From the outset, Intel’s Core i7 and AMD’s Ryzen 7 CPUs have remained stalwarts of high performance. We already have evaluated their desktop equivalents, the Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 7 7700X, and today we’ll examine their mobile counterparts, the Core i7-13700H vs Ryzen 7 7840HS, in-depth.
Key Takeaways
- The Ryzen 7 7840HS featuring Zen 4 architecture is fabricated at an intelligent 4nm node, and the Core i7 13700H with the Raptor Lake architecture is fabricated at a 10nm resolution process.
- Regarding gaming performance, the Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms the Core i7 13700H with its competent AMD Radeon 780M iGPU.
- In terms of power efficiency, the Ryzen 7 7840HS stands out, boasting a default TDP of only 35-54W, while the Core i7 13700H, with a turbo TDP of 115W, consumes comparatively more power.
Comparison Table
Feature | Intel Core i7-13700H | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 4 |
CPU Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP8 |
Former Codename | Raptor Lake | Phoenix |
Processor Technology for CPU Cores | Intel 10nm | TSMC 4nm FinFET |
No. of Cores | 6 P-cores + 8 E-cores Total: 14 |
8 |
No. of Threads | 20 | 16 |
Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
CPU Max Turbo Frequency | Up to 5.00 GHz | Up to 5.1 GHz |
Unlocked for Overclocking | No | No |
L1 Cache | 80K (per core) | 512KB |
L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 8MB |
L3 Cache | 24 MB Intel Smart Cache | 16MB |
Instruction Set | 64-bit | x86-64 |
Package Die Count | 1 | 1 |
Total Transistor Count | – | 25.0 billion |
Max Memory Size | 64GB | 256GB (UDIMM Subtype) |
Memory Type + Frequency | DDR5: Up to 5200 MT/s DDR4: Up to 3200 MT/s LPDDR5x: Up to 6400 MT/s LPDDR4x: Up to 4267 MT/s |
DDR5: Up to 5600 MT/s LPDDR5x: Up to 7500 MT/s |
No. of Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
ECC Memory Support | No | Yes (FP7r2 only; Requires platform support) |
Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | AMD Radeon 780M |
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency | 1.50 GHz | 2.70 GHz |
Execution Units | 96 | Unknown |
Multi-Format Codec Engines | 2 | 12 cores |
PCI Express Revision | PCIe Gen 5 | PCIe 4.0 |
No. Of PCI Express Lanes | 28 | 20 |
Max Operating Temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Processor Base Power | 45W | 35W |
Maximum Turbo Power | 115W | 54W |
Minimum Assured Power | 35W | – |
Launch Date | Q1’23 | Q1’23 |
Architectural Differences
- Process Node: the Core i7-13700H is crafted using the advanced 10nm process technology, while the Ryzen 7 7840HS boasts an even smaller 4nm process node, showcasing cutting-edge fabrication.
- Clock Speed: With a Base Clock of 2.4 GHz and a Boost Clock of 5 GHz, the Core i7-13700H ensures solid performance. On the other hand, the Ryzen 7 7840HS offers a Base Clock of 3.8 GHz and a Boost Clock of 5.1 GHz, delivering snappy responsiveness.
- Memory Support Variation: While the Core i7-13700H supports a maximum of 64GB RAM, the Ryzen 7 7840HS provides a striking advantage with support for up to an impressive 256GB, ideal for memory-intensive applications.
- TDP: The Core i7-13700H boasts a TDP of 45W, ensuring robust performance levels. In comparison, the Ryzen 7 7840HS operates within a lower 35W TDP, making it a power-efficient contender.
- Supported Technologies: The Core i7-13700H introduces PCIe Gen 5 support, catering to the latest connectivity standards. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports PCIe Gen 4, offering impressive data transfer capabilities for cutting-edge peripherals.
Benchmarks – Core i7-13700H Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
Now that we’ve analyzed their technical specifications in detail, let’s discuss the real-world performance of these CPUs across various demanding tasks.
Cinebench R23

Single-Core Performance
- When comparing single-core performance results from Cinebench R23, the Core i7 13700H excels over the Ryzen 7 7840HS by around 2.22%.
- The Ryzen 7 7840HS achieved 1798 single-core scores, whereas the Core i7 13700H earned 1838 scores.
Similar Comparison: Ryzen 7 7840U Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
Multi-Core Performance
- In Cinebench R23’s multi-core test, the Ryzen 7 7840HS surpasses the Core i7 13700H by approximately 9.3% margin.
- For this test, the Ryzen 7 7840HS earned an impressive 17,114 score, whereas the Core i7 13700H achieved 15,663.5 scores.
- The multi-core scores dictate the overall performance of a CPU, and as per the Cinebench R23 benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 7840HS defeats the Core i7 13700H by 9.3%.
7-Zip Compression Test

- There is no significant difference (Only 38 MIPS or 0.06%) in data compression rates for the two CPUs.
- The Core i7 13700H and Ryzen 7 7840HS compressed the required data at similar rates of 62,660 MIPS and 62,622 MIPS, respectively.
3DMark 11 Benchmarks

- According to 3DMark 11 Benchmarks, the multi-threads performance of the Core i7 13700H is 9.75% greater than the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
- The Ryzen 7 7840HS secured 19,193 points, falling just behind the Core i7 13700H, which reached an exceptional 21,064 points.
Also Read: Core i7 13700H Vs Core i7 12700H
HWBOT x265

- During a test to encode a 4K video using the x265 codec, the Core i7 13700H unveiled a performance advantage of 14.4% over the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
- In contrast to the Ryzen 7 7840HS’ limited performance of 14.6 FPS, the Core i7 13700H delivered excellent results, achieving a smooth 17.7 FPS.
Blender 3.3

- According to Blender 3.3 benchmarks, the Core i7 13700H demonstrates a 1.6% higher efficiency in handling arduous tasks than the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
- The Core i7 13700H completed the tasks in only 375.5 seconds, thereby outpacing the Ryzen 7 7840HS, which took 381 seconds to finish the same task.
Similar Comparison: Core i7 13700H Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
WebXPRT 4 Benchmarks

- Based on WebXPRT 4 Benchmarks for JavaScript performance, the Core i7 13700H creates a 1.33% lead over the Ryzen 7 7840HS.
- The Core i7 13700H obtained an amazing 266.5 points, surpassing the Ryzen 7 7840HS, which garnered a score of 263 points.
Mozilla Kraken 1.1

- In Mozilla Kraken 1.1 test for browsing performance, the Ryzen 7 7840HS ascertained 3.6% better capabilities than the Core i7 13700H.
- The Core i7 13700H operated at a ping of 518ms; however, the Ryzen 7 7840HS managed to achieve a more attractive ping of 490.5ms.
Also Read: Core i7 1360P Vs Core i7 13700H
FP32 Benchmarks

- According to the FP32 benchmarks, the Ryzen 7 7840HS’ AMD Radeon 780M offers an impressive performance boost of about 93% over the Intel Iris Xe Graphics of the Core i7 13700H.
- The Core i7 13700H delivered a respectable 2,230 GFLOPS, but the Ryzen 7 7840HS transcended it with an almost double frame rate of 4,300 GFLOPS.
Power Consumption

- As per the idle power draw observed by an external monitor, the Ryzen 7 7840HS is about 35% more power efficient than the Core i7 13700H.
- During the idle monitoring period, the Core i7 13700H drew 14.3W of power, whereas the Ryzen 7 7840HS drew only 10.6W.
Must Read: Core i7 13700HX Vs Core i7 13700H
Which One Should You Go For?
Now that we have fully compared the Core i7 13700H vs Ryzen 7 7840HS, let’s find which CPU would best serve your particular requirements. Both processors have fiercely competed against each other, but we will now provide our final recommendation.
I recommend the Ryzen 7 7840HS to gamers because of its extremely powerful iGPU. It is also more power efficient, thus saving your laptop’s battery. Furthermore, the Ryzen 7 7840HS excels in multi-core performance.
However, when it comes to tasks like video editing, encoding, Javascript performance, and similar things, I would recommend the Core i7 13700H because of its higher performance than the Ryzen 7 7840HS in such tasks. Additionally, the multi-threads performance of the Core i7 13700H is also greater than the rival.
Pros And Cons
Intel Core i7-13700H |
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS | ||
Pros |
Cons |
Pros |
Cons |
|
|
|
|
The Ryzen 7 7840HS has a better 256GB DDR5 memory with a maximum frequency of 7500 MT/s for LPDDR5x. However, it does not support DDR4. No. The Core i7 13700H is a more power-hungry processor with a turbo power of 115W. During idle periods, the Core i7 13700H consumes about 35% more power than the Ryzen 7 7840HS. The Ryzen 7 7840HS renders far better gaming performance than the Core i7 13700H with the help of its highly potent AMD Radeon 780M iGPU.Common Questions Answered
Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋
How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔