EA Thought Core Audience Would Always Buy Dragon Age No Matter What, Says Former Writer

Expert Verified By

EA Thought "RPG Nerds" Would Buy Veilguard And Was Shocked By Last Year's Failure!

Story Highlight
  • Following the failure of Dragon Age: The Veilguard, a former writer has discussed EA’s confidence in the franchise.
  • The publisher attempted to appeal to a wide audience and expected core fans to always buy new games.
  • It believed that the traditional RPG mechanics of older Dragon Age games were slow and needed to be changed.

Dragon Age: Veilguard marked one of the industry’s more surprising failures last year. Although BioWare is now moving forward with the development of Mass Effect, the team’s morale has taken a major hit, with various developers also leaving the studio.

Discussing the Dragon Age franchise and EA’s past failures, a former writer of the franchise has revealed that EA falsely believed a chunk of the RPG audience would always show up to play Dragon Age.

Why it matters: This belief is partly why the publisher was so surprised when Dragon Age: The Veilguard failed to perform as expected.

BioWare Battlefield
BioWare’s Veilguard Was A Failure EA Didn’t See Coming

David Gaider, the former lead writer of Dragon Age, recently discussed EA’s thought process behind moving the franchise from an RPG focus to a more action-adventure-focused experience.

As per David Gaider, EA believed the slower mechanics of games like Dragon Age: Origins were cumbersome and not well suited to a broader audience. The publisher believed these mechanics appealed more to hardcore RPG fans, whom it described as “RPG nerds.”

EA was of the belief that these “nerds” would always buy new entries belonging to RPG franchises, so the publisher attempted to attract a broader audience. The same philosophy was applied to Dragon Age: Veilguard, but EA was proven wrong last year.

You didn’t have to worry about the nerds. You didn’t have to appeal to them.

-David Gaider

Dragon Age: The Veilguard was a major departure from the series’ core ideas in many ways, and the game suffered as a result of this approach.

Many criticized the game’s poor writing and minimal RPG elements. The title also became controversial due to its dialogue, much of which contradicted the series’ traditionally darker themes.

Dragon Age The Veilguard Featured
Dragon Age Is Unlikely To Return Anytime Soon After Its Latest Failure

Following recent events, fans hope that EA has learned that appealing to a different audience is not always the best idea. Perhaps the next Mass Effect won’t make the same mistake.

What are your thoughts on Dragon Age: The Veilguard nearly a full year after its launch? Let’s discuss in the comments and on the Tech4Gamers Forums.

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

KCD2 Dev Supports Stop Killing Games, Says It Cares About Making Games That Players Can Return To

The developer of KCD2 supports the Stop Killing Games initiative, as it aims to create games that players can return to again and again.

Ubisoft CEO Blames Organized Campaigns of Criticism Against Its Games

Ubisoft yet again blames gamers for the hate it receives, ignoring the mistakes it has made in the past few years.

Ubisoft Execs Say Assassin’s Creed Shadows Has Set The Bar For Their Future Games

Ubisoft boss says that Assassin's Creed Shadows launch was a defining moment, and it has set the bar for their future open-world games.

FromSoft Is Working On A Dark Souls 3 Remaster Planned For 2026, It’s Claimed

As per a notable media outlet, FromSoft is currently working on a Dark Souls 3 remaster, which will release in 2026.

Gabe Newell Urges Devs To Master AI Urgently or They Won’t Survive

In a new Q&A, Newell emphasized that people who understand and learn about AI will be more valuable in the long run than veteran programmers.