GuidesComparisonsARC B580 Vs RX 7600: Our Recommendation

ARC B580 Vs RX 7600: Our Recommendation

How does one of the only true budget cards in the modern era compare to Intel's new offering?

Expert Verified By

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Rated: 7/10

Intel ARC B580

Rated: 9/10


Pros And Cons

CPUProsCons
RX 7600✅ Power efficient
✅ More tried and tested
❌ Worse in terms of performance
ARC B580✅ Has 25% more shading units
✅ Better in terms of performance
❌ Slightly more expensive

Key Takeaways

  • The ARC B580 was about 23% faster than the Radeon card when we tested games, while performance in terms of power consumption was about equal.
  • The 7600 took around 10% less power than the Intel card, which is noticeable, if not a significant difference.
  • The RX 7600 is about $20 cheaper than the Intel card as of late January 2025.
  • If you are in a position to get either card, we would recommend going with the ARX B580 because of its significantly better performance.


Comparison Table

FeatureRX 7600Arc B580
PurposeGamingGaming
SegmentMid-rangeMid-range
ArchitectureRDNA 3.0Generation 12.7
GPU CodenameNavi 33BMG-G21
Render Output Units (ROPs)6480
Tensor CoresNo160
Ray-tracing Cores3220
ManufacturingTSMCTSMC
Fabrication Process6 nm5 nm
GPU Review-Intel ARC B580 Review

Architectural Differences

  1. Process Nodes: Both the ARC B580 and the RX 7600 use 5nm processing nodes.
  2. Clock Speeds: The RX 7600 clocks between 1720MHz and 2655MHz, whereas the ARC B580 has a fixed clock speed of 2670MHz.
  3. VRAM: The ARC B580 has 12GB of GDDR6 memory connected through a 192-bit bus, which is wider than the 128-bit bus of the RX 7600.
  4. TDP: The TDP of the Battlemage graphics card is around 190 watts, much higher than the 165 watts of the RX 7600.
  5. Supported Technologies: Upscaling, frame generation, and low latency solutions are present on both graphics cards, with the added benefit of those from AMD being open-source.

AMD used to be the king of the budget tier, partly because of how bad Nvidia had become with making cheap graphics cards. With the entry of Intel’s second-gen cards into the market, the position of AMD has been challenged. Let us see how they compare in the ARC B580 vs RX 7600 comparison!


Gaming Benchmarks – 1440p

The best way to represent how the cards compare is to see how they perform in modern games. To measure this, we have used a standard test bench, the specs of which you can take a look at below:

Test Bench

Star Wars Jedi: Survivor

Star Wars Jedi Survivor
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • The first game that we tested ran about 18.6% better on the Intel card. It had a performance of around 51 FPS on average, which was much improved from the 43 FPS of the RX 7600.
  • The minimums were about 11% better on the ARC B580, with the card going down to around 39 FPS in our testing, while the RX 7600 held at around 35 FPS.

A Plague Tale: Requiem

A Plague Tale Requiem
A Plague Tale Requiem @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • The difference jumped to around 24.5% in our test of A Plague Tale, where the RX 7600 got an average of 45 FPS, while the ARC B580 held closer to around 56 FPS.
  • The 1% lows were held at around 38 FPS with the RX 7600, while the ARC B580 ran this game with a minimum of about 45 FPS.

Cyberpunk 2077

Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • The B580 was close to 19% faster in this game, with a framerate of 63 FPS on average, while the RX 7600 got an average closer to about 53 FPS.
  • The dips in performance were closer, with the B580 getting 1% lows of around 51 FPS, while the RX 7600 got a framerate of around 47 FPS, accounting for a difference of 8.5%.

Dying Light 2

Dying Light 2
Dying Light 2 @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • Our test of Dying Light 2 had an average framerate of 55 FPS with the B580, which was about 35% higher than the 41 FPS of the RX 7600.
  • The 1% lows were around 31 FPS on the Radeon card, which was about 45% lower than the much smoother 45 FPS lows of the B580.

Dragon Age: The Veilguard

Dragon Age The Veilguard
Dragon Age: The Veilguard @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • This Dragon Age game ran with a framerate of around 24 FPS on the RX 7600, while the ARX B580 ran it 120% better with an average framerate closer to around 53 FPS.
  • The minimums were an embarrassing 13 FPS on the AMD, while the ARC B580 was a whopping 231% faster with a framerate of around 43 FPS.

Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered

Marvel Spider-Man Remastered
Marvel Spider-Man Remastered @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • The performance in Spider-Man came close between these two cards, with the RX 7600 getting an average framerate of around 102 FPS, only 4% behind the ARC’s 106 FPS.
  • Minimum framerates were also relatively close, with a framerate of 73 FPS on the RX 7600, whereas the B580 had a performance of 79 FPS, which is about 8% better.

Hogwarts Legacy

Hogwarts Legacy
Hogwarts Legacy @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • Both the graphics cards were evenly matched in the average framerate of Hogwarts Legacy with a performance of 59 FPS.
  • The 1% lows were also remarkably identical at 42 FPS. This sudden levelling of the playing field is either because the 7600 is very well optimized in this game or the ARC is poorly optimized.

The Last Of Us Part 1

The Last Of Us
The Last Of Us @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • The average framerate of the ARC B580 was around 54 FPS in our test of this game, which was about 50% faster than the 36 FPS of the RX 7600.
  • Minimum framerates were about 44 FPS on the B580, making it 120% better than the 20 FPS of the RX 7600.

Productivity Benchmarks

Recently, we’ve started to consider the productivity tests in our benchmarks to paint the fullest picture of the cards we compare. The tests in this section will be performed using the same testbench mentioned above.

UL Procyon

UL PROCYON
UL PROCYON @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • UL Procyon, which is a benchmark specifically designed to emulate the performance of cards in real-world scenarios, performed over twice as well on the Intel card.
  • The RX 7600 hovered around a performance of 708 points, while the ARC B580 got a performance closer to about 1490 points.

Handbrake

Handbreak
Handbreake @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • When we tested AV1 encoding on Handbrake, the RX 7600 had an encoding speed of around 312 FPS, which was about 14% higher than the 273 FPS of the ARC B580.
  • The performance of the Intel card was about 3% better when it came to traditional H.264 encoding, with a speed of 322 FPS instead of 312 on the Radeon card.

Blender

Blender
Blender @1440p (Image By Tech4Gamers)
  • Blender performed noticeably better on the Radeon card. It rendered our scene about 30% faster than the Battlemage GPU.
  • The RX 7600 had a render time of about 234 seconds, whereas the B580 took around 305 seconds to complete the same render.

Overall Performance

ProcessorRX 7600ARC B580
Average FPS📈50.37📈62.12
1% Lows📉37.37📉48.5
Productivity (Rating)✏️4.59/10✏️7/10
Winner: ARC B580

Average Framerate

Our testing showed that the B580 was consistently more powerful than the RX 7600, at least regarding the average FPS. The B580 was significantly ahead in most games, with only one title being a tie between the two. The overall difference between the two was 23% in favour of the B580.

1% Lows

The RX 7600 seems to be bottlenecked because of its small memory buffer, which causes it to tank very hard in the 1% lows of some titles. This resulted in the ARC B580 being about 30% faster when it comes to the minimum framerates in the average of the games we ran.

Productivity

Though UL Procyon ran better on the Intel card, nothing else did to a significant amount. Yes, both the cards are comparable when it comes it encoding, but the Radeon card won by a very significant margin when it came to Blender. Overall, we think it would be fair to call this category a tie.

Power Consumption

GameRX 7600ARC B580
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor245265
A Plague Tale: Requiem243267
Cyberpunk 2077239268
Dying Light 2241263
Dragon Age: The Veilguard235269
Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered237267
Hogwarts Legacy235255
The Last Of Us Part 1241274
Average Power Draw239.5⚡266⚡
Winner: RX 7600

In our testing, we noticed that the Radeon card consumed less power than the Intel one. Our estimates showed that the RX 7600 took around 10% less power than the ARC B580. This isn’t a huge difference, especially considering the difference in performance, but it might matter if you don’t have any power headroom.

Temperature

GameRX 7600ARC B580
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor6669
A Plague Tale: Requiem6763
Cyberpunk 20776576
Dying Light 26879
Dragon Age: The Veilguard7066
Marvel's Spider-Man Remastered6268
Hogwarts Legacy6367
The Last Of Us Part 16764
Average Temperatures66🌡️69🌡️
Winner: RX 7600

Price And Value

CPURX 7600ARC B580Price Difference
Launch MSRP💲269💲2498.03%
Current Price💲249💲2698.03%

The launch MSRP and current RX 7600 and ARX B580 prices seem to have flipped, with the 7600 going from being $20 more expensive to about $20 cheaper. Still, depending on the OEM, both these cards are of very comparable price, which makes the performance of the B580 that much more impressive.


What We Recommend

Radeon RX 7600: The RX 7600 did perform adequately for the price before the new Intel cards came out, but a new standard has been set in the market. Currently, the RX 7600 is beaten where it matters by the Intel ARC B580, which makes it very hard to recommend this card.

Intel ARC B580: There is a fair bit of controversy regarding this card, with claims being made that it does not perform well with lower-end processors. However, if you trust Intel to improve the capability of this card with cheaper processors, the ARC B580 is the obvious choice in this comparison.

The extra performance the ARX B580 gives for a similar price is too much to give up, even if the 7600 might take back a little less power. For this reason, it has earned our recommendation in the ARC B580 Vs RX 7600 comparison.


FAQs

How much newer is the ARC B580 compared to the RX 7600?

The B580 came out 1 year and 8 months after the RX 7600.

Do both of these cards use a by 8 PCIe connection?

Yes, both the RX 7600 and the ARC B580 use a by 8 connection.

Is the 8GB of VRAM getting cramped on the RX 7600?

Yes, the 8GB of VRAM on the RX 7600 has started to show its age.

What power supply is recommended with the RX 7600?

The RX 7600 is recommended to be used with a 450-watt power supply.

What power supply is recommended with the ARC B580?

The ARC B580’s recommended power supply capacity is about 450 watts.

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Related articles

MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi Review: A Great Daily Driver

The MSI MAG X870E Tomahawk WiFi is an impressive addition to MSI’s X870E arsenal. It prioritizes performance over looks, with a minimalistic design but solid numbers across all our tests. Its VRM setup (14+2+1 DRPS with 80A SPS for VCore) should handle any AM5 CPU (but don’t expect serious overclocking). Additionally, the I/O (5G LAN, WiFi 7, dual Gen 5 M.2, and more) and EZ-DIY features make this an overall solid option for $299.

MSI MAG B850 Tomahawk Max WiFi Review: Performance On A Budget

The MSI MAG B850 Tomahawk Max WiFi is an excellent mid-ranger and a great option for stepping onto the latest platform with your Ryzen 9000 CPU. It has a decent 14+2+1 DRPS design with 14x 80A SPS for the CPU, enough for even the AM5 big dogs. 5G LAN, WiFi 7, dual Gen 5 M.2 slots, PCIe 5.0 x16, and EZ-DIY are the highlights on the board. The lack of dual-sided thermal pads for the Gen 5 M.2 slot is a disappointment.

G.Skill Trident Z5 Royal Neo DDR5-8000 CL38 EXPO Kit Review

The Trident Z5 Royal Neo DDR5-8000 CL38 is G.Skill's latest addition to their EXPO DDR5 lineup. It follows the same design as previous kits from this lineup, with a mirrored silver/gold finish and a crystalline light bar. It's capable of running at DDR5-6400 CL28 with a latency of just 8.75ns, a configuration at which it can beat any kit in the market with speeds ranging from 6000-6400 MT/s. All this comes at a towering price tag of $179, though.

Best CPU Coolers for Core Ultra 9 285K In 2025 [20+ Tested]

We picked out the best CPU coolers for Core Ultra 9 285K after months of dedicated testing, bringing you our 5 top picks.

X870 Vs X870E: We Tested Both Chipsets

In the X870 vs X870E comparison, we will take a look at the performance, connectivity, price, and value for money for these chipsets.

Similar Guides