Intel’s iGPU Game Is Getting Stronger, Thanks To Its Competition

Expert Verified By

Story Highlight
  • The iGPUs were never intended to offer a decent gaming experience, at least on Intel chips.
  • AMD’s iGPU popularity has pushed Intel to finally focus on this aspect of the processor as well.
  • Intel’s latest iGPUs, like Intel Arc 140T & 140V, offer marginally better performance than what AMD has to offer right now.

Intel was the first to introduce the concept of iGPUs back in 2010 with its Core i-series processor. AMD sure took clear notes and made decent improvements on it a year later with its Llano APUs. Nevertheless, Intel’s approach to integrated graphics remained the same, unlike AMD, which constantly improved its iGPU to offer better gaming and graphics-related performance. Hence, the reason why Intel CPUs were always paired with a discrete graphics card. Intel has finally abandoned that approach and is now on the same path as AMD.

AMD’s Dominance 

AMD has been on the APU path since 2011; however, its true success began with the Zen architecture. The Zen-based APUs incorporated Vega graphics that completely destroyed Intel’s HD graphics. Though Intel did shift to Iris Xe graphics in its 11th-generation processors, it was still lagging behind the Vega graphics. On top of that, the shift of AMD from Vega to RDNA architecture in their Ryzen 6000 series processor further widened the gap between the two. This move again marked AMD as the superior one in the iGPU space in the industry. 

AMD's Architectural Hierarchy
AMD’s Architectural Hierarchy

Intel’s Major Leap 

Now being dominated for a while, Intel revamped its whole CPU and integrated graphics situation. So, instead of calling it the 15th generation, Intel rebranded them to Core Ultra processors (series 1). These processors were better in performance per watt (not to be confused with raw performance) than their predecessors. Moreover, the bundled Intel Xe graphics were miles ahead in terms of gaming performance than the Iris Xe graphics. Things only got better with the Core Ultra series 2 processors that feature integrated graphics, like the Intel Arc 140T.

This is Intel’s fastest iGPU to date and is actually beating AMD’s counterparts in gaming. One of the demonstrations comes from the YouTuber “ETA Prime” who specifically focuses on testing portable hardware with integrated graphics. In his video, he showed that the Intel Arc 140T, which is integrated into the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, actually performs better than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with RDNA 3.5-based Radeon 890M graphics. 

For instance, Intel’s iGPU gave an average of 76 FPS, while the AMD counterpart only managed to push out 71 FPS in Shadow of the Tomb Raider at 1080p Med settings. Same slight improvements can be seen in other titles, as well as the synthetic benchmarks. 

Intel vs AMD TimeSpy Test (Credit: ETA Prime)
Intel vs AMD TimeSpy Test (Credit: ETA Prime)

Key Reason Behind The Leap

One of the primary reasons behind this leap is Intel’s change in its CPU architecture. Previously, their CPUs were based on the mainstream monolithic die design; however, now they have switched to the disaggregated die design. This allows them to individually customize the chiplets and keep them intact over the Foveros base tile. Meaning, they can improve the graphics power in new revisions without redesigning the whole thing. Not only that, these new iGPUs are based on the Xe architecture, which gives them full support for features like XeSS, XeLL (Low Latency), and XeSS-FG (Frame Gen).

Intel Arc Graphics Overview (Credit: Intel)
Intel Arc Graphics Overview (Credit: Intel)

A Step In The Right Direction

Intel has learned from its mistakes and made praiseworthy improvements in the iGPU space. Moreover, beating AMD after years of struggle is a great thing since it will keep the competition running. Which is to provide better performance from all aspects, either the CPU or the integrated graphics, to make the user’s purchase totally worth it. From now on, we can only expect things to get more competitive between the companies, ultimately benefiting the consumers. 

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

Two Years After Concord, PlayStation’s Live-Service Ambitions Remain In Shambles

PlayStation's live-service plans continue to falter, with Concord's second anniversary serving as a reminder of a huge failure.

Firmware Is The Performance Layer Nobody Benchmarks

BIOS revisions, microcode, and device firmware decide more about a gaming PC rig than most standard upgrades.

Where Should You Buy and Sell CS2 Skins? Steam Community Market vs. Third-Party Marketplaces

Steam or third-party marketplaces? Compare CS2 skin fees, cashouts, prices, and liquidity to find the better place to buy and sell skins in 2026.

A Way Out Proves Mandatory Co-Op Still Works

Explore how A Way Out proves mandatory co-op design creates unforgettable storytelling and why two-player games deserve a mainstream spot.

AMD Radeon Price Hike May Empty Your Bank

Discover why impending AMD Radeon price hikes could make desktop GPU upgrades significantly more expensive for budget PC builders.