“There Is No Sense In Releasing Sequel For A Live-Service Game”, Says Dev

Expert Verified By

A "Service sequel" Even Sounds Dubious!

Story Highlight
  • A live-service title can run for years if the developer releases rich content regularly.
  • That said, some developers have released a sequel to their live service games.
  • The War Thunder producer thinks it is ‘dubious’ to think that a live service needs a sequel if fans are enjoying it. 

Live-service games can perform well for years if they receive constant updates from the developer. So, it might not make a lot of sense for such games to receive sequels. However, sequels have been released for games like Overwatch, and while they received a lot of backlash, they didn’t actually fail.

While some may think releasing a sequel for a live service game is fine, many think it is not, and War Thunder producer is among the latter. We recently interviewed him, and he said that releasing a sequel for such games makes no sense

Why it matters: Live-service titles can be viable even after a decade, just like War Thunder, released in 2013 and still going strong. 

War Thunder Image
Live-Service Titles Can Work For Years If Done Right

In a recent interview with Tech4Gamers, Vyacheslav Bulannikov, the producer of War Thunder, shed light on how it is meaningless for live-service titles to receive sequels.  

There is no sense to release a sequel to a service that works. That’s why Apple has not released App Store 2.0, and Netflix has not released Netflix 2.0.

-Vyacheslav Bulannikov

He then stated that companies continuously improve their services, so there is no point in a sequel. It is about adding new hardware support and releasing updates to add new features to keep the fandom engaged. 

A “2.0” release for a service is usually a reboot, and rebooting means that the company is trying to get lapsed users back or attract a completely new audience.

He then discussed how this decision can be interpreted as an indirect acknowledgement that ‘the old service was a failure.’ While this seems a little harsh, Bulannikov has made some interesting and valid points

He thinks that it is not a good idea to release a sequel for a live-service game when it is already loved and supported by the fandom. 

What do you think about the producer’s take on sequels relating to live-service titles? Do you agree with this take? Let us know your thoughts in the comments section, or join the discussion at the Tech4Gamers official forums

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

Xbox and Microsoft “Very Happy” with Obsidian RPG Reception, Says Avowed Director

The avowed director has recently stated that Xbox and Microsoft have been very happy with the reception of their latest RPG.

The Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion Remake Expected to Launch Before June, Says Relaible Leaker

A credible leaker in the industry has stated that The Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion Remake could be coming sooner than June.

Battlefield 6 Aims To “Define Future of First-Person Shooters” As Series Hits 100 Million Players

EA's latest hiring streak for Battlefield 6 reveals one of the team's ambitions for the next big entry in the AAA franchise.

Ubisoft Shareholders Threatening To Sue Them For “Hiding Information”; EA And Microsoft Potentially In Talks To Buy Its IPs

Ubisoft is reportedly in talks to sell its IPs but has limited the information to shareholders, sparking protests.

AOHI Debuts Future Starship Pro; Ultra-Fast And Durable 10,000 mAh Power Bank

The AOHI Starship Pro offers a compact and hassle-free charging experience for gaming, working, and all types of other tasks.