 vs RX 6700 unveils barely a winner. Through meticulous examination of benchmark tests, one card slightly rises above the other, leaving some room for doubt.

• Fascinatingly, the RX 7600 and RX 6700 engaged in a tight FPS performance competition, with each card having a slight advantage in different games.
• When it comes to gaming performance, the RX 6700 takes a slight lead over the RX 7600. With an average FPS of 83.5, it surpasses the RX 7600’s 83, albeit by a narrow margin.
• To sum up, in terms of FPS performance, the RX 6700 outperforms the RX 7600 by a marginal 0.6% advantage, solidifying its position as the slightly superior choice.

Similar Comparisons: RTX 3060 Vs RTX 3070

Average Power Consumption

As we delve into the intricate details of our analysis, the power consumption aspect of the RX 7600 and RX 6700 graphics cards emerges as a significant factor. During our comprehensive benchmark testing, a few notable observations regarding power consumption came to light:

• To completely utilize the capabilities of the RX 7600, it is advisable to have a power supply of at least 450W to accommodate its power requirements, given its TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 165W.
• In contrast, the RX 6700 draws more power compared to the RX 7600, with a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 175W. It requires a power supply of at least 500 W to ensure smooth operation and optimal performance.
• Hence, in terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the RX 6700 trails behind the RX 7600 by a margin of 5.8%.
• Surprisingly, during benchmark tests, the RX 6700 exhibited lower average power consumption of 150.3W, outperforming the RX 7600’s power consumption of 163.4W.
• In summary, the RX 6700 showcases an impressive power efficiency advantage, consuming, on average, 8.3% lower power than the RX 7600.

Average Thermal Statistics

As we delve deeper into the realm of thermal performance, it is essential to examine how the RX 7600 and RX 6700 handle the demanding task of dissipating heat. Here are some of our findings regarding this factor:

• Based on thorough benchmark testing, the RX 6700 exhibits superior thermal efficiency compared to the RX 7600.
• Moreover, the RX 6700 showcases superior thermal efficiency with an average temperature of 61.3°C, outperforming the RX 7600’s higher average temperature of 65.8°C.
• Finally, the benchmark results provide undeniable evidence of the RX 6700’s thermal efficiency superiority, with a remarkable 7% advantage over the RX 7600.

Pricing And Availability

When it comes to pricing and availability, the RX 7600 and RX 6700 graphics cards have distinct differences in terms of MSRP and availability on platforms like Newegg. The RX 7600 is currently priced at approximately 269 USD, while the RX 6700 has a higher price point of around 350 USD. This results in a significant price gap of 26.1%.

It’s important to note that these prices are approximate and subject to change based on factors such as supply and demand. Therefore, the availability of specific models may also vary, influencing the purchasing decision.

RX 6700 Vs RX 7600: Which One To Pick In 2023?

• Despite the RX 7600 being 26.1% cheaper than the RX 6700, it lags behind by a marginal 0.6% in terms of average FPS performance.
• On the other hand, the RX 6700 stands out with its remarkable thermal efficiency, showcasing an 8.3% reduction in power consumption and maintaining a 7% lower average temperature compared to the RX 7600.
• While the RX 7600 matches the benchmark performance of the RX 6700 and boasts a lower price, the RX 6700 gains the upper hand in power consumption and temperature management over its counterpart.

Also Read: NVIDIA RTX 3060 vs GTX 1080

Pros And Cons

Selecting between the RX 7600 and RX 6700 may present a challenge, but fear not! We’re here to provide you with additional options to consider. Visit our website to explore in-depth reviews of two other outstanding GPUs: the ARC A770 and the RTX 3060 Ti. These GPUs offer impressive performance and features that might align better with your specific needs and preferences.