ReviewsCoolersID-Cooling FROST X45 Review: One of The Best Thermal Pastes We've Tested

ID-Cooling FROST X45 Review: One of The Best Thermal Pastes We’ve Tested

I have tested the latest ID-Cooling FROST X45 and compared it against other thermal pastes in the market to see if it is worth it or not.

Expert Verified By

A Good Change!

Review Summary

ID-Cooling’s new X45 thermal paste is an upgrade over their previous versions, offering better thermal performance with easier application thanks to its lower thickness. It’s ideal for overclockers or anyone wanting top cooling without spending much—priced at $6.99 for 2g. It performs slightly better than the older X25 and beats top brands in temperature tests.

Hours Tested: 3
Tech4Gamers Recommended Award

Overall
9.5/10
9.5/10

Pros

  • Chart Leader
  • User Friendly
  • Good Value

Cons

  • Availability (May not available in some regions)

ID-Cooling has launched its new thermal paste, the X45, which boasts a thermal conductivity of 15.2 W/m-K, making it an upgrade from previous offerings such as the X05, X25, and X35. The X45 is available in two sizes: 4g and 2g.

This table provides a clear comparison of the key specifications for each of the ID-cooling thermal compounds.

Specification (As Advertised) ID-Cooling X45 ID-Cooling X35 ID-Cooling X25 ID-Cooling X05
Color Grey Grey Grey
Net Weight 2g / 4g 4g 2g / 4g 3g / 5g
Thermal Conductivity 15.2 W/m-K 14.2 W/m-K 10.5 W/m-K 6.5 W/m-K
Thermal Resistance 0.03℃-cm²/W 0.0026℃-cm²/W
Thermal Impedance < 0.05 ℃-cm³/W < 0.07 ℃-cm³/W
Dielectric Constant 5 5
Density 2.8 g/cm³ 2.5 g/cm³ 2.6 g/cm³ 2.5 g/cm³
Viscosity 140 Pas 150 Pas 560 Pas 480 Pas
Operation Temperature -50℃ ~ 300℃ -250℃ ~ 300℃ -40℃ ~ 180℃ -50℃ ~ 200℃

Packaging

The packaging has a gradient of blue tones, giving it a cool and frosty experience in alignment with the product name, “Frost X45.”

The container has some basic accessories. The packaging contains a plastic spreader, alcohol wipe, and thermal paste syringe.

Application

ID-COOLING FROST X45
ID-COOLING FROST X45 (Image By Tech4Gamers)

We’re demonstrating our go-to application method: five blobs at all die corners so the paste spreads evenly. The application was smooth and much easier to apply, as demonstrated. The silicon is not greasy or oily and not as viscous as the previous ID-Cooling pastes such as X25 (560 Pas) and X05 (540 Pas); the ID-Cooling Frost X45 is noticeably less viscous, which is 150 Pas, which makes the Frost X45 easier to apply on a die or spread. Spreading would require a little skill, but we are not using the spread method, as the CPU IHS would spread it once the cooler is in contact with the IHS.

Why do we focus on placing five blobs of thermal paste at each corner of an AM5 CPU? It’s because this method makes sure the paste spreads evenly across the surface and doesn’t leave gaps. After testing, the cooler was taken off to check the coverage—and it showed that the paste had spread properly and was easy to clean up.

Methodology

After applying the thermal paste, we ran two 15-minute Cinebench R23 tests with a 5-minute break in between to let things cool down. Then, we ran a third 15-minute test and noted the average temperatures, measured as the difference above room temperature. Thermal pastes nowadays require almost no burn-in time; however, if the paste is too viscous, that would be another case, and extra warm-up tests are needed to prepare it.

We have ensured that the room temperature remains consistently set at 22.0°C. To maintain accurate readings, we use a high-quality thermo-hygrometer available in the market. It is important to note that we have completely eliminated the influence of ambient temperatures in our data, and all results are presented as deltas over the ambient conditions.

Beurer Thermo hygrometer (Image By Tech4Gamers)

During testing, the case fans, liquid cooler fans, and pump all ran at a constant max speed. We used HWINFO64 Pro to track the CPU tDIE temperature.

To keep the results accurate, we closed all background apps and disconnected from the internet so nothing else—like updates or background tasks—could affect CPU performance.

Our Test System

Benchmarks

ID-Cooling X45 Benchmarks (Image By Tech4Gamers)

Should You Buy It?

Buy It If

You’re an overclocker: ID-Cooling X45 offers the best thermal performance, almost zero cure time, and requires no burn-in. Higher boost clocks nowadays are achieved with lower temperatures due to AMD’s PBO and Intel’s Boost Algorithm. ID-Cooling X45 offers the best performance in our charts while being electrically nonconductive.

You want the best of the best: Currently, the ID-Cooling X45 tops our chart, maintaining a temperature of 65.5° and outperforming competitors like Noctua, Arctic, Thermal Grizzly, and Thermal Right.

You need value for the money: ID-Cooling X45 does not cost too much, The ID-Cooling X45 is reasonably priced at just $6.99 for a 2gm tube, and $7.99 4gm tube.

Don’t Buy It If

❌ Pump-out can’t be avoided: If you’re using a high-end GPU or applying thermal paste directly on silicon—like in laptops or consoles—and want it to last for a few years without needing a redo, it’s better to go with Phase-Change Material (PCM) or PTM for longer durability.

Final Thoughts

ID-Cooling X45 is recommended for those who want the absolute best possible thermal results; we have also tested the previous ID-Cooling X25 best; X45 leads its predecessor by 0.4c, which is minor and might not be noticeable, but it’s still an improvement. The biggest improvement was in its viscosity. Unlike X25, which was concrete and could require extra effort if you spread the paste. Thankfully, the X45 was much more friendly.

 
Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Related articles

Netac WH51 Review: Turn Your Spare M.2 Into A Pocket Rocket

If you have an extra Gen3 NVMe or SATA M.2 drive lying around and gathering dust, the WH51 is one of the best-value enclosures on the market to turn it into a blazing-fast, pocket-friendly flash drive. However, be aware that pairing this enclosure with a high-end Gen4 NVMe drive may result in significant overheating during prolonged heavy workloads, such as hours of video rendering. For such usage, this enclosure may not offer adequate heat dissipation.

Netac WH61S M.2 Enclosure Review: Tool-Less Design Meets 10Gbps Limits

The Netac WH61S is budget-friendly and functional. It is a USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) enclosure with good build quality for the price. However, it has thermal limitations with high-end drives. The metal shell is enough for small file transfers, but high-performance drives can reach nearly 80°C. It's a good option if you have old storage lying around and want a portable drive.

Arctic P12 Pro Reverse A-RGB Fans Review: The Best Value Reverse Fan?

The Arctic P12 Pro Reverse A-RGB fans are a fantastic, budget-friendly option for budget builders prioritizing a clean, strut-free aesthetics in a dual-chamber case. Priced at $18 per fan, it undercuts the premium fan market significantly while retaining strong build quality and vivid ARGB illumination.

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus Review: AMD Should Be (Mostly) Worried

The Intel Core Ultra 270K Plus is a fantastic CPU in specific professional environments, but finds itself in a highly awkward position for general consumers and gamers. This CPU is a master class in multi-core scaling and thermals, but is cannibalized by the incredible value of its own smaller sibling, Intel Core Ultra 250K Plus. If you want a CPU that can basically do everything, the Core Ultra 270K Plus is a must-have processor for the $299.

Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus Review: Punching Above Its Weight Class

The Intel Core Ultra 250K Plus stands out as the best choice for anyone building an entry-level to mid-range PC in 2026. At an aggressive price of $199, it delivers unmatched multithreaded performance with its 18-Core Hybrid Architecture (6P Cores and 12E Cores). Exceptional efficiency and elite frame rates in gaming make it compelling. Compared to its direct $199 competitor, the AMD Ryzen 9 9600X, the 250K Plus provides far superior multi-threaded capabilities and competitive gaming performance.

Similar Guides