The Nvidia RTX 50-Series GPUs Are A Literal Ticking Time Bomb – Here’s Why

Expert Verified By

Nvidia may have released the final cards of its lineup with the RTX 5060 Series, but trust me, a horde of catastrophic architectural elements are still being exposed.

Story Highlight
  • Igor’s Lab has uncovered an alarming hardware flaw that’s common in all RTX 50 Series GPUs that causes the power delivery subsections to overheat considerably.
  • A lack of thermal conductivity in these critical areas means that your Blackwell GPUs are guaranteed to overheat, especially the lower-end variants like the RTX 5060 and 5070 GPUs which have fewer power phases.
  • Alleviating this high-temperature risk is a fairly simple job, but it does require you to dismantle your GPU, and regardless, should already be taken care of by Nvidia before shipping the GPUs in question.

Igor Wallossek of Igor’s Lab has done it again—uncovering yet another hardware flaw that Nvidia would rather sweep under the rug. A critical power delivery hotspot issue threatens to compromise the longevity and stability of these next-gen graphics cards. 

If left unaddressed, this could spell disaster for early adopters and tarnish Nvidia’s reputation for reliability.

Problematic Design Language 

For starters, using thermal imaging and meticulous testing, Igor’s team identified localized temperature hotspots on the PCB, specifically around the voltage regulation modules (VRMs). 

In simple words, the electrical components that make up the power delivery subsystem, such as the FETs (Field Effect Transistors), coils, and drivers that work in conjunction to deliver power to the GPU’s supply rails are grouped too close together to prioritize a compact PCB design by sacrificing heat dissipation. 

Speaking of the PCB, it comprises several thin layers of copper sandwiched together, which in turn are connected to numerous power planes. Collectively, this architectural design increases the thermal density around the voltage converters, fortifying the thermal efficiency burden.

Resultantly, these power delivery hotspots reach dangerously high temperatures—far beyond what’s considered safe for long-term operation. 

RTX 5070 & RTX 5080: Actual Observations

To put this dilemma into perspective, Igor’s Lab pitted a PNY RTX 5070 against a Palit RTX 5080 Gaming Pro OC with the help of a thermal camera to accurately gauge temperatures where the primary NVVDDs (Nvidia Variable Video Data Decoders) are located in between the rear display outputs and the GPU die.

The RTX 5080 measured 80.5°C in this specific area whereas the GPU core itself remained stagnant at a cool 70°C. 

The RTX 5080 still fares relatively well in comparison to the RTX 5070. (Image Credits - Igor's Lab)
The RTX 5080 still fares relatively well in comparison to the RTX 5070. (Image Credits – Igor’s Lab)

Unfortunately, the RTX 5070 fared much worse with the NVVDDs’ temperature reaching a scalding 107.3°C due to the GPU having a sizeably shorter PCB in comparison to the RTX 5080. 

What’s worse for the RTX 5070 is that all of its power delivery components are situated between the display outputs and the GPU itself as opposed to the RTX 5080 which has some of its PD components distributed throughout the right, left, and top sections of the GPU’s PCB.

Understandably, a shorter PCB means that the RTX 5070 will have fewer power phases to regulate the current through, which will obviously increase the overall current density that corresponds to higher temperatures.

The RTX 5070's hotspot can get pretty toasty. (Image Credits - Igor's Lab)
The RTX 5070’s hotspot can get pretty toasty. (Image Credits – Igor’s Lab)

Also, it’s worth mentioning that Igor’s Lab recorded a consistent pattern here as the RTX 5070’s GPU core also sat at a cool 69.7°C, effectively isolating the problem with regards to the power delivery hotspot. 

Nvidia’s AIB Guidelines: Adding Insult To Injury

What’s worse? This isn’t an isolated flaw. The problem appears to affect all RTX 50-series GPUs based on current board designs. 

Thanks to Igor’s Lab’s insightful research, we can conclude that that’s because Nvidia messed up its Thermal Design Guide which serves as a central document that’s exclusively made available to the company’s AIBs (Add-In Board partners).

An exclusive screenshot of the Nvidia Thermal Design Guide that hasn't been made available to the public. (Image Credits - Igor's Lab)
An exclusive screenshot of the Nvidia Thermal Design Guide that hasn’t been made available to the public. (Image Credits – Igor’s Lab)

Assumptions of ideal thermal circumstances, the narrow-minded vision of PCB power losses, anomalous temperature-dependent behavior of components like MOSFETs, and a lack of long-term thermal aging consideration are just some of Nvidia’s oversights.

That means unless Nvidia or its board partners intervene, everyone buying these cards could be sitting on a time bomb.

Why This Matters: The Risks Of Ignoring The Issue

Excessive heat in power delivery components doesn’t just throttle performance—it kills hardware prematurely. Capacitors, MOSFETs, and PCB traces degrade faster under sustained high temperatures. Over time, this can lead to:

  • Voltage instability (crashes, black screens)
  • Solder joint degradation (cracked connections, GPU failure)
  • Reduced lifespan (a card that dies just outside warranty)

Nvidia has built its reputation on reliability, but if these hotspots go unaddressed, we could see a wave of early GPU deaths, reminiscent of the RTX 4090 melting power connector fiasco—only this time, the problem is embedded in the PCB itself.

What This Means For Gamers & Enthusiasts

If you’re planning to buy an RTX 50-series GPU at launch, beware. Until Nvidia or its partners revise the cooling design, you might be gambling with your card’s lifespan. Here’s what you can do:

  1. Wait for revised models—Early adopters often pay the price for rushed designs.
  2. Monitor hotspot temps—Tools like HWiNFO64 can track VRM and PCB temperatures.
  3. Consider aftermarket cooling—If the issue persists, third-party solutions (like high-performance thermal pads/paste like Arctic MX4) might be necessary.
Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

Lightweight Vs Heavy Gaming Mice: Which One’s Best For You?

Going for either the light or the heavy mouse depends on multiple factors and they also come with some problems which you need to be aware of.

Why You Should Switch To A Glass Mouse Pad (Unfair Advantage)

Unlike cloth mouse pads, glass mouse pads give you the smoothness that makes you feel like you're cheating in games.

Are 8GB VRAM GPUs Enough For Today’s Gaming Standards?

According to system requirements and basic tests, 8GB VRAM GPUs are fine for today's gaming standards, but what about the future?

Why Do Pro Players Sit Closer To The Monitor? (And Should You?)

We often see professional players sitting way too close to the monitor. But does it give them an edge over other players? Let's find out.

Why Logitech MX Master 3S Is Still The Best Ergonomical Mouse

Logitech dominates the ergonomic mouse market and the MX Master 3S remains the best choice for most users. Find out why in this article.