PlayStation Sending Concord Out To Die At $40 Launch Price

Expert Verified By

Concord Won't Be Able To Compete Against Free Games!

Story Highlight
  • Concord will be priced at $40, but it will be swarmed by free-to-play titles in the unforgiving live service market.
  • This price tag will limit the game’s appeal, pushing millions away who would have tried it otherwise.
  • To make matters worse, players who buy the game will likely be forced to deal with egregious microtransactions and monetization.

PlayStation just shared more details on Concord recently, and let’s just say, the footage didn’t do Firewalk Studios’ work any favors.

Whether it be the generic MCU-style quips and characters or the cookie-cutter first-person shooter gameplay done countless times before, nothing about Concord immediately shouts originality.

However, this may not be the biggest problem. PlayStation has already confirmed that this title will not follow the general free-to-play trend, and recent listings confirm that it will cost about $40.

While this price makes Concord noticeably cheaper than the average $70 AAA release, PlayStation is practically asking to have the first-person shooter smothered by the competition here.

Why it matters: Following the highly successful Helldivers 2, PlayStation seems to be making a mistake in its journey toward becoming a live service giant.

YouTube video

Free To Play Is The Way To Go

Going free-to-play is a no-brainer for the type of game Firewalk Studios is creating.

Reflect on the biggest first-person shooters on the market, and you’ll probably think of Overwatch, Valorant, Apex Legends, Call of Duty, and more. All of these have one thing in common: they’re either free-to-play or have one such component, in Call of Duty’s case.

Even Marvel’s Rivals, a first-person shooter dubbed an Overwatch clone, will launch as a free-to-play title. In my opinion, PlayStation’s decision to price Concord at $40 comes across as tone-deaf.

PlayStation may find the day-one sales beneficial, but the free-to-play market is relentless and one that is rarely kind to newcomers. It doesn’t help that Firewalk Studios hasn’t shown much originality or given gamers a reason to go out and spend $40 on the title.

Keep in mind that, unlike free-to-play titles, Concord will probably require an additional PS Plus purchase on consoles, bringing the price tag further up. Also, before you bring up Helldivers 2’s launch price, consider the fact that there aren’t many games that capture the happy-go-lucky vibe of that co-op shooter.

It is also important to remember that third-person shooters, in general, are nowhere near as popular.

Concord
Concord’s gameplay trailer focused on standard multiplayer aspects and offered nothing new.

Limiting Newcomers From The Beginning

The biggest advantage of free-to-play games is that they eliminate the barrier of entry. This also makes it so that the general consumer is more willing to try newer releases.

Imagine booting up your PC or PS5, and you see a shiny new first-person shooter from PlayStation. Who doesn’t love first-person shooters? And PlayStation rarely creates bad games. This is what you’d probably think, right?

This is the mindset that initially made Fortnite and Warzone so big. As someone who was never particularly interested in either of these, I downloaded both of them on multiple occasions and logged on for several hours simply because my friends asked me to and I had nothing to lose.

A similar scenario recently pushed me toward XDefiant. Sure, I moved on from the game rather quickly, but others probably stuck with it. PlayStation has deprived Concord of this magical experience.

Considering the size of the first-person shooter market, millions would have probably tried the title on day one had Sony gone the free-to-play route.

YouTube video

What About The Microtransactions?

If there’s one thing guaranteed for the live service genre, it’s the fact that you can bet on microtransactions running the show.

Like every other free-to-play shooter, I fully expect Concord to be infested with microtransactions. Battle Passes, cosmetic DLC, multiple currencies, you name it; Firewalk Studios is probably working on all of this and more right now.

I’m someone who hates modern microtransactions, but the free-to-play model makes them easier to deal with.

Once you stack up $40 for the base release, $80 for 12 months of PS Plus on consoles, and the additional cash for microtransactions, you may as well go and play any of the hundred free-to-play live-service titles available on the market.

Ultimately, PlayStation seems to have written an early death sentence for its ambitious first-person shooter. Concord needs every advantage it can find, and a free-to-play model could have been a game-changer in this situation.

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

Why Gamers Should Understand Data Privacy Policies

Data collection is a major part of all games, making it crucial for the average gamer to understand the process and everything in between.

Activision Needs To Let Raven Software Out of The “Support Role” Jail

Raven Software, the legendary developer of Heretic, can do much more than just support Call of Duty, when will Activision realize this?

It’s Unfortunate Bethesda Couldn’t Appreciate The Worth of Arkane

Its past works were neglected, was forced to work on absurd projects, and then made the scapegoat, Arkane Austin's story is one big tragedy.

An Authentic Rayman Revival Could Be Ubisoft’s Saving Grace

Ubisoft's own actions caused its downfall, but if it's serious about making amends, a true Rayman revival could be a strong first step.

The First-Person Perspective Is Really Hurting Indiana Jones And The Great Circle

As impressive a job as MachineGames has done with Indiana Jones so far, a non-third-person Indy game is equivalent to a glaring handicap.