GuidesComparisonsCore i7 13700H vs Ryzen 7 7840HS: Will Intel Win?

Core i7 13700H vs Ryzen 7 7840HS: Will Intel Win?

In this comparison, we will be testing the performance of the Core i7 13700H and Ryzen 7 7840HS, as well as discussing their architecture and specifications.

Expert Verified By

Intel Core i7 13700H

Rated: 7/10

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS

Rated: 8/10

Pros And Cons

Core i7 13700H✅ Higher core count of 20
✅ Gen V Microprocessor PCIe Revision
❌ ECC Memory Not Supported
❌ More power-hungry
Ryzen 7 7840HS✅ Cutting Edge 4nm Fabrication Node
✅ High-Performance iGPU
❌ DDR4 Unsupported
❌ Subpar Video Editing performance

Key Takeaways
  • The Ryzen 7 7840HS featuring Zen 4 architecture is fabricated at an intelligent 4nm node, and the Core i7 13700H with the Raptor Lake architecture is fabricated at a 10nm resolution process.
  • Regarding gaming performance, we noticed that the Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms the Core i7 13700H with its competent AMD Radeon 780M iGPU.
  • In our power efficiency tests, the Ryzen 7 7840HS stands out, boasting a default TDP of only 35-54W, while the Core i7 13700H, with a turbo TDP of 115W, consumes comparatively more power.

Core i7 13700H vs Ryzen 7 7840HS – Comparison Table

FeatureIntel Core i7-13700HAMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
ArchitectureRaptor LakeZen 4
CPU SocketFCBGA1744FP8
Former CodenameRaptor LakePhoenix
No. of Cores6 P-cores + 8 E-cores
Total: 14
No. of Threads2016
L1 Cache80K (per core)512KB
L2 Cache2MB (per core)8MB
L3 Cache24 MB Intel Smart Cache16MB
Instruction Set64-bitx86-64
Max Memory Size64GB256GB (UDIMM Subtype)
ECC Memory SupportNoYes (FP7r2 only; Requires platform support)
Integrated GraphicsIntel Iris Xe GraphicsAMD Radeon 780M
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency1.50 GHz2.70 GHz
Multi-Format Codec Engines2 cores12 cores
Max Operating Temperature100°C100°C
Launch DateQ1'23Q1'23

Architectural Differences

  1. Process Node: the Core i7-13700H is crafted using the advanced 10nm process technology, while the Ryzen 7 7840HS boasts an even smaller 4nm process node, showcasing cutting-edge fabrication.
  2. Clock Speed: With a Base Clock of 2.4GHz and a Boost Clock of 5GHz, the Core i7-13700H ensures solid performance. On the other hand, the Ryzen 7 7840HS offers a Base Clock of 3.8GHz and a Boost Clock of 5.1GHz.
  3. Memory Support Variation: While the Core i7-13700H supports a maximum of 64GB RAM, the Ryzen 7 7840HS provides a striking advantage with support for up to an impressive 256GB, ideal for memory-intensive applications.
  4. TDP: The Core i7-13700H boasts a TDP of 45W, ensuring robust performance levels. In comparison, the Ryzen 7 7840HS operates within a lower 35W TDP, making it a power-efficient contender.
  5. PCIe Connectivity: The Core i7-13700H introduces PCIe Gen 5 support, catering to the latest connectivity standards. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports PCIe Gen 4, offering impressive data transfer capabilities for cutting-edge peripherals.

From the outset, Intel’s Core i7 and AMD’s Ryzen 7 CPUs have remained stalwarts of high performance. We already have evaluated their desktop equivalents, the Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 7 7700X, and today we’ll examine their mobile counterparts, the Core i7-13700H vs Ryzen 7 7840HS, in-depth.

Core i7 13700H vs Ryzen 7 7840HS – Benchmarks

Now that we’ve analyzed their technical specifications in detail, let’s discuss the real-world performance of these CPUs across various demanding tasks.

Cinebench R23

Cinebench R23 Benchmarks – image Credits (Tech4Gamers)

Single-Core Performance

  • When we compared single-core performance results from Cinebench R23, the Core i7 13700H excelled over the Ryzen 7 7840HS by around 2.22%.
  • The Ryzen 7 7840HS achieved 1798 single-core scores, whereas the Core i7 13700H earned 1838 scores.

Multi-Core Performance

  • In our Cinebench R23’s multi-core test, the Ryzen 7 7840HS surpasses the Core i7 13700H by approximately a 9.3% margin.
  • For this test, the Ryzen 7 7840HS earned an impressive 17,114 score, whereas the Core i7 13700H achieved 15,663.5 scores.
  • The multi-core scores dictate the overall performance of a CPU, and as per the Cinebench R23 benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 7840HS defeats the Core i7 13700H by 9.3%.

7-Zip Compression Test

Data Compression Rates of the two CPUs – image credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • There was no significant difference (Only 38 MIPS or 0.06%) in data compression rates for the two CPUs in our 7-Zip Compression Test.
  • The Core i7 13700H and Ryzen 7 7840HS compressed the required data at similar rates of 62,660 MIPS and 62,622 MIPS, respectively.

3DMark 11 Benchmarks

3DMark 11 Benchmarks – image credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • According to 3DMark 11 Benchmarks, the multi-threads performance of the Core i7 13700H is 9.75% greater than the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
  • The Ryzen 7 7840HS secured 19,193 points, falling just behind the Core i7 13700H, which reached an exceptional 21,064 points.

HWBOT x265

4K Video Encoding Test Results – image credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • During a test to encode a 4K video using the x265 codec, we analyzed the Core i7 13700H unveiling a performance advantage of 14.4% over the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
  • In contrast to the Ryzen 7 7840HS’ limited performance of 14.6 FPS, the Core i7 13700H delivered excellent results, achieving a smooth 17.7 FPS.

Blender 3.3

Blender 3.3 Classroom Benchmarks – image credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • According to Blender 3.3 benchmarks, the Core i7 13700H demonstrates a 1.6% higher efficiency in handling arduous tasks than the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
  • The Core i7 13700H completed the tasks in only 375.5 seconds, thereby outpacing the Ryzen 7 7840HS, which took 381 seconds to finish the same task.

WebXPRT 4 Benchmarks

Productivity Benchmarks
WebXPRT 4 Benchmarks – image credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Based on our WebXPRT 4 Benchmarks for JavaScript performance, the Core i7 13700H creates a 1.33% lead over the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
  • The Core i7 13700H obtained an amazing 266.5 points, surpassing the Ryzen 7 7840HS, which garnered a score of 263 points.

Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Productivity Benchmarks
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Benchmarks – image credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In the Mozilla Kraken 1.1 test for browsing performance, the Ryzen 7 7840HS ascertained 3.6% better capabilities than the Core i7 13700H.
  • The Core i7 13700H operated at a ping of 518ms; however, the Ryzen 7 7840HS managed to achieve a more attractive ping of 490.5ms.

FP32 Benchmarks

Productivity Benchmarks
iGPU Performance Results – image credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • According to the FP32 benchmarks that we carried out, the Ryzen 7 7840HS’ AMD Radeon 780M offers an impressive performance boost of about 93% over the Intel Iris Xe Graphics of the Core i7 13700H.
  • The Core i7 13700H delivered a respectable 2,230 GFLOPS, but the Ryzen 7 7840HS transcended it with an almost double frame rate of 4,300 GFLOPS.

Which One Should You Go For?

Intel Core i7 13700H: In our opinion, the Intel i7 13700H is a robust processor that excels at both multi-core and single-core tasks effortlessly. However, it fell short in our comparison between the Core i7 13700H and Ryzen 7 7840HS. It particularly struggled in video editing and encoding tasks, where its performance was subpar compared to its rival.

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: On the other hand, we found the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS to be an extremely competitive processor which has a powerful iGPU. This performance is coupled with power efficiency, which cuts a lot of slack on your laptop’s battery power. Our benchmarks are proof of its dominance in multicore tasks.

For gamers, we recommend the Ryzen 7 7840HS for its powerful iGPU and energy efficiency. It excels in multi-core performance. However, for tasks like video editing and encoding, the Core i7 13700H offers superior performance and multi-threading.

Common Questions Answered

Which processor has more suitable memory, the Core i7 13700H or Ryzen 7 7840HS?

The Ryzen 7 7840HS has a better 256GB DDR5 memory with a maximum frequency of 7500 MT/s for LPDDR5x. However, it does not support DDR4.

Does the Ryzen 7 7840HS consume more power than the Core i7 13700H?

No. The Core i7 13700H is a more power-hungry processor with a turbo power of 115W. During idle periods, the Core i7 13700H consumes about 35% more power than the Ryzen 7 7840HS.

Which processor is better for gaming, the Core i7 13700H or Ryzen 7 7840HS?

The Ryzen 7 7840HS renders far better gaming performance than the Core i7 13700H with the help of its highly potent AMD Radeon 780M iGPU.

More From Intel Core i7 13700H:

More From AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS:

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Related articles

Why CPU Frequency Doesn’t Matter These Days In Gaming

CPU frequency has always been considered a key metric for measuring gaming performance, but it's not as important as you think.

RTX 4070 Ti Super vs RTX 4070: Should You Upgrade?

In the RTX 4070 Ti Super vs RTX 4070 comparison, we will see how the beefed up version of the 4070 compares with its vanilla counterpart.

RTX 4080 Super vs RTX 4080: Does Super Make Any Difference?

In the RTX 4080 Super vs RTX 4080 comparison, we will distinguish Nvidia's latest and greatest GPU with its vanilla variant.

RTX 4080 Super Vs RTX 3080: Pricing, Benchmarks & Overall

In RTX 4080 Super Vs RTX 3080, we will analyze Nvidia's technolgy upgrade benfits by comparing the gaming performance of these GPUs.

Core i7 14700K Vs Ryzen 5 7600X: We Tested 11 Games

The Core i7 14700K vs Ryzen 5 7600X comparison will measure these chips in gaming performance, architecture, and power consumption.

Similar Guides