70% of Developers Believe Live Service Games Are Unsustainable

Expert Verified By

Due To Competition & Players Losing Interest!

Story Highlight
  • Game Developers conducted a survey where the majority of developers were concerned about this genre’s sustainability.
  • The two major reasons for the concerns were players losing interest and market competition.
  • Developers also expressed concern about monetization practices.

Live-service gaming is just as popular as single-player gaming today. For investors and publishers, the former is more lucrative, motivating the likes of Warner Bros, EA, and PlayStation to pursue the model.

However, it is no surprise that breaking into live-service is difficult today. According to a new survey, a large number of developers are also concerned about the sustainability of this genre.

Why it matters: Players are comfortable with the already existing live service games, so developers struggle to attract audiences for new projects.

Helldivers 2
Helldivers 2 Is The Latest Live-Service Hit on The Market

A survey conducted by GDC asked 600 developers about different aspects of the genre, including business models and monetization.

In this survey, it was found that 39% of the developers were concerned about sustainability, while 31% were very concerned. In total, only 30% of the developers did not have any concerns about live service.

The survey suggests that two big reasons behind their perspective include gamers losing interest and the competition. This makes it increasingly challenging to keep a live-service game going after initial success.

A game like Palworld, while not primarily live service, serves as a great example. Despite its record-breaking start, it has lost most of the initial audience that tagged along after the buzz.

Suicide Squad: Kill The Justice League Skull and Bones
Two Major Games Have Already Failed In 2024

While teams behind games like Hogwarts Legacy and Days Gone may pivot to live service, they could find it difficult to stand out.

Therefore, survival in the market would require innovations from the developers’ end. Perhaps new ways to keep gamers engaged or pocket-friendly monetization could be potential solutions.

A game like Helldivers 2 is a great example in this regard, highlighting that a basic approach is often the best one. However, developers are right to worry since failures like Suicide Squad show how one misstep can be the end of all live-service ambitions.

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

Assassin’s Creed Black Flag Remake Delayed By Up to a Year from Its Original Release

Assassin's Creed Black Flag remake is now scheduled to release in FY 2027, delayed by up to a year from its initial FY 2026 release.

Following Restructuring at Ubisoft, Their New Model Pivots Toward Live-Service and Open-World Games

Ubisoft has gone through a massive restructuring and announced a new model that will be centered on open-world and live-service games.

Ubisoft Aims To Make Assassin’s Creed, Far Cry and Rainbow Six “Annual Billionare Brands”

Ubisoft says it wants to make its flagship titles annual billion-dollar brands, despite sales in recent years not being that impressive.

Ubisoft Shuts Down 2 Studios, Cancels 6 In-Development Games Including Sands of Time Remake

Ubisoft has just undergone a massive restructuring, resulting in the closure of 2 studios and the cancellation of 6 new games.

Crimson Desert Goes Gold Two Months Before Launch, Signaling No Further Delays

Crimson Desert has officially gone gold two months before release. The game is expected to keep its March 19 release.