Nvidia Fires Back At AMD In New DeepSeek Benchmark Claiming Better Performance

Expert Verified By

AMD and Nvidia show conflicting results favoring their hardware.

Story Highlight
  • Nvidia claims that the RTX 5090 is up to 2.2 times faster than the RX 7900 XTX in AI benchmarks.
  • In contrast, AMD’s results suggest that the RX 7900 XTX is faster than both the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080 in several tests.
  • Both tests reveal a significant difference in benchmark results between Nvidia and AMD.

Nvidia has fired back after losing to AMD’s Radeon RX 7900 XTX in the DeepSeek AI test, asserting that its RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 GPUs are noticeably better than the RDNA 3 flagship.

Nvidia wrote a blog post stating that the RTX 5090 is up to 2.2 times faster than the RX 7900 XTX.

Why it matters: The difference in benchmark results justifies the need for caution when evaluating marketing claims, as manufacturers may optimize their tests to favor their own products.

Source: Nvidia

Nvidia used Distill Qwen 7b, Llama 8b, and Qwen 32b to benchmark the RTX 5090, RTX 4090, and RX 7900 XTX in three DeepSeek R1 AI model variants. The RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 were said to be 124% and 47% faster than the RX 7900 XTX, respectively, while using the Qwen LLM with the 32b setting.

The RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 outperformed the RX 7900 XTX by 106% and 47%, respectively, using Llama 8b. Compared to the RX 7900 XTX, the RTX 5090 was 103% faster, while the RTX 4090 offered 46% faster performance with Qwen 7b.

When compared to AMD’s testing, which includes the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080, Nvidia’s results are stunning. In comparison to the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080, AMD claimed that the RX 7900 XTX was up to 113% and 134% faster, respectively.

With the RTX 4090, Nvidia presents a quite different image, demonstrating that it is significantly faster than the RX 7900 XTX rather than the other way around. The GeForce RTX 5090 in comparison destroyed the RX 7900 XTX, offering more than double the performance.

This serves as a helpful reminder to be skeptical of benchmark results offered by the manufacturer. However, it’s always best to wait for third-party results, instead of relying on Nvidia or AMD marketing claims. 

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

Ubisoft Aims To Make Assassin’s Creed, Far Cry and Rainbow Six “Annual Billionare Brands”

Ubisoft says it wants to make its flagship titles annual billion-dollar brands, despite sales in recent years not being that impressive.

Ubisoft Shuts Down 2 Studios, Cancels 6 In-Development Games Including Sands of Time Remake

Ubisoft has just undergone a massive restructuring, resulting in the closure of 2 studios and the cancellation of 6 new games.

Crimson Desert Goes Gold Two Months Before Launch, Signaling No Further Delays

Crimson Desert has officially gone gold two months before release. The game is expected to keep its March 19 release.

Ubisoft Cancels Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time Remake and Delays 7 Other Titles

Ubisoft cancelled Prince of Persia: Sands of Time remake as it didn't meet their quality expectations and delayed 7 of its upcoming games.

Nvidia Underfire For Attempting To Access Pirated Documents to Train Its AI Models

Nvidia reportedly greenlit a deal with a piracy site for documents to train its AI models, despite being warned of its illegal nature.