Nvidia Fires Back At AMD In New DeepSeek Benchmark Claiming Better Performance

Expert Verified By

AMD and Nvidia show conflicting results favoring their hardware.

Story Highlight
  • Nvidia claims that the RTX 5090 is up to 2.2 times faster than the RX 7900 XTX in AI benchmarks.
  • In contrast, AMD’s results suggest that the RX 7900 XTX is faster than both the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080 in several tests.
  • Both tests reveal a significant difference in benchmark results between Nvidia and AMD.

Nvidia has fired back after losing to AMD’s Radeon RX 7900 XTX in the DeepSeek AI test, asserting that its RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 GPUs are noticeably better than the RDNA 3 flagship.

Nvidia wrote a blog post stating that the RTX 5090 is up to 2.2 times faster than the RX 7900 XTX.

Why it matters: The difference in benchmark results justifies the need for caution when evaluating marketing claims, as manufacturers may optimize their tests to favor their own products.

Source: Nvidia

Nvidia used Distill Qwen 7b, Llama 8b, and Qwen 32b to benchmark the RTX 5090, RTX 4090, and RX 7900 XTX in three DeepSeek R1 AI model variants. The RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 were said to be 124% and 47% faster than the RX 7900 XTX, respectively, while using the Qwen LLM with the 32b setting.

The RTX 5090 and RTX 4090 outperformed the RX 7900 XTX by 106% and 47%, respectively, using Llama 8b. Compared to the RX 7900 XTX, the RTX 5090 was 103% faster, while the RTX 4090 offered 46% faster performance with Qwen 7b.

When compared to AMD’s testing, which includes the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080, Nvidia’s results are stunning. In comparison to the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080, AMD claimed that the RX 7900 XTX was up to 113% and 134% faster, respectively.

With the RTX 4090, Nvidia presents a quite different image, demonstrating that it is significantly faster than the RX 7900 XTX rather than the other way around. The GeForce RTX 5090 in comparison destroyed the RX 7900 XTX, offering more than double the performance.

This serves as a helpful reminder to be skeptical of benchmark results offered by the manufacturer. However, it’s always best to wait for third-party results, instead of relying on Nvidia or AMD marketing claims. 

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

Job Listing Confirms Sony’s Live-Service Title Fairgames Is Powered by Unreal Engine 5

Tech4Gamers came across a job listing at SIE for Fairgames, which revealed that the game is being built on Unreal Engine 5.

Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus Surpasses 265K by 4.2% in Geekbench Benchmarks

The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus is 4.2% faster than the 265K demonstrated in a performance test by Geekbench.

Netflix Was Initially Interested in Buying EA, Disney and Fox, But Decided To Go For WB

Netflix was reportedly interested in buying EA in the first place, but then settled for Warner Bros, Fox, and Disney and their games studios.

Tomb Raider Studio Has a New Open-World Action-Adventure Project in the Works Since 2019

Eidos Montreal, studio behind Tomb Raider games is working on a new third-person action adventure game since 2019.

Ubisoft Open to Bringing Back Dual Protagonists in Future Assassin’s Creed Games; If the Story Supports It

Assassin's Creed Shadows associate game director claims Ubisoft plans to do dual protagonists in future titles if the narrative calls for it.