Intel Core i9 13900H
Rated: 8.5/10
AMD Ryzen 7940HS
Rated: 9/10
Pros And Cons
| CPU | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Core i9 13900H | ✅ Higher Overall Performance ✅ Larger Power Budget | ❌ Unimpressive Power Efficiency ❌ Hefty Price Tag |
| Ryzen 9 7940HS | ✅ Mediocre Performance ✅ Better Power Efficiency | ❌ Lower Benchmark Results ❌ Fewer Compatibility Options |
- The Ryzen 9 7490HS and i9 13900HS traded blows in our tests utilizing single-core performance. We noticed that the i9 was about 4% faster than the Ryzen 9 in multi-core-reliant tests.
- Moreover, the 7940HS consumed about 7% less power than the 13900HS when tested with an external monitor.
- We see that the Ryzen 7940HS is based on a much more recent manufacturing process, 5nm vs 10nm on the i9.
Comparison Table
| Model | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | Intel Core i9 13900H |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Intel Raptor Lake-H | Zen 4 |
| Released | January 3, 2023 | January 4, 2023 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Multiplier | 26x | 40x |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| ROPs | 24 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 96 | 12 |
| Socket | BGA-1744 | FP8 |
| L1 Cache | 80K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 24MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Max. Temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| iGPU | AMD Radeon 780M | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs |
Architectural Differences
- Clock Speeds: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS operates at a base clock speed of 4000MHz, which can boost up to 5200MHz. In contrast, the Intel Core i9 13900H has a base clock speed of 1900MHz that can boost up to 5400MHz.
- Cores Count: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has 8 cores, while the Intel Core i9 13900H features 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. This totals 16 threads for the Ryzen processor and 20 threads for the i9 13900H.
- L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a smaller L3 cache of 16 MB, whereas the Intel Core i9 13900H features a larger L3 cache of 24 MB.
- Processing Nodes: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is based on the Zen 4 architecture and utilizes a 5nm manufacturing process. On the other hand, the Intel Core i9 13900H is based on the Intel Raptor Lake-H architecture and utilizes a 10nm process node.
- Other Features: As discussed above, the Intel processor utilizes both efficiency and performance cores inspired by the ARM processors used in mobile phones. The big.LITTLE hybrid core architecture allows the 13900H to cram in more performance than the Ryzen 9 7940HS without sacrificing efficiency.
For a new mobile processor, thorough evaluation is key. Despite similar performance, disparities exist between the Core i9 13900H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS GPUs. Our comparison scrutinizes these differences and benchmarks their performance in relevant benchmarks.
Core i9 13900H Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS – Benchmarks
Having seen the difference in architecture between the Core i9 13900H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS, we will look at the performance of these processors in modern, demanding benchmarks in this part of the comparison.
Do note that the numbers mentioned here are a median between several laptops with these processors, so the performance of the computer you purchase might differ from what you see here.
Cinebench R23
- The Cinebench R23 performance was impressive on both of our processors. The 13900H had a multi-core score of 18848 points, whereas the Ryzen had a multicore score of 17281, which favors the 13900H by about 8% in performance.
- As for single-core performance, the 13900H came out ahead once again. It had a single-core score of 1995 points, compared to the 1792 points of the Ryzen 9. The difference here came out to about 10%.
7-Zip
- In our analysis, during the 7-Zip multi-thread compression test, the Ryzen exhibited slightly better performance than the i9, achieving approximately 71681 MIPS.
- In contrast, the i9 was around 1% slower in this test, with a performance of 71221 MIPS.
Blender
- In the Classroom render, the i9 13900H finished our Blender benchmark in 322 seconds. In contrast, we saw that the Ryzen was significantly faster, with a render time of only 297 seconds.
- Switching gears to the Blender BMW render, it performed slightly worse on the Ryzen processor. The Ryzen 9 finished the render in 185 seconds, compared to 183 seconds on the i9.
3DMark 11
- In the 3DMark physics simulation, both processors performed almost equivalently.
- The Ryzen 9 7940HS had a score of 23230 points, whereas the i9 had a performance of 23483 points. In my opinion, such a minute difference between these processors can be chalked up to the margin of error.
Geekbench 6
- In our vital Geekbench 6 benchmark, the Ryzen processor came on top in terms of single-core performance, It had a performance of 2025 points compared to the 1977 points of the i9.
- The significantly reduced core count of the Ryzen affects it greatly in the multi-core test. In had a median performance of 12145 points, whereas the i9 has a 12% greater performance of about 13782 points.
Octane V2
- In this benchmark testing of the performance of web apps on both these processors, we saw the i9 once again coming about 7% ahead of the Ryzen.
- The i9 performed 96210 points, compared to the 89067 points of the Ryzen.
Power Consumption
- For the power consumption, we tested the power drawn with an external monitor while running the Cinebench R15 test.
- The Ryzen 9 7940HS had a lower power consumption of about 122 watts on average, whereas the i9 had a power consumption of about 146 watts. This was about 7% lower for the Ryzen, corresponding to its performance penalty in multi-core tests.
Ryzen 9 7940HS Vs Core i9 13900H – Which One Should You Go For?
Intel Core i9 13900H: In our evaluation, we’ve found that while the Core i9 processor surpasses the Ryzen 9 7940HS in power, it also comes with a notably higher price tag and consumes more power. This might deter users looking for a balance between economy and performance from choosing it as their preferred option.
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: However, we’ve noticed that AMD-powered laptops often provide better affordability and energy efficiency compared to their Intel counterparts. Therefore, if you’re seeking a budget-friendly processor with excellent performance and power efficiency, the Ryzen 9 7940HS emerges as an outstanding choice.
We recommend the Intel i9 13900H to all performance-hungry users who wish to have a smooth experience regardless of budget and power consumption readings. However, the Ryzen 9 7940HS inevitably tilts the scales towards itself in talks of powerful performance with power efficiency and economical price.
This processor is based on the Raptor Lake-H series architecture the Alder Lake architecture is presented with a different name. The efficiency cores on the 13900H are about as powerful as those on the i7 6290HQ processor. The AMD Ryzen 7940HS makes use of the Radeon 780M graphics.Frequently Asked Questions
More From Core i9-13900H:
More From Ryzen 9 7940HS:
Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋
How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔
[Comparisons Expert]
Ali Tauseef is an experienced writer and computer enthusiast with a passion for graphics cards and processors. With a wealth of knowledge in the field of computer technology, he regularly publishes blogs and in-depth comparisons on Tech4Gamers.
