In our last comparison, we put NVIDIA’s last-gen RTX 3080 Ti against AMD’s flagship RX 7900 XT model and saw Team Red leading by at least a 20-50% performance boost. But this time, let’s put the new models, GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon RX 7900 XT, on the table and see which card comes out on top during the extensive benchmark tests.
- The AMD RX 7900 XT comes with a dual-die design, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti follows a monolithic design.
- The average FPS during benchmarks showed the Radeon RX 7900 XT running games at 82.5 FPS, while the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti ran at 78 FPS, providing a ~5.6% lead for the RX 7900 XT in gaming performance.
- The NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti is ~10.8% more power efficient than the Radeon RX 7900 XT, as per benchmark results.
- Moreover, the RTX 4070 Ti remained 1.4% more thermally efficient compared to the AMD RX 7900 XT.
|Specs||Radeon RX 7900 XT||GeForce RTX 4070 Ti|
|GPU Name||Navi 31 XT||AD104|
|Foundry||TSMC 5nm||TSMC 5nm|
|Base Clock Speed||1500 MHz||2310 MHz|
|Boost Clock Speed||2394 MHz||2610 MHz|
|Memory Capacity||20 GB GDDR6||12 GB GDDR6|
|Memory Bandwidth||800.0 GB/s||504.2 GB/s|
|Memory Bus Width||320 bit||192-bit|
|Thermal Design Power (TDP)||300 Watts||285 Watts|
|No. of transistors||57,700 million||35,800 million|
|Price||899 USD||799 USD|
|Release Date||Nov 3rd, 2022||Jan 3rd, 2023|
|Best Variants||Best RTX 4070 Ti Cards|
Difference In Architecture
Although both the RTX 4070 Ti and the RX 7900 XT come from the newest generation, they are still manufactured by different brands. Therefore, it is understandable that both cards offer different architectural designs.
Let’s check these differences one by one.
The first significant difference between the cards is their respective chipset design. The NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti comes with its infamous Ada Lovelace technology and monolithic architecture.
On the other hand, AMD’s Radeon 7900 XT offers a new dual-die design. The upgrade allows the GPU to operate GCD (Graphic Compute Die) and MCD (Memory Cache Die separately).
Also Read: RTX 4070 Ti Vs RX 7900 XT [Gaming & Comparison]
The next thing on the list is the designated process nodes. Here, the Radeon RX 7900 XT is seen equipped with a dedicated 6nm MCD (Memory Cache Die) and a 5nm GCD (Graphic Compute Die), respectively.
Meanwhile, the RTX 4070 Ti comes with its own specialized 5nm custom process nodes called the 4N. In addition, the process nodes on both cards come from TSMC.
Another important difference comes with the stream multiprocessors. The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT comes with specialized dual-issue stream processors, which allow the GPU to run up to two instructions simultaneously.
On the contrary, since this technology is absent in NVIDIA’s RTX 4070 Ti, the card is only capable of processing a single instruction at one time.
When going over connectivity ports, we see the AMD Radeon 7900 XT taking a massive lead over NVIDIA’s GeForce 4070 Ti. The former comes with the latest DisplayPort 2.1, which allows the GPU to handle big resolution scales. It can generate bandwidths of up to 54Gbps easily and can run at a resolution of up to 4K 480 Hz.
Meanwhile, the latter still utilizes the old DisplayPort 1.4a, which limits its bandwidth to 32.4Gpbs automatically.
NVIDIA DLSS 3.0 Vs AMD FSR 3.0
NVIDIA’s RTX generation cards come with its infamous DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) technology. It allows the GPU to provide multiple upscaling features by utilizing the Tensor Cores on the graphics card to create natural image quality and boost the overall gaming performance and statistics.
Meanwhile, AMD also proves a similar feature known as the FSR technology for its graphics card. But unlike NVIDIA’s DLSS, which utilizes hardware components, AMD’s FSR actually uses software functionalities to provide similar results.
Moreover, since these technologies have been showing promising results in games, we were recently greeted with the news of new updates for both DLSS and FSR.
NVIDIA’s latest line of GPUs from the RTX 4000 series comes with the DLSS 3.0. The new update allows the graphics cards to boost in-game performance by creating and implementing artificial image frames through optical flow accelerators.
Meanwhile, AMD also takes a similar approach and utilizes the new fluid motion frame technology to provide similar results to the DLSS. Now although AMD has already announced the new FSR 3.0, the software update hasn’t rolled out yet. So there are still many things that need to be checked to provide proper results.
The only thing that we can tell you so far is that since AMD’s FSR technology isn’t tied up with any hardware specs, it can be used with many cards, including the older ones. On the other hand, although NVIDIA’s DLSS can only be used on certain cards, it still provides better results by utilizing the new fourth-gen Tensor Cores.
Read More: NVIDIA DLSS Vs AMD FSR
AMD Radeon RX 7000 Series
The GPU market has always been a competitive industry, and AMD is making sure it stays the top dog by constantly evolving its technology and functionalities. Moreover, their recent release of the Radeon RX 7000 series is living proof of it.
The new series is equipped with many new features yet again and has already launched two options in the market, the Radeon RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT, respectively. In addition, both cards follow the same core structure but vary a little when it comes to specifications.
But since we have mentioned them having a common core structure, so let’s take an in-depth look at the series and see how much has changed compared to the past.
After the recent success of the RX 6000 series, AMD has improved its performance by equipping one of the best video output options to its new cards. The RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT come with the support of DisplayPort 2.1.
The new upgrade allows the card to handle a bandwidth of up to 54Gbps and even supports high-definition video streams, including 8K 165 Hz and 4K 180 Hz as well. Moreover, users can now achieve a color depth of up to 68 billion colors.
All the cards from AMD’s RX 6000 series came with the RDNA 2, but this has changed in the new lineup. The RX 7000 series is not only powered by the latest RDNA 3 technology, but AMD has also equipped these cards with a new chipset design that is quite similar to the Ryzen 3000 Processors.
In addition, these GPUs are utilizing the new technology to implement a chiplet design which allows the cards to separate their GCD (Graphics Compute Die) and MCD (Memory Cache Die). Moreover, Both of these Die systems can be used individually for infinity caches and shaders.
Compute Die Systems
The advanced chiplet design of the AMD 7000 series enables the graphics card to operate two distinct die systems simultaneously, delivering exceptional performance and efficiency.
The new GCD (Graphics Compute Die) is equipped with a 5nm node. On the other hand, the MCD (Memory Cache Die) comes with a 6nm node. Additionally, the chips are based on TSMC and help the GPU achieve massive numbers like 61 TFLOPs of computing execution and 5.3 TB/s of chiplet interconnect efficiency.
In addition, according to some claims from AMD, the new chiplet technology is capable of providing a 54% improvement when it comes to performance-to-power ratio.
Moreover, the graphics processing units (GPUs) are equipped with cutting-edge dual-issue technology, enabling the card to execute two commands simultaneously. This results in improved performance and a boost in AI capability, with a 2.7 times increase in AI performance.
Besides this, there is also a major improvement in the ray tracing accelerators. The new cards can now provide up to 1.5 times more rays in comparison to the older generation.
The new GCD (Graphic Compute Die) on the Radeon RX 7000 series also supports a dual media engine. This allows users to utilize functions such as simultaneous 8K60FPS AV1 encode/decode and encode/decode for their HEVC/AVC as well.
The latest design of the engine boasts a remarkable improvement in video coding capabilities thanks to its advanced AI enhancement. This has led to a significant boost of 1.8 times, making it a sought-after choice for streamers and fans alike. By utilizing this upgraded feature, users can expect a much smoother and visually stunning streaming experience.
The recent announcement by AMD of the upgraded version of FSR 2.0 has generated a buzz in the gaming community. The unveiling took place just a month before the launch of the highly anticipated RX 7000 series, creating even more excitement among fans. Although the company gave a sneak peek of the updated software during a premier gaming event, they have yet to reveal the full details.
But according to a few leaks, AMD will implement a new fluid motion technology that will be combined with their Super Resolution Technology.
In terms of performance, the latest update from AMD claims to provide a significant improvement in performance, doubling the previous version’s capabilities for 4K gaming. However, it remains to be seen until the official release of FSR 3.0.
Also Read: RTX 4070 Ti Vs RX 7900 XTX: Which Is Better?
The new Decoupled Clocks are also garnering a lot of attention from users, and the reason behind this is the separation of clock modules. The new Radeon RX 7000 series showcases a separate front-end and shader clock speed.
According to AMD, after doing some detailed research on this technology, their engineers have found that the front-end frequency has been limiting the potential performance of their graphics cards for a while now.
So to tackle this situation, AMD has decided to separate the clock speed modules, and now they have designated 2.3 GHz to the shader frequency clock speed and 2.5 GHz to the front-end frequency clock speed.
Moreover, AMD is claiming that the separation has led to Radeon RX 7000 series providing a 25% better power efficiency and a 15% improvement in performance as well.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4000 Series
The RTX 4000 series by NVIDIA is the company’s latest effort to maintain its dominance in the market. Building upon the success of the RTX 3000 series, NVIDIA aims to establish further its position as a leading player in the graphics card industry.
The updated DLSS 3.0 from NVIDIA is set to revolutionize gaming with its cutting-edge features. By utilizing the implementation of the fourth-generation Tensor Cores and the innovative Optical Flow Accelerator, the new technology is capable of generating brand-new frames through the processing of current and previous frame data.
NVIDIA also boasts that this update will provide a four times performance boost compared to DLSS 2.0, making it a must-have for all gamers.
Ada Lovelace Architecture
The new GeForce 4000 series from NVIDIA boasts a cutting-edge architecture known as Ada Lovelace. In addition, the graphics card is built on a modified 5nm node. The new chipset comes from TSMC and is called 4N.
Due to the improved architecture, NVIDIA is able to utilize 76 billion transistors in their new RTX 4000 series. Moreover, this is a massive 70% increase compared to the old RTX 3000 series. But besides this, the RTX 4000 cards are still using the same monolithic die design as before.
The Ada Lovelace architecture is set to bring a new level of performance to the GeForce RTX 4000 series. NVIDIA has made several optimizations to its core processors to ensure that they perform better than ever.
Shaders, Tensor Cores, and Ray tracing are some of the areas that have seen significant improvements. So let’s check them out in detail one by one:
The new generation of Tensor Cores from NVIDIA boasts a significant increase in the number of shaders, reaching 90 TFLOPs. This delivers double the performance while consuming half the power compared to its predecessor.
The Streaming Multiprocessors also feature a Shader Execution Reordering, which optimizes GPU threads by rescheduling similar tasks. This technology addresses the issue of data and execution divergence in shader execution, leading to a much-improved performance.
Similar Comparisons: RTX 4070 Ti Vs RTX 3090: Benchmarks & Difference
NVIDIA’s latest addition to its hardware line, the fourth-generation Tensor Cores, are set to revolutionize deep learning and AI processes.
Along with the inclusion of an FP8 Transformer Engine, these cores boast a significant improvement in AI inference performance, up to 5 times better than the previous generation. NVIDIA’s dedication to innovation and improvement is once again evident with this new and exciting development.
Along with the release of the new RTX 4000 series, NVIDIA has made significant advancements in its Ray Tracing capabilities as well. This includes state-of-the-art cores that boast clock speeds of up to 200 TFLOPs, enabling the system to carry out complex calculations with lightning-fast speeds.
The system’s improved performance is due to the integration of two new engines, the DMM (Displayed Micro-mesh) and the OMM (Opacity Micromap engines). The DMM engine enhances the details of objects, while the OMM engine speeds up the rendering of complex geometries.
Now that we have explained all the relevant aspects of these cards, it is finally time to check how well they perform in actual games. But let’s thank Testing Games first, as the channel helped us gather this data.
Below are the specifications of the testing rig:
- CPU: Core i9-13900K
- Motherboard: ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming
- Memory: G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5 6000MHz
- CPU Cooler: be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4.
- Power Supply: CORSAIR HX Series HX1200 1200W
- Storage Unit: SAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB
- Operating System: Windows 11
During these benchmark tests, we will be the RTX 4070 Ti vs RX 7900 XT against each other to compare multiple statistics, including 1% lows, temperature, power consumption, and average FPS. In addition, all the games will be tested at 4K resolution and ultra settings.
Note: Since most of these stats are captured via software like MSI Afterburner, they can’t be considered 100% accurate. In addition, many other factors can impact the performance of your GPU, including external environments (ventilation, room temperature, etc.)
Cyberpunk 2077 (Ray Tracing OFF)
- The RX 7900 XT boasts a 14.8% performance boost with an average of 58 FPS, compared to 50 FPS on the RTX 4070 Ti.
- In addition, the RTX 4070 Ti also has lower 1% lows at 40 FPS compared to 48 FPS on the RX 7900 XT, a difference of 18%.
- Surprisingly, despite the performance disadvantage, the RX 7900 XT consumes 5.9% more power at 285.2 watts compared to the 4070 Ti’s 268.6 watts.
- Moreover, the temperatures are close with the RX 7900 XT at 55°C and the 4070 Ti at 53°C, with a difference of 2°C or 3.7%.
Cyberpunk 2077 (Ray Tracing Ultra)
- Using a performance increase of 33.33%, the RTX 4070 Ti provides an average of 42 FPS, outpacing the RX 7900 XT’s average of 30 FPS.
- The 4070 Ti leads in 1% lows as well, with a score of 29 FPS compared to the RX 7900 XT’s 23 FPS, creating a difference of 23%.
- Despite its performance, the RX 7900 XT requires more power with 286.1 watts compared to the 4070 Ti’s 267.5 watts, a difference of 6.7%.
- Although temperatures are close, the RTX 4070 Ti runs at 54°C compared to the RX 7900 XT’s 59°C, with a difference of 5°C or 8.8%.
Forza Horizon 5 (Ray Tracing Extreme)
- Starting with the performance, the RTX 4070 Ti edges out the RX 7900 XT with a 7.5% increase, boasting an average of 110 FPS compared to 102 FPS.
- Additionally, the 4070 Ti holds the lead in 1% lows, registering 97 FPS as opposed to the RX 7900 XT’s 86 FPS, a 12% difference.
- However, power consumption reveals a different story, as the RX 7900 XT draws 16.5% more electricity, reaching 271.1 watts compared to the 4070 Ti’s 229.6 watts.
- Despite the difference in power, the temperatures remain relatively close, with the RTX 4070 Ti at 61°C and the RX 7900 XT at 56°C, leading to a difference of 5°C or 8.5%.
Hitman 3 (Ray Tracing ON)
- Reflecting on FPS, the RX 7900 XT boasts a 15.5% advantage with an average of 139 FPS, compared to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 119 FPS.
- Additionally, the RX 7900 XT presents a slightly higher 1% low with 110 FPS, while the RTX 4070 Ti follows close behind with 95 FPS, a difference of 14.6%.
- Moreover, due to the FPS advantage, the RX 7900 XT requires more power consumption at 284.7 watts compared to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 265.5 watts, a 6.9% difference.
- Finally, it’s worth noting that the RX 7900 XT operates at a slightly higher temperature of 59°C, compared to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 58°C, providing a difference of only 1°C or 1.7%.
Spider-Man Miles Morales (Ray Tracing OFF)
- Starting with FPS, the RX 7900 XT outpaces the RTX 4070 Ti with a 13.4% boost, offering 104 FPS on average compared to 82 FPS.
- Additionally, the RX 7900 XT delivers higher 1% lows at 89 FPS, surpassing the RTX 4070 Ti’s 69 FPS by 25.3%.
- Due to the performance edge, the RX 7900 XT consumes 6.7% more power at 285.7 watts compared to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 249.4 watts.
- Lastly, the RX 7900 XT runs slightly hotter at 52°C compared to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 50°C, offering a difference of 2°C or 3.9%.
Similar Comparisons: RTX 4070 Ti Vs RTX 3070 Ti: Worth Upgrading?
Spider-Man Miles Morales (Ray Tracing Ultra)
- Starting with FPS, the RX 7900 XT edges ahead by providing a 1.5% performance boost with an average of 66 FPS compared to 65 FPS on the RTX 4070 Ti.
- Additionally, the RX 7900 XT boasts a higher 1% low performance with 53 FPS versus the RTX 4070 Ti’s 43 FPS, a difference of 20.8%.
- Despite the small performance advantage, the RX 7900 XT has a higher power consumption of 286.3 watts, compared to 243.2 watts on the RTX 4070 Ti, a difference of 16.27%.
- Lastly, the RX 7900 XT runs slightly warmer with a temperature of 57°C compared to 54°C on the RTX 4070 Ti, a difference of 3°C or 5.4%.
Horizon Zero Dawn (Ray Tracing On)
- To start, the RX 7900 XT offers a slight FPS advantage, boasting an average of 95 FPS versus the RTX 4070 Ti’s 91 FPS, which translates to a 4.3% increase.
- In terms of 1% lows, the RX 7900 XT continues to hold a slight lead with 86 FPS compared to the 4070 Ti’s 82 FPS, a difference of 4.7%.
- Due to the increased performance, the RX 7900 XT draws more power, consuming 278.2 watts versus the RTX 4070 Ti’s 259 watts, a difference of 7.1%.
- Finally, the RX 7900 XT runs hotter than the RTX 4070 Ti, reaching 59°C compared to the latter’s 54°C, which equates to an 8.8% or 5°C of difference.
Red Dead Redemption 2 (Ray Tracing Ultra)
- In terms of FPS, the RX 7900 XT surpasses the RTX 4070 Ti with a 13% boost, providing an average of 90 FPS compared to 79 FPS on the RTX 4070 Ti.
- The RX 7900 XT also offers a higher 1% low FPS, with 72 FPS compared to 65 FPS on the RTX 4070 Ti, leading to a difference of 10.2%.
- The RX 7900 XT consumes 281.7 watts, compared to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 256 watts, resulting in a 9.5% increase in power consumption.
- The RX 7900 XT runs slightly hotter, with a temperature of 58°C compared to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 53°C, showing a 9% or 5°C increase.
God Of War (Ray Tracing Ultra)
- In terms of FPS, the RX 7900 XT outperforms the RTX 4070 Ti with a 9.5% boost. It has an average of 88 FPS, while the RTX 4070 Ti offers 80 FPS.
- In 1% lows, the RX 7900 XT showcases a massive improvement. It provides 80 FPS compared to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 41 FPS. This results in a difference of 64%.
- Similarly, due to its higher FPS performance, the RX 7900 XT only consumes 5.6% more power than the RTX 4070 Ti, with 284.5 watts compared to 268.9 watts.
- Lastly, the RX 7900 XT runs 2°C or 3.6% cooler. It generates a temperature of 54°C, compared to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 56°C.
The Witcher 3 (Ray Tracing OFF)
- In terms of FPS, the RX 7900 XT provides a 7.4% boost with an average of 97 FPS. On the other hand, the RTX 4070 Ti produced 90 FPS.
- The RX 7900 XT offers a 9.3% improvement in 1% lows. It offers 78 FPS compared to 71 FPS on the RTX 4070 Ti.
- Like before, the RX 7900 XT has a higher power consumption. It consumes 291.2 watts compared to 250.9 watts on the RTX 4070 Ti, leading to a 14.8% difference.
- Additionally, the RX 7900 XT runs slightly cooler, with a temperature of 49°C compared to 50°C on the RTX 4070 Ti, providing a 1°C or 2% difference.
Also Check: RTX 4070 Ti Vs RTX 3080 Ti [Gaming Benchmarks]
The Witcher 3 (Ray Tracing Ultra)
- Comparing FPS, the RTX 4070 Ti draws a close performance boost of 26.6%. It provides an average of 51 FPS versus 39 FPS on the RX 7900 XT.
- The 1% lows of the 4070 Ti are higher. It offers 42 FPS compared to 31 FPS on the RX 7900 XT, showing a difference of 30.1%.
- Despite the performance gap, the RX 7900 XT consumes 16.9% more power at 293.1 watts, compared to the 4070 Ti’s power consumption of 247.4 watts.
- Interestingly, the 4070 Ti runs hotter than the RX 7900 XT. The card runs at 51°C compared to 45°C on the RX 7900 XT. This leads to a 12.5% or 6°C of difference.
Overall Gaming Performance
Comparing the FPS benchmarks of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon RX 7900 XT across multiple games, the outcome of the Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti battle becomes clear.
- Notably, the RX 7900 XT dominates in most of the games. But the difference becomes minimal in some games, such as Spider-Man Miles Morales (Ray Tracing Ultra) and Horizon Zero Dawn.
- Surprisingly, the RTX 4070 Ti slightly leads in a few games. These included Cyberpunk 2077 (Ray Tracing Ultra), Forza Horizon 5, and Witcher 3 (Ray Tracing Ultra), showcasing its potential.
- In terms of average FPS performance across all games, the Radeon RX 7900 XT produces 82.5 FPS. On the other hand, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti produces 78 FPS.
- This results in a boost of 5.6% in FPS for users with the Radeon RX 7900 XT compared to the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti.
Average Power Consumption
During the RX 7900 XT vs RTX 4070 Ti test, a pattern was noticed in terms of power consumption across all tested games.
- The Radeon RX 7900 XT has a TDP of 300 watts, which leads to high power consumption. Therefore, it requires a power supply of at least 700 watts.
- On the other hand, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has a TDP of 285 watts, which is more power-efficient. So it only requires a power supply of 600 W to perform at its peak.
- This leads to the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti having a 5.1% more power-efficient TDP compared to the Radeon RX 7900 XT.
- Additionally, in all the tested games, the RX 7900 XT was never close to the power efficiency of the RTX 4070 Ti. It never consumed less or equal power.
- Moreover, the RX 7900 XT drained more power even in games where its average FPS count was lower than the RTX 4070 Ti. These included games like Cyberpunk 2077 (Ray Tracing Ultra), Forza Horizon 5, and Witcher 3 (Ray Tracing Ultra).
- Similarly, the average power consumption of the Radeon RX 7900 XT was 284.3 watts. Meanwhile, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti consumed an average of 255 watts. It led to the RTX 4070 Ti being 10.8% more power-efficient than the RX 7900 XT.
Also Read: RTX 4070 Ti Vs RTX 3080: Should You Upgrade?
Average Thermal StatisticsContrary to the power consumption charts, the average thermal statistics show a different story. Here, both the RTX 4070 Ti and RX 7900 XT provided close results during the benchmark test.
- Firstly, the RTX 4070 Ti is slightly more thermally efficient and generates less heat. In addition, it was true even in games where its average FPS production is better than RX 7900 XT.
- Moreover, RX 7900 XT produced an average heat of 54.8°C. On the other hand, the RTX 4070 Ti generated an average heat of 54°C.
- There’s a minor difference in average thermal statistics. But this allowed the RTX 4070 Ti to be 1.4% more thermally efficient compared to RX 7900 XT.
Pricing And Availability
Now that we have gone through all the aspects related to the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Radeon RX 7900 XT benchmark. It’s time to take a look at the prices and availability of the cards.
It’s important to keep in mind that these two cards belong to the latest lineups from AMD and NVIDIA. Therefore, you can’t consider them as a budget-friendly option. The MSRP for the Radeon RX 7900 XT is $899. On the other hand, the NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti can be purchased for $799.
It’s also worth mentioning that both of these cards come in various models and variants. This variation can also impact the overall cost of your desired card. Some more premium options might be provided by GPU manufacturers. These include brands such as ASUS, MSI, and GIGABYTE, which can be even more expensive than others.
In comparison, AMD’s Radeon RX 7900 XT is almost 11.7% more costly than NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. This price difference could be even greater, depending on the model and variant you choose.
RX 4070 Ti Vs RX 7900 XT: Which One Is Better?
Since both cards deliver exceptional performance, choosing one can be a challenge. However, there are key factors to consider that can help simplify your decision.
The Radeon RX 7900 XT has a slight advantage in terms of average FPS. It boasts a 5.6% improvement in FPS production over the RTX 4070 Ti. But when it comes to power consumption, the RTX 4070 Ti shines, being 10.8% more energy efficient.
In terms of thermal efficiency, the RTX 4070 Ti once again comes out on top again. It produces 1.4% less heat than the RX 7900 XT. In addition, it also offers a more affordable option, costing 11.7% less.
It’s important to consider whether you prioritize higher FPS or cost savings. The RX 7900 XT offers slightly improved performance. Meanwhile, the RTX 4070 Ti offers a more budget-friendly option with efficient power consumption and heat generation. In any case, we hope that you enjoyed reading our RTX 4070 Ti vs RX 7900 XT comparison.
Additionally, our website holds many other similar comparisons. You can check our latest guide on RX 7900 XT vs RX 6800 XT if you’re interested in exploring other options.
The RX 7900 XT comes from the latest lineups from AMD. It boasts a whopping 20 GBs of GDDR6 memory to execute tasks efficiently. In addition, it provides all the latest features that AMD has to offer. This includes features like the FSR 3.0, among many more
So far, the RX 7900 XT is providing a close matchup to the RTX 4070 Ti. The card can be seen providing a slightly better FPS performance but costs a little more than its competition.
So far, there is no confirmed date announced. But it is still estimated that the RTX 4070 will be released in April 2023. The card is long-awaited, and there are already many leaks related to its specs and performance.
Yes, the RTX 4070 Ti is an absolutely worthy card. Because the card comes at a much more affordable price compared to AMD’s latest lineup. It also provides a close performance to the RX 7900 XT
- RX 7900 XT Vs RTX 3080 Ti: Which Is Better?
- RX 7900 XT Vs RTX 3080 [Gaming Benchmarks 2023]
- RX 7900 XTX Vs RX 7900 XT [Difference & Benchmarks]
- RX 7900 XT vs RTX 4080: Which Is Better?
Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋
How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔