“There Is No Sense In Releasing Sequel For A Live-Service Game”, Says Dev

Expert Verified By

A "Service sequel" Even Sounds Dubious!

Story Highlight
  • A live-service title can run for years if the developer releases rich content regularly.
  • That said, some developers have released a sequel to their live service games.
  • The War Thunder producer thinks it is ‘dubious’ to think that a live service needs a sequel if fans are enjoying it. 

Live-service games can perform well for years if they receive constant updates from the developer. So, it might not make a lot of sense for such games to receive sequels. However, sequels have been released for games like Overwatch, and while they received a lot of backlash, they didn’t actually fail.

While some may think releasing a sequel for a live service game is fine, many think it is not, and War Thunder producer is among the latter. We recently interviewed him, and he said that releasing a sequel for such games makes no sense

Why it matters: Live-service titles can be viable even after a decade, just like War Thunder, released in 2013 and still going strong. 

War Thunder Image
Live-Service Titles Can Work For Years If Done Right

In a recent interview with Tech4Gamers, Vyacheslav Bulannikov, the producer of War Thunder, shed light on how it is meaningless for live-service titles to receive sequels.  

There is no sense to release a sequel to a service that works. That’s why Apple has not released App Store 2.0, and Netflix has not released Netflix 2.0.

-Vyacheslav Bulannikov

He then stated that companies continuously improve their services, so there is no point in a sequel. It is about adding new hardware support and releasing updates to add new features to keep the fandom engaged. 

A “2.0” release for a service is usually a reboot, and rebooting means that the company is trying to get lapsed users back or attract a completely new audience.

He then discussed how this decision can be interpreted as an indirect acknowledgement that ‘the old service was a failure.’ While this seems a little harsh, Bulannikov has made some interesting and valid points

He thinks that it is not a good idea to release a sequel for a live-service game when it is already loved and supported by the fandom. 

What do you think about the producer’s take on sequels relating to live-service titles? Do you agree with this take? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section, or join the discussion at the Tech4Gamers official forums

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

Ubisoft Cancelled Post–Civil War Assassin’s Creed Title Last Year for Being ‘Too Controversial’

Ubisoft reportedly canceled an Assassin's Creed game last year set after the Civil War era, featuring a protagonist who was a former slave.

Nintendo Switch 2 Outpaces Original Switch by 77%, Selling 2.4 Million Units in US in 3 Months

The Nintendo Switch 2 has now surpassed 2.4 million unit sales in the US, which is 77% faster than its predecessor.

Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 Set To Receive New Content As Game Hits 5 Million Units Sold

Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 has now sold a whopping 5 million units, and new content for the RPG is also on the way.

New Silent Hill f Xbox Ad Reminds Players: You’re Buying A License, Not The Game

Xbox is marketing Silent Hill f with a tag underneath stating that you will only purchase the license to play the horror title.

Over 60% US Gamers Buy Two or Fewer Games Per Year

Only 14% of games in the US buy new games regularly, and they are the main drivers of the paid game market.