Ryzen 5 7500F Vs Core i5 13500: Which One Is Better?

The Ryzen 5 7500F and the Core i5 13500 cater to budget-conscious gamers, but how would they compare if we pinned them against each other? This Ryzen 5 7500F vs Core i5 13500 comparison will deal with both big CPU makers’ different approaches with their budget processors.

Key Takeaways

• The Ryzen 5 7500F performed 6.7% better in our gaming tests at 1080p than the i5 13500.
• In our testing, the i5 13500 was 2.8% cooler than the AMD processor on average.
• The i5 13500 has a price tag of $239, whereas the Ryzen 5 7500F can be had for 25% lower at $179.

Ryzen 5 7500F Vs Core i5 13500

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Core Count: The Ryzen 5 7500F has 6 cores and 12 threads, but the situation of the Core i5 13500 is different because of its hybrid core architecture. It has 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores that help the processor draw less power in lower-intensity processes.
2. Clock Speeds: The i5 13500 can clock at 2.50GHz at its lowest and 4.80GHz at its highest, whereas the Ryzen outclasses it in both metrics with a base clock of 3.70GHz and a boost of up to 5.00GHz.
3. Lithography: Intel has been using the 10nm manufacturing process for a while now, and they stuck with it for the i5 13500. On the other hand, Ryzen uses a more advanced 5nm manufacturing process.
4. Memory Support: The Ryzen 5 7500F can only support DDR5 memory at up to 5200MHz, whereas the i5 supports both DDR4 memory at 3200MHz and DDR5 memory at up to 4800MHz.
   From a speed point of view, the Ryzen can go faster, but from a cost-efficiency perspective, you don’t even have to think about changing RAM sticks with the Intel CPU if your rig was made in the last few years.
5. TDP: Both processors have the same default TDP of 65 watts.
6. Other Features: The i5 13500 uses a more tried and tested LGA 1700 socket, compatible with Intel’s 12th-generation processors. This means if you have a 12th-generation PC, upgrading is as simple as taking the old CPU out and putting the new one in.
   On the other hand, AMD just shifted to a new AM5 socket after using AM4 since the inception of Ryzen, bringing up the platform cost of this processor.

Gaming Benchmarks

You can only gather so much from the on-paper specifications of computer hardware, which is exactly why this part of the Ryzen 5 7500F vs Core i5 13500 comparison will highlight the performance of both CPUs within modern titles.

To show the limits of these processors, we needed them to be the bottleneck of the system, meaning we tested them at the 1080p resolution while decking out the rest of our test bench with the hardware listed below:

• MOBO – Z790 (MSI MPG Z790 CARBON WIFI), X670E (ASRock X670E Taichi)
• RAM – DDR5-5600 CL46 16GB x 2
• SSD – SEAGATE Firecuda 520 2TB
• GPU – Geforce RTX 4090
• PSU – 1050W
• OS – Windows 11 Pro

Player Unknown’s Battlegrounds

• Kicking off the comparison with PUBG at 1080p with Ultra settings, the Ryzen 5 7500F pulled ahead with an average framerate of around 427 FPS, which is around 4.6% higher than the Intel CPU at 408 FPS.
• 1% lows were more or less the same on both processors, with the Ryzen maintaining 220 FPS, whereas the Core CPU had 219 FPS on minimum.
• The variation between the temperatures of both processors at the peak was also more or less non-existent, with the Ryzen 5 7500F reaching a peak temperature of 59°C, whereas the 13500 was a hair cooler with a peak temperature of 58°C.

Also Read: Core i5-13500 Vs Ryzen 5 7600

League Of Legends

• This competitive MOBA gave a very strong advantage to the AMD processor, which had an average framerate of 310 FPS, 33% higher than the i5 13500’s average of 233 FPS.
• The difference we saw with the 1% lows was even larger at 55% in favor of the 216 FPS outputted by the Ryzen, whereas the 13500 had lows of 139 FPS. In a story-driven game, we would have said that having such high FPS to begin with means the difference is not noticeable by most, but in the competitive world of League Of Legends, every frame can make a difference in response time.
• Temperatures were once again very similar between the pair of these processors, with the Ryzen 5 7500F having a peak temperature of 49°C, whereas the Core i5 13500 had a slightly cooler 48°C peak temperature.

Overwatch 2

• The Ryzen saw its first loss in this competitive shooter, performing close to 4% worse on the 7500F than the Intel CPU. The former got an average framerate of 382 FPS, whereas the i5 13500 had a performance of 395 FPS.
• AMD took an even bigger loss in terms of 1% lows, maintaining 316 FPS, whereas the Core i5 had a performance of 358 FPS. The advantage of the i5 grew to 13% over the Ryzen 5 in this department.
• We started to see a larger deviation between the temperatures of the two processors in this game, with the Ryzen 5 7500F reaching a peak of 59°C, whereas the i5 13500 got a peak of 57°C.

Similar Guide: Core i5-13500 Vs i5-13400

Lost Ark

• AMD regained its lead in this title, with Lost Ark running a minuscule 1.5% faster on the Ryzen with an average framerate of 210 FPS, whereas its rival had an average framerate of 207 FPS.
• The pendulum swung back to Intel when it came to 1% lows, where it was 2.5% more performant than its competitor, which had a minimum of 119 FPS, whereas the i5 13500 had a minimum framerate of 122 FPS.
• Temperatures again had a two-degree difference between the processors, with the Ryzen running at a temperature of 55°C at its peak, whereas the 13500 got a peak temperature of 53°C.

Dota 2

• This MOBA also ran better on the Ryzen by about 3.3%. The 7500F had an average framerate of around 213 FPS, whereas the i5 13500 pumped out 206 FPS.
• The crown went over to the Intel processor in 1% lows, beating the Ryzen by about 10%. The i5 had a minimum framerate of 101 FPS, whereas its rival managed a minimum of 112 FPS.
• Temperatures remained two degrees apart in this test, with the Ryzen having a peak temperature of 52°C, whereas the i5 13500 peaked at around a cool 50°C.

Also Read: Ryzen 5 7500F Beats Intel Core i5 13400

Cyberpunk 2077

• Even at a low resolution, Cyberpunk proved to be so graphically demanding that our processors didn’t have room to stretch their legs, only being 1.8% apart in average framerates. The Ryzen 5 7500F got an average of 164 FPS, whereas the 13500 had an average framerate of 161 FPS.
• The Ryzen pulled through in terms of 1% lows, beating out the Core CPU by about 17%. The Ryzen 5 7500F got minimums of 134 FPS, whereas the 13500 had lows of around 114 FPS.
• Temperatures finally equalized with these processors after dancing around each other for all the games before. Here, the Ryzen 5 7500F and Core i5 13500 both peaked at 63°C.

Diablo 4

• Finally, the last game in our testing ran better on the Ryzen 5 7500F by about 11%. AMD’s processor had an average framerate of 263 FPS, whereas the i5 13500 averaged around 236 FPS.
• The difference remained about 11% in the 1% lows, with the Ryzen 5 7500F maintaining a minimum of 152 FPS, whereas the Core i5 13500 had several dips to around 137 FPS.
• The temperature difference grew to three degrees in this final game, with the Ryzen reaching 58°C, whereas the 13500’s temperature peaked around 55°C.

Overall Gaming Benchmarks

Now that we have the performance data of the Ryzen 5 7500F and the Core i5 13500, this part of the comparison will take a look at the bigger picture of the behavior of both of these chips.

Framerate

• The Ryzen 5 7500F had an average framerate of around 281 FPS, which is 6% greater than the i5’s average of 263 FPS.
• 1% lows were 180 FPS on the Ryzen 5 7500F over our 7-game benchmarking suite, whereas the Core i5 13500 was about 4.7% weaker at 172 FPS as it’s 1% lows.

Temperatures

• The higher speed of the i5 13500 also resulted in it getting higher average temperatures of around 56°C, whereas the Ryzen 5 7500F was cooler, boasting an average temperature of around 54°C.
• The better temperatures of the i5 make it a better candidate for overclocking, but Intel locks down easy overclocking for only the K series of chips, whereas AMD’s setup makes it a piece of cake to play with the knobs and dials of your processor.

Price And Availability

• The i5 13500 has a retail value of $239, 25% more than AMD’s 7500F, with a price tag of $179.
• Both processors should be available at any big computer parts store of your choosing and any online store with a computer hardware section.

Core i5 13500 Vs Ryzen 5 7500F: Which One To Choose?

Now that we know the ins and outs of both processors, this part of the Ryzen 5 7500F vs Core i5 13500 comparison will lay out our findings to help guide you to the best processor for your needs.

• The Ryzen 5 performed 6.6% better in our testing against its rival at 1080p, making it more capable in gaming scenarios. Remember that the higher the resolution, the less the horsepower of your processor will matter.
• The i5 13500 might be a higher price, but the extra money you’d have to pony up for an AM5 motherboard and DDR5 memory will make this purchase just as expensive, if not more.
• Because this is the second year of Intel using the LGA 1700 socket for its processors, you will probably not be able to upgrade to the next 14th-gen chips as easily because they will more than likely use a different socket. If AMD’s track record is anything to go by, buying into AM5 right now might save you an inevitable upgrade in the future.
• The Ryzen processor does not have an integrated GPU, meaning that it cannot display a signal to your monitor, and you need to have a graphics card for your computer to function.
• If you have an existing 12th-generation computer, it’s best to go for the Intel processor because of the ease of upgrade.
• If you’re making a new computer from scratch for 1080p or 1440p gaming with a decent graphics card, the Ryzen 5 7500F will repay its higher platform cost by being relevant for longer.
• As for non-gaming workloads, the extra cores of the i5 make it the better option, so if you do something CPU-heavy for work or as a hobby, you should buy the Core i5 13500.

Pros And Cons