DLSS 4.5 Delivers Better-Than-Expected Results — But Only If You Disable In-Game Denoising

Expert Verified By

DLSS 4.5 Works As A Better Denoisers Than The Stock Ones In Games!

Story Highlight
  • DLSS 4.5 presets L and M produce a superior result when the in-game denoiser is disabled.
  • Upon testing, it was revealed that the in-game denoiser was interfering with the upscaler.
  • DLSS 4.5 likely has its own denoiser baked into it, which looks better than the ones used in games.

Nvidia’s DLSS technology has come a long way, and the latest 4.5 rendition works wonders, delivering image quality better than that on native resolution, depending on the presets.

However, for lower presets, specifically the M and L versions, actually produce noised ray-traced reflections when turned on. However, fixing that is just as simple as disabling the in-game noiser, which results in a far better-looking image quality and ray tracing result.

Why it matters: This simple fix shows that the DLSS 4.5 presets M and L have issues, and Nvidia needs to resolve them, potentially in a future version of the technology.

Folks at Digital Foundry made this discovery and found that disabling the in-game denoiser does wonders on presets L and M, and the difference, as shown, is day and night.

The interesting reveal is that DLSS 4.5 denoising actually works better than the stock denoisers in-game. If anything, having an upscaler with this capability would do wonders for games with heavy ray-tracing.

As for the reason behind the poor image when the in-game denoiser is turned on, the tech experts talked with a third-party developer and found that preset L and M have poor interplay with ray tracing effects denoising that is done prior to DLSS upscaling a lower resolution image.

DLSS 4.5
DLSS 4.5 Works Well Even On Older GPUs Like The 6-Year Old RTX 3080

Furthermore, it’s also understandable that DLSS 4.5 potentially has its own denoiser baked into it, which interferes with the one used in-game when forced. Hopefully, Nvidia will take this into account for future DLSS updates and fix it. 

Overall, Digital Foundry concluded that preset L and M are quite similar to each other, with preset L having the advantage of handling better noise and aliasing on vegetation.

What are your thoughts on this story? Please share your thoughts with us in the comments below, or at the official Tech4Gamers Forums.

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

Microsoft Adding Gaming Copilot To Xbox Series S|X As Part of AI Push

Microsoft has confirmed that Gaming Copilot is set to make its official debut on Xbox Series S|X consoles in the near future.

Nvidia Says Its Future GPUs Will Boast 1,000,000x Better Path Tracing Due to AI Advancements

Nvidia says it plans to achieve a 1,000,000x leap in path tracing performance compared to its Pascal GPU, using AI and RTX technologies.

COLORFUL Launches the iGame GeForce RTX 50 Ultra Series with Street-Inspired Design

COLORFUL launches the iGame GeForce RTX 50 Ultra Series featuring hip-hop inspired design, graffiti RGB lighting, and triple-fan cooling.

Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2 Creator Applauds The Witcher 4, Calls For AI Adoption

Daniel Vavra applauded The Witcher 4 NVIDIA Mega Geometry demo, but went on to say that CDPR could make a bigger and livelier game with AI.

Crimson Desert Devs Claim Denuvo Won’t Affect Performance Despite Recent Controversy

Crimson Desert developers claim that all benchmarks released were using Denuvo, and it doesn't affect the performance at all.