70% of Developers Believe Live Service Games Are Unsustainable

Expert Verified By

Due To Competition & Players Losing Interest!

Story Highlight
  • Game Developers conducted a survey where the majority of developers were concerned about this genre’s sustainability.
  • The two major reasons for the concerns were players losing interest and market competition.
  • Developers also expressed concern about monetization practices.

Live-service gaming is just as popular as single-player gaming today. For investors and publishers, the former is more lucrative, motivating the likes of Warner Bros, EA, and PlayStation to pursue the model.

However, it is no surprise that breaking into live-service is difficult today. According to a new survey, a large number of developers are also concerned about the sustainability of this genre.

Why it matters: Players are comfortable with the already existing live service games, so developers struggle to attract audiences for new projects.

Helldivers 2
Helldivers 2 Is The Latest Live-Service Hit on The Market

A survey conducted by GDC asked 600 developers about different aspects of the genre, including business models and monetization.

In this survey, it was found that 39% of the developers were concerned about sustainability, while 31% were very concerned. In total, only 30% of the developers did not have any concerns about live service.

The survey suggests that two big reasons behind their perspective include gamers losing interest and the competition. This makes it increasingly challenging to keep a live-service game going after initial success.

A game like Palworld, while not primarily live service, serves as a great example. Despite its record-breaking start, it has lost most of the initial audience that tagged along after the buzz.

Suicide Squad: Kill The Justice League Skull and Bones
Two Major Games Have Already Failed In 2024

While teams behind games like Hogwarts Legacy and Days Gone may pivot to live service, they could find it difficult to stand out.

Therefore, survival in the market would require innovations from the developers’ end. Perhaps new ways to keep gamers engaged or pocket-friendly monetization could be potential solutions.

A game like Helldivers 2 is a great example in this regard, highlighting that a basic approach is often the best one. However, developers are right to worry since failures like Suicide Squad show how one misstep can be the end of all live-service ambitions.

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

BIOSTAR Showcases Low-Power Edge AI Systems at CES 2026 With MemryX Partnership

BIOSTAR showcases the EdgeComp MU-N150 with MemryX MX3 M.2 AI accelerator at CES 2026, delivering compact, low-power edge AI solutions.

New DLC For The Witcher 3 Is Almost Inevitable – Analyst 100% Sure

The analyst who previously predicted The Witcher 3...

New Tests Show DLSS 4.5 Delivers Better Image Quality Than Native Resolution in Some Games

Testing shows DLSS 4.5 provides better quality than...

Wolfenstein Developer MachineGames Reportedly Working on a Rainbow Six Siege–Style Multiplayer Shooter

Reliable insider claims that MachineGames, developers behind Wolfenstein games, are working on a new Rainbow Six Siege-like multiplayer game.

New Possible Life Is Strange Game Leaked, Titled ‘Life Is Strange: Reunion’

A new potential Life is Strange game has leaked online based on a new rating by PEGI, and it has been titled Life is Strange: Reunion.