GuidesComparisonsCore i9 13900K Vs M2 Max

Core i9 13900K Vs M2 Max [Benchmarks & Differences]

In this article, we will be taking a closer look at the Core i9 13900K Vs M2 Max, in order to find out their performance difference.

Expert Verified By

In the ever-evolving landscape of high-performance processors, the clash between the Core i9 13900K vs M2 Max is nothing short of remarkable. As we delve into this intriguing face-off, we will explore the intricate details of their specifications and dive into comprehensive performance benchmarks, shedding light on how these two powerhouses stack up against each other.

Key Takeaways

  • Starting off, the Core i9 13900K excels in benchmarks, making it the top choice for robust single-core and multi-core tasks, setting a new standard, including 15.9% and 73.2% lead in single and multi-core scores on average, respectively, processing power.
  • With a lower 30W TDP compared to the Core i9 13900K’s 125W, the M2 Max offers commendable performance while prioritizing energy-conscious users’ needs.
  • Moreover, the Core i9 13900K supports up to 128GB DDR5-5600 and DDR4-3200 memory, while the M2 Max impressively handles up to 96GB LPDDR5-6400, catering to diverse memory demands.
  • Finally, the Core i9 13900K’s ECC memory support ensures robust error correction, enhancing reliability in critical tasks, a feature absent in the M2 Max.

Comparison Table

Key Specifications M2 Max Core i9 13900K
Vendor Apple Intel
Release Date January 17, 2023 September 27, 2022
Device Type Laptop Desktop
Instruction Set ARMv8 x86-64
Integrated GPU Apple M2 Max GPU (38-core) UHD Graphics 770
Performance Cores 8 8
Performance Threads 8 16
Base Clock 2.4 GHz 3.0 GHz
Boost Clock 3.5 GHz 5.4 GHz
Total Cores 12 24
Total Threads 12 32
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 32MB (shared) 2MB (per core)
Transistors 67 billion 1.42 billion
Fabrication Process 5nm 10nm
TDP (PL1) 30W 125W
Socket Apple M-Socket LGA-1700
GPU Base Clock 450 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1398 MHz 1650 MHz
Cuda Cores 4864 256
Display Capabilities 7680Γ—4320 – 60 Hz
Memory Support Up to 96GB LPDDR5-6400 Up to 128GB

– DDR5-5600,
– DDR4-3200

ECC Support No Yes
Max. Memory Bandwidth 409.6 GB/s 89.6 GB/s

Core i9 13900K Vs M2 Max: Architectural Differences

While both the Intel Core i9 13900K and Apple M2 Max are poised to redefine high-performance computing, a closer examination of their architectural nuances reveals intriguing disparities that can significantly influence their real-world capabilities.

  1. Process Node: Showcasing technological advancements, the M2 Max harnesses the efficiency of a 5nm process node, while the Core i9 13900K relies on a 10nm process node for its performance.
  2. Clock SpeedMoreover, the M2 Max pursues its tasks with a Base Clock of 2.4 GHz and a Boost Clock of 3.5 GHz, contrasting the Core i9 13900K’s vigor with a Base Clock of 3.0 GHz and a remarkable Boost Clock of 5.4 GHz.
  3. Memory Support Variation: In the realm of memory, the M2 Max’s support extends to an impressive 96GB of LPDDR5-6400, while the Core i9 13900K lays claim to a broader spectrum, accommodating up to 128GB of DDR5-5600 and DDR4-3200.
  4. TDPFurthermore, the M2 Max maintains its equilibrium with a power-efficient 30W TDP, whereas the Core i9 13900K commands a more robust 125W TDP, reflecting a divergence in performance and energy consumption.
  5. Supported Technologies: While the Core i9 13900K integrates the advantages of ECC memory support, the M2 Max lacks this technology, a factor that can influence their roles in critical computing applications.

Performance Benchmarks

Now that we’ve dissected the architectural distinctions, it’s time to embark on a journey through comprehensive performance benchmarks. These tests will unveil how the Intel Core i9 13900K and Apple M2 Max navigate the intricate terrain of various benchmark software, providing a tangible glimpse into their prowess across a spectrum of computing tasks.

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core) Performance Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The Core i9 13900K asserts its supremacy with a remarkable 28.6% lead, achieving a single-core score of 2253, while the M2 Max follows with a respectable score of 1689.

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core) Performance Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In multi-core prowess, the Core i9 13900K dominates with a staggering 85.9% advantage, achieving an impressive score of 38305, while the M2 Max delivers a solid performance with a score of 15284.

Passmark CPU (Single-Core)

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core) Performance Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Furthermore, the Core i9 13900K maintains its lead with a 12% difference, scoring 4707, while the M2 Max showcases its capabilities with a score of 4171 in the single-core Passmark CPU test.

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)

Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core) Performance Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • In addition, when it comes to multi-core tests, the Core i9 13900K shines with a substantial 77.8% lead, achieving an impressive score of 60621, while the M2 Max demonstrates commendable performance with a score of 26641.

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Performance Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • Moreover, the Core i9 13900K continues its lead, surpassing the M2 Max by 12.5% with a single-core score of 2292, while the M2 Max attains a score of 2022.

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Performance Benchmarks – Image Credits (Tech4Gamers)
  • The Core i9 13900K demonstrates its multi-core might with a 45.8% advantage, achieving a score of 24127, while the M2 Max delivers a competitive performance with a score of 15130 in the Geekbench 5 multi-core test.

M2 Max Vs Core i9 13900K: Which Chip Should You Pick? 

  • The Core i9 13900K emerges as a powerhouse, showcasing significant leads in multiple benchmarks, including by 15.9% and 73.2% in single and multi-core scores on average, respectively, making it an ideal choice for users who demand top-tier performance for both single-core and multi-core tasks.
  • While the Core i9 13900K excels in performance, the M2 Max holds its own with an impressive balance of power and efficiency. With a lower TDP of 30W compared to the Core i9 13900K’s 125W, the M2 Max is well-suited for energy-conscious users seeking a versatile computing experience.
  • The Core i9 13900K supports memory configurations of up to 128GB DDR5-5600 and DDR4-3200, while the M2 Max offers a notable memory capacity of up to 96GB LPDDR5-6400. Depending on your memory-intensive needs, both processors cater to a wide range of demanding applications.
  • If error correction capabilities are paramount, the Core i9 13900K supports ECC memory, a feature absent in the M2 Max. For users requiring enhanced reliability and accuracy in critical computing tasks, the Core i9 13900K’s ECC support may tip the scale in its favor.

FAQs

What are the main performance differences between the M2 Max and Core i9 13900K?

The Core i9 13900K showcases superior performance across various benchmarks, delivering remarkable single-core and multi-core processing power compared to the M2 Max.

Which processor offers better power efficiency, the M2 Max or the Core i9 13900K?

The M2 Max boasts an energy-efficient design with a lower 30W TDP, making it an appealing choice for users seeking performance and less power consumption.

Does the M2 Max or Core i9 13900K offer more memory flexibility?

Both processors cater to memory-intensive tasks, with the Core i9 13900K supporting up to 128GB DDR5-5600 and DDR4-3200, while the M2 Max handles up to 96GB LPDDR5-6400.

Was our article helpful? πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’»

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. πŸ”‹

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. πŸ˜”

Related articles

RTX 4070 Super Vs RX 7900 XT: We Tested 10 Games

In the RTX 4070 Super Vs RX 7900 XT comparison, we will delve into the difference between Nvidia's mid-range to AMD's high-end.

RTX 4070 Super Vs RX 6800 XT [We Tested Both]

We've compared the RTX 4070 Super Vs RX 6800 XT and saw that even with varying specs, one card showed better gaming performance.

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Vs RTX 3060: We Tested 7 Games

In this article we will be analyzing the performance gap of the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Vs GeForce RTX 3060, through a series of benchmarks.

RTX 2060 Vs GTX 1660 Super: Gaming Benchmarks 2024

In this article, we will compare the RTX 2060 Vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super and see which one is better suited to be part of your rig.

Ryzen 5 7600 Vs 7600X: Pricing, Benchmarks And Overall

Let us compare AMD's latest budget CPUs, the Ryzen 5 7600X vs Ryzen 5 7600, and see which one performs better in our gaming benchmarks.

Similar Guides