FSR 4 INT8 Version Leaked For RDNA 2/3 GPUs, Shows Better Visuals Than FSR 3.1

Expert Verified By

Provides Better Visuals But Slightly Compromised Performance!

Story Highlight
  • The leaked FSR 4 INT8 version unlocks AMD’s latest upscaling feature for RDNA 2/3 GPUs.
  • It provides better visuals than FSR 3.1, but the performance takes a slight hit, similar to DLSS 4.
  • FSR 4 INT8 provides a visual boost to RDNA 2/3 GPUs, but FSR 4 on RDNA 4 is still superior.

The latest version of AMD’s upscaling FSR 4 is currently available only to users with newer GPUs. The version is greatly improved with better visuals and performance, but the older versions weren’t as good, resulting in bad performance on older cards.

The RX 9000 series boasts an FP8 format that enables hardware acceleration, a feature absent in older cards. However, a new FSR 4 INT8 version has leaked online that allows the upscaling version for RDNA2/3 GPUs. 

Why it matters: FSR 3.1 was the last version compatible with RDNA2/3 cards, and while it does provide a slight performance boost, it heavily compromises visuals; the FSR 4 INT8 version helps address this issue. 

FSR 4 INT8 provides a visual boost to RDNA 2/3 GPUs, but FSR 4 on RDNA 4 is still superior.

AMD doesn’t appear to have any official plans to release it, but the builds have leaked online, allowing you to try it for yourself. FSR 4 INT8 (via ComputerBase) does provide a lot better visuals than the older version, but the performance takes a hit. 

The FP8 build present on RX 9000 GPUs is still the superior version, but you do see an upgrade in visuals. It does take a performance hit as it doesn’t match the smoothness of FSR 4 on RDNA4 GPUs. 

The scenarios differ for various games, but testing shows that FSR4 for RDN4 is significantly more consistent than FSR 4 INT8 on RDN2/3. The trend was observed in Horizon, Cronos, and other games. 

Performance takes a slight hit with the leaked version.

The performance even takes a hit compared to FSR 3.1. You do get significantly better visuals, but the FPS goes down slightly. So, this is a trade-off you have to decide if you do decide to use FSR 4. 

Nonetheless, if AMD decides to launch FSR 4 INT8 on older GPUs, it will be a worthwhile upgrade. The visuals can match FSR4 on RDNA4 GPUs, and the performance loss isn’t too big compared to FSR 3.1. 

What are your thoughts on FSR 4 INT8 for RDNA 2/3 GPUs? Let us know your opinions in the comments or join the discussion at the Tech4Gamers Forum.

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

Finally, the Apple MacBook Pro Will be Getting a Touchscreen

Apple's new OLED MacBook Pro will "100%" feature a touchscreen and will launch in late 2026, according to a new leak.

Satya Nadella Says YouTube Earns More From Xbox Than Microsoft Does

Satya Nadella says that Xbox needs to be sustainable moving forward, joking that even YouTube earns more from the brand than Microsoft.

Intel Plans to Release Raptor Lake For a Third Time in 2027 as “Raptor Lake Next”

Intel is apparently planning to release "Raptor Lake Next" in 2027, a new lineup of CPUs based on the 3-year-old architecture.

Stellar Blade Is Finally Coming To Xbox, But Developers Need Time To Port To The Console

The publishing head of Shift Up has revealed on X that Stellar Blade is coming to Xbox, but the development team still needs time.

Xbox Helix Could Ship Without A Controller To Bring Down Costs, Predicts Insider

According to an insider, Xbox could launch the upcoming Project Helix without a controller included in the package to reduce costs.