GuidesComparisonsCore i7-1360P Vs Core i7-12700H - Productivity Tests

Core i7-1360P Vs Core i7-12700H – Productivity Tests

In this article we will looking into the specs, architecture and performance of the Core i7-1360P and Core i7-12700H.

Expert Verified By

After putting Intel’s Core i7-1360P and Core i7-12700H CPUs against Apple’s M2 chip, we’re now comparing the two against each other. Learn if the power-efficient Raptor Lake chip stands a chance against a high-performance Alder Lake chip. Let’s get into it and compare Core i7-1360P vs Core i7-12700H. 

Key Takeaways

  • Starting with the processing node, both the mobile CPUs are built on the Intel 7 (10nm) manufacturing process.
  • The Core i7-12700H is about 20.4% faster in multi-core applications, while the Core i7-1360P takes the crown by 5.2% in single-core performance.
  • The Core i7-12700H yields better value in both multi-core (73.4%) and single-core (47.8%) performance. 

Comparison Table

Mobile CPU Core i7-1360P Core i7-12700H
Architecture Willow Cove Hybrid Core
Codename Raptor Lake-P Alder Lake-S
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Processing Node Intel 7 (10nm) Intel 7 (10nm)
Socket BGA-1744 BGA-1744
No. of Cores 12 (4P + 8E) 14 (6P + 8E)
No. of Threads 16 (8 + 8) 20 (12 + 8)
Base Clock
  • 2.2GHz (P-cores)
  • 1.6GHz (E-cores)
  • 2.3GHz (P-cores)
  • 1.7GHz (E-cores)
Boost Clock
  • 5GHz (P-cores)
  • 3.7GHz (E-cores)
  • 4.7GHz (P-cores)
  • 3.5GHz (E-cores)
L1 Cache 80KB per core 80KB per core
L2 Cache 2MB per core 1280KB per core
L3 Cache 18MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Memory Support
  • DDR5 up to 5200 MT/s
  • LPDDR5 up to 6400 MT/s
  • LPDDR5x up to 6400 MT/s
  • DDR4 up to 3200 MT/s
  • LPDDR4 up to 4267 MT/s
  • DDR5 up to 4800 MT/s
  • LPDDR5 up to 5200 MT/s
  • DDR4 up to 3200 MT/s
  • LPDDR4x up to 4267 MT/s
Memory Size Up to 64GB Up to 64GB
PCIe Revision 4.0 4.0 
No. of PCIe Lanes 20 28 
Overclocking Support No No
Integrated Graphics Intel Iris Xe Graphics  Intel Iris Xe Graphics 
GPU Base Clock 300MHz 300MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1500MHz 1400MHz
Shaders 768 768
TMUs 48 48
ROPs 24 24
Execution Units  96 96
iGPU Theoretical 
1.69 TFLOPs 1.69 TFLOPs
Total Graphics Power 15W 15W
CPU Max Operating Temperature 100ยฐC 100ยฐC
CPU Base Power 20-28W (configurable) 35-45W (configurable)
CPU Boost Power 64W 115W
Launch Date January 3, 2023 January 4, 2022

Architectural Differences: 

  1. Core/Thread Counts: The Core i7-12700H has 14 cores, including 6 P-cores and 8 E-cores, along with 20 threads. In contrast, the Core i7-1360P has 12 cores with 4 P-cores and 8 E-cores, totaling 16 threads. 
  2. Clock SpeedsRegarding base frequencies, the Core i7-1360P clocks 2.2GHz (P-cores) and 1.6GHz (E-cores). The Core i7-12700H betters that by 100MHz, with 2.3GHz and 1.7GHz, respectively. As for boost frequencies, the Core i7-1360P can push its P-cores to 5GHz and the E-cores to 3.7GHz. On the other hand, the Core i7-12700H clocks 4.7GHz (E-cores) and 3.5GHz (E-cores). 
  3. Memory: The Core i7-1360P improves DDR5 support (up to 6400 MT/s) and adds LPDDR5x support. Meanwhile, the Core i7-12700H only supports DDR5 speeds up to 5200 MT/s and does not have LPDDR5x support. 
  4. Cache: The Core i7-12700H has an impressive 24MB pool of L3 cache compared to 16MB of the Core i7-1360P.
  5. TDPThe Core i7-12700H (the H-suffix stands for high-performance) draws 35W to 45W at the base and up to 115W on boost frequencies. In comparison, the Core i7-1360P (P for power efficiency) uses 20W to 28W at the base and as much as 64W in boost mode. 

Related: Core i7-1360P Vs Apple M2

Core i7-1360P Vs Core i7-12700H: Performance Benchmarks

Cinebench R23

Cinebench R23 multi-core and single-core
Cinebench R23 (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • Starting with the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, the Core i7-12700H records 16206 points. In reply, the Core i7-1360P managed 12242 points. (a 32.3% difference) 
  • The Core i7-1360P is the better CPU in the single-core test with 1878 points, over 1788 of the Core i7-12700H. 

Geekbench 5

Geekbench 5 multi-core and single-core
Geekbench 5 (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • Moving on to Geekbench 5, the Core i7-12700H racked up 12146 multi-core points compared to 10629 points scored by the Core i7-1360P.
  • Again, the Core i7-1360P shifted the tide and scored 1806 single-core points. It leads by 4.8%, as the Core i7-12700H scored 1722 points.

Also Check: Core i7 1360P Vs Core i7 13700H

Geekbench 6

Geekbench 6 multi-core and single-core
Geekbench 6 (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • In Geekbench 6, the Core i7-12700H scored 11276 points as far as the multi-core test is concerned. In comparison, the Core i7-1360P managed 9811 points.
  • Meanwhile, the single-core test sees the Intel Core i7-1360P score 2195 points in reply to 2011 points of the Core i7-12700H.


Passmark multi-core and single-core 
Passmark (Image by Tech4Gamers)
  • The last application is Passmark, in which Core i7-12700H accumulated 26587 multi-core points. Conversely, the Core i7-1360P scored 21229 points.
  • As for the single-core results, the Core i7-1360P (3770 points) reigned supreme again over the Core i7-12700H (3650 points).

Similar Comparison: Core i7-1360P Vs Core i5-1340P

Overall Performance

Average multi-core and single-core scores
Overall performance (Image by Tech4Gamers) 
  • Multi-core Performance: The Core i7-12700H averaged 16553 points over the four tests, bettering the Core i7-1360P’s score of 13744. Hence, the Core i7-12700H is approximately 20.4% faster than the Core i7-1360P. 
  • Single-core Performance: The single-core results show the Core i7-1360P averaging 2412 points over the three applications. Contrastingly, the Core i7-12700H averaged 2292 points. So, the Core i7-1360P is the better single-core performer by 5.2%

Core i7-12700H Vs Core i7-1360P: Which One Provides Better Value?

After discussing the performance and prices, we can estimate which CPU has better value. Firstly, the Core i7-1360P is the better single-core performer (5.2%), whereas the Core i7-12700H is better in multi-core applications (20.4%). Secondly, Core i7-12700H laptops are cheaper than Core i7-1360P laptops.

The cheapest Core i7-12700H costs nearly 53% less than the cheapest Core i7-1360P laptop. This huge price difference negates the much smaller performance advantage of the Core i7-1360P in single-core applications.

Considering that, the Core i7-12700H has better value in multi-core (73.4%) and single-core (47.8%) applications. 

Similar Read: Core i7-12700H Vs Core i7-1255U

Final Thoughts 

That’s the end of my Core i7-1360P vs Core i7-12700H comparison. My findings say the Core i7-12700H has more value than the Core i7-1360P. As the Core i7-1360P is still very recent, the laptops haven’t dropped in price much.

Conversely, Core i7-12700H laptops are much cheaper than their initial launch prices. Thus, the high-performance Core i7-12700H has more value in both multi-core and single-core performance. 

If you need a powerful yet power-efficient laptop, the Core i7-1360P is an excellent CPU to go for. However, waiting for the next generation might be good, so the prices of the current-gen laptops will drop. In any case, I hope this guide has been helpful to you. 

Also Read: Core i7 13700H Vs Core i7 12700H

Pros And Cons 

CPU Pros Cons
Core i7-1360P
  • Better single-core performance
  • Much more power-efficient 
  • Improved DDR5 support
  • Unimpressive value 
  • Relatively lackluster multi-core 
Core i7-12700H
  • Much better in multi-core 
  • Better overall value
  • More PCIe lanes for I/O
  • Power-hungry
  • Slightly lags behind
    in single-core performance

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the Core i7-1360P use a better processing node than the Core i7-12700H?

No. Both CPUs use the same Intel 7 (10nm ESF) processing node.

What is the difference in memory support between Core i7-1360P and Core i7-12700H?

While both CPUs support the same speeds of DDR4 memory, the Core i7-1360P improves DDR5 support to 6400 MT/s. Additionally, it adds LPDDR5x support which the Core i7-12700H lacks.

Is the Intel Core i7-1360P faster than the Intel Core i7-12700H?

The Core i7-1360P is, on average, 5.2% faster in single-core applications. However, it’s much weaker when it comes to multi-core performance (about 20.4%).

Was our article helpful? ๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. ๐Ÿ”‹

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. ๐Ÿ˜”

Related articles

RTX 4070 Ti Super vs RTX 4070: Should You Upgrade?

In the RTX 4070 Ti Super vs RTX 4070 comparison, we will see how the beefed up version of the 4070 compares with its vanilla counterpart.

RTX 4080 Super vs RTX 4080: Does Super Make Any Difference?

In the RTX 4080 Super vs RTX 4080 comparison, we will distinguish Nvidia's latest and greatest GPU with its vanilla variant.

RTX 4080 Super Vs RTX 3080: Pricing, Benchmarks & Overall

In RTX 4080 Super Vs RTX 3080, we will analyze Nvidia's technolgy upgrade benfits by comparing the gaming performance of these GPUs.

Core i7 14700K Vs Ryzen 5 7600X: We Tested 11 Games

The Core i7 14700K vs Ryzen 5 7600X comparison will measure these chips in gaming performance, architecture, and power consumption.

Ryzen 7 5700X Vs Ryzen 7 5800X [Gaming Benchmarks]

Let's compare the Ryzen 7 5700X Vs Ryzen 7 5800X and see which processor performs better when it comes to gaming.

Similar Guides