Core i9 13900H Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS: Productivity Benchmarks

If you are looking for a new mobile processor in the current tech landscape, it is important to take your time to evaluate the differences between any potential purchasing decisions. Though the two processors in our comparison today have similar performance, they could differ in other ways. In this Core i9 13900H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS comparison, we will look at these differences and the performance of both of these processors in relevant benchmarks.

Key Takeaways

• The Ryzen 9 7490HS and i9 13900HS traded blows in tests utilizing single-core performance. The i9 was about 4% faster than the Ryzen 9 in multi-core-reliant tests.
• The 7940HS consumed about 7% less power than the 13900HS when tested with an external monitor.
• The Ryzen 7940HS is based on a much more recent manufacturing process, 5nm vs 10nm on the i9.

Comparison Table

Architectural Differences

1. Clock Speeds: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS operates at a base clock speed of 4000MHz, which can boost up to 5200MHz. In contrast, the Intel Core i9 13900H has a base clock speed of 1900MHz that can boost up to 5400MHz. These higher clock speeds in the Intel processor will translate to great boosts in performance coupled with its greater number of threads and cores.
2. Cores Count: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has 8 cores, while the Intel Core i9 13900H features 6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. This totals 16 threads for the Ryzen processor and 20 threads for the i9 13900H. This difference should make itself apparent in our multi-core performance tests.
3. L3 Cache: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has a smaller L3 cache of 16MB, whereas the Intel Core i9 13900H features a larger L3 cache of 24MB. 
4. Processing Nodes: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is based on the Zen 4 architecture and utilizes a 5nm manufacturing process. On the other hand, the Intel Core i9 13900H is based on the Intel Raptor Lake-H architecture and utilizes a 10nm process node. 
5. Other Features: As discussed above, the Intel processor utilizes both efficiency and performance cores inspired by the ARM processors used in mobile phones. The big.LITTLE hybrid core architecture allows the 13900H to cram in more performance than the Ryzen 9 7940HS without sacrificing efficiency.

Also Read: Core i9 13900HX Vs Core i9 13900H

Core i9 13900H Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS: Benchmarks

Having seen the difference in architecture between the Core i9 13900H vs Ryzen 9 7940HS, we will look at the performance of these processors in modern, demanding benchmarks in this part of the comparison.

Do note that the numbers mentioned here are a median between several laptops with these processors, so the performance of the computer you purchase might differ from what you see here.

Cinebench R23 

• The Cinebench R23 performance was impressive on both of our processors. The 13900H had a multi-core score of 18848 points, whereas the Ryzen had a multicore score of 17281. This comes out to about an 8% difference in performance, favoring the i9.
• As for single-core performance, the 13900H came out ahead once again. It had a single-core score of 1995 points, compared to the 1792 points of the Ryzen 9. The difference here came out to about 10%.

7-Zip

• In the 7-Zip multi-thread compression test, the Ryzen performed slightly better than the i9. It had a performance of about 71681 MIPS.
• In comparison, the i9 was about 1% slower in this test, with a performance of 71221 MIPS.

Blender

• In the Classroom render, the i9 13900H finished the benchmark in 322 seconds. In contrast, the Ryzen was significantly faster, with a render time of only 297 seconds.
• Switching gears to the Blender BMW render, it performed slightly worse on the Ryzen processor. The Ryzen 9 finished the render in 185 seconds, compared to 183 seconds on the i9.

3DMark 11

• In the 3DMark physics simulation, both processors performed almost equivalently. 
• The Ryzen 9 7940HS had a score of 23230 points, whereas the i9 had a performance of 23483 points. Such a minute difference between these processors can be chalked up to the margin of error.

Geekbench 6

• In the popular Geekbench 6 benchmark, the Ryzen processor came on top in terms of single-core performance, It had a performance of 2025 points compared to the 1977 points of the i9.
• The significantly reduced core count of the Ryzen affects it greatly in the multi-core test. In had a median performance of 12145 points, whereas the i9 has a 12% greater performance of about 13782 points.

Octane V2

• In this benchmark testing of the performance of web apps on both these processors, the i9 once again came about 7% ahead of the Ryzen.
• The i9 performed 96210 points, compared to the 89067 points of the Ryzen.

Power Consumption

• For the power consumption, we tested the power drawn with an external monitor while running the Cinebench R15 test. 
• The Ryzen 9 7940HS had a lower power consumption of about 122 watts on average, whereas the i9 had a power consumption of about 146 watts. This was about 7% lower for the Ryzen, corresponding to its performance penalty in multi-core tests.

Ryzen 9 7940HS Vs Core i9 13900H: Which One Should You Go For?

• The Core i9 processor is more powerful than the Ryzen 9 7940HS but is significantly more expensive and has higher power consumption.
• Laptops with AMD chips are generally cheaper and more power-efficient than those with Intel chips.
• The Ryzen 9 7940HS is a good choice for most users who want a powerful, well-rounded processor with good performance, cost, and power efficiency.

Pros And Cons