DLSS 4.5 Delivers Better-Than-Expected Results — But Only If You Disable In-Game Denoising

Expert Verified By

DLSS 4.5 Works As A Better Denoisers Than The Stock Ones In Games!

Story Highlight
  • DLSS 4.5 presets L and M produce a superior result when the in-game denoiser is disabled.
  • Upon testing, it was revealed that the in-game denoiser was interfering with the upscaler.
  • DLSS 4.5 likely has its own denoiser baked into it, which looks better than the ones used in games.

Nvidia’s DLSS technology has come a long way, and the latest 4.5 rendition works wonders, delivering image quality better than that on native resolution, depending on the presets.

However, for lower presets, specifically the M and L versions, actually produce noised ray-traced reflections when turned on. However, fixing that is just as simple as disabling the in-game noiser, which results in a far better-looking image quality and ray tracing result.

Why it matters: This simple fix shows that the DLSS 4.5 presets M and L have issues, and Nvidia needs to resolve them, potentially in a future version of the technology.

Folks at Digital Foundry made this discovery and found that disabling the in-game denoiser does wonders on presets L and M, and the difference, as shown, is day and night.

The interesting reveal is that DLSS 4.5 denoising actually works better than the stock denoisers in-game. If anything, having an upscaler with this capability would do wonders for games with heavy ray-tracing.

As for the reason behind the poor image when the in-game denoiser is turned on, the tech experts talked with a third-party developer and found that preset L and M have poor interplay with ray tracing effects denoising that is done prior to DLSS upscaling a lower resolution image.

DLSS 4.5
DLSS 4.5 Works Well Even On Older GPUs Like The 6-Year Old RTX 3080

Furthermore, it’s also understandable that DLSS 4.5 potentially has its own denoiser baked into it, which interferes with the one used in-game when forced. Hopefully, Nvidia will take this into account for future DLSS updates and fix it. 

Overall, Digital Foundry concluded that preset L and M are quite similar to each other, with preset L having the advantage of handling better noise and aliasing on vegetation.

What are your thoughts on this story? Please share your thoughts with us in the comments below, or at the official Tech4Gamers Forums.

Was our article helpful? 👨‍💻

Thank you! Please share your positive feedback. 🔋

How could we improve this post? Please Help us. 😔

Gear Up For Latest News

Get exclusive gaming & tech news before it drops. Sign up today!

Join Our Community

Still having issues? Join the Tech4Gamers Forum for expert help and community support!

Latest News

Join Our Community

104,000FansLike
32,122FollowersFollow

Trending

DLSS 5 Is More AI Image Enhancement Than Rendering Breakthrough, NVIDIA Confirms

Nvidia confirms that DLSS 5 isn't image rendering; instead, it takes a 2D frame with motion vectors and enhances it using AI.

Intel Announces 10% Price Increase For It’s Consumer CPUs

According to a report from ETNews, Intel is planning to raise the price of it's consumer CPUs by 10% by the end of the march.

Crimson Desert Has Sold 2 Million Copies In Less Than 24 Hours

Crimson Desert has sold 2 million copies in less than a day, and Pearl Abyss is working to make updates based on fan feedback.

Crimson Desert Has Fallen Behind Dragon Age The Veilguard in Positive Steam Reviews

Comparing both RPGs, Crimson Desert is now lagging behind Dragon Age Veilguard in terms of positive reviews on Steam.

“Insane Scale”- A Reviewer Spent 205 Hours In Crimson Desert And Still Isn’t Halfway Through

Blaine Smith revealed that he isn't even halfway through achieving 100% completion in all areas of Crimson Desert, after spending 205 hours.